Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels constitute a large superfamily of ion channels that can be grouped in seven subfamilies: TRPC, TRPM, TRPML, TRPP, TRPV, TRPA and TRPN (Montell, 2005). The channels of the TRP superfamily are diverse in respect to modes of activities, ion selectivity and physiological functions. Most TRP channels are non-selective cation channels with varying preferences for Ca²⁺ over Na⁺ (Owsianik et al., 2006). Some TRPs are physically stimulated or voltage-activated, whereas others respond to the binding of ligands or the direct interaction with other proteins. Corresponding to their functional diversity TRPs are involved in many cellular processes, including mechanosensation, thermosensitivity, nociception and store-operated Ca²⁺ entry (Nilius and Flockerzi, 2014).

TRPC4 is one of seven members of the subfamily of TRPC (canonical TRPs) channels (Freichel et al., 2014). TRPC channels are Ca²⁺/Na⁺-permeable cation channels that are expressed in many cell types and tissues, including brain, placenta, adrenal gland, retina endothelia, testis, and kidney (Freichel et al., 2014). The channels play an important role in vasorelaxation and neurotransmitter release. TRPC4 contributes to axonal regeneration after nerve injury (Wu et al., 2008) and TRPC channels in general are necessary mediators of pathologic cardiac hypertrophy (Wu et al., 2010).

The activation mechanism of TRPC4 has been controversially discussed (Plant and Schaefer, 2003). Dependent on the cellular environment and method of measurement, the reported activation mechanism, permeability and biophysical properties differ for TRPC4 and its close homologue TRPC5 (Plant and Schaefer, 2003). Several studies showed that TRPC4 and TRPC5 form receptor-operated, Ca²⁺-permeable, non-selective cation channels (Okada et al., 1998; Schaefer et al., 2000). Others found that TRPC4 and TRPC5 are activated by Ca²⁺ store-depletion with moderate to high Ca²⁺ permeabilities (Philipp et al., 1996; Warnat et al., 1999). In line with both findings, TRPC4 directly interacts with IP₃ receptors, calmodulin (Mery et al., 2001; Tang et al., 2001), STIM1 (Lee et al., 2010; Zeng et al., 2008), the lipid-binding protein SESTD1 (Miehe et al., 2010) and the G protein G_αi2 (Jeon et al., 2012). SESTD1 binds several phospholipid species and is essential for efficient receptor-mediated activation of TRPC5 (Miehe et al., 2010). In addition, TRPC channels have been shown to be activated by NO (Yoshida et al., 2006).

Recently, (-)-Englerin A has been shown to be a potent and selective activator of TRPC4 and TRPC5 calcium channels (Akbulut et al., 2015). It selectively kills renal cancer cells by elevated Ca²⁺ influx. (-)-Englerin A is so far the only known potent activator of TRPC4 and TRPC5.

The resolution revolution in cryo-EM (Kuhlbrandt, 2014) brought an enormous amount of high-resolution structures of TRP channels in the last 5 years (Madej and Ziegler, 2018). The cryo-EM structure of TRPV1 (Liao et al., 2013) ushered structural biology of TRP channels in a new era. So far structure models for 48 TRP channels from six subfamilies have been published (Madej and Ziegler, 2018). The TRPCs represent the only subfamily for which no high-resolution structure has been reported so far limiting our understanding of these important types of cation channels. Here, we present the first cryo-EM structure of zebrafish TRPC4 in its unliganded (apo), closed state.

Initially, we planned to heterologously express human TRPC4 in HEK293 cells and purify it to determine its structure by single particle cryo-EM. However, the protein proved not to be stable enough for structural investigations. We therefore screened TRPC4 orthologues from several different species and found wild type TRPC4 from zebrafish (TRPC4_DR) to be the most suitable for our studies. TRPC4_DR has very high sequence similarity to human TRPC4 (76% sequence identity, Figure 1—figure supplement 1).

To determine whether TRPC4_DR has the same channel properties as human TRPC4, we performed voltage-clamp experiments with HEK293 cells heterologously expressing TRPC4_DR. The measurements demonstrated that, like human TRPC4 (Akbulut et al., 2015), TRPC4_DR can be activated by (-)-Englerin A resulting in similar currents (Figure 1). Of note, current-voltage curves (IV-curves) in the presence of (-)-Englerin A showed a doubly rectifying form (Figure 1e) and reversal potentials close to 0 mV (−3.2 ± 1.7 mV, n = 6). The doubly rectifying form of the IV-curve is a characteristic hallmark of active TRPC4 (Akbulut et al., 2015; Freichel et al., 2014; Schaefer et al., 2000). Under the experimental conditions, namely asymmetric ion concentrations, reversal potentials close to 0 mV indicate a poor cation selectivity, which is a known property of several TRPC4 variants from different species (Freichel et al., 2014; Schaefer et al., 2002).

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

We overexpressed Strep-tagged TRPC4_DR in HEK293, solubilized it in n-dodecyl-β-d-maltopyranoside (DDM)/cholesteryl hemisuccinate (CHS) and purified it using affinity and size exclusion chromatography (Figure 2—figure supplement 1a–b). After purification the detergent was exchanged against amphipols. The resulting sample was homogeneous and suitable for structural studies (see Materials and methods, Figure 2—figure supplement 1c–e). We then solved the structure of TRPC4_DR in its unliganded (apo), closed state by cryo-EM and single-particle analysis (see Materials and methods) at an average resolution of 3.6 Å (Figure 2a, Table 1, Figure 2—figure supplements 2–4, Video 1). The high quality of the map allowed us to build a model of 70% of TRPC4_DR de novo. The final model contains residues 18–753 with some loops missing (Figure 2b). As in most other TRP structures the C-terminal region (residues 754–915) could not be resolved indicating that this region is highly flexible.

Figure 2 with 5 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Video 1

Download asset

The overall structure of the homotetrameric TRPC4_DR is similar to that of other TRP channels (Figure 2a–b). Especially the transmembrane domain comprising the voltage-sensor-like (VSL) domain and pore domain is structurally conserved. Like TRPVs, TRPMs, TRPAs and TRPNs, TRPC4_DR does not have extracellular but extended cytoplasmic domains. The resolved regions of the cytoplasmic domain of TRPC4_DR reaches ~80 Å into the cytosol and is relatively short compared to other TRP channels. The cytoplasmic domain can be separated in an upper and lower part. The upper part comprises a conserved TRP domain, a pre-S1 elbow domain that enters partially the membrane and an extended helical linker domain (Figure 2c–d). The lower part is formed by the Rib (or Stretcher) helix, the C-terminal helix and four ankyrin repeats (Figure 2c–d). 3-D classification and refinement of the final data set (Figure 2—figure supplement 3) revealed that the lower cytoplasmic part of TRPC4_DR is flexible, whereas the transmembrane domain is not (Video 2).

