Modulating FOXO3 transcriptional activity by small, DBD-binding molecules

  1. Judith Hagenbuchner
  2. Veronika Obsilova
  3. Teresa Kaserer
  4. Nora Kaiser
  5. Bettina Rass
  6. Katarina Psenakova
  7. Vojtech Docekal
  8. Miroslava Alblova
  9. Klara Kohoutova
  10. Daniela Schuster
  11. Tatsiana Aneichyk
  12. Jan Vesely
  13. Petra Obexer
  14. Tomas Obsil  Is a corresponding author
  15. Michael J Ausserlechner  Is a corresponding author
  1. Medical University Innsbruck, Austria
  2. The Czech Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic
  3. University of Innsbruck, Austria
  4. Charles University, Czech Republic
  5. Charles University, Afghanistan

Abstract

FOXO transcription factors are critical regulators of cell homeostasis and steer cell death, differentiation and longevity in mammalian cells. By combined pharmacophore-modelling-based in silico and fluorescence polarization-based screening we identified small molecules that physically interact with the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of FOXO3 and modulate the FOXO3 transcriptional program in human cells. The mode of interaction between compounds and the FOXO3-DBD was assessed via NMR spectroscopy and docking studies. We demonstrate that compounds S9 and its oxalate salt S9OX interfere with FOXO3 target promoter binding, gene transcription and modulate the physiologic program activated by FOXO3 in cancer cells. These small molecules prove the druggability of the FOXO-DBD and provide a structural basis for modulating these important homeostasis regulators in normal and malignant cells.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Judith Hagenbuchner

    Department of Pediatrics II, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Veronika Obsilova

    Department of Structural Biology of Signaling Proteins, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4887-0323
  3. Teresa Kaserer

    Institute of Pharmacy, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nora Kaiser

    Department of Pediatrics I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Bettina Rass

    Department of Pediatrics I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Katarina Psenakova

    Department of Structural Biology of Signaling Proteins, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8877-6599
  7. Vojtech Docekal

    Department of Organic Chemistry, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Miroslava Alblova

    Department of Structural Biology of Signaling Proteins, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Klara Kohoutova

    Department of Structural Biology of Signaling Proteins, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Daniela Schuster

    Institute of Pharmacy, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Tatsiana Aneichyk

    Division of Molecular Pathophysiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jan Vesely

    Department of Organic Chemistry, Charles University, Prague, Afghanistan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Petra Obexer

    Department of Pediatrics II, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Tomas Obsil

    Department of Structural Biology of Signaling Proteins, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
    For correspondence
    obsil@natur.cuni.cz
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Michael J Ausserlechner

    Department of Pediatrics I, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
    For correspondence
    michael.j.ausserlechner@i-med.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1015-2302

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (I3089-B28)

  • Judith Hagenbuchner
  • Veronika Obsilova
  • Tomas Obsil
  • Michael J Ausserlechner

Grantová Agentura České Republiky (17-33854L)

  • Veronika Obsilova
  • Tomas Obsil

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2019, Hagenbuchner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,198
    views
  • 478
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Judith Hagenbuchner
  2. Veronika Obsilova
  3. Teresa Kaserer
  4. Nora Kaiser
  5. Bettina Rass
  6. Katarina Psenakova
  7. Vojtech Docekal
  8. Miroslava Alblova
  9. Klara Kohoutova
  10. Daniela Schuster
  11. Tatsiana Aneichyk
  12. Jan Vesely
  13. Petra Obexer
  14. Tomas Obsil
  15. Michael J Ausserlechner
(2019)
Modulating FOXO3 transcriptional activity by small, DBD-binding molecules
eLife 8:e48876.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48876

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48876

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Parnian Arafi, Sujan Devkota ... Michael S Wolfe
    Research Article

    Missense mutations in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilin-1 (PSEN1) cause early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD) and alter proteolytic production of secreted 38-to-43-residue amyloid β-peptides (Aβ) by the PSEN1-containing γ-secretase complex, ostensibly supporting the amyloid hypothesis of pathogenesis. However, proteolysis of APP substrate by γ-secretase is processive, involving initial endoproteolysis to produce long Aβ peptides of 48 or 49 residues followed by carboxypeptidase trimming in mostly tripeptide increments. We recently reported evidence that FAD mutations in APP and PSEN1 cause deficiencies in early steps in processive proteolysis of APP substrate C99 and that this results from stalled γ-secretase enzyme-substrate and/or enzyme-intermediate complexes. These stalled complexes triggered synaptic degeneration in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of FAD independently of Aβ production. Here, we conducted full quantitative analysis of all proteolytic events on APP substrate by γ-secretase with six additional PSEN1 FAD mutations and found that all six are deficient in multiple processing steps. However, only one of these (F386S) was deficient in certain trimming steps but not in endoproteolysis. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy in intact cells revealed that all six PSEN1 FAD mutations lead to stalled γ-secretase enzyme-substrate/intermediate complexes. The F386S mutation, however, does so only in Aβ-rich regions of the cells, not in C99-rich regions, consistent with the deficiencies of this mutant enzyme only in trimming of Aβ intermediates. These findings provide further evidence that FAD mutations lead to stalled and stabilized γ-secretase enzyme-substrate and/or enzyme-intermediate complexes and are consistent with the stalled process rather than the products of γ-secretase proteolysis as the pathogenic trigger.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Kira A Cozzolino, Lynn Sanford ... Dylan J Taatjes
    Research Article

    Hyperactive interferon (IFN) signaling is a hallmark of Down syndrome (DS), a condition caused by Trisomy 21 (T21); strategies that normalize IFN signaling could benefit this population. Mediator-associated kinases CDK8 and CDK19 drive inflammatory responses through incompletely understood mechanisms. Using sibling-matched cell lines with/without T21, we investigated Mediator kinase function in the context of hyperactive IFN in DS over a 75 min to 24 hr timeframe. Activation of IFN-response genes was suppressed in cells treated with the CDK8/CDK19 inhibitor cortistatin A (CA), via rapid suppression of IFN-responsive transcription factor (TF) activity. We also discovered that CDK8/CDK19 affect splicing, a novel means by which Mediator kinases control gene expression. To further probe Mediator kinase function, we completed cytokine screens and metabolomics experiments. Cytokines are master regulators of inflammatory responses; by screening 105 different cytokine proteins, we show that Mediator kinases help drive IFN-dependent cytokine responses at least in part through transcriptional regulation of cytokine genes and receptors. Metabolomics revealed that Mediator kinase inhibition altered core metabolic pathways in cell type-specific ways, and broad upregulation of anti-inflammatory lipid mediators occurred specifically in kinase-inhibited cells during hyperactive IFNγ signaling. A subset of these lipids (e.g. oleamide, desmosterol) serve as ligands for nuclear receptors PPAR and LXR, and activation of these receptors occurred specifically during hyperactive IFN signaling in CA-treated cells, revealing mechanistic links between Mediator kinases, lipid metabolism, and nuclear receptor function. Collectively, our results establish CDK8/CDK19 as context-specific metabolic regulators, and reveal that these kinases control gene expression not only via TFs, but also through metabolic changes and splicing. Moreover, we establish that Mediator kinase inhibition antagonizes IFN signaling through transcriptional, metabolic, and cytokine responses, with implications for DS and other chronic inflammatory conditions.