ERK3/MAPK6 controls IL-8 production and chemotaxis

  1. Katarzyna Bogucka
  2. Malvika Pompaiah
  3. Federico Marini
  4. Harald Binder
  5. Gregory Harms
  6. Manuel Kaulich
  7. Matthias Klein
  8. Christian Michel
  9. Markus P Radsak
  10. Sebastian Rosigkeit
  11. Peter Grimminger
  12. Hansjörg Schild
  13. Krishnaraj Rajalingam  Is a corresponding author
  1. Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany
  2. Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
  3. Institute for Immunology/ University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
  4. University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany

Abstract

ERK3 is a ubiquitously expressed member of the atypical mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and the physiological significance of its short half-life remains unclear. By employing gastrointestinal 3D organoids, we detect that ERK3 protein levels steadily decrease during epithelial differentiation. ERK3 is not required for 3D growth of human gastric epithelium. However, ERK3 is stabilized and activated in tumourigenic cells, but deteriorates over time in primary cells in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). ERK3 is necessary for production of several cellular factors including interleukin-8 (IL-8), in both, normal and tumourigenic cells. Particularly, ERK3 is critical for AP-1 signaling through its interaction and regulation of c-Jun protein. The secretome of ERK3 deficient cells is defective in chemotaxis of neutrophils and monocytes both in vitro and in vivo. Further, knockdown of ERK3 reduces metastatic potential of invasive breast cancer cells. We unveil an ERK3-mediated regulation of IL-8 and epithelial secretome for chemotaxis.

Data availability

The RNA-seq data presented in this manuscript have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO series accession number GSE136002 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE136002)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Katarzyna Bogucka

    Cell Biology Unit, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Malvika Pompaiah

    Cell Biology Unit, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Federico Marini

    Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3252-7758
  4. Harald Binder

    IMBEI, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gregory Harms

    Cell Biology Unit, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Manuel Kaulich

    Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9528-8822
  7. Matthias Klein

    Institute of Immunology, Institute for Immunology/ University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christian Michel

    Department of Hematology, Medical Oncology, & Pneumology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Markus P Radsak

    Department of Hematology, Medical Oncology, & Pneumology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sebastian Rosigkeit

    Cell Biology Unit, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Peter Grimminger

    Department of General, visceral and transplantation surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Hansjörg Schild

    Department of Immunology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Krishnaraj Rajalingam

    Cell Biology Unit, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    For correspondence
    krishna@uni-mainz.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4175-9633

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RA1739/4-1)

  • Krishnaraj Rajalingam

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC1292)

  • Katarzyna Bogucka

Merck KGaA (ERK-KR)

  • Krishnaraj Rajalingam

Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (SUNMAPK)

  • Malvika Pompaiah

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Yuting Ma, Suzhou Institute of Systems Medicine, China

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The animalexperiment was performed under the permission (G16-1-026) of the National Investigation Office Rheinland-Pfalz and conducted according to the German Animal Protection Law

Human subjects: Tissue samples employed are obtained from the biobank of the university medical center. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients, and the study was approved by the ethical committee at the University Medical Center of the JGU Mainz (approval # 837.100.16 (10419).

Version history

  1. Received: October 7, 2019
  2. Accepted: April 17, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 21, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 30, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Bogucka et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,122
    views
  • 427
    downloads
  • 28
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Katarzyna Bogucka
  2. Malvika Pompaiah
  3. Federico Marini
  4. Harald Binder
  5. Gregory Harms
  6. Manuel Kaulich
  7. Matthias Klein
  8. Christian Michel
  9. Markus P Radsak
  10. Sebastian Rosigkeit
  11. Peter Grimminger
  12. Hansjörg Schild
  13. Krishnaraj Rajalingam
(2020)
ERK3/MAPK6 controls IL-8 production and chemotaxis
eLife 9:e52511.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52511

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52511

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Alex Weiss, Cassandra D'Amata ... Madeline N Hayes
    Research Article

    High-throughput vertebrate animal model systems for the study of patient-specific biology and new therapeutic approaches for aggressive brain tumors are currently lacking, and new approaches are urgently needed. Therefore, to build a patient-relevant in vivo model of human glioblastoma, we expressed common oncogenic variants including activated human EGFRvIII and PI3KCAH1047R under the control of the radial glial-specific promoter her4.1 in syngeneic tp53 loss-of-function mutant zebrafish. Robust tumor formation was observed prior to 45 days of life, and tumors had a gene expression signature similar to human glioblastoma of the mesenchymal subtype, with a strong inflammatory component. Within early stage tumor lesions, and in an in vivo and endogenous tumor microenvironment, we visualized infiltration of phagocytic cells, as well as internalization of tumor cells by mpeg1.1:EGFP+ microglia/macrophages, suggesting negative regulatory pressure by pro-inflammatory cell types on tumor growth at early stages of glioblastoma initiation. Furthermore, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene targeting of master inflammatory transcription factors irf7 or irf8 led to increased tumor formation in the primary context, while suppression of phagocyte activity led to enhanced tumor cell engraftment following transplantation into otherwise immune-competent zebrafish hosts. Altogether, we developed a genetically relevant model of aggressive human glioblastoma and harnessed the unique advantages of zebrafish including live imaging, high-throughput genetic and chemical manipulations to highlight important tumor-suppressive roles for the innate immune system on glioblastoma initiation, with important future opportunities for therapeutic discovery and optimizations.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ian Lorimer
    Insight

    Establishing a zebrafish model of a deadly type of brain tumor highlights the role of the immune system in the early stages of the disease.