The genetic factors of bilaterian evolution

  1. Peter Heger  Is a corresponding author
  2. Wen Zheng
  3. Anna Rottmann
  4. Kristen A Panfilio
  5. Thomas Wiehe
  1. Universitaet zu Koeln, Germany
  2. Sichuan University, China
  3. University of Cologne, Germany

Abstract

The Cambrian explosion was a unique animal radiation ~540 million years ago that produced the full range of body plans across bilaterians. The genetic mechanisms underlying these events are unknown, leaving a fundamental question in evolutionary biology unanswered. Using large-scale comparative genomics and advanced orthology evaluation techniques, we identified 157 bilaterian-specific genes. They include the entire Nodal pathway, a key regulator of mesoderm development and left-right axis specification; components for nervous system development, including a suite of G protein-coupled receptors that control physiology and behaviour, the Robo-Slit midline repulsion system, and the neurotrophin signalling system; a high number of zinc finger transcription factors; and novel factors that previously escaped attention. Contradicting the current view, our study reveals that genes with bilaterian origin are robustly associated with key features in extant bilaterians, suggesting a causal relationship.

Data availability

Accession numbers and/or URLs for previously published transcriptome datasets are listed in Supplementary file 3. Download links for previously published genomic sequences are listed in Supplementary File 1-Supplementary Table S7.Orthology datasets generated in this study have been deposited to Dryad, under the doi:10.5061/dryad.4qf7168

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Peter Heger

    Institute for Genetics, Universitaet zu Koeln, Cologne, Germany
    For correspondence
    peter.heger@uni-koeln.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2583-2981
  2. Wen Zheng

    West China-Washington Mitochondria and Metabolism Research Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Anna Rottmann

    Institute for Genetics, Universitaet zu Koeln, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kristen A Panfilio

    Institute for Zoology/Developmental Biology, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6417-251X
  5. Thomas Wiehe

    Institut fuer Genetik, Universitaet zu Koeln, Koeln, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8932-2772

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC~680 and CRC~1211)

  • Thomas Wiehe

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC~680)

  • Kristen A Panfilio

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Heger et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,835
    views
  • 821
    downloads
  • 63
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Peter Heger
  2. Wen Zheng
  3. Anna Rottmann
  4. Kristen A Panfilio
  5. Thomas Wiehe
(2020)
The genetic factors of bilaterian evolution
eLife 9:e45530.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45530

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45530

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Julia D Sigwart, Yunlong Li ... Jin Sun
    Research Article

    A major question in animal evolution is how genotypic and phenotypic changes are related, and another is when and whether ancient gene order is conserved in living clades. Chitons, the molluscan class Polyplacophora, retain a body plan and general morphology apparently little changed since the Palaeozoic. We present a comparative analysis of five reference quality genomes, including four de novo assemblies, covering all major chiton clades, and an updated phylogeny for the phylum. We constructed 20 ancient molluscan linkage groups (MLGs) and show that these are relatively conserved in bivalve karyotypes, but in chitons they are subject to re-ordering, rearrangement, fusion, or partial duplication and vary even between congeneric species. The largest number of novel fusions is in the most plesiomorphic clade Lepidopleurida, and the chitonid Liolophura japonica has a partial genome duplication, extending the occurrence of large-scale gene duplication within Mollusca. The extreme and dynamic genome rearrangements in this class stands in contrast to most other animals, demonstrating that chitons have overcome evolutionary constraints acting on other animal groups. The apparently conservative phenome of chitons belies rapid and extensive changes in genome.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Christopher S McAllester, John E Pool
    Research Article

    Chromosomal inversion polymorphisms can be common, but the causes of their persistence are often unclear. We propose a model for the maintenance of inversion polymorphism, which requires that some variants contribute antagonistically to two phenotypes, one of which has negative frequency-dependent fitness. These conditions yield a form of frequency-dependent disruptive selection, favoring two predominant haplotypes segregating alleles that favor opposing antagonistic phenotypes. An inversion associated with one haplotype can reduce the fitness load incurred by generating recombinant offspring, reinforcing its linkage to the haplotype and enabling both haplotypes to accumulate more antagonistic variants than expected otherwise. We develop and apply a forward simulator to examine these dynamics under a tradeoff between survival and male display. These simulations indeed generate inversion-associated haplotypes with opposing sex-specific fitness effects. Antagonism strengthens with time, and can ultimately yield karyotypes at surprisingly predictable frequencies, with striking genotype frequency differences between sexes and between developmental stages. To test whether this model may contribute to well-studied yet enigmatic inversion polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster, we track inversion frequencies in laboratory crosses to test whether they influence male reproductive success or survival. We find that two of the four tested inversions show significant evidence for the tradeoff examined, with In(3 R)K favoring survival and In(3 L)Ok favoring male reproduction. In line with the apparent sex-specific fitness effects implied for both of those inversions, In(3 L)Ok was also found to be less costly to the viability and/or longevity of males than females, whereas In(3 R)K was more beneficial to female survival. Based on this work, we expect that balancing selection on antagonistically pleiotropic traits may provide a significant and underappreciated contribution to the maintenance of natural inversion polymorphism.