Cryo-EM structures demonstrate human IMPDH2 filament assembly tunes allosteric regulation
Abstract
Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) mediates the first committed step in guanine nucleotide biosynthesis and plays important roles in cellular proliferation and the immune response. IMPDH reversibly polymerizes in cells and tissues in response to changes in metabolic demand. Self-assembly of metabolic enzymes is increasingly recognized as a general mechanism for regulating activity, typically by stabilizing specific conformations of an enzyme, but the regulatory role of IMPDH filaments has remained unclear. Here, we report a series of human IMPDH2 cryo-EM structures in both active and inactive conformations. The structures define the mechanism of filament assembly, and reveal how filament-dependent allosteric regulation of IMPDH2 makes the enzyme less sensitive to feedback inhibition, explaining why assembly occurs under physiological conditions that require expansion of guanine nucleotide pools. Tuning sensitivity to an allosteric inhibitor distinguishes IMPDH from other metabolic filaments, and highlights the diversity of regulatory outcomes that can emerge from self-assembly.
Data availability
The cryo-EM maps described here have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank with accession numbers 20687, 20688, 20690, 20691, 20701, 20704, 20705, 20706, 20707, 20709, 20716, 20718, 20720, 20722, 20723, 20725, 20742, 20741, and 20743. The refined atomic coordinates have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank with accession numbers 6U8E, 6U8N, 6U8R, 6U8S, 6U9O, 6UA2, 6UA4, 6UA5, 6UAJ, 6UC2, 6UDP, 6UDO, and 6UDQ.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, IMP, NAD+ assembly interface cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20687.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, IMP, NAD+ assembly interface atomic modelProtein Data Bank, 6U8E.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, IMP, NAD+ fully extended cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20688.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, IMP, NAD+ fully extended atomic modelProtein Data Bank, 6U8N.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, IMP, NAD+ Bent (1:3) cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20690.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, IMP, NAD+ Bent (1:3) atomic modelProtein Data Bank, 6U8R.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, NAD+ assembly interface cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20718.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, NAD+ fully extended cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20716.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, NAD+ fully compressed cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20709.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, IMP assembly interface cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20723.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, IMP fully extended cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20722.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, IMP fully compressed cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20720.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP free octamerElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20725.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP assembly interfaceElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20742.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP assembly interfaceProtein Data Bank, 6UDP.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP fully compressedElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20741.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP fully compressedProtein Data Bank, 6UDO.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP fully compressed endElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20743.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP fully compressed endProtein Data Bank, 6UDQ.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP, NAD+ assembly interface cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20691.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP, NAD+ assembly interface atomic modelProtein Data Bank, 6U8S.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP, NAD+ bent (2:2) cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20704.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP, NAD+ bent (2:2) atomic modelProtein Data Bank, 6UA2.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP, NAD+ bent (3:1) cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20705.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP, NAD+ bent (3:1) atomic modelProtein Data Bank, 6UA4.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP, NAD+ fully compressed cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20701.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP, NAD+ fully compressed atomic modelProtein Data Bank, 6U9O.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP, NAD+ free octamer cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20707.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP, NAD+ free octamer atomic modelProtein Data Bank, 6UAJ.
-
IMPDH2 ATP, GTP, IMP, NAD+ free interfacial octamer cryo-EM mapElectron Microscopy Data Bank, 20706.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institutes of Health (5R01GM118396-04)
- Justin M Kollman
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Sjors HW Scheres, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, United Kingdom
Publication history
- Received: November 1, 2019
- Accepted: January 29, 2020
- Accepted Manuscript published: January 30, 2020 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: February 13, 2020 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2020, Johnson & Kollman
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,596
- Page views
-
- 526
- Downloads
-
- 29
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
Formation of membraneless organelles or biological condensates via phase separation and related processes hugely expands the cellular organelle repertoire. Biological condensates are dense and viscoelastic soft matters instead of canonical dilute solutions. To date, numerous different biological condensates have been discovered; but mechanistic understanding of biological condensates remains scarce. In this study, we developed an adaptive single molecule imaging method that allows simultaneous tracking of individual molecules and their motion trajectories in both condensed and dilute phases of various biological condensates. The method enables quantitative measurements of concentrations, phase boundary, motion behavior and speed of molecules in both condensed and dilute phases as well as the scale and speed of molecular exchanges between the two phases. Notably, molecules in the condensed phase do not undergo uniform Brownian motion, but instead constantly switch between a (class of) confined state(s) and a random diffusion-like motion state. Transient confinement is consistent with strong interactions associated with large molecular networks (i.e., percolation) in the condensed phase. In this way, molecules in biological condensates behave distinctly different from those in dilute solutions. The methods and findings described herein should be generally applicable for deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying the assembly, dynamics and consequently functional implications of biological condensates.
-
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
Single-molecule tweezers, such as magnetic tweezers, are powerful tools for probing nm-scale structural changes in single membrane proteins under force. However, the weak molecular tethers used for the membrane protein studies have limited the observation of long-time, repetitive molecular transitions due to force-induced bond breakage. The prolonged observation of numerous transitions is critical in reliable characterizations of structural states, kinetics, and energy barrier properties. Here, we present a robust single-molecule tweezer method that uses dibenzocyclooctyne (DBCO) cycloaddition and traptavidin binding, enabling the estimation of the folding 'speed limit' of helical membrane proteins. This method is >100 times more stable than a conventional linkage system regarding the lifetime, allowing for the survival for ~12 h at 50 pN and ~1000 pulling cycle experiments. By using this method, we were able to observe numerous structural transitions of a designer single-chained transmembrane (TM) homodimer for 9 h at 12 pN, and reveal its folding pathway including the hidden dynamics of helix-coil transitions. We characterized the energy barrier heights and folding times for the transitions using a model-independent deconvolution method and the hidden Markov modeling (HMM) analysis, respectively. The Kramers rate framework yields a considerably low speed limit of 21 ms for a helical hairpin formation in lipid bilayers, compared to μs scale for soluble protein folding. This large discrepancy is likely due to the highly viscous nature of lipid membranes, retarding the helix-helix interactions. Our results offer a more valid guideline for relating the kinetics and free energies of membrane protein folding.