7 figures, 2 tables and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Accumulation of HMGCR protein in livers of Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice with mixed C57BL/6 × 129 genetic background.

(A) Amino acid sequence and predicted topology of mouse UBIAD1 protein. Asparagine-100 (N100), which corresponds to the most frequently mutated amino acid residue in SCD, is enlarged, shaded in red and indicated by an arrow. (B) Male WT, Ubiad1WT/Ki, and Ubiad1Ki/Ki littermates (8–9 weeks of age, eight mice/group) were fed an ad libitum chow diet prior to sacrifice. Livers of the mice were harvested and subjected to subcellular fractionation as described in ‘Materials and methods.’ Aliquots of resulting membrane (Memb.) and nuclear extract (N.E.) fractions (80–160 µg of total protein/lane) for each group were pooled and subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblot analysis using antibodies against endogenous HMGCR, SREBP-1, SREBP-2, UBIAD1, Insig-1, Insig-2, calnexin, and LSD-1. Although shown in a separate panel, LSD-1 serves as a loading control for the nuclear SREBP immunoblots. The amount of hepatic HMGCR protein in Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice was determined by quantifying the band corresponding to HMGCR using ImageJ software.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.002
Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Relative amounts of hepatic mRNAs encoding components of the Scap-SREBP pathway and lipid analysis in WT and Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice.

(A) Total RNA isolated from livers of mice used in Figure 1B (8 mice/group) was separately isolated. Equal amounts of RNA from the individual mice were subjected to quantitative real-time RT-PCR using primers against the indicated gene; cyclophilin mRNA was used as an invariant control. Each value represents the amount of mRNA relative to that in WT mice, which is arbitrarily defined as 1. Bars, mean ± S.E. (error bars) of data from eight mice. (B) The amount of cholesterol, triglycerides, and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) in livers and plasma from WT or Ubiad1 knockin mice used in Figure 1B was determined by a colorimetric assay as described in ‘Materials and methods.’ Error bars, S.E. The p value was calculated using Student’s t test: *, p ≤ 0.05. Hmgcs, HMG coenzyme A synthase; Fpps, farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase; Sqs, squalene synthase; Acs, acetyl coenzyme A synthetase; Acc1, acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase-1; Fas, fatty acid synthase; Scd-1, stearoyl coenzyme A desaturase-1; Gpat, glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase; Abcg5 and Abcg8, ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 5 and 8, respectively; Ggpps, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.003
Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Accumulation of HMGCR protein in tissues of WT and Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice with C57BL/6 genetic background.

(A and B) Eight to nine-week old male WT, Ubiad1WT/Ki, and Ubiad1Ki/Ki littermates (six mice/group) were fed an ad libitum chow diet prior to study. Aliquots of membrane (Memb.) and nuclear extract (N.E.) fractions from homogenized livers, enucleated eyes, kidneys, brains, testes, and spleens (23–50 µg of total protein/lane) were analyzed by immunoblot using antibodies against the indicated proteins. The asterisk indicates a non-specific cross-reactive band observed in the anti-HMGCR immunoblot from brain and pancreas. Although shown in separate panels, LSD-1 serves as a loading control for the nuclear SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 immunoblots. In (B), the amount of HMGCR protein in the indicated tissues from Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice was determined by quantifying the band corresponding to HMGCR using Image J software. (C) For mRNA analysis, equal amounts of RNA from the indicated tissue of individual mice were subjected to quantitative real-time RT-PCR using primers against the Hmgcr mRNA and cyclophilin mRNA as an invariant control. Error bars, S.E.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.004
Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Accumulation of HMGCR protein in eyes and livers of WT and Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice.

Female WT, Ubiad1WT/Ki, and Ubiad1Ki/Ki littermates of animals used in Figure 2 (six mice/group, 8–9 weeks of age) were fed an ad libitum chow diet prior to study. Aliquots of membrane (Memb.) and nuclear extract (N.E.) fractions from homogenized livers (A) and enucleated eyes (B) (50–80 µg of total protein/lane) were analyzed by immunoblot using antibodies against the indicated proteins. Although shown in separate panels, LSD-1 serves as a loading control for the nuclear SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 immunoblots in (A).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.005
Figure 3 with 1 supplement
Analysis of nonsterol isoprenoids in WT and Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice.

