Many bacteria can move in response to environmental signals. This helps guide them towards better conditions for growth and survival. Escherichia coli is a bacterium that can swim quickly through liquid, using tiny propeller-like structures that rotate many times per second. These ‘propellers’ are powered by a cellular motor, called the flagellar motor, which similar to an electric motor, requires an energy source to drive movement.

Proteorhodopsin, a protein originally isolated from free-swimming micro-organisms in the ocean, is an alternative energy source that helps bacteria move. The protein is located close to the surface of the cell, where it acts like a solar panel and captures energy from light. In cells powered by proteorhodopsin, the intensity of light from their environment determines their swimming speed: brighter light means faster movement, and less light, slower movement. Proteorhodopsin is now also a useful tool in the laboratory. For example, genetically engineering bacteria to produce proteorhodopsin provides a way to control their movement remotely, using a light source.

Swimming bacteria, much like cars in city traffic, are known to accumulate in areas where their speed decreases. By controlling swimming speed with proteorhodopsin, researchers can manipulate the local density of bacteria simply by projecting different patterns of light.

To study the factors influencing this phenomenon, Frangipane et al. used genetically modified E. coli that could respond to light via proteorhodopsin to make layers of cells that could then have light patterns projected onto them. The results showed that the bacteria responded slowly to these stimuli, which was the main factor limiting the resolution of the final pattern they formed. A simple feedback mechanism, which compared the pattern formed by the cells to the desired image and updated the projected light accordingly, was enough to solve this problem. This way, the layers of E.coli could be turned into a near-perfect copy of the original image.

This work allows us to control the movement of large populations of bacteria more precisely than ever before. This could be extremely valuable for building the next generation of microscopic devices. For example, bacteria could be made to surround a larger object such as a machine part or a drug carrier, and then used as living propellers to transport it where it is needed.

A local reduction of speed in a crowd of walking pedestrians or urban car traffic usually results in the formation of high-density regions. Mathematically speaking, a self-propelled particle, moving by an isotropic random walk with space dependent speed, explores the available space with a probability density that is inversely proportional to the local value of the speed (Schnitzer, 1993; Tailleur and Cates, 2009; Cates and Tailleur, 2015), spending a longer time in slow regions than in fast ones. As a consequence, any mechanism that allows to substantially modulate the local propulsion speed can be used as an efficient strategy for controlling the density (Stenhammar et al., 2016). In swimming bacteria, proteorhodopsin (PR) provides a particularly convenient way of achieving spatial speed control through the projection of light patterns. PR is a light-driven proton pump that uses photon energy to pump protons out of the cytoplasm, thus modulating the corresponding electrochemical gradient across the inner membrane (Béjà et al., 2000). Since this proton motive force drives the rotation of the flagellar motor (Gabel and Berg, 2003), PR puts a ‘solar panel’ on every cell allowing to remotely control its swimming speed with light (Walter et al., 2007). This has been recently exploited to control the rotational speeds of bio-hybrid micromachines using bacteria as micropropellers (Vizsnyiczai et al., 2017). In light driven Janus colloids, spatially asymmetric speed profiles can also affect particle orientation giving rise to an artificial phototaxis mechanism (Lozano et al., 2016). Arlt et al. (2018) have recently shown that, by projecting a masked illumination pattern, ‘photokinetic’ (Wilde and Mullineaux, 2017) bacteria can be accumulated in dark regions and depleted from brighter ones thus forming binary patterns. Here we demonstrate that bacterial density can be controlled to form reconfigurable complex patterns. To do this we exploit a Digital Light Processing (DLP) projector to shape light with a megapixel resolution and with a dynamic range of 256 (8 bit) light intensity levels. We experimentally investigate the limits of validity of the predicted law of inverse proportionality between local density and speed. We demonstrate that observed deviations from this law can be quantitatively described by a theoretical model that explicitly takes into account memory effects in light response. Finally we show that a model independent feedback control loop allows density shaping with high spatial resolution and gray level accuracy.

