Learning: The cerebellum influences vocal timing
We are starting to understand how the cerebellum contributes to vocal learning in songbirds.
- Duke University, United States
Spoken language is a fundamental human skill that relies on vocal learning. Many species are able to produce vocalizations, but only a small number are considered vocal learners. For example, humans learn to speak by imitating the speech of others, and juvenile passerine songbirds learn to sing by mimicking adult birds (Bolhuis et al., 2010).
In both humans and songbirds, the brain circuits essential for vocal learning connect the cortex (a highly evolved brain structure involved in associative learning) and the basal ganglia (a more evolutionarily ancient brain region involved in reinforcement learning; Brainard and Doupe, 2013; Mooney, 2009). In humans, another part of the brain, called the cerebellum or ‘little brain’, may also have an important role in vocal learning. This region is highly active during speech, and children with cerebellar dysfunction often take much longer to learn how to speak (Ziegler and Ackermann, 2017). Moreover, patients with cerebellar disease or damage often suffer from ‘ataxic dysarthria’, a motor speech disorder that affects the timing and clarity of speech (Ackermann, 2008). A better knowledge of how cerebellar circuits interact with the basal ganglia and the cortex is thus critical for understanding how vocal learning is established, and how it is disrupted by injury or disease.
Birds are commonly used to study vocal learning, but the role of the cerebellum in birdsong has so far been unclear. Now, in eLife, Ludivine Pidoux and colleagues at Paris Descartes University report that this structure is also essential for the timing aspects of vocal learning in zebra finches (Pidoux et al., 2018).
Studies in humans and non-human primates have shown that the cerebellum contributes to motor control and motor learning through several pathways. In addition to descending pathways to the spinal cord, the cerebellum connects to the cortex and the basal ganglia via the thalamus, a central structure that relays motor and sensory signals to and from the cortex (Strick et al., 2009; Bostan and Strick, 2018). Since an anatomical connection between the cerebellum and the basal ganglia is also present in songbirds, it was important to test whether the cerebellum could influence the activity of basal ganglia and participate in song learning (Person et al., 2008).
Using a series of elegant anatomical, electrophysiological and pharmacological approaches, Pidoux et al. demonstrate for the first time that this cerebellar pathway has an important role in vocal learning in birds. Stimulating a cluster of neurons in the cerebellum known as the dentate nucleus, activated neurons that participate in song learning within the basal ganglia (Area X) via the thalamus (Figure 1). This activity also propagated via the thalamus to various areas in the cortex, including certain motor areas controlling the vocal chords.
Figure 1
Brain circuits for vocal learning in songbirds and humans.
Songbird circuits that support vocal learning (left), also labeled according to their homologous structures in humans (right). These include the cortex (gray and dark gray), the basal ganglia (Area X/BG; red) and the thalamus (green and light green). Pidoux et al. have revealed a functional connection (bold arrows) from an area in the cerebellum, the dentate nucleus (DN; blue), through the dorsal thalamic zone in the thalamus (DTZ; green) to Area X (red) in the basal ganglia. Abbreviations: DLM medial portion of the dorsolateral nucleus of the anterior thalamus; HVC song-related motor nuclei, used as proper name; LMAN lateral magnocellular nucleus of the anterior nidopallium; RA robust nucleus of the arcopallium.
This pathway appears to be the only route for the dentate nucleus to modulate the basal ganglia. When the activity was blocked in thedorsal thalamic zone connecting the cerebellum and Area X, neurons in the basal ganglia were prevented from responding to stimulation in the cerebellum. In contrast, blocking the pathways connecting the cortex with Area X did not affect the activity of this region. These results suggest that the cerebellum can influence the circuits in the basal ganglia required for vocal learning, implying that it could play a key role in this process.
Indeed, when this cerebellar pathway was disrupted, juvenile birds were less able to copy the songs of adults. This manipulation particularly affected aspects of song timing. However, this was not the case when the same pathway was disrupted in adult birds, suggesting that the cerebellum is specifically relevant for learning key aspects of song timing. This is consistent with the well-known role of the cerebellum in learned motor timing (Ivry and Spencer, 2004; Mauk et al., 2000). Together, these results provide a complete functional circuit pathway from the cerebellum to the basal ganglia to the premotor neurons involved in song production.
