Stem Cells: Getting to the heart of cardiovascular evolution in humans
Cardiovascular disease is one of the leading causes of death in both humans and captive chimpanzees. However, despite having similar heart anatomies, humans and chimpanzees are prone to different types of cardiovascular disease. In humans, a build-up of fatty materials in the arteries (a condition called atherosclerosis) can restrict blood flow to the heart, which can cause myocardial ischemia. On the other hand, great apes, including chimpanzees, are more likely to suffer heart disease from myocardial fibrosis (Lowenstine et al., 2016). This condition, which rarely leads to heart disease in humans, involves increased deposition of collagen in heart tissue (Lammey et al., 2008).
Both genetic and environmental factors could be responsible for these differences. Interestingly, cholesterol is a major risk factor for atherosclerosis in humans, yet captive chimpanzees manage to avoid this condition despite having higher cholesterol levels than humans (Varki et al., 2009). However, a lack of appropriate model systems has made it difficult to investigate how genetic differences in disease susceptibility evolved between these two species.
Recent studies have shown that cardiomyocytes (heart muscle cells derived from stem cells) recapitulate many of the features of normal human and chimpanzee hearts, although there are important differences in metabolism and maturation state (Pavlovic et al., 2018). Since it is possible to grow human and chimpanzee cardiomyocytes under common environmental conditions, this provides an opportunity to study differences in the genetics of the two systems (Gallego Romero et al., 2015). Now, in eLife, Michelle Ward and Yoav Gilad from the University of Chicago report how cardiomyocytes can be used to compare the genomic consequences of myocardial ischemia in humans and chimpanzees (Ward and Gilad, 2019).
A characteristic symptom of myocardial ischemia is oxygen deprivation, also known as hypoxia, which is caused by a reduction in the flow of blood to the heart. To simulate hypoxia, Ward and Gilad first cultured cardiomyocytes in normal oxygen levels, then exposed them to a ten-fold decrease in oxygen for six hours, before returning them to normal oxygen levels. Depriving heart tissue of oxygen typically leads to increased production of reactive oxygen species (such as peroxides) that can cause DNA damage and lipid degradation. Hypoxia induced similar effects in both human and chimpanzee cardiomyocytes, suggesting that such experiments can recapitulate the effects of myocardial ischemia.
RNA sequencing revealed that nearly one third of the genes that are expressed in cardiomyocytes respond to hypoxia. Moreover, 75% of these responded in the same way in both species, suggesting that hypoxia has a widespread and largely conserved effect on gene expression. In contrast, previous work has shown that the immune responses in humans and chimpanzees are quite different (Barreiro et al., 2010).
Next, Ward and Gilad investigated how patterns of gene expression were influenced by hypoxia within these two species. Despite the similarities revealed in the RNA sequencing experiments, several hundred genes still differed in their responses. One possible explanation for these differences is that hypoxia-related transcription factors bind to response genes to varying degrees. Consistent with this possibility, hypoxia-related factors were shown to frequently bind to, or near to, conserved response genes, but not to genes with chimpanzee-specific responses. This suggests that changes in transcription factor binding, and possibly changes to the sites they bind to, may be responsible for the several hundred genes that respond differently to hypoxia in the two species.
Another notable difference is the response of a protein called RASD1, which is upregulated during hypoxia in human cardiomyocytes but not in chimpanzee cardiomyocytes. Interestingly, this gene is also upregulated in patients with myocardial ischemia and other diseases related to atherosclerosis. RASD1 could therefore have a role in regulating hypoxia-induced tissue damage in humans.
Ward and Gilad then explored the role of genes called eQTL genes (where eQTL is short for expression quantitative trait loci). Genetic variation within these genes can explain some of the disparity in mRNA levels among individuals in a population. Intersecting eQTL genes with genetic association studies has become a popular strategy for identifying disease-risk genes (Albert and Kruglyak, 2015). However, several recent lines of evidence suggest that eQTL genes may reflect mostly neutral genetic variation and are not therefore associated with any specific diseases (Jasinska et al., 2017; Tung et al., 2015).
Ward and Gilad found that there was a significant overlap between the conserved hypoxia response genes and the genes that are upregulated in patients with myocardial ischemia. This overlap indicates that the response genes are relevant to disease: however, the overlap between these genes and eQTL genes was lower than expected (Figure 1). Therefore, identifying the genetic variants and genes that influence disease-relevant responses, such as hypoxia, is likely to be more informative than traditional baseline eQTL studies. This means that stem cell models, such as those studied by Ward and Gilad, could be used more generally to study how common variation and evolved genetic differences influence other disease-relevant responses.
References
-
The role of regulatory variation in complex traits and diseaseNature Reviews Genetics 16:197–212.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3891
-
Interstitial myocardial fibrosis in a captive chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) populationComparative Medicine 58:389–394.
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2019, Pollen and Pavlovic
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,219
- views
-
- 101
- downloads
-
- 2
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Evolutionary Biology
Eyespot patterns have evolved in many prey species. These patterns were traditionally explained by the eye mimicry hypothesis, which proposes that eyespots resembling vertebrate eyes function as predator avoidance. However, it is possible that eyespots do not mimic eyes: according to the conspicuousness hypothesis, eyespots are just one form of vivid signals where only conspicuousness matters. They might work simply through neophobia or unfamiliarity, without necessarily implying aposematism or the unprofitability to potential predators. To test these hypotheses and explore factors influencing predators’ responses, we conducted a meta-analysis with 33 empirical papers that focused on bird responses to both real lepidopterans and artificial targets with conspicuous patterns (i.e. eyespots and non-eyespots). Supporting the latter hypothesis, the results showed no clear difference in predator avoidance efficacy between eyespots and non-eyespots. When comparing geometric pattern characteristics, bigger pattern sizes and smaller numbers of patterns were more effective in preventing avian predation. This finding indicates that single concentric patterns have stronger deterring effects than paired ones. Taken together, our study supports the conspicuousness hypothesis more than the eye mimicry hypothesis. Due to the number and species coverage of published studies so far, the generalisability of our conclusion may be limited. The findings highlight that pattern conspicuousness is key to eliciting avian avoidance responses, shedding a different light on this classic example of signal evolution.
-
- Evolutionary Biology
The rise of angiosperms to ecological dominance and the breakup of Gondwana during the Mesozoic marked major transitions in the evolutionary history of insect-plant interactions. To elucidate how contemporary trophic interactions were influenced by host plant shifts and palaeogeographical events, we integrated molecular data with information from the fossil record to construct a time tree for ancient phytophagous weevils of the beetle family Belidae. Our analyses indicate that crown-group Belidae originated approximately 138 Ma ago in Gondwana, associated with Pinopsida (conifer) host plants, with larvae likely developing in dead/decaying branches. Belids tracked their host plants as major plate movements occurred during Gondwana’s breakup, surviving on distant, disjunct landmasses. Some belids shifted to Angiospermae and Cycadopsida when and where conifers declined, evolving new trophic interactions, including brood-pollination mutualisms with cycads and associations with achlorophyllous parasitic angiosperms. Extant radiations of belids in the genera Rhinotia (Australian region) and Proterhinus (Hawaiian Islands) have relatively recent origins.