A mammalian Wnt5a–Ror2–Vangl2 axis controls the cytoskeleton and confers cellular properties required for alveologenesis
Abstract
Alveolar formation increases the surface area for gas-exchange and is key to the physiological function of the lung. Alveolar epithelial cells, myofibroblasts and endothelial cells undergo coordinated morphogenesis to generate epithelial folds (secondary septa) to form alveoli. A mechanistic understanding of alveologenesis remains incomplete. We found that the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway is required in alveolar epithelial cells and myofibroblasts for alveologenesis in mammals. Our studies uncovered a Wnt5a–Ror2–Vangl2 cascade that endows cellular properties and novel mechanisms of alveologenesis. This includes PDGF secretion from alveolar type I and type II cells, cell shape changes of type I cells and migration of myofibroblasts. All these cellular properties are conferred by changes in the cytoskeleton and represent a new facet of PCP function. These results extend our current model of PCP signaling from polarizing a field of epithelial cells to conferring new properties at subcellular levels to regulate collective cell behavior.
eLife digest
The lungs enable the exchange of gases between inhaled air and the bloodstream. This exchange happens in structures called alveoli, which have a large surface area that aids in efficient gas exchange. Shortly after birth in mice, or during the last few months before birth in humans, alveoli develop folds called secondary septa that increase their surface area and improve the efficiency of gas exchange.
Several types of cells work together to form secondary septa. Surface cells called epithelia and underlying “myofibroblast” cells and small blood vessels must both communicate and move together to build the septa. The processes that control the formation of septa have not been fully studied. In other cases, a cell signaling pathway known as the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway has been shown to help coordinate cell movements. The PCP pathway works by changing the cytoskeleton of cells, which is the series of protein fibers that give cells their shape and structure and the ability to move.
Zhang et al. have now studied septa in mouse lungs and revealed how three genes – Wnt5a, Ror2 and Vangl2 – in the PCP pathway control this process. This pathway oversees changes to the cytoskeleton in both epithelial cells and myofibroblasts, helping the cells to change shape and move together to form septa. Unusually, the PCP pathway has different effects in different cells, rather than affecting all cells similarly. This is partly due to so-called PDGF signals from the epithelial cells that help to guide the growth and movement of myofibroblasts. This process is helped by the epithelial cells changing their shape to accommodate myofibroblasts during septa formation.
Further analysis also showed reduced PCP signaling in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, also known as COPD. This could be a factor in the extensive lung damage seen in these patients. These findings help to explain a key lung development process and may provide new insights to understand lung diseases such as COPD.
Introduction
Gas exchange, the essential function of the lung, depends on the production of a sufficient number of functional alveoli to provide surface area for gas exchange (Burri, 2006; Whitsett and Weaver, 2015; Chao et al., 2016). Elucidating the molecular mechanisms by which alveoli are formed remains a major unresolved question. Lung branching morphogenesis is followed by the construction of primary saccules at the distal end of the branching lung tree. The smooth wall of the primary saccules is further modified by the generation of secondary crests or septa, which divide the saccules into alveoli. As a result, the surface area of gas exchange is greatly increased to meet the high demand of oxygen consumption in terrestrial, warm-blooded animals. Uncovering the molecular basis of alveolar development will also provide insight into diseases that affect the alveoli. For instance, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), in which maturation of alveoli fails to occur (Silva et al., 2015), is prevalent in premature babies. Moreover, insults to the lung in adult life such as infectious diseases or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can lead to destruction of alveoli and respiratory failure (Patel et al., 2019). A mechanistic understanding of alveolar formation will offer new therapies to regenerate alveolar surface area and treat diseases caused by loss of alveoli (Rodríguez-Castillo et al., 2018).
The most important step in alveolar development is the formation of epithelial folds (secondary septa) within the saccules, in which thin and flat alveolar type I (AT1) cells cover a core of myofibroblasts, connective tissue and capillaries (Branchfield et al., 2016). Compared to AT1 cells, alveolar type II (AT2) cells contribute to a much smaller surface area for gas exchange but they play a central role in lung expansion after birth by secreting pulmonary surfactants. During the first 2–3 days of postnatal life, the smooth wall (the primary septa) of saccules in wild-type mouse lungs is modified by epithelial folding, which is termed rudimentary secondary crests or septa, to increase the surface area for gas exchange. Secondary septa consist of alveolar type I cells that cover a core of myofibroblasts, connective tissue and capillaries (Chao et al., 2016). Elongation of secondary septa is associated with deposition of elastin by myofibroblasts and maturation of capillaries. At around postnatal day 5, many of the primary saccules have been subdivided into alveoli by secondary septation although this process will continue for another 25 days and beyond. Secondary septa formation greatly increases the surface area for gas exchange in mammals and is the most critical event during alveolar formation.