Video 2

Download asset

Voltage-sensor like domain and ion conducting pore

Although TRP channels contain a structurally conserved VSL domain comprising four helices (S1-S4), only some members of the TRP family, such as TRPM8, TRPM4, and TRPP1 have been shown to exhibit mild voltage sensitivity (Nilius et al., 2003; Shen et al., 2016a; Voets et al., 2007). Helix S4 harbors the key residues involved in voltage sensing in voltage-gated ion channels (Swartz, 2008). A general motif in the voltage-sensing domain (VSD) of voltage-gated ion channels comprises two sets of basic residues on helix S4 that are stabilized by counteracting acidic residues and separated by a hydrophobic patch (Kim and Nimigean, 2016). Upon voltage change, helix S4 moves and the positively charged residues jump from one counteracting set of residues over the hydrophobic patch to the next set of negatively charged residues (Zhang et al., 2012).

Comparing the VSL domain in our structure and other TRP channels with the VSD in the structure of the Kv1.2-Kv2.1 paddle chimera (Long et al., 2007), we found that R491 in TRPC4_DR is located at the same position as K302 in the potassium channel, corresponding to the lower pair of electrostatically interacting residues (Figure 3a). At this position an arginine has been observed in TRPM4 and TRPM8 (Winkler et al., 2017; Yin et al., 2018), and a lysine in TRPP1 (Shen et al., 2016b) (Figure 3a). In all cases, the basic residues are stabilized by interaction with acidic residues. Importantly, there are no equivalently interacting residues in TRPV1 at this position (Liao et al., 2013) (Figure 3a). The hydrophobic patch that has been shown to maintain the electric field across the membrane by preventing the movement of ions (Lacroix et al., 2014) is more prominent in all compared TRP channels than in the Kv1.2-Kv2.1 paddle chimera (Figure 3a). However, the second pair of interacting basic and acidic residues, which is essential for the movement of helix S4 comprising residues R290, R293, E183 and E226 in Kv1.2, cannot be found in the TRP channels. Only TRPM8 has two residues with complementary charges at this position, however, these residues point away from each other in the structure and do not interact (Yin et al., 2018) (Figure 3a). Thus, the mechanism of voltage gating in TRP channels must differ from that of voltage-gated ion channels.

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Interestingly, positively charged residues that are involved in voltage sensing in Kv1.2, such as R293, R296, R299, R302, R305, and K308 are replaced by polar residues, including N485, S488, S494, and T497 in TRPC4_DR. The VSL domain in other TRP channels contains more hydrophobic residues (Liao et al., 2013; Winkler et al., 2017) (Figure 3b).

Upstream of the VSL domain resides the pre-S1 elbow domain. It sits inside the membrane and forms a cavity with helices S1 and S4 in which we could identify density corresponding to a sterol (Figure 4a–b). Since we added CHS during the purification of TRPC4_DR, we fitted this molecule into the density. Interestingly, a CHS molecule has also been found at the same position in the structures of TRPM4 (Autzen et al., 2018) and TRPML3 (Hirschi et al., 2017). In a second cavity between the pre-S1 elbow domain and helices S1 and S2 resides a proline-rich repeat connecting the TRP and helical linker domains (see below).

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

The activation of TRPC4 and TRPC5 is dependent on Ca²⁺ (Plant and Schaefer, 2003). However, so far no Ca²⁺ binding sites have been described for TRPCs and we do not have Ca²⁺ in our sample buffer. Interestingly, the four coordinating residues that have been reported for binding of Ca²⁺ in Ca²⁺-activated TRPM4 (Autzen et al., 2018) are conserved in TRPC4 (Figure 2—figure supplement 4). In the TRPC4_DR structure, their position is very similar to TRPM4 and would allow the coordination of a Ca²⁺ ion (Figure 2—figure supplement 4). Although we indeed observed an extra density at the center between these residues, we did not assign it to Ca²⁺ because of the limited resolution (Figure 2—figure supplement 4d).

Like in other TRP channels, helix S5 and S6 swap over to the respective helices of the adjacent protomer and form the pore at the center of the tetrameric channel (Figure 2b). The extracellular opening of the pore is negatively charged (Figure 5a) and the residue E555 at the tip of the pore turret, which is conserved in TRPC1, TRPC4, and TRPC5 (Liu et al., 2003), forms a salt bridge with R556 of the adjacent protomer (Figure 2—figure supplement 5a–b). This results in a positioning of E555 away from the pore and in a relatively wide opening of its entrance similar to TRPV1 (Liao et al., 2013) (Figure 5b–d). This is in contrast to the narrow pore openings of the more selective Ca²⁺ channels TRPV5 (Hughes et al., 2018) and TRPV6 (McGoldrick et al., 2018) and possibly explains the lower selectivity of TRPC4 channels. Mutation of E555 (E559 in TRPC1) to lysine results in decreased store-operated Ca²⁺ influx (Liu et al., 2003), suggesting that a negatively charged and stable pore opening is crucial for the undisturbed permeation of cations through TRPCs.

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

The selectivity filter is formed by four glycine residues (G577) that constrict the pore to a diameter of 7.0 Å (3.7 Å defined by opposing van der Waals surfaces) (Figure 5c–d). Since the diameters of Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ ions are ~2 Å in their dehydrated and ~10–12 Å in their fully hydrated state, the cations are likely partly dehydrated when passing through the selectivity filter. Although TRPs differ in their cation selectivity, there is no clear factor recognizable that determines the level of selectivity (Table 2). Neither the diameter of the filter, ranging from 1.8 to 8.4 Å, nor the type of residue, mostly glycine or aspartate, correlates with the selectivity of the channels for Na⁺ or Ca²⁺ (Table 2). The level of selectivity must therefore be defined differently.

