GATA6 mutations in hiPSCs inform mechanisms for maldevelopment of the heart, pancreas, and diaphragm

  1. Arun Sharma
  2. Lauren K Wasson
  3. Jon AL Willcox
  4. Sarah U Morton
  5. Joshua M Gorham
  6. Daniel M DeLaughter
  7. Meraj Neyazi
  8. Manuel Schmid
  9. Radhika Agarwal
  10. Min Young Jang
  11. Christopher N Toepfer
  12. Tarsha Ward
  13. Yuri Kim
  14. Alexandre C Pereira
  15. Steven R DePalma
  16. Angela Tai
  17. Seongwon Kim
  18. David Conner
  19. Daniel Bernstein
  20. Bruce D Gelb
  21. Wendy K Chung
  22. Elizabeth Goldmuntz
  23. George Porter
  24. Martin Tristani-Firouzi
  25. Deepak Srivastava
  26. Jonathan G Seidman
  27. Christine E Seidman  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
  3. Stanford Medical School, United States
  4. Mount Sinai School of Medicine, United States
  5. Columbia University, United States
  6. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States
  7. University of Rochester, United States
  8. University of Utah, United States
  9. Gladstone Institutes, United States
  10. Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States

Abstract

Damaging GATA6 variants cause cardiac outflow tract defects, sometimes with pancreatic and diaphragmic malformations. To define molecular mechanisms for these diverse developmental defects, we studied transcriptional and epigenetic responses to GATA6 loss of function and missense variants during cardiomyocyte differentiation of isogenic human induced pluripotent stem cells. We show that GATA6 is a pioneer factor in cardiac development, regulating SMYD1 that activates HAND2, and KDR that with HAND2 orchestrates outflow tract formation. Loss of function variants perturbed cardiac genes and also endoderm lineage genes that direct PDX1 expression and pancreatic development. Remarkably, an exon 4 GATA6 missense variant, highly associated with extra-cardiac malformations, caused ectopic pioneer activities, profoundly diminishing GATA4, FOXA1/2 and PDX1 expression and increasing normal retinoic acid signaling that promotes diaphragm development. These aberrant epigenetic and transcriptional signatures illuminate the molecular mechanisms for cardiovascular malformations, pancreas and diaphragm dysgenesis that arise in patients with distinct GATA6 variants.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Arun Sharma

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lauren K Wasson

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5193-5215
  3. Jon AL Willcox

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sarah U Morton

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Joshua M Gorham

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Daniel M DeLaughter

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Meraj Neyazi

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Manuel Schmid

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Radhika Agarwal

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Min Young Jang

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Christopher N Toepfer

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Tarsha Ward

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Yuri Kim

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Alexandre C Pereira

    Instituto do Coração, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Steven R DePalma

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Angela Tai

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Seongwon Kim

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. David Conner

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Daniel Bernstein

    Pediatrics, Stanford Medical School, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Bruce D Gelb

    Pediatrics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Wendy K Chung

    Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Elizabeth Goldmuntz

    Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2936-4396
  23. George Porter

    Pediatrics, University of Rochester, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  24. Martin Tristani-Firouzi

    Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  25. Deepak Srivastava

    Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3480-5953
  26. Jonathan G Seidman

    Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9082-3566
  27. Christine E Seidman

    Medicine and Genetics, Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    cseidman@genetics.med.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6380-1209

Funding

National Institutes of Health (UM1HL128711)

  • George Porter
  • Martin Tristani-Firouzi
  • Deepak Srivastava
  • Jonathan G Seidman
  • Christine E Seidman

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Tarsha Ward

National Institutes of Health (UM1HL128761)

  • Christine E Seidman

National Institutes of Health (UM1HL098147)

  • Daniel M DeLaughter

National Institutes of Health (U01-HL098153)

  • Jonathan G Seidman
  • Christine E Seidman

National Institutes of Health (U01-HL098163)

  • Jonathan G Seidman
  • Christine E Seidman

National Institutes of Health (U01-HL098123)

  • Jonathan G Seidman
  • Christine E Seidman

National Institutes of Health (U01-HL098162)

  • Jonathan G Seidman
  • Christine E Seidman

National Science Foundation (EEC-1647837)

  • Jonathan G Seidman
  • Christine E Seidman

National Institutes of Health (T32HL116273)

  • Arun Sharma

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: CHD subjects were recruited to the Congenital Heart Disease Network Study of the Pediatric Cardiac Genomics Consortium (CHD GENES: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01196182) after approval from Institutional Review Boards as previously described (Pediatric Cardiac Genomics et al., 2013; Jin et al., 2017). Written informed consent was received from subjects or their parents prior to inclusion in the study. Clinical diagnoses were standardized based on review of medical data and family interviews.