Male mice (10–12 weeks of age, five mice/group) were fed ad libitum a chow diet prior to study. Livers were collected for subcellular fractionation and immunoblot analysis of resulting membrane fractions (80 µg total protein/lane) using antibodies against the indicated proteins or to determine the amount of menaquinone-4 (MK-4), geranylgeraniol, ubiquinone-10, phylloquinone, and menaquinone-7 (MK-7) by LC-MS/MS as described in ‘Materials and methods.’ The relative amount of hepatic MK-4 in Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice was determined by normalizing the amount of the vitamin K2 subtype to the amount of UBIAD1 protein, which was quantified using ImageJ software. Error bars, S.E. The p value was calculated using Student’s t test: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.007
Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Analysis of nonsterol isoprenoids in various tissues of WT and Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice.

The indicated tissues from mice used in Figure 3 were collected and the amount of menaquinone-4 (MK-4), geranylgeraniol, and ubiquinone-10 by LC-MS/MS as described in ‘Material and methods.’ Error bars, S.E. The p value was calculated using Student’s t test: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.008
Sterol-mediated regulation of HMGCR in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from WT and Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice.

MEFs from WT and Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice were set up for experiments on day 0 at 2 × 105 cells per 10 cm dish in MEF medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). (A) On day 3, cells were harvested for subcellular fractionation. Aliquots of resulting membrane and nuclear extract fractions (35–50 µg total protein/lane) were subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblot analysis using antibodies against the indicated proteins. (B) On day 3, cells were harvested for measurement of Hmgcr mRNA levels by quantitative RT-PCR and total cholesterol levels using a colorimetric assay as described in ‘Materials and methods.’ (C and D) On day 2, cells were depleted of isoprenoids through incubation for 16 hr at 37°C in MEF medium containing 10% lipoprotein-deficient serum, 10 µM sodium compactin, and 50 µM sodium mevalonate. The cells were subsequently treated with 1 µg/ml 25-HC as indicated; in (D), the cells also received 10 µM MG-132. (C) After 4 hr at 37°C, cells were harvested for preparation of membrane and nuclear extract fractions (35–50 µg total protein/lane) that were analyzed by immunoblot with antibodies against the indicated protein. (D) Following incubation for 1 hr at 37°C, cells were harvested, lysed in detergent-containing buffer, and immunoprecipitated with 30 µg polyclonal anti-HMGCR antibodies. Immunoprecipitated material was subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis with IgG-A9 (against HMGCR) and IgG-P4D1 (against ubiquitin).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.009
Figure 5 with 1 supplement
Regulation of HMGCR in livers of cholesterol-fed WT, Ubiad1Ki/Ki, and HmgcrKi/Ki mice.

Male mice (12–13 weeks of age, five mice/group) were fed an ad libitum chow diet supplemented with the indicated amount of cholesterol for 5 days. Aliquots of membrane (Memb.) and nuclear extract (N.E.) fractions from homogenized livers (A and C) or enucleated eyes (B) (70 µg protein/lane) were analyzed by immunoblot analysis with antibodies against the indicated proteins as described in the legend to Figure 1. The asterisk denotes a nonspecific band observed in the nuclear SREBP-2 immunoblot. (D) For mRNA analysis, equal amounts of RNA from livers of mice were subjected to quantitative real-time RT-PCR using primers against the indicated mRNAs and cyclophilin mRNA as an invariant control. Error bars, S.E. Pcsk9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.010
Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Effect of dietary cholesterol on expression of mRNAs encoding components of the Scap-SREBP pathway in livers of WT and Ubiad1 knock-in mice.

Total RNA from livers of mice used in Figure 5A (5 mice/group) was separately isolated. Equal amounts of RNA from the individual mice were subjected to quantitative real-time RT-PCR using primers against the indicated gene; cyclophilin mRNA was used as an invariant control. Each value represents the amount of mRNA relative to that in WT mice fed a chow diet, which was arbitrarily defined as 1. Bars, mean ± S.E. (error bars) of data from five mice. ApoE, apolipoprotein E; Acat-1, acyl-coenyzme A:cholesterol acyltransferase-1.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.011
Figure 6 with 1 supplement
Statin-mediated regulation of HMGCR and UBIAD1 in WT and Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice.

Male mice (6–8 weeks of age, five mice/group) were fed an ad libitum chow diet supplemented with the indicated amount (A and C) or 0.2% (D) lovastatin for 5 days. (A and C) Aliquots of membrane and nuclear extract fractions from homogenized livers (A) or enucleated eyes (C) (70 µg protein/lane) were analyzed by immunoblot analysis with antibodies against the indicated proteins. In (B), the amount of HMGCR protein in livers of Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice shown in (A) was determined by quantifying the band corresponding to HMGCR using Image J software and normalizing to the amount of the protein in untreated WT controls. (D) Post nuclear supernatants (PNS) obtained from liver homogenates were fractionated on a discontinuous sucrose gradient (7.5–45%) that yielded a light membrane fraction enriched in Golgi and a heavy membrane fraction enriched in ER. Aliquots of the homogenates (lysate), nuclear extracts (N.E.), PNS, Golgi-enriched membranes, and ER-enriched membranes were subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblot analysis with antibodies against the indicated proteins.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.012
Figure 6—figure supplement 1
Effect of lovastatin on expression of mRNAs encoding components of the Scap-SREBP pathway in livers of WT and Ubiad1 knock-in mice.