Density shaping in photokinetic bacteria or colloids relies on the connection between density and local speed. The density $\rho (\mathbf{𝐫})\propto 1/v(\mathbf{𝐫})$ is always a steady-state solution of the master equation of a self-propelled particle with isotropic reorientation dynamics and spatially varying speed $v(\mathbf{𝐫})$ (Cates and Tailleur, 2015). In our case, $v(\mathbf{𝐫})=v(I(\mathbf{𝐫}))$ where $\mathbf{𝐫}=(x,y)$ is the position in the two dimensional image space and $I(\mathbf{𝐫})$ the light intensity at $\mathbf{𝐫}$. This result assumes that all bacteria have the same response to light and that they instantaneously adapt to intensity variations so that the speed only depends on the local value of $I$. However, suspensions of swimming bacteria, are known to be characterized by motility properties that occur in broad distributions and, in principle, a broad spectrum of light responses could be found. To quantify the effect of light on the speed distributions of our strain, we monitored bacterial dynamics while projecting a chessboard pattern consisting of 12 different levels of light intensity. To do this we couple a DLP projector to a custom video-microscopy setup working in both bright-field and dark-field mode (see Figure 1 and Materials and methods).

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Using differential dynamic microscopy (DDM) (Cerbino and Trappe, 2008; Wilson et al., 2011; Maggi et al., 2013) we extract the light dependent values of the mean $v$ and standard deviation $\sigma$ of the speed distributions (Figure 2(a)) (see Materials and methods). Although the absolute value of the swimming speed depends on several factors (strain, growth medium, etc.) we find a non linear speed response that is consistent with what previously reported for PR expressing bacteria. In particular the speed versus intensity curve is very well fitted by a hyperbola showing saturation for large light intensity values as already reported in (Walter et al., 2007; Schwarz-Linek et al., 2016; Vizsnyiczai et al., 2017; Arlt et al., 2018).

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Figure 2—source data 1

Source data for Figure 2

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36608.005

Download elife-36608-fig2-data1-v1.csv

We also find that, throughout the intensity range, $v$ and $\sigma$ are directly proportional (see Figure 2(b)) suggesting a homogeneous growth law for individual cell speeds $v_i(I)=v_i^{s}f(I)$, where $v_i^s$ is the saturation speed for the $i$-th cell and $f(I)$ is a dimensionless function saturating at one for large intensities. Interestingly, in this scenario, the mean speed $v(I)$ will also be proportional to $f(I)$ so that the probability density ${\rho }_i$ for the generic $i$-th cell will be proportional to the inverse of the local mean speed:

This implies that, despite broad speed distributions, the local density is expected to be only determined by the mean local speed, as set by the light intensity pattern and measured by DDM. To validate this hypothesis we use a DLP projector to display a complex light pattern onto a 400 µm thick layer of cells (Figure 1) that have been preliminarily exposed to a uniform bright illumination for 5 min. This time is much longer than the speed response time of bacteria (Figure 4) thus ensuring that cells are initialized to swim at maximal speed. The projecting system has an optical resolution of 2 µm approximately matching the size of a single cell which represents the physical ‘pixel’ of our density images. This value sets the limit for the minimum theoretical resolution of density configurations that would be achievable if bacteria could be precisely and statically arranged in space. In practice, as we will see, the real resolution will always be larger for two main reasons: (i) bacteria do not respond instantly to light temporal variations thus introducing a blur in the target speed map, (ii) the stationary state is an ensemble of noisy patterns that constantly fluctuate because of swimming and Brownian motions of bacteria. After projecting an inverted Mona Lisa image, bacteria start to concentrate in dark regions while moving out from the more illuminated areas. After about 4 min, dark field microscopy reveals a recognizable bacterial ‘replica’ of Leonardo’s painting, where brighter areas correspond to regions of accumulated cells. Once a stationary pattern is reached, we collect a time averaged image from which we extract the bacterial density ${\rho }^{*}$ shown in Figure 3 normalized to be one when uniform (see Materials and methods).

