Differential expression of MAGEA6 toggles autophagy to promote pancreatic cancer progression

  1. Yiu Huen Tsang  Is a corresponding author
  2. Yumeng Wang
  3. Kathleen Kong
  4. Caitlin Grzeskowiak
  5. Oksana Zagorodna
  6. Turgut Dogruluk
  7. Hengyu Lu
  8. Nicole Villafane
  9. Venkata Hemanjani Bhavana
  10. Daniela Moreno
  11. Sarah H Elsea
  12. Han Liang
  13. Gordon B Mills
  14. Kenneth L Scott
  1. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  2. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
  3. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States

Abstract

The melanoma-associated antigen family A (MAGEA) antigens are expressed in a wide variety of malignant tumors but not in adult somatic cells, rendering them attractive targets for cancer immunotherapy. Here we show that a number of cancer-associated MAGEA mutants that undergo proteasome-dependent degradation in vitro could negatively impact their utility as immunotherapeutic targets. Importantly, in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cell models, MAGEA6 suppresses macroautophagy (autophagy). The inhibition of autophagy is released upon MAGEA6 degradation, which can be induced by nutrient deficiency or by acquisition of cancer-associated mutations. Using xenograft mouse models, we demonstrated that inhibition of autophagy is critical for tumor initiation whereas reinstitution of autophagy as a consequence of MAGEA6 degradation contributes to tumor progression. These findings could inform cancer immunotherapeutic strategies for targeting MAGEA antigens and provide mechanistic insight into the divergent roles of MAGEA6 during pancreatic cancer initiation and progression.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.Source data files have been provided for Figures 1.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yiu Huen Tsang

    Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    For correspondence
    tsangsa@ohsu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0895-6854
  2. Yumeng Wang

    Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kathleen Kong

    Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Caitlin Grzeskowiak

    Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Oksana Zagorodna

    Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Turgut Dogruluk

    Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9212-9471
  7. Hengyu Lu

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Nicole Villafane

    Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Venkata Hemanjani Bhavana

    Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Daniela Moreno

    Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Sarah H Elsea

    Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Han Liang

    Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Gordon B Mills

    Department of System Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Kenneth L Scott

    Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Institutes of Health (5R01CA211176-04)

  • Sarah H Elsea

National Institutes of Health (U24209851)

  • Gordon B Mills

Cullen Foundation

  • Turgut Dogruluk

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP140102)

  • Hengyu Lu

National Institutes of Health (1F32CA221015-01)

  • Kathleen Kong

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP120046)

  • Kenneth L Scott

American Association for Cancer Research (14-20-25-SCOT)

  • Kenneth L Scott

National Institutes of Health (U01CA168394)

  • Gordon B Mills

National Institutes of Health (1103109301)

  • Kenneth L Scott

Lustgarten Foundation (RFP-B-042)

  • Kenneth L Scott

National Institutes of Health (U01CA168394)

  • Kenneth L Scott

National Institutes of Health (R01CA175486)

  • Han Liang

National Institutes of Health (U24209851)

  • Han Liang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Grant McArthur, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (AN-5428) of Baylor College of Medicine. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Baylor College of Medicine . All surgery was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Version history

  1. Received: June 1, 2019
  2. Accepted: April 6, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 9, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 17, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Tsang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,891
    views
  • 259
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yiu Huen Tsang
  2. Yumeng Wang
  3. Kathleen Kong
  4. Caitlin Grzeskowiak
  5. Oksana Zagorodna
  6. Turgut Dogruluk
  7. Hengyu Lu
  8. Nicole Villafane
  9. Venkata Hemanjani Bhavana
  10. Daniela Moreno
  11. Sarah H Elsea
  12. Han Liang
  13. Gordon B Mills
  14. Kenneth L Scott
(2020)
Differential expression of MAGEA6 toggles autophagy to promote pancreatic cancer progression
eLife 9:e48963.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48963

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48963

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Savvas Nikolaou, Amelie Juin ... Laura M Machesky
    Research Article Updated

    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma carries a dismal prognosis, with high rates of metastasis and few treatment options. Hyperactivation of KRAS in almost all tumours drives RAC1 activation, conferring enhanced migratory and proliferative capacity as well as macropinocytosis. Macropinocytosis is well understood as a nutrient scavenging mechanism, but little is known about its functions in trafficking of signalling receptors. We find that CYRI-B is highly expressed in pancreatic tumours in a mouse model of KRAS and p53-driven pancreatic cancer. Deletion of Cyrib (the gene encoding CYRI-B protein) accelerates tumourigenesis, leading to enhanced ERK and JNK-induced proliferation in precancerous lesions, indicating a potential role as a buffer of RAC1 hyperactivation in early stages. However, as disease progresses, loss of CYRI-B inhibits metastasis. CYRI-B depleted tumour cells show reduced chemotactic responses to lysophosphatidic acid, a major driver of tumour spread, due to impaired macropinocytic uptake of the lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1. Overall, we implicate CYRI-B as a mediator of growth and signalling in pancreatic cancer, providing new insights into pathways controlling metastasis.

    1. Cancer Biology
    Chenxi Gao, Huaibin Ge ... Jing Hu
    Research Article

    BRAFV600E mutation is a driver mutation in the serrated pathway to colorectal cancers. BRAFV600E drives tumorigenesis through constitutive downstream extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation, but high-intensity ERK activation can also trigger tumor suppression. Whether and how oncogenic ERK signaling can be intrinsically adjusted to a ‘just-right’ level optimal for tumorigenesis remains undetermined. In this study, we found that FAK (Focal adhesion kinase) expression was reduced in BRAFV600E-mutant adenomas/polyps in mice and patients. In Vil1-Cre;BRAFLSL-V600E/+;Ptk2fl/fl mice, Fak deletion maximized BRAFV600E’s oncogenic activity and increased cecal tumor incidence to 100%. Mechanistically, our results showed that Fak loss, without jeopardizing BRAFV600E-induced ERK pathway transcriptional output, reduced EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-dependent ERK phosphorylation. Reduction in ERK phosphorylation increased the level of Lgr4, promoting intestinal stemness and cecal tumor formation. Our findings show that a ‘just-right’ ERK signaling optimal for BRAFV600E-induced cecal tumor formation can be achieved via Fak loss-mediated downregulation of ERK phosphorylation.