Total RNA from livers of mice used in Figure 6A (5 mice/group) was separately isolated. Equal amounts of RNA from the individual mice were subjected to quantitative real-time RT-PCR using primers against the indicated gene; cyclophilin mRNA was used as an invariant control. Each value represents the amount of mRNA relative to that in WT mice fed a chow diet, which was arbitrarily defined as 1. Bars, mean ± S.E. (error bars) of data from five mice.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.013
Figure 7 with 1 supplement
Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice exhibit signs of corneal opacification upon aging.

(A) Male and female mice (15 WT, 24 Ubiad1Ki/Ki, 50 weeks of age) consuming an ad libitum chow diet were analyzed by stereomicroscopic examination. Corneal opacification is indicated by white arrows. (B–E) Mice analyzed in (A) were sacrificed, corneas were then harvested and analyzed by immunohistochemical staining with anti-HMGCR polyclonal antibodies (B), quantitative RT-PCR (C), and LC-MS/MS (D and E) as described in the legend to Figure 1 and ‘Materials and methods.’ Error bars, S.E. The p value was calculated using Student’s t test: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p 0.005. Dhcr7, 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase; Dhcr24, 24-dehydrocholesterol reductase; 7-DehyDes., 7-dehydrodesmosterol; 8-Dehydrochol., 8-dehydrocholesterol; 7-Dehydrochol., 7-dehydrocholesterol.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.014
Figure 7—figure supplement 1
Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice exhibit signs of corneal opacification upon aging.

Female mice (15 WT, 24 Ubiad1Ki/Ki, 50 weeks of age) consuming an ad libitum chow diet were analyzed by stereomicroscopic examinations as described in Figure 7. Corneal opacification is indicated by white arrows.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.015

Tables

Table 1
Comparison of wild type (WT) and ubiad1ki/ki mice.