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Figure 3—source data 1

Source data for Figure 3

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36608.007

Download elife-36608-fig3-data1-v1.csv

We split the density image into components corresponding to the same illumination level $I$. We then average the density within each component and report in Figure 3(c) the obtained value as a function of the inverse mean speed $1/v(I)$ obtained from the speed vs intensity curve in Figure 2(a). The high speed side of the graph can be very well fitted by a straight line with a finite intercept $q=0.5$. This suggests that 50% of the total scattering objects in the field of view responds to light and can be spatially modulated while the remaining 50% can be attributed to cells which are non-motile or insensitive to light and also to stray light generated away from the focal plane. The ratio between the maximum and minimum modulation of the light sensitive component can be obtained as $\text{max}[{\rho }^{*}-q]/\text{min}[{\rho }^{*}-q]=2$. A strong deviation from linearity is evident in the high density/low speed region. A violation of the $\rho \propto 1/v$ law can be attributed to many factors that are not included in the simple theory discussed above. In particular, the theory assumes that speed is a local function of space which would only be the case if bacteria instantly adapt to temporal changes in light intensity. However, previous studies have evidenced that speed response is not instantaneous but it displays a relaxation pattern characterized by multiple timescales. In addition to a fast relaxation time associated to the membrane discharge (Walter et al., 2007), ATP synthase and the dynamics of stator units of the flagellar motors introduce slower timescales in the speed relaxation dynamics (Tipping et al., 2013; Arlt et al., 2018). Using DDM we measured speed response to a uniform light pattern whose intensity switches between two values every 100 s. Results are reported in Figure 4 and clearly show the presence of two timescales. The short time scale is smaller than our time resolution (1 s) and appears as an instantaneous jump that accounts for about a fraction $\beta =0.44$ of the total relaxation. A slower relaxation follows and it is well fitted by an exponential function with a time constant ${\tau }_{\text{m}}=35$ s that is the same for both the rising and falling relaxations. As a result, bacteria will experience an effective speed map that is a blurred version of what we would expect for an instantaneous response $V(\mathbf{𝐫})=v(I(\mathbf{𝐫}))$. In the case of smooth swimming cells, with a two-step light response, we calculate that, for weak speed modulations around a baseline value $V_0$, the actual speed map can be obtained as a simple convolution (see Materials and methods):

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

Figure 4—source data 1

Source data for Figure 4

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36608.009

Download elife-36608-fig4-data1-v1.csv

with $\gamma (x,y)$ a convolution kernel that is analytic in Fourier space:

where $q=\sqrt{q_x^2+q_y^2}$ is the modulus of the wave vector and ${\displaystyle k^{-1}=v_0{\tau }_m}$. Assuming that the stationary distribution will remain isotropic even in the presence of memory, the relation ${\displaystyle \rho \propto 1/w}$ will then still be valid provided one uses the actual, blurred speed map $w$ and not the original map $V$ corresponding to instantaneous response. We can then anticipate the stationary density once we calculate the actual speed map $w$ with the convolution formula (1). Recalling that only a fraction $\alpha$ of cells is motile the estimated normalized stationary density will be

where ${\displaystyle \overline{w^{-1}}}$ is the spatial average of the inverse actual speed $w(x,y)$. Plotting ${\rho }^{*}$ as a function of $1/V$ we find that this simple model quantitatively explains the density behavior in Figure 3 with the natural choice of free parameters $\alpha =0.5$, $\beta =0.44$, and $k^{-1}=\overline{v}{\tau }_m=59$ µm where $\overline{v}$ is the spatial average of $V(x,y)$. This result is certainly encouraging and prompts for a deeper and more systematic investigation using simpler light patterns. Our aim here, however, is to investigate the resolution limits of density shaping with photokinetic bacteria. Although memory effects could be reduced by deleting ATP-synthase genes (Arlt et al., 2018), resulting in a suppression of the slow component in speed relaxation, response will never be truly instantaneous. In addition to memory effects, steric and/or hydrodynamic interactions will always affect density by hindering bacteria penetration and further accumulation in densely packed regions. The combined action of these effects on the stationary density map cannot be easily incorporated in a theoretical model that provides precise quantitative predictions with a priori known parameters.

An alternative and more practical strategy to improve the accuracy of density shaping, is to implement a feedback control loop. We set up an automated control loop that performs one iteration every 20 s, comparing the current density map to the desired target image and updating the illumination pattern accordingly (see Materials and methods). Light levels are increased in those regions with a density that exceeds the target value and decreased where density is lower. At each step the light intensity increment is simply proportional to the pixel by pixel difference of target and actual density images. We quantify the distance between the obtained density pattern and the target image by the sum of the squared pixel-by-pixel difference after a proper rescaling procedure (see Materials and methods).