Table 2

TRP family name	Residue	Van der waals diameter (Å)	Selectivity* PCa: PNa	Reference
TRPC4DR	G577	3.7	7
TRPV1	G643	1.5	3.8–9.6	(Liao et al., 2013)
TRPV2	Gly604 (M606)	1.9 (1.35)	3	(Zubcevic et al., 2016)
TRPML3	G457 (D459)	2.0 (4.2)	Highly selective for Ca2+	(Zhou et al., 2017)
TRPML1	G470 (D471)	1.4 (2.1)	N.D.	(Schmiege et al., 2017)
TRPN (NOMPC)	G1506	3.8	N.D.	(Jin et al., 2017)
TRPA1	D915	3.2	0.8	(Paulsen et al., 2015)
TRPV5	D542	2.6	>100	(Hughes et al., 2018)
TRPV6	D541	0.9	>100	(Saotome et al., 2016)
TRPM4	G972	4.3	PNa: PCa > 100	(Guo et al., 2017a)
TRPP1 (PKD2)	Leu641 (Gly642)	1.7 (3.6)	PNa: PCa > 100	(Shen et al., 2016a)

1. *(Venkatachalam and Montell, 2007)

Directly above the selectivity filter resides S580 (Figure 5c–d) which is replaced by an asparagine residue in human TRPC4 and TRPC5 (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). In TRPC5 this residue has been shown to be important for Ca²⁺ permeability (Chen et al., 2017b) and in TRPV1 D646, located at a similar position, has been identified as important residue for cation selection (García-Martínez et al., 2000).

The lumen of the pore below the selectivity filter is mainly hydrophobic (Figure 5b) and leads to the lower gate at the cytoplasmic end formed by the conserved residues I617 and N621 (Figure 5c). I617 belongs to the M3 motif found in all TRPCs, TRPVs, and TRPMs (Freichel et al., 2014). In our case, the TRPC4_DR channel is almost completely closed. The four isoleucines and four asparagines constrict the pore to a diameter of ~5.3 and ~4.2 Å, respectively (1.6 and 0.7 Å defined by opposing van der Waals surfaces) (Figure 5c–d). Ca²⁺ and Na⁺ ions are too large to fit through these constrictions even in a dehydrated state. The lower constriction of the TRPP channel PKD2 is also formed by an asparagine and leads to a closure of the pore (Shen et al., 2016b). Below the asparagine and very close to the cytoplasmic end of the pore, a glutamine (Q625) points towards the pore (Figure 5c). This residue is conserved in all TRPCs (Figure 1—figure supplement 1), however, its significance has remained unknown.

An important region inside the pore domain is the LFW motif (residues 571–573), which is also conserved in TRPC1 and TRPC5. In TRPC5, mutation of the LFW motif to AAA results in non-functional but folded channels (Strübing et al., 2003). In our TrpC4_DR structure F572 and W573 form part of a prominent hydrophobic contact between the pore helix of one protomer and helix S6 of the adjacent protomer, stabilizing the pore (Figure 2—figure supplement 5c–d). The triple AAA mutation in this region likely destabilizes this interaction and results in the collapse of the pore explaining the inactivity of the channel. Interestingly, we found an additional density corresponding to an annular lipid at this interface (Figure 4a,c). The shape of the density clearly corresponds to phosphatidic acid (PA) or ceramide-1 phosphate. Since PA has been assigned to a similar density found in polycytin-2 (Wilkes et al., 2017) and PA has been included in our purification buffer we fitted PA into the density (Figure 4c). The phosphate head group interacts with the peptide backbone nitrogen and the polar side chains of T599 of helix S6 and the side chain amino and amide groups of W573 and Q569 of the pore helix, respectively (Figure 4c). The non-polar tail group is stabilized by interaction with multiple hydrophobic residues from the surrounding helices S5, S6 and the pore helix (Figure 4c).

Another well-studied region of the pore domain contains two cysteines (C549 and C554). Yoshida et al. showed that S-nitrosylation of these residues in TRPC5 leads to the activation of the channel (Yoshida et al., 2006). The authors proposed that the modification of the residues has a direct effect on the conformation of helix S6, resulting in the opening of the gate. In the TRPC4 structure, however, C549 and C554 do not locate in close proximity to helix S6 (Figure 2—figure supplement 5a–b). We can therefore exclude a direct interaction. The cysteines form a disulfide bridge in TRPC4_DR (Figure 2—figure supplement 5a–b) and are likely involved in putting E555 in place, which is located at the extracellular vestibule above the selectivity filter (see above). Nitrosylation, that reduces the disulphide bond of cystines (Yoshida et al., 2006) could thus lead to a destabilization of the upper region of the selectivity filter. In this process, E555 could be released and orient towards the center of the pore, altering its properties. Thus, the conformational change could result in a negatively charged sink at the turret, thereby attracting cations, possibly explaining the effect of the increased Ca²⁺ conductance observed by Yoshida et al. (Yoshida et al., 2006).

The TRP domain and helical linker domain

The TRP domain and linker domain connect the transmembrane domain with the lower cytoplasmic domain (Figure 2c–d). The TRP domain (residues E634 – N658) resides directly after helix S6 and is sandwiched between the linker and transmembrane domains. It is conserved in all TRP subfamilies except TRPPs and TRPMLs (Madej and Ziegler, 2018; Venkatachalam and Montell, 2007). The core of the TRP domain consists of the conserved WKXQR TRP box sequence (residues 635–639). Its central residue W635 has been shown to be of crucial importance for gating of several TRP channels. Its mutation in TRPV3 leads to Olmsted syndrome (Lin et al., 2012) and in NOMPC an exchange to alanine results in a channel with a prominent basal current that does not respond to mechanical stimuli anymore (Jin et al., 2017).

Like in other TRP domain-containing TRPs, W635 in TRPC4_DR interacts with the conserved G503 in the adjacent M2 motif (residues 502–511) thereby linking the TRP domain with the linker between helices S4-S5 (Figure 6a–b). G503 is conserved in all TRP subfamilies containing a TRP domain (Figure 6c). Mutation of this residue to serine in TRPC4 and TRPC5 forces the channels in an open conformation (Beck et al., 2013). The proper interaction between G503 and W635 guarantees the stabilization of helix S6 that forms the lower gate of the pore. It becomes clear from looking at these residues in our TRPC4_DR structure, that a G503S or W635A mutation would impair the interaction at this site and result in the loss of control over the gate (Figure 6b).