Male WT and Ubiad1Ki/Ki littermates (8–9 weeks of age, eight mice/group) were fed an ad libitum chow diet prior to study. WT mice were littermates of Ubiad1Ki/Ki mice. Each value represents the mean ±S.E. of 8 values. The p value was calculated using Student’s t test: *, p≤0.05.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396.006
ParameterWTUbiad1Ki/Ki
Body Weight (g)19.8 ± 0.420.1 ± 0.6
Liver Weight (g)1.0 ± 0.050.9 ± 0.03
Plasma Triglycerides (mg/dL)123.6 ± 31.294.5 ± 5.7
Plasma Cholesterol (mg/dL)100.4 ± 8.490.3 ± 9.0
Plasma Nonesterified Fatty Acids (mEq/L)1.3 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.03
Liver Triglycerides (mg/g)9.61 ± 1.816.3 ± 5.0
Liver Cholesterol (mg/g)1.17 ± 0.061.65 ± 0.24*
Key resources table
Reagent
type (species)
or resource
DesignationSource
or reference
IdentifiersAdditional
information
Genetic reagent (M. musculus)Mouse/Ubiad1Ki/Ki (UBIAD1 (N100S)):C57BL/6JThis paperN/AHeterozygous knockin mice harboring mutations in the endogenous Ubiad1 gene that change Asparagine-100 to a Serine residue
Genetic reagent
(M. musculus)
Mouse/Ubiad1Ki/Ki
(UBIAD1 (N100S)):
C57BL/6
This paperHomozygous knockin
mice harboring
mutations in the
endogenous Ubiad1
gene that change
Asparagine-100 to
a Serine residue
Genetic
reagent
(M. musculus)
Mouse/HmgcrKi/Ki
(HMGCR K89R/
K248R):C57BL/6
PMID:
27129778
N/A
Cell lineMouse Embryonic
Fibroblast-
Ubiad1WT/WT
This paperN/AMouse embryonic
fibroblasts from
wild type C57BL/
6 mice
Cell lineMouse Embryonic
Fibroblast-
Ubiad1Ki/Ki
This paperN/AMouse embryonic
fibroblasts from
Ubiad1Ki/Ki
C57BL/6 mice
Cell lineMouse Embryonic
Fibroblast-
HmgcrWT/WT
This paperN/AMouse embryonic
fibroblasts from
wild type C57BL/
6 mice
Cell lineMouse Embryonic
Fibroblast-
Hmgcr Ki/Ki
This paperN/AMouse embryonic
fibroblasts from
HmgcrKi/Ki
C57BL/6 mice
AntibodyRabbit
monoclonal
anti-SREBP-1
PMID:
28244871
IgG-20B12
AntibodyRabbit
monoclonal
anti-SREBP-2
PMID:
25896350
IgG-22D5
AntibodyRabbit
polyclonal
anti-UBIAD1
This paperIgG-205Rabbit polyclonal
antibody raised
against amino
acids 2–21 of
mouse UBIAD1;
used at 1–5 µg/ml for immunoblots
AntibodyRabbit
polyclonal anti-
HMGCR
PMID:
27129778
IgG-839cused at 1–5 µg/ml for immunoblots
AntibodyMouse
monoclonal anti-
HMGCR
PMID:
22143767
IgG-A9used at 1–5 µg/ml for immunoblots
AntibodyRabbit
polyclonal anti-
Insig-1
PMID:
27129778
anti-Insig-1used at 1:1000 dilution for immunoblots
AntibodyRabbit polyclonal anti-Insig-2This paperIgG-492Rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against a C-terminal peptide (CKVIPEKSHQE) of hamster Insig-2; used at 5 µg/ml for immunoblots
AntibodyRabbit polyclonal anti-UBXD8PMID: 27129778IgG-819used at 1–5 µg/ml for immunoblots
AntibodyRabbit polyclonal anti-CalnexinNovus BiologicalsCat#NB100-1965; RRID:AB_10002123used at 1–5 µg/ml for immunoblots
AntibodyRabbit polyclonal anti-GM130AbcamCat#ab30637; RRID:AB_732675used at 1–5 µg/ml for immunoblots
AntibodyRabbit polyclonal anti-LSD-1Cell Signaling TechnologyCat#2139; RRID:AB_2070135used at 1–5 µg/ml for immunoblots
AntibodyMouse monoclonal anti-ubiquitin (IgG-P4D1)Santa CruzCat#SC8017;RRID:AB_628423used at 1–5 µg/ml for immunoblots
Recombinant DNA reagent
Sequence-based reagentUbiad1Ki/Ki genotyping primers:
Forward, GGAACACTTGGCTCTCATCT;
Reverse, GGGAGCAGTGTTCATAATCC
This paperN/AGenotyping was determined by PCR analysis of genomic DNA prepared from tails of mice.
Sequence-based reagentHmgcrKi/Ki genotyping primers:
K89R- Forward, GTCCATGAACATGTTCACCG; Reverse, CAGCACGTCCTATTGGCAGA
K248R – Forward, TCGGTGATGTTCCAGTCTTC; Reverse, GGTGGCAAACACCTTGTATC
PMID: 27129778N/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)UBIAD1 Forward,
GACAGAACTTTGGTGGACAGAATTC;
Reverse, CAGCCCAAGGTGTAGAGGAAGA
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)SREBP-1a Forward,
GGCCGAGATGTGCGAACT;
Reverse, TTGTTGATGAGCTGGAGCATGT
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)SREBP-1c Forward,
GGAGCCATGGATTGCACATT;
Reverse, GGCCCGGGAAGTCACTGT
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)SREBP-2 Forward,
GCGTTCTGGAGACCATGGA;
Reverse, ACAAAGTTGCTCTGAAAACAAATCA
