ERK3/MAPK6 controls IL-8 production and chemotaxis

  1. Katarzyna Bogucka
  2. Malvika Pompaiah
  3. Federico Marini
  4. Harald Binder
  5. Gregory Harms
  6. Manuel Kaulich
  7. Matthias Klein
  8. Christian Michel
  9. Markus P Radsak
  10. Sebastian Rosigkeit
  11. Peter Grimminger
  12. Hansjörg Schild
  13. Krishnaraj Rajalingam  Is a corresponding author
  1. Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany
  2. Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
  3. Institute for Immunology/ University Medical Center Mainz, Germany
  4. University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany

Abstract

ERK3 is a ubiquitously expressed member of the atypical mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and the physiological significance of its short half-life remains unclear. By employing gastrointestinal 3D organoids, we detect that ERK3 protein levels steadily decrease during epithelial differentiation. ERK3 is not required for 3D growth of human gastric epithelium. However, ERK3 is stabilized and activated in tumourigenic cells, but deteriorates over time in primary cells in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). ERK3 is necessary for production of several cellular factors including interleukin-8 (IL-8), in both, normal and tumourigenic cells. Particularly, ERK3 is critical for AP-1 signaling through its interaction and regulation of c-Jun protein. The secretome of ERK3 deficient cells is defective in chemotaxis of neutrophils and monocytes both in vitro and in vivo. Further, knockdown of ERK3 reduces metastatic potential of invasive breast cancer cells. We unveil an ERK3-mediated regulation of IL-8 and epithelial secretome for chemotaxis.

Data availability

The RNA-seq data presented in this manuscript have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO series accession number GSE136002 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE136002)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Katarzyna Bogucka

    Cell Biology Unit, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Malvika Pompaiah

    Cell Biology Unit, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Federico Marini

    Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3252-7758
  4. Harald Binder

    IMBEI, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gregory Harms

    Cell Biology Unit, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Manuel Kaulich

    Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9528-8822
  7. Matthias Klein

    Institute of Immunology, Institute for Immunology/ University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Christian Michel

    Department of Hematology, Medical Oncology, & Pneumology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Markus P Radsak

    Department of Hematology, Medical Oncology, & Pneumology, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sebastian Rosigkeit

    Cell Biology Unit, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Peter Grimminger

    Department of General, visceral and transplantation surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Hansjörg Schild

    Department of Immunology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Krishnaraj Rajalingam

    Cell Biology Unit, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    For correspondence
    krishna@uni-mainz.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4175-9633

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RA1739/4-1)

  • Krishnaraj Rajalingam

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC1292)

  • Katarzyna Bogucka

Merck KGaA (ERK-KR)

  • Krishnaraj Rajalingam

Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (SUNMAPK)

  • Malvika Pompaiah

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The animalexperiment was performed under the permission (G16-1-026) of the National Investigation Office Rheinland-Pfalz and conducted according to the German Animal Protection Law

Human subjects: Tissue samples employed are obtained from the biobank of the university medical center. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients, and the study was approved by the ethical committee at the University Medical Center of the JGU Mainz (approval # 837.100.16 (10419).

Copyright

© 2020, Bogucka et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,354
    views
  • 444
    downloads
  • 32
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Katarzyna Bogucka
  2. Malvika Pompaiah
  3. Federico Marini
  4. Harald Binder
  5. Gregory Harms
  6. Manuel Kaulich
  7. Matthias Klein
  8. Christian Michel
  9. Markus P Radsak
  10. Sebastian Rosigkeit
  11. Peter Grimminger
  12. Hansjörg Schild
  13. Krishnaraj Rajalingam
(2020)
ERK3/MAPK6 controls IL-8 production and chemotaxis
eLife 9:e52511.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52511

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52511

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Shixuan Liu, Ceryl Tan ... Ran Kafri
    Research Advance Updated

    Proliferating animal cells maintain a stable size distribution over generations despite fluctuations in cell growth and division size. Previously, we showed that cell size control involves both cell size checkpoints, which delay cell cycle progression in small cells, and size-dependent regulation of mass accumulation rates (Ginzberg et al., 2018). While we previously identified the p38 MAPK pathway as a key regulator of the mammalian cell size checkpoint (Liu et al., 2018), the mechanism of size-dependent growth rate regulation has remained elusive. Here, we quantified global rates of protein synthesis and degradation in cells of varying sizes, both under unperturbed conditions and in response to perturbations that trigger size-dependent compensatory growth slowdown. We found that protein synthesis rates scale proportionally with cell size across cell cycle stages and experimental conditions. In contrast, oversized cells that undergo compensatory growth slowdown exhibit a superlinear increase in proteasome-mediated protein degradation, with accelerated protein turnover per unit mass, suggesting activation of the proteasomal degradation pathway. Both nascent and long-lived proteins contribute to the elevated protein degradation during compensatory growth slowdown, with long-lived proteins playing a crucial role at the G1/S transition. Notably, large G1/S cells exhibit particularly high efficiency in protein degradation, surpassing that of similarly sized or larger cells in S and G2, coinciding with the timing of the most stringent size control in animal cells. These results collectively suggest that oversized cells reduce their growth efficiency by activating global proteasome-mediated protein degradation to promote cell size homeostasis.

    1. Cell Biology
    Yajun Zhai, Peiyi Liu ... Gongzheng Hu
    Research Article

    Discovering new strategies to combat the multidrug-resistant bacteria constitutes a major medical challenge of our time. Previously, artesunate (AS) has been reported to exert antibacterial enhancement activity in combination with β-lactam antibiotics via inhibition of the efflux pump AcrB. However, combination of AS and colistin (COL) revealed a weak synergistic effect against a limited number of strains, and few studies have further explored its possible mechanism of synergistic action. In this article, we found that AS and EDTA could strikingly enhance the antibacterial effects of COL against mcr-1- and mcr-1+ Salmonella strains either in vitro or in vivo, when used in triple combination. The excellent bacteriostatic effect was primarily related to the increased cell membrane damage, accumulation of toxic compounds and inhibition of MCR-1. The potential binding sites of AS to MCR-1 (THR283, SER284, and TYR287) were critical for its inhibition of MCR-1 activity. Additionally, we also demonstrated that the CheA of chemosensory system and virulence-related protein SpvD were critical for the bacteriostatic synergistic effects of the triple combination. Selectively targeting CheA, SpvD, or MCR using the natural compound AS could be further investigated as an attractive strategy for the treatment of Salmonella infection. Collectively, our work opens new avenues toward the potentiation of COL and reveals an alternative drug combination strategy to overcome COL-resistant bacterial infections.