Essential metabolism for a minimal cell

  1. Marian Breuer
  2. Tyler M Earnest
  3. Chuck Merryman
  4. Kim S Wise
  5. Lijie Sun
  6. Michaela R Lynott
  7. Clyde A Hutchison
  8. Hamilton O Smith
  9. John D Lapek
  10. David J Gonzalez
  11. Valérie de Crécy-Lagard
  12. Drago Haas
  13. Andrew D Hanson
  14. Piyush Labhsetwar
  15. John I Glass
  16. Zaida Luthey-Schulten  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States
  2. J Craig Venter Institute, United States
  3. University of California, San Diego, United States
  4. University of Florida, United States

Abstract

JCVI-syn3A, a robust minimal cell with a 543 kbp genome and 493 genes, provides a versatile platform to study the basics of life. Using the vast amount of experimental information available on its precursor, Mycoplasma mycoides capri, we assembled a near-complete metabolic network with 98% of enzymatic reactions supported by annotation or experiment. The model agrees well with genome-scale in vivo transposon mutagenesis experiments, showing a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.59. The genes in the reconstruction have a high in vivo essentiality or quasi-essentiality of 92% (68% essential), compared to 79% in silico essentiality. This coherent model of the minimal metabolism in JCVI-syn3A at the same time also points toward specific open questions regarding the minimal genome of JCVI-syn3A, which still contains many genes of generic or completely unclear function. In particular, the model, its comparison to in vivo essentiality and proteomics data yield specific hypotheses on gene functions and metabolic capabilities; and provide suggestions for several further gene removals. In this way, the model and its accompanying data guide future investigations of the minimal cell. Finally, the identification of 30 essential genes with unclear function will motivate the search for new biological mechanisms beyond metabolism.

Data availability

Proteomics: data were uploaded to MassIVE (massive.ucsd.edu) with dataset identifier MSV000081687 and ProteomeXchange with dataset identifier PXD008159. All other new data are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marian Breuer

    Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Tyler M Earnest

    Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1630-0791
  3. Chuck Merryman

    Synthetic Biology Group, J Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Kim S Wise

    Synthetic Biology Group, J Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Lijie Sun

    Synthetic Biology Group, J Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Michaela R Lynott

    Synthetic Biology Group, J Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Clyde A Hutchison

    Synthetic Biology Group, J Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    Clyde A Hutchison, is a consultant for Synthetic Genomics, Inc. (SGI), and holds SGI stock and/or stock options.
  8. Hamilton O Smith

    Synthetic Biology Group, J Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    Hamilton O Smith, is on the Board of Directors and cochief scientific officer of Synthetic Genomics, Inc. (SGI) and holds SGI stock and/or stock options.
  9. John D Lapek

    Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. David J Gonzalez

    Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Valérie de Crécy-Lagard

    Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Drago Haas

    Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Andrew D Hanson

    Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Piyush Labhsetwar

    Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. John I Glass

    Synthetic Biology Group, J Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Zaida Luthey-Schulten

    Center for the Physics of Living Cells, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
    For correspondence
    zan@illinois.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9749-8367

Funding

National Science Foundation (PHY 1430124 Postdoctoral Fellowship)

  • Marian Breuer

National Institutes of Health (K12 GM06852)

  • John D Lapek

University of California (Office of the President)

  • David J Gonzalez

Ray Thomas Edwards Foundation

  • David J Gonzalez

J Craig Venter Institute

  • Chuck Merryman
  • Kim S Wise
  • Clyde A Hutchison
  • Hamilton O Smith
  • John I Glass

National Science Foundation (PHY 1430124)

  • Marian Breuer
  • Tyler M Earnest
  • Zaida Luthey-Schulten

National Science Foundation (MCB-1611711)

  • Valérie de Crécy-Lagard
  • Andrew D Hanson

National Science Foundation (MCB-1244570)

  • Marian Breuer
  • Tyler M Earnest
  • Zaida Luthey-Schulten

Department of Energy (ORNL 4000134575)

  • Piyush Labhsetwar

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Breuer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 17,404
    views
  • 2,252
    downloads
  • 127
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marian Breuer
  2. Tyler M Earnest
  3. Chuck Merryman
  4. Kim S Wise
  5. Lijie Sun
  6. Michaela R Lynott
  7. Clyde A Hutchison
  8. Hamilton O Smith
  9. John D Lapek
  10. David J Gonzalez
  11. Valérie de Crécy-Lagard
  12. Drago Haas
  13. Andrew D Hanson
  14. Piyush Labhsetwar
  15. John I Glass
  16. Zaida Luthey-Schulten
(2019)
Essential metabolism for a minimal cell
eLife 8:e36842.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36842

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36842

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jian Qiu, Margaritis Voliotis ... Martin J Kelly
    Research Article

    Hypothalamic kisspeptin (Kiss1) neurons are vital for pubertal development and reproduction. Arcuate nucleus Kiss1 (Kiss1ARH) neurons are responsible for the pulsatile release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). In females, the behavior of Kiss1ARH neurons, expressing Kiss1, neurokinin B (NKB), and dynorphin (Dyn), varies throughout the ovarian cycle. Studies indicate that 17β-estradiol (E2) reduces peptide expression but increases Slc17a6 (Vglut2) mRNA and glutamate neurotransmission in these neurons, suggesting a shift from peptidergic to glutamatergic signaling. To investigate this shift, we combined transcriptomics, electrophysiology, and mathematical modeling. Our results demonstrate that E2 treatment upregulates the mRNA expression of voltage-activated calcium channels, elevating the whole-cell calcium current that contributes to high-frequency burst firing. Additionally, E2 treatment decreased the mRNA levels of canonical transient receptor potential (TPRC) 5 and G protein-coupled K+ (GIRK) channels. When Trpc5 channels in Kiss1ARH neurons were deleted using CRISPR/SaCas9, the slow excitatory postsynaptic potential was eliminated. Our data enabled us to formulate a biophysically realistic mathematical model of Kiss1ARH neurons, suggesting that E2 modifies ionic conductances in these neurons, enabling the transition from high-frequency synchronous firing through NKB-driven activation of TRPC5 channels to a short bursting mode facilitating glutamate release. In a low E2 milieu, synchronous firing of Kiss1ARH neurons drives pulsatile release of GnRH, while the transition to burst firing with high, preovulatory levels of E2 would facilitate the GnRH surge through its glutamatergic synaptic connection to preoptic Kiss1 neurons.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    David B Blumenthal, Marta Lucchetta ... Martin H Schaefer
    Research Article

    Degree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study bias affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait proteins in large-scale experiments tend to have many false-positive interaction partners. Studying the degree distributions of thousands of PPI networks of controlled provenance, we address the question if PL distributions in observed PPI networks could be explained by these biases alone. Our findings are supported by mathematical models and extensive simulations and indicate that study bias and technical bias suffice to produce the observed PL distribution. It is, hence, problematic to derive hypotheses about the topology of the true biological interactome from the PL distributions in observed PPI networks. Our study casts doubt on the use of the PL property of biological networks as a modeling assumption or quality criterion in network biology.