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

E648 and E649 which are conserved in TRPC4 and TRPC5 (Figure 1—figure supplement 1) are located at a peripheral loop of the TRP domain (Figure 7a). The glutamates interact electrostatically with two lysine residues (K684 and K685) in Stim1 proteins resulting in the activation of cation currents (Lee et al., 2010; Zeng et al., 2008). In line with this biochemical finding, E648 and E649 (E649 is not resolved in our structure) are exposed at the periphery of TRPC4_DR (Figure 7a) and are accessible for interactions with other proteins.

Figure 7 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

TRPC4_DR contains two conserved proline-rich regions downstream of the TRP domain. Proline-rich regions are often involved in specific protein–protein interactions and signal transmission. In TRPC4_DR the first proline-rich region formed by P654, P655, P656 re-enters the membrane and is sandwiched between the pre-S1 elbow domain and helix S2 making it inaccessible from the cytoplasm or the membrane. The second proline-rich region around the residues P661 and P663 is not resolved in our structure but this region is located at the outside of the protein and could thereby be accessible for interacting with regulatory proteins like Homer. Homer is an adaptor protein that facilitates the physical interaction between TRPC1 and the IP₃ receptor (Yuan et al., 2003).

The helical linker domain is made of three layers of helices that are arranged like stair steps and a coil of shorter helices (Figure 2d). The upper layer of helices harbors the M1 motif (residues 285–319), which is conserved in the TRPC family (Flockerzi, 2007). The central two helices form a short coiled-coil structure that harbors the multimerization motif (residues D254 -Q302), that has been predicted to be involved in the multimerization of TRPCs (Freichel et al., 2014). Indeed, in contrast to other TRP family members (Madej and Ziegler, 2018), the helical linker domain does not only connect the transmembrane domain with the lower cytoplasmic domain but also strongly interacts with the adjacent linker domains thereby stabilizing the tetramer (Figure 2a–b). This kind of interaction has not been observed in the structures of other TRP subfamily members, such as TRPA1 (Paulsen et al., 2015), NOMPC (Jin et al., 2017) and TRPM4 (Autzen et al., 2018; Guo et al., 2017a; Winkler et al., 2017). In the TRPV subfamily, the cytoplasmic inter-protomer interaction is mediated between the ankyrin repeat domain of one protomer and the β-strand linker domain of the adjacent protomer (Liao et al., 2013).

The lower part of the cytoplasmic domain

Ankyrin repeats, the Rib helix, and C-terminal helix domain constitute the most distant region of TRPC4_DR (Figure 2c–d). Ankyrin repeats, that are often involved in protein-protein interactions (Sedgwick and Smerdon, 1999), are abundant in TRP channels in varying numbers, ranging from 0 in TRPP (Shen et al., 2016b) and TRPML (Chen et al., 2017a; Hirschi et al., 2017; Schmiege et al., 2017; Zhou et al., 2017) to 29 in NOMPC (Jin et al., 2017). In most structures of TRPs the first ankyrin repeats are oriented in a parallel fashion like in TRPA1 (Paulsen et al., 2015) (Figure 8a). TRPCs contain four ankyrin repeats in the cytoplasmic domain. Biochemical studies have shown that at least the first ankyrin repeat is necessary in TRPC5 for proper tetramerization and function of the channel (Schindl et al., 2008). In the structure of TRPC4_DR the repeats take a unique twisted orientation and swap over to an adjacent protomer interacting with the C-terminal helix domain and Rib domain explaining the ankyrin repeat’s stabilizing effect on the tetramer (Figures 2b and 8b).

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

The Rib helix runs almost parallel to the membrane and protrudes from the cytoplasmic domain (Figure 7a). It contains a dual calmodulin- and IP₃ receptor-binding site (CIRB) (Mery et al., 2001; Tang et al., 2001) and has been described as binding hub not only for these proteins but also for SESTD1 (Miehe et al., 2010) and the G protein G_αi2 (Jeon et al., 2012) (Zhu, 2005). It is therefore a central interaction site for TRPC4-modulating proteins and the activity of the channel might be modulated by a displacement mechanism in which the different modulators compete for the same binding site (Zhu, 2005). A homologous helix has been observed in the structure of TRPM4 (Autzen et al., 2018; Guo et al., 2017a; Winkler et al., 2017). However, in the structure of TRPM4 the Rib helix is buried by other domains and only the very tip is accessible from the surface (Figure 7b). The Rib helix of TRPC4_DR, however, is accessible from the cytoplasm and direct binding of calmodulin or IP₃-receptor is possible (Figure 7—figure supplement 1).

A second major protein interaction hub is the C-terminal helix domain. It has only been observed before in TRPA1 (Paulsen et al., 2015), TRPM4 (Autzen et al., 2018) (Guo et al., 2017b; Winkler et al., 2017), and TRPM8 (Yin et al., 2018). In all described structures, it has a coiled-coil structure (Figure 9a–b). In the case of TRPC4_DR, however, the helices run in a parallel fashion (Figure 9c). The C-terminal helix domain has been shown to bind to the D₂ dopamine receptor (Hannan et al., 2008) and spectrin αII and βV which are involved in surface expression and activation of TRPC4 (Odell et al., 2008).

Figure 9

Download asset Open asset

Our structure of TRPC4 misses 162 residues at the C-terminus. This part of the protein comprises a PDZ-binding domain (Mery et al., 2002) and a second IP₃-binding domain (Mery et al., 2001) and calmodulin binding sites (Tang et al., 2001; Trost et al., 2001). Interestingly, the largest part of this region is missing in the second most abundant splice variant of TRPC4, namely TRPC4β (Freichel et al., 2014). In line with our structural data, a sequence-based structure prediction using PSIPRED (Buchan et al., 2013) indicates that this region has no defined secondary structure.

In summary, the results allow us to understand the three-dimensional organization of TRPC channels. The structure of TRPC4_DR reveals how the ion conduction pathway is built and our results point towards a gating mechanism that is conserved in all type I TRP channels. Future studies will be needed to structurally understand how TRPCs are activated or in general modulated by proteins and other factors and permeate cations. Our structure-based localization of previously biochemically identified protein binding sites provides the structural framework for further experiments towards understanding how binding of regulatory protein affect the structure and function of TRPC4.