The current model posits that interstitial fibroblasts respond to platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) signaling and migrate to the prospective secondary septa to form alveolar myofibroblasts (Chao et al., 2016), which express smooth muscle actin (SMA). It is postulated that myofibroblast migration and elastin deposition by myofibroblasts provide the driving force for secondary septa elongation. However, the molecular mechanisms that control cell migration remain poorly understood. Similarly, the molecular processes that mediate interactions between alveolar epithelial cells and prospective myofibroblasts during secondary septa formation are unknown. Importantly, whether alveolar epithelial cells also play an active role in promoting alveologenesis has not been determined. New insight into these key issues is pivotal to our mechanistic understanding of alveolar formation.
We reasoned that signaling pathways that control the actomyosin cytoskeleton likely play a crucial role in cell migration and interaction during secondary septa formation. The planar cell polarity (PCP; also known as tissue polarity) pathway (Torban et al., 2012; Campanale et al., 2017; Davey and Moens, 2017; Butler and Wallingford, 2017; Gray et al., 2011; Humphries and Mlodzik, 2018; Sokol, 2015; Zallen, 2007; Blair and McNeill, 2018; Peng and Axelrod, 2012) has been shown to regulate the actomyosin cytoskeleton. In this study, we employed PCP signaling as a tool to reveal the molecular basis of secondary septation and alveolar formation in mice. PCP (a non-canonical Wnt pathway) is a fundamental, conserved mechanism for polarizing a field of cells within the plane of an epithelial cell sheet and is essential in many tissues. PCP signaling is initiated by the binding of Wnt ligands to the Frizzled (Fz) receptors (Wang et al., 2016). The signal is relayed by a set of core PCP components that include cytoplasmic and membrane proteins. The outcome of PCP signaling is an altered actomyosin cytoskeleton that is local and is associated with polarized cellular function in a field of cells. The role of PCP components in lung development has been described (Yates et al., 2010; Poobalasingam et al., 2017), but its molecular mechanisms are unknown. Other well-characterized systems that require PCP include convergent extension in neural tube closure, hair cell orientation in the cochlea of the inner ear, hair follicle orientation, and motile cilia positioning in the trachea. It is somewhat surprising that, in each system, the molecular mechanisms that mediate PCP’s effects on cellular behavior are largely underexplored.
Our work described in this report has discovered a new mechanism of PCP signaling in which a Wnt5a–Ror2–Vangl2 axis controls tissue patterning through regulating cellular properties and not tissue polarity. Specifically, PCP signaling controls PDGF ligand secretion from alveolar type I and type II cells, instructs cell shape change of alveolar type I cells, and regulates myofibroblast migration. All of these are mediated though the actomyosin cytoskeleton. These novel insights significantly extend our current understanding of alveolar formation and PCP signaling in tissue patterning. They not only provide a new conceptual framework for understanding how the alveolus is generated during development but also have a major impact on advancing disease mechanisms caused by alveolar malformation or destruction.
Results
Inactivation of Vangl2 in the distal lung epithelium disrupts alveolar formation
To understand how PCP pathway components control alveolar formation, we eliminated PCP signaling in the distal lung epithelium by generating Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice. A floxed (f) allele of Vangl2 (Vangl2f) (Song et al., 2010) was converted into a null allele through strong expression of Cre from the Sox9 locus (Sox9-Cre) (Akiyama et al., 2005) in the SOX9+ distal lung epithelium. During canalicular (16.5–17.5 days post coitus (dpc)) and saccular development (17.5 dpc–postnatal (P) day 4), following the completion of branching morphogenesis, airspace at the terminal bronchioles is subdivided to form saccules (Schittny, 2017). Lined by alveolar type I and type II cells, saccules function as the primitive gas-exchange unit. As expected, VANGL2 protein was barely detectable in the distal epithelium of Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs by 18.5 dpc (shortly before birth), while VANGL2 expression in the lung mesenchyme and elsewhere was unaffected (Figure 1—figure supplements 1, 2 and 3). Loss of Vangl2 abolishes PCP signaling since Vangl2 encodes a four-pass transmembrane protein and is an essential component of mammalian PCP signaling (Bailly et al., 2018).
Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ animals were born alive and cannot be distinguished from their wild-type littermates by their outer appearance or activity at birth (Figure 1—figure supplement 3). However, at postnatal day 2, Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice can be identified by their slightly diminished body size. The reduced size and activity in these mutants became more pronounced as postnatal development proceeded. Mortality was observed in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice at various time points postnatally, especially between postnatal day 3 and 7 (mostly after day 4/5). Interestingly, a small number of Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice survived beyond postnatal day 7. Vangl2-deficient lungs consisted of enlarged saccules (Figure 1A) and failed to generate alveoli (Figure 1B). These results establish an essential role of Vangl2 in alveolar formation (traditionally defined as P5-25 in mice) during lung development.
Of note, the mammalian genome contains two homologs (Vangl1 and Vangl2) of fly Van Gogh (Van)/strabismus. Vangl1-deficient mice that are homozygous for a gene-trapped null allele of Vangl1 (Vangl1gt) (Torban et al., 2008) are fully viable without apparent lung phenotypes and reproduce with normal litter size. This suggests that Vangl1 plays a minor role in alveolar formation and loss of Vangl1 is compensated by Vangl2 in alveologenesis. Of note, we failed to recover live Vangl1gt/gt; Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice postnatally. Hence, our study on alveologenesis has focused on Vangl2. Surprisingly, the widely used ShhCre (Harfe et al., 2004), which drives Cre expression along the entire developing lung epithelium, failed to effectively eliminate VANGL2 (Figure 1—figure supplement 4). Vangl1gt/gt; Vangl2f/f; ShhCre/+ mice were fully viable and fertile without apparent phenotypes (Figure 1—figure supplement 4). In the literature, a hypomorphic (reduced function) allele of Vangl2, Vangl2Lp (loop tail) (Murdoch et al., 2001), has been reported in several studies. Homozygous Vangl2Lp/Lp mice die in utero due to neural tube defects while heterozygous Vangl2Lp/+ mice display mild alveolar defects in adults but minimal alveolar phenotypes at postnatal day 7 (Poobalasingam et al., 2017). Thus, Vangl2Lp/+ mice are unsuitable for studying the molecular mechanisms of alveolar formation. This would require complete removal of Vangl2 function in a select compartment (e.g., the lung epithelium, mesenchyme or others) through conditional inactivation of Vangl2f using various mouse Cre lines. Our approach thus enables us to reveal how PCP signaling regulates alveolar development.
To determine the cause of neonatal lethality in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice, we examined lungs from control and Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice at different time points postnatally. We noticed that the primary septa in control lungs became visibly thinner during the first three days of postnatal life likely due to flattening of AT1 cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 5). The thickness of the primary septa subsequently increased, presumably reflecting cell proliferation and structural changes in the mesenchyme and folding of AT1 cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 5), which is correlated with the progression of alveolar development (Yang et al., 2016). No obvious difference in the gross morphology of the lungs was noticed between control and Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice prior to postnatal day 3 (Figure 1A). Histological analysis of control and Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs showed no apparent difference prior to postnatal day 3 (Figure 1B). Loss of Vangl2 mediated by Sox9-Cre thus does not disrupt branching morphogenesis or saccule formation (Figure 1—figure supplement 3).
At postnatal day 3, enlarged saccules were discerned in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs in comparison with controls under a dissecting microscope (Figure 1A). This finding was confirmed by morphological analysis of dissected lungs using light microscopy (Figure 1B). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of control and Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs revealed lack of rudimentary secondary septa (arrows) in the mutant lungs (Figure 1C). No apparent defects in other organs were found in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice (Figure 1—figure supplement 6). The primary septa in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs underwent a similar thinning process in the first three days of postnatal life. However, the primary septa in mutant lungs failed to engender subsequent modification and retained a relatively thin appearance (Figure 1B). These results suggest that loss of PCP signaling in the distal lung cells has a profound influence on the normal progression and development of the primary septa to generate secondary septa. Only a very small number of primordial secondary septa could be detected in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs. As a result, Vangl2-deficient lungs contained enlarged saccules (Figure 1B, Figure 1—figure supplement 7) with an increased mean linear intercept (MLI, a measure of air space size) (Figure 1D). Disruption of secondary septa formation in the absence of PCP signaling in the distal lung epithelium likely led to respiratory failure and neonatal lethality.