As soon as the feedback is turned on at time $t_0=6$ min (Figure 5(a)) the distance from the target starts to decrease reaching a new stationary value after about 4 min. The final stationary density map shows a level of detail significantly higher than the image obtained before the feedback was turned on (Figure 5(b,c)). The image is stable and resolution does not deteriorate for hours. However a dark region surrounds the illuminated area so that swimming cells that exit the field of view do not come back and the number of motile cells in the illuminated area is reduced by about 50% in one hour. This issue is the main limiting factor for the lifetime of our patterns and could be solved in the future by using sample chambers that match the size of the illuminated area. As evidenced in Figure 5(d), the feedback precompensates this blurring effect due to memory by converging to a sharpened version of the initial target image. Results of comparable quality have been replicated four times in each of the two independent biological replicates.

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

Figure 5—source data 1

Source data for Figure 5

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36608.011

Download elife-36608-fig5-data1-v1.csv

A remarkable feature of this optically controlled material lays in its intrinsic dynamic and reconfigurable nature. As a demonstration of this property we show the dynamic morphing of a bacterial layer from an Albert Einstein’s to a Charles Darwin’s portrait (see Figure 6 and Video 1). The morphing is triggered by instantly switching between the two target images on the DLP projector and exponentially converges to the second target in a characteristic time of 1.8 min.

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

Figure 6—source data 1

Source data for Figure 6

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36608.013

Download elife-36608-fig6-data1-v1.csv

Video 1

Download asset

Although light induced density modulations can be achieved in large samples of Brownian (passive) colloidal systems, active materials provide a largely superior performance in terms of both required power and response time. The stationary density distribution of Brownian colloids is governed by the Boltzmann law stating that the logarithmic ratio of maximum to minimum density is given by

where $\mathrm{\Delta }U$ is the optical energy difference between brightest and darkest regions. For a plastic or glass bead of radius $a=1$µm in water, this energy difference can be estimated in the Rayleigh regime as (Ashkin et al., 1986) $\mathrm{\Delta }U\approx a^{3}I/c$ where $I$ is the maximum power density and $c$ is the speed of light. For a contrast level comparable to the ones shown above, $\log ({\rho }_{\max }/{\rho }_{\min })\approx 1$, the required power density would be $I\approx k_{B}Tc/a^3\approx 1$ W/mm${}^2$. This value is three orders of magnitude larger than the maximum power densities used in our experiments. Our active system is also much faster than its Brownian counterprt as evidenced by comparing the timescales of pattern formation. In both the active and passive case, dynamics is governed by the interplay of diffusion and drift with characteristic timescales ${\tau }_{\mathrm{diff}}$ and ${\tau }_{\mathrm{drift}}$. Calling $\mathrm{\ell }=1$ mm the largest length scale in the target pattern, we obtain for the active case ${\tau }_{\mathrm{drift}}\approx \mathrm{\ell }/v\approx 200$ s where we used $v=5$ µm/s as the typical swimming speed. A diffusion time scale can be obtained as ${\tau }_{\mathrm{diff}}\approx {\mathrm{\ell }}^2/2D$ where $D$ is the active translational diffusion coefficient. For wild type bacteria, moving with a run and tumble dynamics, $D=v^2{\tau }_{\text{run}}$ where ${\tau }_{\text{run}}\approx 1$ s is the mean duration of a run. The corresponding characteristic diffusion time is ${\tau }_{\mathrm{diff}}\approx {\mathrm{\ell }}^2/2D\approx 2\times {10}^4$ s. This timescale can be considerably reduced if, as in our case, we suppress tumbling and use a smooth swimming strain with a much larger reorientation time ${\tau }_{\mathrm{rot}}\approx$20 s (Berg, 1993). In this case the diffusion timescale drops down to ${\tau }_{\mathrm{diff}}\approx {10}^3$ s leading to a faster relaxation towards the stationary state. In the Brownian case the drift timescale is given by ${\tau }_{\mathrm{drift}}\approx \mu k_{B}T/\mathrm{\ell }\approx$10${}^6$ s where $\mu =50$ µm/s pN is the mobility of a 1 µm radius microsphere. The same colloidal particle has a diffusivity $D=\mu k_{B}T=0.2$ µm${}^2$/s giving again ${\tau }_{\mathrm{diff}}\approx {\mathrm{\ell }}^2/2D\approx {\mathrm{\hspace{0.33em}10}}^6$ s. Summarizing, using optical forces to achieve a comparable density modulation for Brownian particles would require a thousand times larger powers and from ${10}^3$ to ${10}^4$ longer times.

