Modulating FOXO3 transcriptional activity by small, DBD-binding molecules

  1. Judith Hagenbuchner
  2. Veronika Obsilova
  3. Teresa Kaserer
  4. Nora Kaiser
  5. Bettina Rass
  6. Katarina Psenakova
  7. Vojtech Docekal
  8. Miroslava Alblova
  9. Klara Kohoutova
  10. Daniela Schuster
  11. Tatsiana Aneichyk
  12. Jan Vesely
  13. Petra Obexer
  14. Tomas Obsil  Is a corresponding author
  15. Michael J Ausserlechner  Is a corresponding author
  1. Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
  2. The Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic
  3. University of Innsbruck, Austria
  4. Charles University, Czech Republic
  5. Charles University, Afghanistan

Abstract

FOXO transcription factors are critical regulators of cell homeostasis and steer cell death, differentiation and longevity in mammalian cells. By combined pharmacophore-modelling-based in silico and fluorescence polarization-based screening we identified small molecules that physically interact with the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of FOXO3 and modulate the FOXO3 transcriptional program in human cells. The mode of interaction between compounds and the FOXO3-DBD was assessed via NMR spectroscopy and docking studies. We demonstrate that compounds S9 and its oxalate salt S9OX interfere with FOXO3 target promoter binding, gene transcription and modulate the physiologic program activated by FOXO3 in cancer cells. These small molecules prove the druggability of the FOXO-DBD and provide a structural basis for modulating these important homeostasis regulators in normal and malignant cells.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Judith Hagenbuchner

    Department of Pediatrics II, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Veronika Obsilova

    Department of Structural Biology of Signaling Proteins, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4887-0323
  3. Teresa Kaserer

    Institute of Pharmacy, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nora Kaiser

    Department of Pediatrics I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Bettina Rass

    Department of Pediatrics I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Katarina Psenakova

    Department of Structural Biology of Signaling Proteins, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8877-6599
  7. Vojtech Docekal

    Department of Organic Chemistry, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Miroslava Alblova

    Department of Structural Biology of Signaling Proteins, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Klara Kohoutova

    Department of Structural Biology of Signaling Proteins, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Daniela Schuster

    Institute of Pharmacy, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Tatsiana Aneichyk

    Division of Molecular Pathophysiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jan Vesely

    Department of Organic Chemistry, Charles University, Prague, Afghanistan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Petra Obexer

    Department of Pediatrics II, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Tomas Obsil

    Department of Structural Biology of Signaling Proteins, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
    For correspondence
    obsil@natur.cuni.cz
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Michael J Ausserlechner

    Department of Pediatrics I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    For correspondence
    michael.j.ausserlechner@i-med.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1015-2302

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (I3089-B28)

  • Judith Hagenbuchner
  • Veronika Obsilova
  • Tomas Obsil
  • Michael J Ausserlechner

Grantová Agentura České Republiky (17-33854L)

  • Veronika Obsilova
  • Tomas Obsil

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Hagenbuchner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,130
    views
  • 473
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Judith Hagenbuchner
  2. Veronika Obsilova
  3. Teresa Kaserer
  4. Nora Kaiser
  5. Bettina Rass
  6. Katarina Psenakova
  7. Vojtech Docekal
  8. Miroslava Alblova
  9. Klara Kohoutova
  10. Daniela Schuster
  11. Tatsiana Aneichyk
  12. Jan Vesely
  13. Petra Obexer
  14. Tomas Obsil
  15. Michael J Ausserlechner
(2019)
Modulating FOXO3 transcriptional activity by small, DBD-binding molecules
eLife 8:e48876.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48876

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48876

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Lina Antenucci, Salla Virtanen ... Perttu Permi
    Research Article

    Orchestrated action of peptidoglycan (PG) synthetases and hydrolases is vital for bacterial growth and viability. Although the function of several PG synthetases and hydrolases is well understood, the function, regulation, and mechanism of action of PG hydrolases characterised as lysostaphin-like endopeptidases have remained elusive. Many of these M23 family members can hydrolyse glycyl-glycine peptide bonds and show lytic activity against Staphylococcus aureus whose PG contains a pentaglycine bridge, but their exact substrate specificity and hydrolysed bonds are still vaguely determined. In this work, we have employed NMR spectroscopy to study both the substrate specificity and the bond cleavage of the bactericide lysostaphin and the S. aureus PG hydrolase LytM. Yet, we provide substrate-level evidence for the functional role of these enzymes. Indeed, our results show that the substrate specificities of these structurally highly homologous enzymes are similar, but unlike observed earlier both LytM and lysostaphin prefer the D-Ala-Gly cross-linked part of mature peptidoglycan. However, we show that while lysostaphin is genuinely a glycyl-glycine hydrolase, LytM can also act as a D-alanyl-glycine endopeptidase.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ting-Wen Chen, Hsiao-Wei Liao ... Chung-Te Chang
    Research Article

    The mRNA 5'-cap structure removal by the decapping enzyme DCP2 is a critical step in gene regulation. While DCP2 is the catalytic subunit in the decapping complex, its activity is strongly enhanced by multiple factors, particularly DCP1, which is the major activator in yeast. However, the precise role of DCP1 in metazoans has yet to be fully elucidated. Moreover, in humans, the specific biological functions of the two DCP1 paralogs, DCP1a and DCP1b, remain largely unknown. To investigate the role of human DCP1, we generated cell lines that were deficient in DCP1a, DCP1b, or both to evaluate the importance of DCP1 in the decapping machinery. Our results highlight the importance of human DCP1 in decapping process and show that the EVH1 domain of DCP1 enhances the mRNA-binding affinity of DCP2. Transcriptome and metabolome analyses outline the distinct functions of DCP1a and DCP1b in human cells, regulating specific endogenous mRNA targets and biological processes. Overall, our findings provide insights into the molecular mechanism of human DCP1 in mRNA decapping and shed light on the distinct functions of its paralogs.