Antigen receptor control of methionine metabolism in T cells

  1. Linda V Sinclair  Is a corresponding author
  2. Andrew JM Howden
  3. Alejandro Brenes
  4. Laura Spinelli
  5. Jens L Hukelmann
  6. Andrew N Macintyre
  7. Xiaojing Liu
  8. Sarah Thomson
  9. Peter M Taylor
  10. Jeffrey C Rathmell
  11. Jason W Locasale
  12. Angus I Lamond
  13. Doreen A Cantrell  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Dundee, United Kingdom
  2. Vanderbilt University, United States
  3. Duke University, United States
  4. Vanderbilt Universit, United States

Abstract

Immune activated T lymphocytes modulate the activity of key metabolic pathways to support the transcriptional reprograming and reshaping of cell proteomes that permits effector T cell differentiation. The present study uses high resolution mass spectrometry and metabolic labelling to explore how murine T cells control the methionine cycle to produce methyl donors for protein and nucleotide methylations. We show that antigen receptor engagement controls flux through the methionine cycle and RNA and histone methylations. We establish that the main rate limiting step for protein synthesis and the methionine cycle is control of methionine transporter expression. Only T cells that respond to antigen to upregulate and sustain methionine transport are supplied with methyl donors that permit the dynamic nucleotide methylations and epigenetic reprogramming that drives T cell differentiation. These data highlight how the regulation of methionine transport licenses use of methionine for multiple fundamental processes that drive T lymphocyte proliferation and differentiation.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files, or being submitted to the PRIDE ProteomeXchange consortium.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Linda V Sinclair

    Cell Signalling and Immunology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    l.v.sinclair@dundee.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1248-7189
  2. Andrew JM Howden

    Cell Signalling and Immunology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alejandro Brenes

    Centre for Gene Regulation and Expression, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8298-2463
  4. Laura Spinelli

    Cell Signalling and Immunology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jens L Hukelmann

    Centre for Gene Regulation and Expression, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Andrew N Macintyre

    Center for Immunobiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Xiaojing Liu

    Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sarah Thomson

    Cell Signalling and Immunology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Peter M Taylor

    Cell Signalling and Immunology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jeffrey C Rathmell

    Center for Immunobiology, Vanderbilt Universit, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Jason W Locasale

    Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7766-3502
  12. Angus I Lamond

    Centre for Gene Regulation and Expression, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6204-6045
  13. Doreen A Cantrell

    Cell Signalling and Immunology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    d.a.cantrell@dundee.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7525-3350

Funding

Wellcome (097418/Z/11/Z)

  • Doreen A Cantrell

Wellcome (202950/Z/16/Z)

  • Doreen A Cantrell

Wellcome (205023/Z/16/Z)

  • Doreen A Cantrell

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust (Principal Research Fellowship to D.A.C. 097418/Z/11/Z and 205023/Z/16/Z ; Wellcome Trust Equipment Award 202950/Z/16/Z ).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Ronald N Germain, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were performed under Project License PPL 60/4488 and P4BD0CE74.The University of Dundee Welfare and Ethical Use of Animals Committee accepted the project licence for submission to the HO. All studies, breeding and maintenance performed in Dundee in compliance with UK Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 guidelines. Individual study plans were approved and deemed compliant by the UVS/Named Compliance Officer.

Version history

  1. Received: December 6, 2018
  2. Accepted: March 26, 2019
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 27, 2019 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 2, 2019 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2019, Sinclair et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,717
    views
  • 1,055
    downloads
  • 133
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Linda V Sinclair
  2. Andrew JM Howden
  3. Alejandro Brenes
  4. Laura Spinelli
  5. Jens L Hukelmann
  6. Andrew N Macintyre
  7. Xiaojing Liu
  8. Sarah Thomson
  9. Peter M Taylor
  10. Jeffrey C Rathmell
  11. Jason W Locasale
  12. Angus I Lamond
  13. Doreen A Cantrell
(2019)
Antigen receptor control of methionine metabolism in T cells
eLife 8:e44210.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44210

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44210

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Rajan M Thomas, Matthew C Pahl ... Andrew D Wells
    Research Article

    Ikaros is a transcriptional factor required for conventional T cell development, differentiation, and anergy. While the related factors Helios and Eos have defined roles in regulatory T cells (Treg), a role for Ikaros has not been established. To determine the function of Ikaros in the Treg lineage, we generated mice with Treg-specific deletion of the Ikaros gene (Ikzf1). We find that Ikaros cooperates with Foxp3 to establish a major portion of the Treg epigenome and transcriptome. Ikaros-deficient Treg exhibit Th1-like gene expression with abnormal production of IL-2, IFNg, TNFa, and factors involved in Wnt and Notch signaling. While Ikzf1-Treg-cko mice do not develop spontaneous autoimmunity, Ikaros-deficient Treg are unable to control conventional T cell-mediated immune pathology in response to TCR and inflammatory stimuli in models of IBD and organ transplantation. These studies establish Ikaros as a core factor required in Treg for tolerance and the control of inflammatory immune responses.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Mark S Lee, Peter J Tuohy ... Michael S Kuhns
    Research Advance

    CD4+ T cell activation is driven by five-module receptor complexes. The T cell receptor (TCR) is the receptor module that binds composite surfaces of peptide antigens embedded within MHCII molecules (pMHCII). It associates with three signaling modules (CD3γε, CD3δε, and CD3ζζ) to form TCR-CD3 complexes. CD4 is the coreceptor module. It reciprocally associates with TCR-CD3-pMHCII assemblies on the outside of a CD4+ T cells and with the Src kinase, LCK, on the inside. Previously, we reported that the CD4 transmembrane GGXXG and cytoplasmic juxtamembrane (C/F)CV+C motifs found in eutherian (placental mammal) CD4 have constituent residues that evolved under purifying selection (Lee et al., 2022). Expressing mutants of these motifs together in T cell hybridomas increased CD4-LCK association but reduced CD3ζ, ZAP70, and PLCγ1 phosphorylation levels, as well as IL-2 production, in response to agonist pMHCII. Because these mutants preferentially localized CD4-LCK pairs to non-raft membrane fractions, one explanation for our results was that they impaired proximal signaling by sequestering LCK away from TCR-CD3. An alternative hypothesis is that the mutations directly impacted signaling because the motifs normally play an LCK-independent role in signaling. The goal of this study was to discriminate between these possibilities. Using T cell hybridomas, our results indicate that: intracellular CD4-LCK interactions are not necessary for pMHCII-specific signal initiation; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs are key determinants of CD4-mediated pMHCII-specific signal amplification; the GGXXG and (C/F)CV+C motifs exert their functions independently of direct CD4-LCK association. These data provide a mechanistic explanation for why residues within these motifs are under purifying selection in jawed vertebrates. The results are also important to consider for biomimetic engineering of synthetic receptors.