In conclusion, we have shown that a suspension of swimming bacteria, with optically controllable speed, can provide a new class of light controllable active materials whose density can be accurately, reversibly and quickly shaped by employing a low power light projector. An alternative strategy to produce static patterns of bacteria is by ‘biofilm lithography’ where an optical template of blue light is used to induce the expression of membrane proteins that promote cell-cell and cell-substrate attachment (Jin and Riedel-Kruse, 2018). As opposed to our motility driven density shaping, these patterns are static and form over a time scale of several hours. Interestingly, the two techniques could be used in combination to achieve faster and more complex (e.g. three dimensional) biofilm lithography by fixing with blue light a template pattern obtained by speed modulation with green light. By further genetic engineering, bacteria could be eventually encapsulated in silicate shells (Müller et al., 2008) producing solid permanent structures for micro-mechanics or micro-optics applications. Finally, the possibility of spatial and temporal control of motile bacteria density could also lead to novel strategies for the transport and manipulation of small cargoes inside microdevices Maggi et al. (2018).

1. 1. Arlt J
   2. Martinez VA
   3. Dawson A
   4. Pilizota T
   5. Poon WCK

   (2018) Painting with light-powered bacteria

   Nature Communications 9:768.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03161-8

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Ashkin A
   2. Dziedzic JM
   3. Bjorkholm JE
   4. Chu S

   (1986) Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles

   Optics Letters 11:288–290.

   https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.11.000288

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. Book

   1. Berg HC

   (1993)

   Random Walks in Biology

   Princeton University Press.

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Béjà O
   2. Aravind L
   3. Koonin EV
   4. Suzuki MT
   5. Hadd A
   6. Nguyen LP
   7. Jovanovich SB
   8. Gates CM
   9. Feldman RA
   10. Spudich JL
   11. Spudich EN
   12. DeLong EF

   (2000) Bacterial rhodopsin: evidence for a new type of phototrophy in the sea

   Science 289:1902–1906.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5486.1902

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Cates ME
   2. Tailleur J

   (2015) Motility-Induced phase separation

   Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 6:219–244.

   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014710

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Cerbino R
   2. Trappe V

   (2008) Differential dynamic microscopy: probing wave vector dependent dynamics with a microscope

   Physical Review Letters 100:188102.

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.188102

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Gabel CV
   2. Berg HC

   (2003) The speed of the flagellar rotary motor of Escherichia coli varies linearly with protonmotive force

   PNAS 100:8748–8751.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1533395100

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Jin X
   2. Riedel-Kruse IH

   (2018) Biofilm lithography enables high-resolution cell patterning via optogenetic adhesin expression

   PNAS 115:3698–3703.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720676115

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Lozano C
   2. Ten Hagen B
   3. Löwen H
   4. Bechinger C

   (2016) Phototaxis of synthetic microswimmers in optical landscapes

   Nature Communications 7:12828.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12828

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Maggi C
    2. Angelani L
    3. Frangipane G
    4. Di Leonardo R

    (2018) Currents and flux-inversion in photokinetic active particles

    Soft Matter 14:4958–4962.

    https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SM00788H

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Maggi C
    2. Lepore A
    3. Solari J
    4. Rizzo A
    5. Di Leonardo R

    (2013) Motility fractionation of bacteria by centrifugation

    Soft Matter 9:10885–10890.

    https://doi.org/10.1039/c3sm51223a

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Müller WE
    2. Engel S
    3. Wang X
    4. Wolf SE
    5. Tremel W
    6. Thakur NL
    7. Krasko A
    8. Divekar M
    9. Schröder HC

