Carbon fixation: Closing the circle
In Chlamydomonas the different stages of the Calvin-Benson cycle take place in separate locations within the chloroplast.
- Georgia Southern University, United States
- Louisiana State University, United States
When the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is viewed under a microscope, the most prominent object in the cell is a structure called the pyrenoid. Located within the chloroplast, the organelle where photosynthesis takes place, the pyrenoid was once thought to be a storage body composed of protein and starch. It subsequently became clear that, instead, the structure hosted most of the cell’s Rubisco, an enzyme that is responsible for the first step in photosynthesis (Rawat et al., 1996), and that the pyrenoid was in fact the main location for the fixation of CO2 in the cell.
Rubisco needs a high concentration of CO2 to work efficiently because it evolved when the Earth’s atmosphere contained almost 100 times as much CO2 as it does now: if the CO2 concentration gets low, a competing reaction with oxygen takes place, which significantly inhibits photosynthesis. Most unicellular algae have adapted to these lower levels of CO2 by developing a carbon concentration mechanism, a process that requires the Rubisco in Chlamydomonas to be packaged in the pyrenoid. Green algae are in the same lineage as terrestrial plants and both groups have Rubisco enzymes with similar properties. However, land plants rarely have pyrenoids because CO2 diffuses 10,000 times more rapidly in air than in water. Once an aquatic organism has fixed CO2, it takes a long time for the next molecule to arrive, hence the need for a carbon concentration mechanism that kicks in when the levels of CO2 get too low.
The carbon concentration mechanism in Chlamydomonas takes bicarbonate (HCO3-) from outside the cells and converts it into CO2 that can be used by Rubisco inside the pyrenoid. There, Rubisco catalyzes the addition of CO2 onto a molecule known as RuBP to create two molecules of a compound called 3PGA; this is the first step in the Calvin-Benson cycle, a chain of reactions which results in the creation of organic molecules that the cell needs. However, while it is established that Calvin-Benson cycle enzymes are inside the chloroplast, their exact location has been unclear in Chlamydomonas. Now, in eLife, Tabea Mettler-Altmann and colleagues – including Anika Küken as first author – report results that help to shed light on this mystery (Küken et al., 2018).
Küken et al. used multiple experimental approaches to identify where the other enzymes involved in the Calvin-Benson cycle were located. Cell cultures grown in low and high concentrations of CO2, and hence with or without an active carbon concentration mechanism, were analyzed for Calvin-Benson cycle enzyme activities in isolated pyrenoids (following a method developed by Mackinder et al., 2016) and in whole cells. Amongst the Calvin-Benson enzymes, only Rubisco was largely detectable in the pyrenoid, with very small amounts in the stroma, the fluid that fills the inner cavity of the chloroplast. Since the activities of the other enzymes of the Calvin-Benson cycle were not in the pyrenoid, this indicated that they were in the stroma. The localization of each of these enzymes was further confirmed by fusing the proteins with a fluorescent ‘Venus’ reporter, and then using confocal microscopy to image the system. This imaging indicated that all of the Calvin-Benson cycle enzymes were in the stroma except Rubisco. The results suggested that a large number of RuBP molecules moved from the pyrenoid to the stroma, and that there was also a large flux of 3PGA from the stroma to the pyrenoid (Figure 1).
Figure 1
The enzymes of the Calvin-Benson cycle are in two locations.