Copyright

© 2020, Sharma et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,866
    views
  • 501
    downloads
  • 46
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Arun Sharma
  2. Lauren K Wasson
  3. Jon AL Willcox
  4. Sarah U Morton
  5. Joshua M Gorham
  6. Daniel M DeLaughter
  7. Meraj Neyazi
  8. Manuel Schmid
  9. Radhika Agarwal
  10. Min Young Jang
  11. Christopher N Toepfer
  12. Tarsha Ward
  13. Yuri Kim
  14. Alexandre C Pereira
  15. Steven R DePalma
  16. Angela Tai
  17. Seongwon Kim
  18. David Conner
  19. Daniel Bernstein
  20. Bruce D Gelb
  21. Wendy K Chung
  22. Elizabeth Goldmuntz
  23. George Porter
  24. Martin Tristani-Firouzi
  25. Deepak Srivastava
  26. Jonathan G Seidman
  27. Christine E Seidman
(2020)
GATA6 mutations in hiPSCs inform mechanisms for maldevelopment of the heart, pancreas, and diaphragm
eLife 9:e53278.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53278

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53278

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sara Jaber, Eliana Eldawra ... Franck Toledo
    Research Article

    Missense ‘hotspot’ mutations localized in six p53 codons account for 20% of TP53 mutations in human cancers. Hotspot p53 mutants have lost the tumor suppressive functions of the wildtype protein, but whether and how they may gain additional functions promoting tumorigenesis remain controversial. Here, we generated Trp53Y217C, a mouse model of the human hotspot mutant TP53Y220C. DNA damage responses were lost in Trp53Y217C/Y217C (Trp53YC/YC) cells, and Trp53YC/YC fibroblasts exhibited increased chromosome instability compared to Trp53-/- cells. Furthermore, Trp53YC/YC male mice died earlier than Trp53-/- males, with more aggressive thymic lymphomas. This correlated with an increased expression of inflammation-related genes in Trp53YC/YC thymic cells compared to Trp53-/- cells. Surprisingly, we recovered only one Trp53YC/YC female for 22 Trp53YC/YC males at weaning, a skewed distribution explained by a high frequency of Trp53YC/YC female embryos with exencephaly and the death of most Trp53YC/YC female neonates. Strikingly, however, when we treated pregnant females with the anti-inflammatory drug supformin (LCC-12), we observed a fivefold increase in the proportion of viable Trp53YC/YC weaned females in their progeny. Together, these data suggest that the p53Y217C mutation not only abrogates wildtype p53 functions but also promotes inflammation, with oncogenic effects in males and teratogenic effects in females.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Mengjie Li, Aiguo Tian, Jin Jiang
    Research Advance

    Stem cell self-renewal often relies on asymmetric fate determination governed by niche signals and/or cell-intrinsic factors but how these regulatory mechanisms cooperate to promote asymmetric fate decision remains poorly understood. In adult Drosophila midgut, asymmetric Notch (N) signaling inhibits intestinal stem cell (ISC) self-renewal by promoting ISC differentiation into enteroblast (EB). We have previously shown that epithelium-derived Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) promotes ISC self-renewal by antagonizing N pathway activity (Tian and Jiang, 2014). Here, we show that loss of BMP signaling results in ectopic N pathway activity even when the N ligand Delta (Dl) is depleted, and that the N inhibitor Numb acts in parallel with BMP signaling to ensure a robust ISC self-renewal program. Although Numb is asymmetrically segregated in about 80% of dividing ISCs, its activity is largely dispensable for ISC fate determination under normal homeostasis. However, Numb becomes crucial for ISC self-renewal when BMP signaling is compromised. Whereas neither Mad RNA interference nor its hypomorphic mutation led to ISC loss, inactivation of Numb in these backgrounds resulted in stem cell loss due to precocious ISC-to-EB differentiation. Furthermore, we find that numb mutations resulted in stem cell loss during midgut regeneration in response to epithelial damage that causes fluctuation in BMP pathway activity, suggesting that the asymmetrical segregation of Numb into the future ISC may provide a fail-save mechanism for ISC self-renewal by offsetting BMP pathway fluctuation, which is important for ISC maintenance in regenerative guts.