Learning: The cerebellum influences vocal timing
Spoken language is a fundamental human skill that relies on vocal learning. Many species are able to produce vocalizations, but only a small number are considered vocal learners. For example, humans learn to speak by imitating the speech of others, and juvenile passerine songbirds learn to sing by mimicking adult birds (Bolhuis et al., 2010).
In both humans and songbirds, the brain circuits essential for vocal learning connect the cortex (a highly evolved brain structure involved in associative learning) and the basal ganglia (a more evolutionarily ancient brain region involved in reinforcement learning; Brainard and Doupe, 2013; Mooney, 2009). In humans, another part of the brain, called the cerebellum or ‘little brain’, may also have an important role in vocal learning. This region is highly active during speech, and children with cerebellar dysfunction often take much longer to learn how to speak (Ziegler and Ackermann, 2017). Moreover, patients with cerebellar disease or damage often suffer from ‘ataxic dysarthria’, a motor speech disorder that affects the timing and clarity of speech (Ackermann, 2008). A better knowledge of how cerebellar circuits interact with the basal ganglia and the cortex is thus critical for understanding how vocal learning is established, and how it is disrupted by injury or disease.
Birds are commonly used to study vocal learning, but the role of the cerebellum in birdsong has so far been unclear. Now, in eLife, Ludivine Pidoux and colleagues at Paris Descartes University report that this structure is also essential for the timing aspects of vocal learning in zebra finches (Pidoux et al., 2018).
Studies in humans and non-human primates have shown that the cerebellum contributes to motor control and motor learning through several pathways. In addition to descending pathways to the spinal cord, the cerebellum connects to the cortex and the basal ganglia via the thalamus, a central structure that relays motor and sensory signals to and from the cortex (Strick et al., 2009; Bostan and Strick, 2018). Since an anatomical connection between the cerebellum and the basal ganglia is also present in songbirds, it was important to test whether the cerebellum could influence the activity of basal ganglia and participate in song learning (Person et al., 2008).
Using a series of elegant anatomical, electrophysiological and pharmacological approaches, Pidoux et al. demonstrate for the first time that this cerebellar pathway has an important role in vocal learning in birds. Stimulating a cluster of neurons in the cerebellum known as the dentate nucleus, activated neurons that participate in song learning within the basal ganglia (Area X) via the thalamus (Figure 1). This activity also propagated via the thalamus to various areas in the cortex, including certain motor areas controlling the vocal chords.
This pathway appears to be the only route for the dentate nucleus to modulate the basal ganglia. When the activity was blocked in thedorsal thalamic zone connecting the cerebellum and Area X, neurons in the basal ganglia were prevented from responding to stimulation in the cerebellum. In contrast, blocking the pathways connecting the cortex with Area X did not affect the activity of this region. These results suggest that the cerebellum can influence the circuits in the basal ganglia required for vocal learning, implying that it could play a key role in this process.
Indeed, when this cerebellar pathway was disrupted, juvenile birds were less able to copy the songs of adults. This manipulation particularly affected aspects of song timing. However, this was not the case when the same pathway was disrupted in adult birds, suggesting that the cerebellum is specifically relevant for learning key aspects of song timing. This is consistent with the well-known role of the cerebellum in learned motor timing (Ivry and Spencer, 2004; Mauk et al., 2000). Together, these results provide a complete functional circuit pathway from the cerebellum to the basal ganglia to the premotor neurons involved in song production.
By identifying the specific role of the cerebellum and its circuits in regulating how the timing of a song is learned, Pidoux et al. have shed new light on the neural basis of vocal learning. However, we are only starting to understand how the cerebellum contributes to vocal learning. Next, we need to discover exactly how this brain region shapes the timing of the learned songs. Meanwhile, the ‘little brain’ must be recognized as a key player in the network of circuits that enable vocal learning.
Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speechNature Reviews Neuroscience 11:747–759.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2931
The basal ganglia and the cerebellum: nodes in an integrated networkNature Reviews Neuroscience 19:338–350.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0002-7
Translating birdsong: songbirds as a model for basic and applied medical researchAnnual Review of Neuroscience 36:489–517.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-152826
The neural representation of timeCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology 14:225–232.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.013
Cerebellar function: coordination, learning or timing?Current Biology 10:R522–R525.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00584-4
Neurobiology of song learningCurrent Opinion in Neurobiology 19:654–660.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2009.10.004
Organization of the songbird basal ganglia, including Area XJournal of Comparative Neurology 508:840–866.https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21699
Cerebellum and nonmotor functionAnnual Review of Neuroscience 32:413–434.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125606
Subcortical contributions to motor speech: phylogenetic, developmental, clinicalTrends in Neurosciences 40:458–468.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.06.005
Article and author information
- Version of Record published: August 28, 2018 (version 1)
© 2018, Hull
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
- Page views
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Midbrain and striatal dopamine signals have been extremely well characterized over the past several decades, yet novel dopamine signals and functions in reward learning and motivation continue to emerge. A similar characterization of real-time sub-second dopamine signals in areas outside of the striatum has been limited. Recent advances in fluorescent sensor technology and fiber photometry permit the measurement of dopamine binding correlates, which can divulge basic functions of dopamine signaling in non-striatal dopamine terminal regions, like the dorsal bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (dBNST). Here, we record GRABDA signals in the dBNST during a Pavlovian lever autoshaping task. We observe greater Pavlovian cue-evoked dBNST GRABDA signals in sign-tracking (ST) compared to goal-tracking/intermediate (GT/INT) rats and the magnitude of cue-evoked dBNST GRABDA signals decreases immediately following reinforcer-specific satiety. When we deliver unexpected rewards or omit expected rewards, we find that dBNST dopamine signals encode bidirectional reward prediction errors in GT/INT rats, but only positive prediction errors in ST rats. Since sign- and goal-tracking approach strategies are associated with distinct drug relapse vulnerabilities, we examined the effects of experimenter-administered fentanyl on dBNST dopamine associative encoding. Systemic fentanyl injections do not disrupt cue discrimination but generally potentiate dBNST dopamine signals. These results reveal multiple dBNST dopamine correlates of learning and motivation that depend on the Pavlovian approach strategy employed.
The cell bodies of postganglionic sympathetic neurons innervating the heart primarily reside in the stellate ganglion (SG), alongside neurons innervating other organs and tissues. Whether cardiac-innervating stellate ganglionic neurons (SGNs) exhibit diversity and distinction from those innervating other tissues is not known. To identify and resolve the transcriptomic profiles of SGNs innervating the heart, we leveraged retrograde tracing techniques using adeno-associated virus (AAV) expressing fluorescent proteins (GFP or Td-tomato) with single cell RNA sequencing. We investigated electrophysiologic, morphologic, and physiologic roles for subsets of cardiac-specific neurons and found that three of five adrenergic SGN subtypes innervate the heart. These three subtypes stratify into two subpopulations; high (NA1a) and low (NA1b and NA1c) neuropeptide-Y (NPY) -expressing cells, exhibit distinct morphological, neurochemical, and electrophysiologic characteristics. In physiologic studies in transgenic mouse models modulating NPY signaling, we identified differential control of cardiac responses by these two subpopulations to high and low stress states. These findings provide novel insights into the unique properties of neurons responsible for cardiac sympathetic regulation, with implications for novel strategies to target specific neuronal subtypes for sympathetic blockade in cardiac disease.