The atomic coordinates and cryo-EM maps for TRPC4DR are available at the Protein Data Bank (PDB)/Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) databases. The accession numbers are 6G1K/EMD-4339. The raw data sets generated in the current study (motion corrected and dose weighted mrc files and box files; 215 GB) are available from the corresponding author upon request.

1. 1. Vinayagam D
   2. Mager T
   3. Apelbaum A
   4. Bothe A
   5. Merino F
   6. Hofnagel O
   7. Gatsogiannis G
   8. Raunser S

   (2018) Electron cryo-microscopy structure of the canonical TRPC4 ion channel

   Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (accession no. 6G1K).

   https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6G1K
2. 1. Vinayagam D
   2. Mager T
   3. Apelbaum A
   4. Bothe A
   5. Merino F
   6. Hofnagel O
   7. Gatsogiannis G
   8. Raunser S

   (2018) Electron cryo-microscopy structure of the canonical TRPC4 ion channel

   Publicly available at the EMDataBank (accession no. EMD-4339).

   http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/entry/emdb/EMD-4339

1. 1. Adams PD
   2. Afonine PV
   3. Bunkóczi G
   4. Chen VB
   5. Davis IW
   6. Echols N
   7. Headd JJ
   8. Hung LW
   9. Kapral GJ
   10. Grosse-Kunstleve RW
   11. McCoy AJ
   12. Moriarty NW
   13. Oeffner R
   14. Read RJ
   15. Richardson DC
   16. Richardson JS
   17. Terwilliger TC
   18. Zwart PH

   (2010) PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution

   Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 66:213–221.

   https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909052925

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Akbulut Y
   2. Gaunt HJ
   3. Muraki K
   4. Ludlow MJ
   5. Amer MS
   6. Bruns A
   7. Vasudev NS
   8. Radtke L
   9. Willot M
   10. Hahn S
   11. Seitz T
   12. Ziegler S
   13. Christmann M
   14. Beech DJ
   15. Waldmann H

   (2015) (-)-Englerin A is a potent and selective activator of TRPC4 and TRPC5 calcium channels

   Angewandte Chemie International Edition 54:3787–3791.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201411511

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Anandakrishnan R
   2. Aguilar B
   3. Onufriev AV

   (2012) H++ 3.0: automating pK prediction and the preparation of biomolecular structures for atomistic molecular modeling and simulations

   Nucleic Acids Research 40:W537–W541.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks375

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Autzen HE
   2. Myasnikov AG
   3. Campbell MG
   4. Asarnow D
   5. Julius D
   6. Cheng Y

   (2018) Structure of the human TRPM4 ion channel in a lipid nanodisc

   Science 359:228–232.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4510

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Barad BA
   2. Echols N
   3. Wang RY
   4. Cheng Y
   5. DiMaio F
   6. Adams PD
   7. Fraser JS

   (2015) EMRinger: side chain-directed model and map validation for 3D cryo-electron microscopy

   Nature Methods 12:943–946.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3541

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Beck A
   2. Speicher T
   3. Stoerger C
   4. Sell T
   5. Dettmer V
   6. Jusoh SA
   7. Abdulmughni A
   8. Cavalié A
   9. Philipp SE
   10. Zhu MX
   11. Helms V
   12. Wissenbach U
   13. Flockerzi V

   (2013) Conserved gating elements in TRPC4 and TRPC5 channels

   Journal of Biological Chemistry 288:19471–19483.

   https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.478305

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Boulay G
   2. Brown DM
   3. Qin N
   4. Jiang M
   5. Dietrich A
   6. Zhu MX
   7. Chen Z
   8. Birnbaumer M
   9. Mikoshiba K
   10. Birnbaumer L

   (1999) Modulation of Ca(2+) entry by polypeptides of the inositol 1,4, 5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) that bind transient receptor potential (TRP): evidence for roles of TRP and IP3R in store depletion-activated Ca(2+) entry

   PNAS 96:14955–14960.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.26.14955

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Buchan DW
   2. Minneci F
   3. Nugent TC
   4. Bryson K
   5. Jones DT

   (2013) Scalable web services for the PSIPRED protein analysis workbench

   Nucleic Acids Research 41:W349–W357.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt381

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Chen Q
   2. She J
   3. Zeng W
   4. Guo J
   5. Xu H
   6. Bai XC
   7. Jiang Y

   (2017a) Structure of mammalian endolysosomal TRPML1 channel in nanodiscs

   Nature 550:415–418.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24035

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Chen VB
    2. Arendall WB
    3. Headd JJ
    4. Keedy DA
    5. Immormino RM
    6. Kapral GJ
    7. Murray LW
    8. Richardson JS
    9. Richardson DC

    (2010) MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography

    Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 66:12–21.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909042073

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Chen X
    2. Li W
    3. Riley AM
    4. Soliman M
    5. Chakraborty S
    6. Stamatkin CW
    7. Obukhov AG

    (2017b) Molecular determinants of the sensitivity to Gq/11-Phospholipase C-dependent Gating, Gd3+ potentiation, and Ca2+ permeability in the transient receptor potential canonical type 5 (TRPC5) channel

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 292:898–911.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.755470

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Emsley P
    2. Lohkamp B
    3. Scott WG
    4. Cowtan K

    (2010) Features and development of Coot

    Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 66:486–501.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910007493

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Eswar N
    2. Eramian D
    3. Webb B
    4. Shen MY
    5. Sali A

    (2008) Protein structure modeling with MODELLER

    Methods in Molecular Biology 426:145–159.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-058-8_8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Flockerzi V

    (2007) An introduction on TRP channels

    Handbook of experimental pharmacology pp. 1–19.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34891-7_1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. Book

    1. Freichel M
    2. Tsvilovskyy V
    3. Camacho-Londoño JE

    (2014) TRPC4- and TRPC4-Containing Channels

    In: Jockusch B. M, editors. The Actin Cytoskeleton. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 85–128.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54215-2_5

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Frenz B
    2. Walls AC
    3. Egelman EH
    4. Veesler D
    5. DiMaio F

    (2017) RosettaES: a sampling strategy enabling automated interpretation of difficult cryo-EM maps

    Nature Methods 14:797–800.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4340

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. García-Martínez C
    2. Morenilla-Palao C
    3. Planells-Cases R
    4. Merino JM
    5. Ferrer-Montiel A

    (2000) Identification of an aspartic residue in the P-loop of the vanilloid receptor that modulates pore properties

