Unique-region phosphorylation targets LynA for rapid degradation, tuning its expression and signaling in myeloid cells

  1. Ben F Brian
  2. Adrienne S Jolicoeur
  3. Candace R Guerrero
  4. Myra G Nunez
  5. Zoi E Sychev
  6. Siv A Hegre
  7. Pål Sætrom
  8. Nagy Habib
  9. Justin M Drake
  10. Kathryn L Schwertfeger
  11. Tanya S Freedman  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Minnesota, United States
  2. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
  3. Imperial College London, United Kingdom

Abstract

The activity of Src-family kinases (SFKs), which phosphorylate immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs), is a critical factor regulating myeloid-cell activation. We reported previously that the SFK LynA is uniquely susceptible to rapid ubiquitin-mediated degradation in macrophages, functioning as a rheostat regulating signaling (Freedman et al., 2015). We now report the mechanism by which LynA is preferentially targeted for degradation and how cell specificity is built into the LynA rheostat. Using genetic, biochemical, and quantitative phosphopeptide analyses, we found that the E3 ubiquitin ligase c-Cbl preferentially targets LynA via a phosphorylated tyrosine (Y32) in its unique region. This distinct mode of c-Cbl recognition depresses steady-state expression of LynA in macrophages derived from mice. Mast cells, however, express little c-Cbl and have correspondingly high LynA. Upon activation, mast-cell LynA is not rapidly degraded, and SFK-mediated signaling is amplified relative to macrophages. Cell-specific c-Cbl expression thus builds cell specificity into the LynA checkpoint.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for graphs in Figure 1, Figure 1-figure supplement 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 3-figure supplement 2, Figure 4, Figure 4-figure supplement 1, Figure 4-figure supplement 5, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 6-figure supplement 1, Figure 7, Figure 8, and Figure 9.Data sets and calibration curves resulting from our targeted mass spectrometry studies have been deposited in Panorama Public (https://panoramaweb.org/project/Panorama%20Public/begin.view?)

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ben F Brian

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Adrienne S Jolicoeur

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Candace R Guerrero

    College of Biological Sciences Center for Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Myra G Nunez

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Zoi E Sychev

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Siv A Hegre

    Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Pål Sætrom

    Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Nagy Habib

    Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Justin M Drake

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kathryn L Schwertfeger

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Tanya S Freedman

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    For correspondence
    tfreedma@umn.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5168-5829

Funding

NIH Office of the Director (R01AR073966)

  • Tanya S Freedman

NIH Office of the Director (R03AI130978)

  • Tanya S Freedman

American Cancer Society (UMN IRG-58-001-55)

  • Tanya S Freedman

University of Minnesota (Grant-in-Aid #92286)

  • Tanya S Freedman

University of Minnesota (Research and Equipment Award NF-0315-02)

  • Tanya S Freedman

University of Minnesota (Center for Autoimmune Diseases Research Pilot Grant)

  • Tanya S Freedman

NIH Office of the Director (R01CA215052)

  • Kathryn L Schwertfeger

NIH Office of the Director (T32DA007097)

  • Ben F Brian

Research Council of Norway (230338)

  • Pål Sætrom

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal use complies with University of Minnesota (UMN) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) policy (Animal Welfare Assurance Number A3456-01). UMN is accredited by AAALAC, and all animal use was approved by the UMN Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, protocol # 1603-33559A). Animals are kept under supervision of a licensed doctor of veterinary medicine and supporting veterinary staff under strict NIH guidelines.

Copyright

© 2019, Brian et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,848
    views
  • 222
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ben F Brian
  2. Adrienne S Jolicoeur
  3. Candace R Guerrero
  4. Myra G Nunez
  5. Zoi E Sychev
  6. Siv A Hegre
  7. Pål Sætrom
  8. Nagy Habib
  9. Justin M Drake
  10. Kathryn L Schwertfeger
  11. Tanya S Freedman
(2019)
Unique-region phosphorylation targets LynA for rapid degradation, tuning its expression and signaling in myeloid cells
eLife 8:e46043.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46043

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46043

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Shraddha KC, Kenny H Nguyen ... Thomas C Boothby
    Research Article

    The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alejandro J Brenes, Eva Griesser ... Angus I Lamond
    Research Article

    Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have great potential to be used as alternatives to embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in regenerative medicine and disease modelling. In this study, we characterise the proteomes of multiple hiPSC and hESC lines derived from independent donors and find that while they express a near-identical set of proteins, they show consistent quantitative differences in the abundance of a subset of proteins. hiPSCs have increased total protein content, while maintaining a comparable cell cycle profile to hESCs, with increased abundance of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins required to sustain high growth rates, including nutrient transporters and metabolic proteins. Prominent changes detected in proteins involved in mitochondrial metabolism correlated with enhanced mitochondrial potential, shown using high-resolution respirometry. hiPSCs also produced higher levels of secreted proteins, including growth factors and proteins involved in the inhibition of the immune system. The data indicate that reprogramming of fibroblasts to hiPSCs produces important differences in cytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins compared to hESCs, with consequences affecting growth and metabolism. This study improves our understanding of the molecular differences between hiPSCs and hESCs, with implications for potential risks and benefits for their use in future disease modelling and therapeutic applications.