1. Ecology
  2. Evolutionary Biology
Download icon

Eco-evolutionary dynamics of nested Darwinian populations and the emergence of community-level heredity

  1. Guilhem Doulcier  Is a corresponding author
  2. Amaury Lambert
  3. Silvia De Monte
  4. Paul B Rainey
  1. École supérieure de physique et de chimie industrielle de la ville de Paris, PSL University, France
  2. Collège de France, France
  3. École Normale Supérieure, France
  4. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Germany
Research Article
  • Cited 1
  • Views 700
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e53433 doi: 10.7554/eLife.53433

Abstract

Interactions among microbial cells can generate new chemistries and functions, but exploitation requires establishment of communities that reliably recapitulate community-level phenotypes. Using mechanistic mathematical models, we show how simple manipulations to population structure can exogenously impose Darwinian-like properties on communities. Such scaffolding causes communities to participate directly in the process of evolution by natural selection and drives the evolution of cell-level interactions to the point where, despite underlying stochasticity, derived communities give rise to offspring communities that faithfully re-establish parental phenotype. The mechanism is akin to a developmental process (developmental correction) that arises from density dependent interactions among cells. Knowledge of ecological factors affecting evolution of developmental correction has implications for understanding the evolutionary origin of major egalitarian transitions, symbioses, and for top-down engineering of microbial communities.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Guilhem Doulcier

    Laboratoire de Génétique de l'Evolution, CNRS UMR 8231, École supérieure de physique et de chimie industrielle de la ville de Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    guilhem.doulcier@ens.fr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3720-9089
  2. Amaury Lambert

    Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology(CIRB), Collège de France, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7248-9955
  3. Silvia De Monte

    Institut de Biologie de l'´Ecole Normale Sup´erieure, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Paul B Rainey

    Department of Microbial Population Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany
    Competing interests
    Paul B Rainey, PBR is a founder of MilliDrop InstrumentsReviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0879-5795

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-IDEX-001-02)

  • Guilhem Doulcier
  • Paul B Rainey

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-54)

  • Silvia De Monte

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02)

  • Silvia De Monte

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

  • Paul B Rainey

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Wenying Shou, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: November 7, 2019
  2. Accepted: June 12, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 7, 2020 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2020, Doulcier et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 700
    Page views
  • 149
    Downloads
  • 1
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Léa Beaumelle et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Understanding the consequences of ongoing biodiversity changes for ecosystems is a pressing challenge. Controlled biodiversity-ecosystem function experiments with random biodiversity loss scenarios have demonstrated that more diverse communities usually provide higher levels of ecosystem functioning. However, it is not clear if these results predict the ecosystem consequences of environmental changes that cause non-random alterations in biodiversity and community composition. We synthesized 69 independent studies reporting 660 observations of the impacts of two pervasive drivers of global change (chemical stressors and nutrient enrichment) on animal and microbial decomposer diversity and litter decomposition. Using meta-analysis and structural equation modeling, we show that declines in decomposer diversity and abundance explain reduced litter decomposition in response to stressors but not to nutrients. While chemical stressors generally reduced biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, detrimental effects of nutrients occurred only at high levels of nutrient inputs. Thus, more intense environmental change does not always result in stronger responses, illustrating the complexity of ecosystem consequences of biodiversity change. Overall, these findings provide strong evidence that the consequences of observed biodiversity change for ecosystems depend on the kind of environmental change, and are especially significant when human activities decrease biodiversity.

    1. Ecology
    Liang Kou et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Plant species diversity affects carbon and nutrient cycling during litter decomposition, yet the generality of the direction of this effect and its magnitude remains uncertain. With a meta-analysis including 65 field studies across the Earth’s major forest ecosystems, we show here that decomposition was faster when litter was composed of more than one species. These positive biodiversity effects were mostly driven by temperate forests but were more variable in other forests. Litter mixture effects emerged most strongly in early decomposition stages and were related to divergence in litter quality. Litter diversity also accelerated nitrogen, but not phosphorus release, potentially indicating a decoupling of nitrogen and phosphorus cycling and perhaps a shift in ecosystem nutrient limitation with changing biodiversity. Our findings demonstrate the importance of litter diversity effects for carbon and nutrient dynamics during decomposition, and show how these effects vary with litter traits, decomposer complexity and forest characteristics.