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 275:32552–32558.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M002391200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Gatsogiannis C
    2. Merino F
    3. Prumbaum D
    4. Roderer D
    5. Leidreiter F
    6. Meusch D
    7. Raunser S

    (2016) Membrane insertion of a Tc toxin in near-atomic detail

    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 23:884–890.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.3281

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Goehring A
    2. Lee CH
    3. Wang KH
    4. Michel JC
    5. Claxton DP
    6. Baconguis I
    7. Althoff T
    8. Fischer S
    9. Garcia KC
    10. Gouaux E

    (2014) Screening and large-scale expression of membrane proteins in mammalian cells for structural studies

    Nature Protocols 9:2574–2585.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.173

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Guo J
    2. She J
    3. Zeng W
    4. Chen Q
    5. Bai XC
    6. Jiang Y

    (2017a) Structures of the calcium-activated, non-selective cation channel TRPM4

    Nature 552:205–209.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24997

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Guo R
    2. Zong S
    3. Wu M
    4. Gu J
    5. Yang M

    (2017b) Architecture of human mitochondrial respiratory megacomplex I 2 III 2 IV 2

    Cell 170:1247–1257.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.050

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Hannan MA
    2. Kabbani N
    3. Paspalas CD
    4. Levenson R

    (2008) Interaction with dopamine D2 receptor enhances expression of transient receptor potential channel 1 at the cell surface

    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 1778:974–982.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.01.011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Hirschi M
    2. Herzik MA
    3. Wie J
    4. Suo Y
    5. Borschel WF
    6. Ren D
    7. Lander GC
    8. Lee SY

    (2017) Cryo-electron microscopy structure of the lysosomal calcium-permeable channel TRPML3

    Nature 550:411–414.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24055

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Hughes TET
    2. Lodowski DT
    3. Huynh KW
    4. Yazici A
    5. Del Rosario J
    6. Kapoor A
    7. Basak S
    8. Samanta A
    9. Han X
    10. Chakrapani S
    11. Zhou ZH
    12. Filizola M
    13. Rohacs T
    14. Han S
    15. Moiseenkova-Bell VY

    (2018) Structural basis of TRPV5 channel inhibition by econazole revealed by cryo-EM

    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 25:53–60.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-017-0009-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Humphrey W
    2. Dalke A
    3. Schulten K

    (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics

    Journal of Molecular Graphics 14:33–38.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Jeon JP
    2. Hong C
    3. Park EJ
    4. Jeon JH
    5. Cho NH
    6. Kim IG
    7. Choe H
    8. Muallem S
    9. Kim HJ
    10. So I

    (2012) Selective Gαi subunits as novel direct activators of transient receptor potential canonical (TRPC)4 and TRPC5 channels

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 287:17029–17039.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.326553

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Jin P
    2. Bulkley D
    3. Guo Y
    4. Zhang W
    5. Guo Z
    6. Huynh W
    7. Wu S
    8. Meltzer S
    9. Cheng T
    10. Jan LY
    11. Jan YN
    12. Cheng Y

    (2017) Electron cryo-microscopy structure of the mechanotransduction channel NOMPC

    Nature 547:118–122.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22981

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Kim DM
    2. Nimigean CM

    (2016) Voltage-gated potassium channels: a structural examination of selectivity and gating

    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 8:a029231.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a029231

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Kuhlbrandt W

    (2014) The resolution revolution

    Science 343:1443–1444.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251652

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Lacroix JJ
    2. Hyde HC
    3. Campos FV
    4. Bezanilla F

    (2014) Moving gating charges through the gating pore in a Kv channel voltage sensor

    PNAS 111:E1950–E1959.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406161111

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Lee KP
    2. Yuan JP
    3. So I
    4. Worley PF
    5. Muallem S

    (2010) STIM1-dependent and STIM1-independent function of transient receptor potential canonical (TRPC) channels tunes their store-operated mode

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 285:38666–38673.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.155036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Liao M
    2. Cao E
    3. Julius D
    4. Cheng Y

    (2013) Structure of the TRPV1 ion channel determined by electron cryo-microscopy

    Nature 504:107–112.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12822

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Lin Z
    2. Chen Q
    3. Lee M
    4. Cao X
    5. Zhang J
    6. Ma D
    7. Chen L
    8. Hu X
    9. Wang H
    10. Wang X
    11. Zhang P
    12. Liu X
    13. Guan L
    14. Tang Y
    15. Yang H
    16. Tu P
    17. Bu D
    18. Zhu X
    19. Wang K
    20. Li R
    21. Yang Y

    (2012) Exome sequencing reveals mutations in TRPV3 as a cause of Olmsted syndrome

    The American Journal of Human Genetics 90:558–564.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.02.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Liu X
    2. Singh BB
    3. Ambudkar IS

    (2003) TRPC1 is required for functional store-operated Ca2+ channels. role of acidic amino acid residues in the S5-S6 region

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 278:11337–11343.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M213271200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Long SB
    2. Tao X
    3. Campbell EB
    4. MacKinnon R

    (2007) Atomic structure of a voltage-dependent K+ channel in a lipid membrane-like environment

    Nature 450:376–382.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06265

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Madej MG
    2. Ziegler CM

    (2018) Dawning of a new era in TRP channel structural biology by cryo-electron microscopy

    Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology 470:213–225.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-018-2107-2

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. McGoldrick LL
    2. Singh AK
    3. Saotome K
    4. Yelshanskaya MV
    5. Twomey EC
    6. Grassucci RA
    7. Sobolevsky AI

    (2018) Opening of the human epithelial calcium channel TRPV6

    Nature 553:233–237.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25182

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Mery L
    2. Magnino F
    3. Schmidt K
    4. Krause KH
    5. Dufour JF

    (2001) Alternative splice variants of hTrp4 differentially interact with the C-terminal portion of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors

    FEBS Letters 487:377–383.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(00)02362-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Mery L
    2. Strauss B
    3. Dufour JF
    4. Krause KH
    5. Hoth M

    (2002)

    The PDZ-interacting domain of TRPC4 controls its localization and surface expression in HEK293 cells

    Journal of Cell Science 115:3497–3508.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Miehe S
    2. Bieberstein A
    3. Arnould I
    4. Ihdene O
    5. Rütten H
    6. Strübing C

    (2010) The phospholipid-binding protein SESTD1 is a novel regulator of the transient receptor potential channels TRPC4 and TRPC5

