IP6 is an HIV pocket factor that prevents capsid collapse and promotes DNA synthesis

  1. Donna L Mallery
  2. Chantal L Márquez
  3. William A McEwan
  4. Claire Dickson
  5. David A Jacques
  6. Madhanagopal Anandapadamanaban
  7. Katsia Bichel
  8. Gregory J Towers
  9. Adolfo Saiardi
  10. Till Böcking  Is a corresponding author
  11. Leo C James  Is a corresponding author
  1. Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, United Kingdom
  2. University of New South Wales, Australia
  3. University College London, United Kingdom

Abstract

The HIV capsid is semi-permeable and covered in electropositive pores that are essential for viral DNA synthesis and infection. Here we show that these pores bind the abundant cellular polyanion IP6, transforming viral stability from minutes to hours and allowing newly synthesised DNA to accumulate inside the capsid. An arginine ring within the pore coordinates IP6, which strengthens capsid hexamers by almost 10°C. Single molecule measurements demonstrate that this renders native HIV capsids highly stable and protected from spontaneous collapse. Moreover, encapsidated reverse transcription assays reveal that, once stabilised by IP6, the accumulation of new viral DNA inside the capsid increases > 100-fold. Remarkably, isotopic labelling of inositol in virus producing cells reveals that HIV selectively packages over 300 IP6 molecules per infectious virion. We propose that HIV recruits IP6 to regulate capsid stability and uncoating, analogous to picornavirus pocket factors.

Data availability

Diffraction data have been deposited in PDB under the accession code 6ERM, 6ERN and 6ES8.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Donna L Mallery

    Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Chantal L Márquez

    EMBL Australia Node in Single Molecule Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. William A McEwan

    Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4408-0407
  4. Claire Dickson

    Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David A Jacques

    EMBL Australia Node in Single Molecule Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6426-4510
  6. Madhanagopal Anandapadamanaban

    Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Katsia Bichel

    Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Gregory J Towers

    Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Adolfo Saiardi

    Medical Research Council (MRC) Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Till Böcking

    EMBL Australia Node in Single Molecule Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    For correspondence
    till.boecking@unsw.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1165-3122
  11. Leo C James

    Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    lcj@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2131-0334

Funding

Medical Research Council (U105181010)

  • Leo C James

Wellcome

  • Leo C James

National Health and Medical Research Council (339223)

  • Till Böcking

National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1036521)

  • David A Jacques

Wellcome (206248/Z/17/Z)

  • William A McEwan

Wellcome

  • Gregory J Towers

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Wesley I Sundquist, University of Utah School of Medicine, United States

Version history

  1. Received: January 23, 2018
  2. Accepted: May 29, 2018
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 31, 2018 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 10, 2018 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2018, Mallery et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,394
    views
  • 867
    downloads
  • 128
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Donna L Mallery
  2. Chantal L Márquez
  3. William A McEwan
  4. Claire Dickson
  5. David A Jacques
  6. Madhanagopal Anandapadamanaban
  7. Katsia Bichel
  8. Gregory J Towers
  9. Adolfo Saiardi
  10. Till Böcking
  11. Leo C James
(2018)
IP6 is an HIV pocket factor that prevents capsid collapse and promotes DNA synthesis
eLife 7:e35335.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35335

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.35335

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Martin Obr, Hans-Georg Kräusslich
    Insight

    Structural and biophysical studies help to follow the disassembly of the HIV-1 capsid in vitro, and reveal the role of a small molecule called IP6 in regulating capsid stability.

    1. Medicine
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Yi-Shin Chang, Kai Huang ... David L Perkins
    Research Article

    Background:

    End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients experience immune compromise characterized by complex alterations of both innate and adaptive immunity, and results in higher susceptibility to infection and lower response to vaccination. This immune compromise, coupled with greater risk of exposure to infectious disease at hemodialysis (HD) centers, underscores the need for examination of the immune response to the COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines.

    Methods:

    The immune response to the COVID-19 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was assessed in 20 HD patients and cohort-matched controls. RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed longitudinally before and after each vaccination dose for a total of six time points per subject. Anti-spike antibody levels were quantified prior to the first vaccination dose (V1D0) and 7 d after the second dose (V2D7) using anti-spike IgG titers and antibody neutralization assays. Anti-spike IgG titers were additionally quantified 6 mo after initial vaccination. Clinical history and lab values in HD patients were obtained to identify predictors of vaccination response.

    Results:

    Transcriptomic analyses demonstrated differing time courses of immune responses, with prolonged myeloid cell activity in HD at 1 wk after the first vaccination dose. HD also demonstrated decreased metabolic activity and decreased antigen presentation compared to controls after the second vaccination dose. Anti-spike IgG titers and neutralizing function were substantially elevated in both controls and HD at V2D7, with a small but significant reduction in titers in HD groups (p<0.05). Anti-spike IgG remained elevated above baseline at 6 mo in both subject groups. Anti-spike IgG titers at V2D7 were highly predictive of 6-month titer levels. Transcriptomic biomarkers after the second vaccination dose and clinical biomarkers including ferritin levels were found to be predictive of antibody development.

    Conclusions:

    Overall, we demonstrate differing time courses of immune responses to the BTN162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in maintenance HD subjects comparable to healthy controls and identify transcriptomic and clinical predictors of anti-spike IgG titers in HD. Analyzing vaccination as an in vivo perturbation, our results warrant further characterization of the immune dysregulation of ESRD.

    Funding:

    F30HD102093, F30HL151182, T32HL144909, R01HL138628. This research has been funded by the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) award UL1TR002003.