By identifying the specific role of the cerebellum and its circuits in regulating how the timing of a song is learned, Pidoux et al. have shed new light on the neural basis of vocal learning. However, we are only starting to understand how the cerebellum contributes to vocal learning. Next, we need to discover exactly how this brain region shapes the timing of the learned songs. Meanwhile, the ‘little brain’ must be recognized as a key player in the network of circuits that enable vocal learning.
References
-
Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speechNature Reviews Neuroscience 11:747–759.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2931
-
The basal ganglia and the cerebellum: nodes in an integrated networkNature Reviews Neuroscience 19:338–350.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0002-7
-
Translating birdsong: songbirds as a model for basic and applied medical researchAnnual Review of Neuroscience 36:489–517.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-152826
-
The neural representation of timeCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology 14:225–232.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.013
-
Cerebellar function: coordination, learning or timing?Current Biology 10:R522–R525.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00584-4
-
Neurobiology of song learningCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology 19:654–660.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2009.10.004
-
Organization of the songbird basal ganglia, including Area XJournal of Comparative Neurology 508:840–866.https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21699
-
Cerebellum and nonmotor functionAnnual Review of Neuroscience 32:413–434.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125606
-
Subcortical contributions to motor speech: phylogenetic, developmental, clinicalTrends in Neurosciences 40:458–468.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.06.005
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2018, Hull
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,802
- views
-
- 173
- downloads
-
- 2
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Learning: The cerebellum influences vocal timing
eLife 7:e40447.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.40447
Further reading
-
- Genetics and Genomics
- Neuroscience
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by mutations in the Survival Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. While traditionally viewed as a motor neuron disorder, there is involvement of various peripheral organs in SMA. Notably, fatty liver has been observed in SMA mouse models and SMA patients. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether intrinsic depletion of SMN protein in the liver contributes to pathology in the peripheral or central nervous systems. To address this, we developed a mouse model with a liver-specific depletion of SMN by utilizing an Alb-Cre transgene together with one Smn2B allele and one Smn1 exon 7 allele flanked by loxP sites. Initially, we evaluated phenotypic changes in these mice at postnatal day 19 (P19), when the severe model of SMA, the Smn2B/- mice, exhibit many symptoms of the disease. The liver-specific SMN depletion does not induce motor neuron death, neuromuscular pathology or muscle atrophy, characteristics typically observed in the Smn2B/- mouse at P19. However, mild liver steatosis was observed, although no changes in liver function were detected. Notably, pancreatic alterations resembled that of Smn2B/-mice, with a decrease in insulin-producing β-cells and an increase in glucagon-producingα-cells, accompanied by a reduction in blood glucose and an increase in plasma glucagon and glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1). These changes were transient, as mice at P60 exhibited recovery of liver and pancreatic function. While the mosaic pattern of the Cre-mediated excision precludes definitive conclusions regarding the contribution of liver-specific SMN depletion to overall tissue pathology, our findings highlight an intricate connection between liver function and pancreatic abnormalities in SMA.
-
- Neuroscience
Childhood adversity is a strong predictor of developing psychopathological conditions. Multiple theories on the mechanisms underlying this association have been suggested which, however, differ in the operationalization of ‘exposure.’ Altered (threat) learning mechanisms represent central mechanisms by which environmental inputs shape emotional and cognitive processes and ultimately behavior. 1402 healthy participants underwent a fear conditioning paradigm (acquisition training, generalization), while acquiring skin conductance responses (SCRs) and ratings (arousal, valence, and contingency). Childhood adversity was operationalized as (1) dichotomization, and following (2) the specificity model, (3) the cumulative risk model, and (4) the dimensional model. Individuals exposed to childhood adversity showed blunted physiological reactivity in SCRs, but not ratings, and reduced CS+/CS- discrimination during both phases, mainly driven by attenuated CS+ responding. The latter was evident across different operationalizations of ‘exposure’ following the different theories. None of the theories tested showed clear explanatory superiority. Notably, a remarkably different pattern of increased responding to the CS- is reported in the literature for anxiety patients, suggesting that individuals exposed to childhood adversity may represent a specific sub-sample. We highlight that theories linking childhood adversity to (vulnerability to) psychopathology need refinement.