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 285:12426–12434.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.068304

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Montell C

    (2005) The TRP superfamily of cation channels

    Science Signaling 2005:re3.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/stke.2722005re3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Moriya T
    2. Saur M
    3. Stabrin M
    4. Merino F
    5. Voicu H
    6. Huang Z
    7. Penczek PA
    8. Raunser S
    9. Gatsogiannis C

    (2017) High-resolution single particle analysis from electron cryo-microscopy images using SPHIRE

    Journal of Visualized Experiments e55448.

    https://doi.org/10.3791/55448

    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Nilius B
    2. Flockerzi V

    (2014)

    Mammalian transient receptor potential (TRP) cation channels. Preface

    Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology 223:v - vi.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Nilius B
    2. Prenen J
    3. Droogmans G
    4. Voets T
    5. Vennekens R
    6. Freichel M
    7. Wissenbach U
    8. Flockerzi V

    (2003) Voltage dependence of the Ca2+-activated cation channel TRPM4

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 278:30813–30820.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M305127200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Odell AF
    2. Van Helden DF
    3. Scott JL

    (2008) The spectrin cytoskeleton influences the surface expression and activation of human transient receptor potential channel 4 channels

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 283:4395–4407.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M709729200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Okada T
    2. Shimizu S
    3. Wakamori M
    4. Maeda A
    5. Kurosaki T
    6. Takada N
    7. Imoto K
    8. Mori Y

    (1998) Molecular cloning and functional characterization of a novel receptor-activated TRP Ca2+ channel from mouse brain

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 273:10279–10287.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.17.10279

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Owsianik G
    2. Talavera K
    3. Voets T
    4. Nilius B

    (2006) Permeation and selectivity of TRP channels

    Annual Review of Physiology 68:685–717.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040204.101406

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Paulsen CE
    2. Armache JP
    3. Gao Y
    4. Cheng Y
    5. Julius D

    (2015) Structure of the TRPA1 ion channel suggests regulatory mechanisms

    Nature 520:511–517.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14367

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Pettersen EF
    2. Goddard TD
    3. Huang CC
    4. Couch GS
    5. Greenblatt DM
    6. Meng EC
    7. Ferrin TE

    (2004) UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis

    Journal of Computational Chemistry 25:1605–1612.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Philipp S
    2. Cavalié A
    3. Freichel M
    4. Wissenbach U
    5. Zimmer S
    6. Trost C
    7. Marquart A
    8. Murakami M
    9. Flockerzi V

    (1996)

    A mammalian capacitative calcium entry channel homologous to Drosophila TRP and TRPL

    The EMBO Journal 15:6166–6171.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Plant TD
    2. Schaefer M

    (2003) TRPC4 and TRPC5: receptor-operated Ca2+-permeable nonselective cation channels

    Cell Calcium 33:441–450.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-4160(03)00055-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Roberts E
    2. Eargle J
    3. Wright D
    4. Luthey-Schulten Z

    (2006) MultiSeq: unifying sequence and structure data for evolutionary analysis

    BMC Bioinformatics 7:382.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-382

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Saotome K
    2. Singh AK
    3. Yelshanskaya MV
    4. Sobolevsky AI

    (2016) Crystal structure of the epithelial calcium channel TRPV6

    Nature 534:506–511.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17975

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Schaefer M
    2. Plant TD
    3. Obukhov AG
    4. Hofmann T
    5. Gudermann T
    6. Schultz G

    (2000) Receptor-mediated regulation of the nonselective cation channels TRPC4 and TRPC5

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 275:17517–17526.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.23.17517

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Schaefer M
    2. Plant TD
    3. Stresow N
    4. Albrecht N
    5. Schultz G

    (2002) Functional differences between TRPC4 splice variants

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 277:3752–3759.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109850200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Schindl R
    2. Frischauf I
    3. Kahr H
    4. Fritsch R
    5. Krenn M
    6. Derndl A
    7. Vales E
    8. Muik M
    9. Derler I
    10. Groschner K
    11. Romanin C

    (2008) The first ankyrin-like repeat is the minimum indispensable key structure for functional assembly of homo- and heteromeric TRPC4/TRPC5 channels

    Cell Calcium 43:260–269.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2007.05.015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Schmiege P
    2. Fine M
    3. Blobel G
    4. Li X

    (2017) Human TRPML1 channel structures in open and closed conformations

    Nature 550:366–370.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Sedgwick SG
    2. Smerdon SJ

    (1999) The ankyrin repeat: a diversity of interactions on a common structural framework

    Trends in Biochemical Sciences 24:311–316.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01426-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Shen PS
    2. Yang X
    3. DeCaen PG
    4. Liu X
    5. Bulkley D
    6. Clapham DE
    7. Cao E

    (2016a) The structure of the polycystic kidney disease channel PKD2 in lipid nanodiscs

    Cell 167:763–773.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.048

    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Shen PS
    2. Yang X
    3. DeCaen PG
    4. Liu X
    5. Bulkley D
    6. Clapham DE
    7. Cao E

    (2016b) The structure of the polycystic kidney disease channel PKD2 in lipid nanodiscs

    Cell 167:763–773.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.048

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Sievers F
    2. Wilm A
    3. Dineen D
    4. Gibson TJ
    5. Karplus K
    6. Li W
    7. Lopez R
    8. McWilliam H
    9. Remmert M
    10. Söding J
    11. Thompson JD
    12. Higgins DG

    (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega

    Molecular Systems Biology 7:539.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.75

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Smart OS
    2. Neduvelil JG
    3. Wang X
    4. Wallace BA
    5. Sansom MS

    (1996) HOLE: a program for the analysis of the pore dimensions of ion channel structural models

    Journal of Molecular Graphics 14:354–360.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7855(97)00009-X

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Strübing C
    2. Krapivinsky G
    3. Krapivinsky L
    4. Clapham DE

    (2003) Formation of novel TRPC channels by complex subunit interactions in embryonic brain

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 278:39014–39019.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M306705200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Swartz KJ

    (2008) Sensing voltage across lipid membranes

    Nature 456:891–897.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07620

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Tang J
    2. Lin Y
    3. Zhang Z
    4. Tikunova S
    5. Birnbaumer L
    6. Zhu MX

    (2001) Identification of common binding sites for calmodulin and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors on the carboxyl termini of trp channels