    (2008) Bioencapsulation of living bacteria (Escherichia coli) with poly(silicate) after transformation with silicatein-alpha gene

    Biomaterials 29:771–779.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.038

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Schnitzer MJ

    (1993) Theory of continuum random walks and application to chemotaxis

    Physical Review E 48:2553–2568.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.48.2553

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Schwarz-Linek J
    2. Arlt J
    3. Jepson A
    4. Dawson A
    5. Vissers T
    6. Miroli D
    7. Pilizota T
    8. Martinez VA
    9. Poon WCK

    (2016) Escherichia coli as a model active colloid: A practical introduction

    Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 137:2–16.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.07.048

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Stenhammar J
    2. Wittkowski R
    3. Marenduzzo D
    4. Cates ME

    (2016) Light-induced self-assembly of active rectification devices

    Science Advances 2:e1501850.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501850

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Tailleur J
    2. Cates ME

    (2009) Sedimentation, trapping, and rectification of dilute Bacteria

    Epl 86:60002.

    https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/86/60002

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Tipping MJ
    2. Steel BC
    3. Delalez NJ
    4. Berry RM
    5. Armitage JP

    (2013) Quantification of flagellar motor stator dynamics through in vivo proton-motive force control

    Molecular Microbiology 87:338–347.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12098

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Vizsnyiczai G
    2. Frangipane G
    3. Maggi C
    4. Saglimbeni F
    5. Bianchi S
    6. Di Leonardo R

    (2017) Light controlled 3D micromotors powered by Bacteria

    Nature Communications 8:15974.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15974

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Walter JM
    2. Greenfield D
    3. Bustamante C
    4. Liphardt J

    (2007) Light-powering Escherichia coli with proteorhodopsin

    PNAS 104:2408–2412.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611035104

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Wilde A
    2. Mullineaux CW

    (2017) Light-controlled motility in prokaryotes and the problem of directional light perception

    FEMS Microbiology Reviews 41:900–922.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fux045

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Wilson LG
    2. Martinez VA
    3. Schwarz-Linek J
    4. Tailleur J
    5. Bryant G
    6. Pusey PN
    7. Poon WC

    (2011) Differential dynamic microscopy of bacterial motility

    Physical Review Letters 106:018101.

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.018101

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Wolfe AJ
    2. Conley MP
    3. Kramer TJ
    4. Berg HC

    (1987) Reconstitution of signaling in bacterial chemotaxis

    Journal of Bacteriology 169:1878–1885.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.169.5.1878-1885.1987

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Giacomo Frangipane

   Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma "Sapienza", Roma, Italy

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1533-4754

2. Dario Dell'Arciprete

   Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma "Sapienza", Roma, Italy

   Contribution

   Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Serena Petracchini

   Istituto Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Università di Roma "Sapienza", Roma, Italy

   Contribution

   Investigation, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Claudio Maggi

   Soft and Living Matter Laboratory, Institute of Nanotechnology (NANOTEC-CNR), Roma, Italy

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing—original draft

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0033-6287

5. Filippo Saglimbeni

   Soft and Living Matter Laboratory, Institute of Nanotechnology (NANOTEC-CNR), Roma, Italy

   Contribution

   Data curation, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Silvio Bianchi

   Soft and Living Matter Laboratory, Institute of Nanotechnology (NANOTEC-CNR), Roma, Italy

   Contribution

   Software, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Gaszton Vizsnyiczai

   Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma "Sapienza", Roma, Italy

   Contribution

   Software, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

8. Maria Lina Bernardini

   1. Istituto Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Università di Roma "Sapienza", Roma, Italy
   2. Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie, Università di Roma "Sapienza", Roma, Italy

   Contribution

   Supervision, Methodology

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

9. Roberto Di Leonardo

   1. Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma "Sapienza", Roma, Italy
   2. Soft and Living Matter Laboratory, Institute of Nanotechnology (NANOTEC-CNR), Roma, Italy

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft

   For correspondence

   roberto.dileonardo@uniroma1.it

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5020-0663

• 13,939

  views

• 853

  downloads

• 91

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.