Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 can be used for precise genetic knock-in of epitope tags into endogenous genes, simplifying experimental analysis of protein function. However, Cas9-assisted epitope tagging in primary mammalian cell cultures is often inefficient and reliant on plasmid-based selection strategies. Here we demonstrate improved knock-in efficiencies of diverse tags (V5, 3XFLAG, Myc, HA) using co-delivery of Cas9 protein pre-complexed with two-part synthetic modified RNAs (annealed crRNA:tracrRNA) and single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN) repair templates. Knock-in efficiencies of ~5-30%, were achieved without selection in embryonic stem (ES) cells, neural stem (NS) cells, and brain tumour-derived stem cells. Biallelic-tagged clonal lines were readily derived and used to define Olig2 chromatin-bound interacting partners. Using our novel web-based design tool, we established a 96-well format pipeline that enabled V5-tagging of 60 different transcription factors. This efficient, selection-free and scalable epitope tagging pipeline enables systematic surveys of protein expression levels, subcellular localization, and interactors across diverse mammalian stem cells.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Newly generated cell lines will be made available on request.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pooran Singh Dewari

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Benjamin Southgate

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Katrina Mccarten

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. German Monogarov

    German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Eoghan O'Duibhir

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Niall Quinn

    Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Ashley Tyrer

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Marie-Christin Leitner

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Colin Plumb

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Maria Kalantzaki

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Carla Blin

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Rebecca Finch

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Raul Bardini Bressan

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5673-9563
  14. Gillian Morrison

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Ashley M Jacobi

    Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc, Coralville, United States
    Competing interests
    Ashley M Jacobi, employed by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT), who sells reagents similar to some described herein. IDT is, however, not a publicly traded company and the authors do not own any shares or equity in IDT. No other authors have any financial interests or relationships with IDT; nor do they own any shares or equity.
  16. Mark A Behlke

    Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc, Coralville, United States
    Competing interests
    Mark A Behlke, employed by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT), who sells reagents similar to some described herein. IDT is, however, not a publicly traded company and the authors do not own any shares or equity in IDT. No other authors have any financial interests or relationships with IDT; nor do they own any shares or equity.
  17. Alex von Kriegsheim

    Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Simon Tomlinson

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Jeroen Krijgsveld

    German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Steven M Pollard

    MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    steven.pollard@ed.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6428-0492

Funding

Cancer Research UK (A17368)

  • Pooran Singh Dewari
  • Benjamin Southgate
  • Eoghan O'Duibhir
  • Steven M Pollard

Medical Research Council (BB/M018040/1)

  • Pooran Singh Dewari
  • Steven M Pollard

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M018040/1)

  • Pooran Singh Dewari
  • Steven M Pollard

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (BB/M018040/1)

  • Pooran Singh Dewari
  • Steven M Pollard

Brain Tumour Charity (GN-000358)

  • Pooran Singh Dewari
  • Steven M Pollard

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Maarten van Lohuizen, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Netherlands

Version history

  1. Received: January 12, 2018
  2. Accepted: April 10, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 11, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 11, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Dewari et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 11,083
    views
  • 1,902
    downloads
  • 45
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pooran Singh Dewari
  2. Benjamin Southgate
  3. Katrina Mccarten
  4. German Monogarov
  5. Eoghan O'Duibhir
  6. Niall Quinn
  7. Ashley Tyrer
  8. Marie-Christin Leitner
  9. Colin Plumb
  10. Maria Kalantzaki
  11. Carla Blin
  12. Rebecca Finch
  13. Raul Bardini Bressan
  14. Gillian Morrison
  15. Ashley M Jacobi
  16. Mark A Behlke
  17. Alex von Kriegsheim
  18. Simon Tomlinson
  19. Jeroen Krijgsveld
  20. Steven M Pollard
(2018)
An efficient and scalable pipeline for epitope tagging in mammalian stem cells using Cas9 ribonucleoprotein
eLife 7:e35069.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35069

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35069

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Joanne Tung, Lei Huang ... Adriana Ordonez
    Research Article

    Activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) is one of three endoplasmic reticulum (ER) transmembrane stress sensors that mediate the unfolded protein response (UPR). Despite its crucial role in long-term ER stress adaptation, regulation of ATF6 alpha (α) signalling remains poorly understood, possibly because its activation involves ER-to-Golgi and nuclear trafficking. Here, we generated an ATF6α/Inositol-requiring kinase 1 (IRE1) dual UPR reporter CHO-K1 cell line and performed an unbiased genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis screen to systematically profile genetic factors that specifically contribute to ATF6α signalling in the presence and absence of ER stress. The screen identified both anticipated and new candidate genes that regulate ATF6α activation. Among these, calreticulin (CRT), a key ER luminal chaperone, selectively repressed ATF6α signalling: Cells lacking CRT constitutively activated a BiP::sfGFP ATF6α-dependent reporter, had higher BiP levels and an increased rate of trafficking and processing of ATF6α. Purified CRT interacted with the luminal domain of ATF6α in vitro and the two proteins co-immunoprecipitated from cell lysates. CRT depletion exposed a negative feedback loop implicating ATF6α in repressing IRE1 activity basally and overexpression of CRT reversed this repression. Our findings indicate that CRT, beyond its known role as a chaperone, also serves as an ER repressor of ATF6α to selectively regulate one arm of the UPR.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Alex Weiss, Cassandra D'Amata ... Madeline N Hayes
    Research Article

    High-throughput vertebrate animal model systems for the study of patient-specific biology and new therapeutic approaches for aggressive brain tumors are currently lacking, and new approaches are urgently needed. Therefore, to build a patient-relevant in vivo model of human glioblastoma, we expressed common oncogenic variants including activated human EGFRvIII and PI3KCAH1047R under the control of the radial glial-specific promoter her4.1 in syngeneic tp53 loss-of-function mutant zebrafish. Robust tumor formation was observed prior to 45 days of life, and tumors had a gene expression signature similar to human glioblastoma of the mesenchymal subtype, with a strong inflammatory component. Within early stage tumor lesions, and in an in vivo and endogenous tumor microenvironment, we visualized infiltration of phagocytic cells, as well as internalization of tumor cells by mpeg1.1:EGFP+ microglia/macrophages, suggesting negative regulatory pressure by pro-inflammatory cell types on tumor growth at early stages of glioblastoma initiation. Furthermore, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting of master inflammatory transcription factors irf7 or irf8 led to increased tumor formation in the primary context, while suppression of phagocyte activity led to enhanced tumor cell engraftment following transplantation into otherwise immune-competent zebrafish hosts. Altogether, we developed a genetically relevant model of aggressive human glioblastoma and harnessed the unique advantages of zebrafish including live imaging, high-throughput genetic and chemical manipulations to highlight important tumor-suppressive roles for the innate immune system on glioblastoma initiation, with important future opportunities for therapeutic discovery and optimizations.