In Chlamydomonas, the Calvin-Benson cycle, which fixes CO2 and creates molecules that will become sugars, takes place in the cavity of the chloroplast or stroma (insert; pale yellow), and in the pyrenoid (purple), a sub-structure surrounded by a starch sheath (brown). The cycle involves the conversion of RuBP into 3PGA, which is then transformed into Triose-P, a compound that is then converted back into RuBP. The creation of 3PGA from RuBP, which takes place in the pyrenoid, is catalyzed by Rubisco and requires a supply of CO2. RuBP diffuses passively from the stroma into the pyrenoid, while 3PGA flows from the pyrenoid into the stroma, where the rest of the Calvin-Benson reactions take place. Enzyme-catalyzed reactions are shown with grey arrows, while movement of molecules, such as the diffusion of RuBP and 3PGA, is indicated with red arrows. A carbon concentration mechanism (top of figure) relies on transport proteins on the cell and chloroplast membranes that pump bicarbonate (HCO3-), a precursor for CO2, into the thylakoid tubules (Wang et al., 2015). There, enzymes called carbonic anhydrases convert the bicarbonate into CO2 (Aspatwar et al., 2018) before it makes its way into the pyrenoid. Image credit: Erin I Walsh (CC-BY 4.0)
Küken et al. – who are based at the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, the University of Potsdam, the Carnegie Institution for Science, the University of Bayreuth and Heinrich Heine University – also quantified how much RuBP was bound to Rubisco and how much was free. They found that most of the bound RuBP was in the pyrenoid, with less free RuBP measured in the stroma. The concentration gradient of RuBP between the two compartments supports the idea that this metabolite moves by diffusion. Cells with an active carbon concentration mechanism, which have a higher percentage of Rubisco in the pyrenoid, also show higher fluxes of RuBP into the structure, and higher fluxes of 3PGA out of it.
The work of Küken et al. reinforces the description of the pyrenoid as a dynamic liquid matrix (Freeman Rosenzweig et al., 2017), surrounded by a starch sheath that does not seem to hinder the diffusion of RuBP and 3PGA between the pyrenoid and the stroma. Moreover, the stroma contains structures called thylakoid tubules, which also take part in photosynthesis. These tubules penetrate through the starch sheath (Figure 1; Engel et al., 2015), possibly increasing the surface area for the diffusion of the metabolites. The model proposed by Küken et al., with the Calvin-Benson cycle taking place in both the stroma and the pyrenoid, and Rubisco acting in the pyrenoid, supports this idea.
The pyrenoid is found in almost all aquatic photosynthetic organisms, although its morphology is different in diatoms, dinoflagellates and green algae (Bedoshvili et al., 2009; Heureux et al., 2017; Jeong et al., 2014). It will be interesting to see if Rubisco is always localized away from the rest of the Calvin-Benson cycle or whether there will be variations between these algal types.
References
-
Chloroplast structure of diatoms of different classesCell and Tissue Biology 3:297–310.https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990519X09030122
-
Native architecture of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast revealed by in situ cryo-electron tomographyeLife 13:04889.
-
The role of Rubisco kinetics and pyrenoid morphology in shaping the CCM of haptophyte microalgaeJournal of Experimental Botany 68:3959–3969.https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx179
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2018, Machingura et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,918
- views
-
- 192
- downloads
-
- 3
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Carbon fixation: Closing the circle
eLife 7:e42507.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42507
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
The biosynthesis of cyclic 3′,5′-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) by mammalian membrane-bound adenylyl cyclases (mACs) is predominantly regulated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Up to now the two hexahelical transmembrane domains of mACs were considered to fix the enzyme to membranes. Here, we show that the transmembrane domains serve in addition as signal receptors and transmitters of lipid signals that control Gsα-stimulated mAC activities. We identify aliphatic fatty acids and anandamide as receptor ligands of mAC isoforms 1–7 and 9. The ligands enhance (mAC isoforms 2, 3, 7, and 9) or attenuate (isoforms 1, 4, 5, and 6) Gsα-stimulated mAC activities in vitro and in vivo. Substitution of the stimulatory membrane receptor of mAC3 by the inhibitory receptor of mAC5 results in a ligand inhibited mAC5–mAC3 chimera. Thus, we discovered a new class of membrane receptors in which two signaling modalities are at a crossing, direct tonic lipid and indirect phasic GPCR–Gsα signaling regulating the biosynthesis of cAMP.
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.
