A conserved filamentous assembly underlies the structure of the meiotic chromosome axis

  1. Alan M V West
  2. Scott C Rosenberg
  3. Sarah N Ur
  4. Madison K Lehmer
  5. Qiaozhen Ye
  6. Götz Hagemann
  7. Iracema Caballero
  8. Isabel Uson
  9. Amy J MacQueen
  10. Franz Herzog
  11. Kevin D Corbett  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, San Diego, United States
  2. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
  3. Institute of Molecular Biology of Barcelona, Spain
  4. Wesleyan University, United States

Abstract

The meiotic chromosome axis plays key roles in meiotic chromosome organization and recombination, yet the underlying protein components of this structure are highly diverged. Here, we show that 'axis core proteins' from budding yeast (Red1), mammals (SYCP2/SYCP3), and plants (ASY3/ASY4) are evolutionarily related and play equivalent roles in chromosome axis assembly. We first identify 'closure motifs' in each complex that recruit meiotic HORMADs, the master regulators of meiotic recombination. We next find that axis core proteins form homotetrameric (Red1) or heterotetrameric (SYCP2:SYCP3 and ASY3:ASY4) coiled-coil assemblies that further oligomerize into micron-length filaments. Thus, the meiotic chromosome axis core in fungi, mammals, and plants shares a common molecular architecture, and likely also plays conserved roles in meiotic chromosome axis assembly and recombination control.

Data availability

Primary diffraction data for M. musculus SYCP3 tetramer structures have been deposited with the SBGrid Data Bank (https://data.sbgrid.org) under dataset numbers 583 (P21 crystal form) and 584 (P1 form).Reduced diffraction data and refined structural models have been deposited with the Protein Data Bank (www.pdb.org) under accession numbers 6DD8 (P21 crystal form) and 6DD9 (P1 form)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alan M V West

    Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Scott C Rosenberg

    Department of Chemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sarah N Ur

    Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Madison K Lehmer

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Qiaozhen Ye

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Götz Hagemann

    Gene Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Iracema Caballero

    Crystallographic Methods, Institute of Molecular Biology of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Isabel Uson

    Crystallographic Methods, Institute of Molecular Biology of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Amy J MacQueen

    Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Wesleyan University, Middletown, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Franz Herzog

    Gene Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8270-1449
  11. Kevin D Corbett

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    kcorbett@ucsd.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5854-2388

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM104141)

  • Alan M V West
  • Scott C Rosenberg
  • Madison K Lehmer
  • Qiaozhen Ye
  • Kevin D Corbett

Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0008/2015)

  • Franz Herzog
  • Kevin D Corbett

National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship)

  • Sarah N Ur

Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research

  • Kevin D Corbett

National Institutes of Health (R15 GM116109)

  • Amy J MacQueen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, West et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,788
    views
  • 575
    downloads
  • 98
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alan M V West
  2. Scott C Rosenberg
  3. Sarah N Ur
  4. Madison K Lehmer
  5. Qiaozhen Ye
  6. Götz Hagemann
  7. Iracema Caballero
  8. Isabel Uson
  9. Amy J MacQueen
  10. Franz Herzog
  11. Kevin D Corbett
(2019)
A conserved filamentous assembly underlies the structure of the meiotic chromosome axis
eLife 8:e40372.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40372

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40372

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Steven Henikoff, David L Levens
    Insight

    A new method for mapping torsion provides insights into the ways that the genome responds to the torsion generated by RNA polymerase II.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.