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)HMGCR Forward, CTTGTGGAATGCCTTGTGATTG;
Reverse, AGCCGAAGCAGCACATGAT
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)Insig-1 Forward, TCACAGTGACTGAGCTTCAGCA;
Reverse, TCATCTTCATCACACCCAGGAC
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)Insig-2a Forward, CCCTCAATGAATGTACTGAAGGATT;
Reverse, TGTGAAGTGAAGCAGACCAATGT
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent
(qRT-PCR)
Insig-2b Forward, CCGGGCAGAGCTCAGGAT;
Reverse, GAAGCAGACCAATGTTTCAATGG
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)SCAP Forward, ATTTGCTCACCGTGGAGATGTT;
Reverse, GAAGTCATCCAGGCCACTACTAATG
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)HMGCS Forward, GCCGTGAACTGGGTCGAA;
Reverse, GCATATATAGCAATGTCTCCTGCAA
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)FPPS Forward, ATGGAGATGGGCGAGTTCTTC;
Reverse, CCGACCTTTCCCGTCACA
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)SqS Forward, CCAACTCAATGGGTCTGTTCCT;
Reverse, TGGCTTAGCAAAGTCTTCCAACT
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)LDLR Forward, AGGCTGTGGGCTCCATAGG;
Reverse, TGCGGTCCAGGGTCATCT
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)PCSK9 Forward, CAGGCGGCCAGTGTCTATG;
Reverse, GCTCCTTGATTTTGCATTCCA
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)ACS Forward, GCTGCCGACGGGATCAG;
Reverse, TCCAGACACATTGAGCATGTCAT
Integrated DNA TechnologiesN/A
Sequence-based reagent (qRT-PCR)ACC1 Forward, TGGACAGACTGATCGCAGAGAAAG;
Reverse, TGGAGAGCCCCACACACA
Integrated DNA
Technologies
N/A
Sequence-
based reagent
(qRT-PCR)
FAS Forward, GCTGCGGAAACTTCAGGAAAT;
Reverse, AGAGACGTGTCACTCCTGGACTT
Integrated DNA
Technologies
N/A
Sequence-
based reagent
(qRT-PCR)
SCD1 Forward, CCGGAGACCCCTTAGATCGA;
Reverse, TAGCCTGTAAAAGATTTCTGCAAACC
Integrated DNA
Technologies
N/A
Sequence-
based reagent
(qRT-PCR)
GPAT Forward, CAACACCATCCCCGACATC;
Reverse, GTGACCTTCGATTATGCGATCA
Integrated DNA
Technologies
N/A
Sequence-
based reagent
(qRT-PCR)
LXRα Forward, TCTGGAGACGTCACGGAGGTA;
Reverse, CCCGGTTGTAACTGAAGTCCTT
Integrated DNA
Technologies
N/A
Sequence-
based reagent
(qRT-PCR)
ABCG5 Forward, TGGATCCAACACCTCTATGCTAAA;
Reverse, GGCAGGTTTTCTCGATGAACTG
Integrated DNA
Technologies
N/A
Sequence-
based reagent
(qRT-PCR)
ABCG8 Forward, TGCCCACCTTCCACATGTC;
Reverse, ATGAAGCCGGCAGTAAGGTAGA
Integrated DNA
Technologies
N/A
Sequence-
based reagent
(qRT-PCR)
GGPS Forward, CGTCTACTTCCTTGGACTGGAAA;
Reverse, AGCTGGCGTGTGAAAAGCTT
Integrated DNA
Technologies
N/A
Sequence-
based reagent
(qRT-PCR)
Cyclophilin Forward, TGGAGAGCACCAAGACAGACA;
Reverse, TGCCGGAGTCGACAATGAT
Integrated DNA
Technologies
N/A
Commercial
assay or kit
TaqMan
Reverse
Transcription
Applied
Biosystems
Cat#N8080234
Commercial
assay or kit
Power
SYBR Green
PCR Master Mix
Applied
Biosystems
Cat#4367659
Commercial
assay or kit
Cholesterol/
Cholesterol Ester
Assay Kit -
Quantitation
AbcamCat#ab65359
Chemical
compound,
drug
CholesterolBio-Serv;Cat#5180;
Chemical
compound,
drug
Sigma-AldrichCat#C8667
Chemical
compound,
drug
Coenzyme Q-10CerilliantCat#V-060
Chemical
compound,
drug
GeranylgeraniolSigma-AldrichCat#G3278
Chemical
compound,
drug
Geranylgeranyl
pyrophosphate
Cayman
Chemical
Company
Cat#63330
Chemical
compound,
drug
LovastatinAbblis Chemicals
LLC, Houston, TX
Cat#AB1004848
Chemical
compound,
drug
Menaquinone-4Sigma-AldrichCat#809896
Chemical
compound,
drug
CerilliantCat#V-031
Chemical
compound,
drug
Menaquinone-7CerilliantCat#V-044
Chemical
compound,
drug
Phylloquinone
(Vitamin K1)
CerilliantCat#V-030
Chemical
compound,
drug
25-HydroxycholesterolAvanti Polar
Lipids
Cat#700019P
Software,
algorithm
Image
Studio v5.0
LiCor
Biosciences
Software,
algorithm
Image J (Fiji)NIH

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Youngah Jo
  2. Jason S Hamilton
  3. Seonghwan Hwang
  4. Kristina Garland
  5. Gennipher A Smith
  6. Shan Su
  7. Iris Fuentes
  8. Sudha Neelam
  9. Bonne M Thompson
  10. Jeffrey G McDonald
  11. Russell A DeBose-Boyd
(2019)
Schnyder corneal dystrophy-associated UBIAD1 inhibits ER-associated degradation of HMG CoA reductase in mice
eLife 8:e44396.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.44396