Direct ETTIN-auxin interaction controls chromatin states in gynoecium development

  1. André Kuhn
  2. Sigurd Ramans Harborough
  3. Heather M McLaughlin
  4. Bhavani Natarajan
  5. Inge Verstraeten
  6. Jiří Friml
  7. Stefan Kepinski
  8. Lars Østergaard  Is a corresponding author
  1. John Innes Centre, United Kingdom
  2. University of Leeds, United Kingdom
  3. Institute of Science and Technology, Austria
  4. Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Austria
  5. John Innes Center, United Kingdom

Abstract

Hormonal signalling in animals often involves direct transcription factor-hormone interactions that modulate gene expression1,2. In contrast, plant hormone signalling is most commonly based on de-repression via the degradation of transcriptional repressors3-5. Recently, we uncovered a non-canonical signalling mechanism for the plant hormone auxin whereby auxin directly affects the activity of the atypical auxin response factor (ARF), ETTIN towards target genes without the requirement for protein degradation6,7. Here we show that ETTIN directly binds auxin, leading to dissociation from co-repressor proteins of the TOPLESS/TOPLESS-RELATED family followed by histone acetylation and induction of gene expression. This mechanism is reminiscent of animal hormone signalling as it affects the activity towards regulation of target genes and provides the first example of a DNA-bound hormone receptor in plants. Whilst auxin affects canonical ARFs indirectly by facilitating degradation of Aux/IAA repressors, direct ETTIN-auxin interactions allow switching between repressive and de-repressive chromatin states in an instantly-reversible manner.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5

Article and author information

Author details

  1. André Kuhn

    Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sigurd Ramans Harborough

    Centre for Plant Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Heather M McLaughlin

    Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3020-7964
  4. Bhavani Natarajan

    Crop Genetics, John Innes Centre, Norwich, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Inge Verstraeten

    Institute of Science and Technology, Klosterneuburg, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jiří Friml

    Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8302-7596
  7. Stefan Kepinski

    Centre for Plant Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Lars Østergaard

    Department of Crop Genetics, John Innes Center, Norwich, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    lars.ostergaard@jic.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8497-7657

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S002901/1)

  • Lars Østergaard

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/L010623/1)

  • Stefan Kepinski

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M011216/1)

  • André Kuhn

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J004553/1)

  • Lars Østergaard

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Kuhn et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,950
    views
  • 703
    downloads
  • 54
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. André Kuhn
  2. Sigurd Ramans Harborough
  3. Heather M McLaughlin
  4. Bhavani Natarajan
  5. Inge Verstraeten
  6. Jiří Friml
  7. Stefan Kepinski
  8. Lars Østergaard
(2020)
Direct ETTIN-auxin interaction controls chromatin states in gynoecium development
eLife 9:e51787.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51787

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51787

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Svanhild Nornes, Susann Bruche ... Sarah De Val
    Research Article Updated

    The establishment and growth of the arterial endothelium require the coordinated expression of numerous genes. However, regulation of this process is not yet fully understood. Here, we combined in silico analysis with transgenic mice and zebrafish models to characterize arterial-specific enhancers associated with eight key arterial identity genes (Acvrl1/Alk1, Cxcr4, Cxcl12, Efnb2, Gja4/Cx37, Gja5/Cx40, Nrp1, and Unc5b). Next, to elucidate the regulatory pathways upstream of arterial gene transcription, we investigated the transcription factors binding each arterial enhancer compared to a similar assessment of non-arterial endothelial enhancers. These results found that binding of SOXF and ETS factors was a common occurrence at both arterial and pan-endothelial enhancers, suggesting neither are sufficient to direct arterial specificity. Conversely, FOX motifs independent of ETS motifs were over-represented at arterial enhancers. Further, MEF2 and RBPJ binding was enriched but not ubiquitous at arterial enhancers, potentially linked to specific patterns of behaviour within the arterial endothelium. Lastly, there was no shared or arterial-specific signature for WNT-associated TCF/LEF, TGFβ/BMP-associated SMAD1/5 and SMAD2/3, shear stress-associated KLF4, or venous-enriched NR2F2. This cohort of well-characterized and in vivo-verified enhancers can now provide a platform for future studies into the interaction of different transcriptional and signaling pathways with arterial gene expression.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Guillermo Luxán
    Insight

    What determines whether an endothelial cell becomes part of an artery, a vein or a capillary?