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:21303–21310.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M102316200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Trost C
    2. Bergs C
    3. Himmerkus N
    4. Flockerzi V

    (2001) The transient receptor potential, TRP4, cation channel is a novel member of the family of calmodulin binding proteins

    Biochemical Journal 355:663–670.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3550663

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Venkatachalam K
    2. Montell C

    (2007) TRP channels

    Annual Review of Biochemistry 76:387–417.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142819

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Voets T
    2. Owsianik G
    3. Janssens A
    4. Talavera K
    5. Nilius B

    (2007) TRPM8 voltage sensor mutants reveal a mechanism for integrating thermal and chemical stimuli

    Nature Chemical Biology 3:174–182.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio862

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Wang RY
    2. Kudryashev M
    3. Li X
    4. Egelman EH
    5. Basler M
    6. Cheng Y
    7. Baker D
    8. DiMaio F

    (2015) De novo protein structure determination from near-atomic-resolution cryo-EM maps

    Nature Methods 12:335–338.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3287

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Warnat J
    2. Philipp S
    3. Zimmer S
    4. Flockerzi V
    5. Cavalié A

    (1999) Phenotype of a recombinant store-operated channel: highly selective permeation of Ca2+

    The Journal of Physiology 518 ( Pt 3:631–638.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0631p.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Waterhouse AM
    2. Procter JB
    3. Martin DM
    4. Clamp M
    5. Barton GJ

    (2009) Jalview version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench

    Bioinformatics 25:1189–1191.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Wilkes M
    2. Madej MG
    3. Kreuter L
    4. Rhinow D
    5. Heinz V
    6. De Sanctis S
    7. Ruppel S
    8. Richter RM
    9. Joos F
    10. Grieben M
    11. Pike AC
    12. Huiskonen JT
    13. Carpenter EP
    14. Kühlbrandt W
    15. Witzgall R
    16. Ziegler C

    (2017) Molecular insights into lipid-assisted Ca²⁺ regulation of the TRP channel Polycystin-2

    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 24:123–130.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.3357

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Winkler PA
    2. Huang Y
    3. Sun W
    4. Du J
    5. Lü W

    (2017) Electron cryo-microscopy structure of a human TRPM4 channel

    Nature 552:200–204.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24674

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Wu D
    2. Huang W
    3. Richardson PM
    4. Priestley JV
    5. Liu M

    (2008) TRPC4 in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons is increased after nerve injury and is necessary for neurite outgrowth

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 283:416–426.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M703177200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Wu X
    2. Eder P
    3. Chang B
    4. Molkentin JD

    (2010) TRPC channels are necessary mediators of pathologic cardiac hypertrophy

    PNAS 107:7000–7005.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001825107

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Yang Z
    2. Fang J
    3. Chittuluru J
    4. Asturias FJ
    5. Penczek PA

    (2012) Iterative stable alignment and clustering of 2D transmission electron microscope images

    Structure 20:237–247.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2011.12.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Yin Y
    2. Wu M
    3. Zubcevic L
    4. Borschel WF
    5. Lander GC
    6. Lee SY

    (2018) Structure of the cold- and menthol-sensing ion channel TRPM8

    Science 359:237–241.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan4325

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Yoshida T
    2. Inoue R
    3. Morii T
    4. Takahashi N
    5. Yamamoto S
    6. Hara Y
    7. Tominaga M
    8. Shimizu S
    9. Sato Y
    10. Mori Y

    (2006) Nitric oxide activates TRP channels by cysteine S-nitrosylation

    Nature Chemical Biology 2:596–607.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio821

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Yuan JP
    2. Kiselyov K
    3. Shin DM
    4. Chen J
    5. Shcheynikov N
    6. Kang SH
    7. Dehoff MH
    8. Schwarz MK
    9. Seeburg PH
    10. Muallem S
    11. Worley PF

    (2003) Homer binds TRPC family channels and is required for gating of TRPC1 by IP3 receptors

    Cell 114:777–789.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00716-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Zeng W
    2. Yuan JP
    3. Kim MS
    4. Choi YJ
    5. Huang GN
    6. Worley PF
    7. Muallem S

    (2008) STIM1 gates TRPC channels, but not Orai1, by electrostatic interaction

    Molecular Cell 32:439–448.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.020

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Zhang X
    2. Ren W
    3. DeCaen P
    4. Yan C
    5. Tao X
    6. Tang L
    7. Wang J
    8. Hasegawa K
    9. Kumasaka T
    10. He J
    11. Wang J
    12. Clapham DE
    13. Yan N

    (2012) Crystal structure of an orthologue of the NaChBac voltage-gated sodium channel

    Nature 486:130–134.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11054

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Zheng SQ
    2. Palovcak E
    3. Armache JP
    4. Verba KA
    5. Cheng Y
    6. Agard DA

    (2017) MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy

    Nature Methods 14:331–332.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4193

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Zhou X
    2. Li M
    3. Su D
    4. Jia Q
    5. Li H
    6. Li X
    7. Yang J

    (2017) Cryo-EM structures of the human endolysosomal TRPML3 channel in three distinct states

    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 24:1146–1154.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.3502

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Zhu MX

    (2005) Multiple roles of calmodulin and other Ca(2+)-binding proteins in the functional regulation of TRP channels

    Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology 451:105–115.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-005-1427-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Zubcevic L
    2. Herzik MA
    3. Chung BC
    4. Liu Z
    5. Lander GC
    6. Lee SY

    (2016) Cryo-electron microscopy structure of the TRPV2 ion channel

    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 23:180–186.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.3159

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Deivanayagabarathy Vinayagam

   Department of Structural Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

2. Thomas Mager

   Department of Biophysical Chemistry, Max Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Visualization, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Amir Apelbaum

   Department of Structural Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany

   Contribution

   Methodology, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Arne Bothe

   Department of Structural Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany

   Contribution

   Methodology, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Felipe Merino

   Department of Structural Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Validation, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4166-8747

6. Oliver Hofnagel

   Department of Structural Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany

   Contribution

   Data curation, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Christos Gatsogiannis

   Department of Structural Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing—review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

8. Stefan Raunser

   Department of Structural Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology, Dortmund, Germany

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review and editing

   For correspondence

   stefan.raunser@mpi-dortmund.mpg.de

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9373-3016

• 4,262

  views

• 736

  downloads

• 91

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.