Inactivation of Vangl2 in interstitial fibroblasts/myofibroblasts disrupts alveolar formation, resembling loss of epithelial Vangl2
Most studies on PCP signaling have focused on how this pathway controls collective cell behavior in epithelial sheets. Whether PCP signaling functions in mesenchymal cells is underexplored. To determine if PCP signaling is required in the lung mesenchyme for alveolar formation, we generated Vangl2f/f; Dermo1Cre/+ and Vangl2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ mice. Dermo1 (Twist2) is broadly expressed in mesenchymal cells while Pdgfra, which encodes a receptor for the platelet-derived growth factor A (PDGFA), is expressed in interstitial fibroblasts and induces smooth muscle actin (SMA) expression, a hallmark of myofibroblasts. Thus, Cre expression from the Dermo1 locus (Dermo1Cre) (Yu et al., 2003) would eliminate Vangl2 in most mesenchymal cells whereas Cre expression from the Pdgfra locus (PdgfraCre) (Roesch et al., 2008) would inactivate Vangl2 in interstitial fibroblasts/myofibroblasts and disrupt PCP signaling.
We found that Vangl2f/f; Dermo1Cre/+ and Vangl2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ mice displayed lung phenotypes (Figure 1E, F, G, H and I) resembling those in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice. Secondary septa failed to form in Vangl2f/f; Dermo1Cre/+ or Vangl2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ mice, saccules were enlarged with an increased mean linear intercept, and many of the mutants failed to survive beyond postnatal day 7 (Figure 1E, F, G, H and I). We noticed that more Vangl2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ survivors with less severe alveolar defects were observed than Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ survivors. This could be due to differential Cre activity or differential contributions of epithelial and mesenchymal PCP signaling to alveolar formation. Loss of one copy of Vangl1 did not exacerbate the lung phenotypes in Vangl2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ mice, highlighting the major role of Vangl2 in interstitial fibroblasts/myofibroblasts during alveolar formation. We conclude that PCP signaling operates in both the lung epithelium and mesenchyme and each process is essential for secondary septa formation by controlling distinct aspects of alveologenesis.
Alveolar defects in mice carrying Ror2-deficient lung epithelium or interstitial fibroblasts/myofibroblasts recapitulate phenotypes caused by Vangl2 loss in the corresponding compartment
To reveal the signaling cascade that controls Vangl2 function and subsequently alveolar formation, we tested the role of Ror2 (receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2), which has been implicated in PCP signaling in other tissues (Ho et al., 2012). To this end, we generated Ror2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice and anticipated that a floxed allele of Ror2 (Ror2f) (Ho et al., 2012) would be converted to a null allele in the distal lung epithelium by Sox9-Cre. If ROR2 is responsible for mediating VANGL2 activity, we predict that loss of Ror2 in the distal lung epithelium in Ror2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice would result in alveolar defects similar to those in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice. Indeed, Ror2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice displayed neonatal lethality and their lungs failed to produce secondary septa (Figure 2A and B). A detailed phenotypic analysis (Figure 2A and B) confirmed the similarity of lung phenotypes between Ror2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ and Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice.
We also produced Ror2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ mice to remove Ror2 in lung interstitial fibroblasts/myofibroblasts. As predicted by our model of a Ror2–Vangl2 cascade, these mice died postnatally due to alveolar defects (Figure 2C and D), resembling phenotypes observed in Vangl2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ mice. Taken together, these studies established a key role of Ror2 in activating Vangl2 in either alveolar epithelial cells or mesenchymal myofibroblasts. The downstream events mediated by Ror2–Vangl2 are critical for secondary septa formation and alveolar formation.
Mesenchymal Wnt5a signaling to lung epithelium and mesenchyme is essential for alveolar development
A key question in further understanding how PCP signaling controls alveolar development is to uncover the signals that trigger a Ror2–Vangl2 cascade. Several non-canonical Wnt ligands are expressed in the lungs (Li et al., 2015) and are candidates for activating a Ror2–Vangl2 axis. We first manipulated the activity of Porcupine (Porcn) in the lung, which is required for the release of all WNT proteins from Wnt-producing cells (Cadigan and Peifer, 2009; MacDonald et al., 2009). Consistent with the involvement of Wnt signaling in alveolar development, treatment of neonatal mice with Wnt-C59 (Proffitt et al., 2013) or LGK974 (WNT-974) (Liu et al., 2013), inhibitors of PORCUPINE, resulted in alveolar defects (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Moreover, inactivation of Porcn in the lung mesenchyme by creating Porcnf/f; Dermo1Cre/+ mice or in lung myofibroblasts by generating Porcnf/f; PdgfraCre/+ mice also led to alveolar defects (Figure 2—figure supplement 2, Figure 2E). In this setting, a floxed allele of Porcn (Porcnf) (Liu et al., 2012) was removed by Dermo1-Cre or Pdgfra-Cre. These results support the notion that Wnt signals in the lung mesenchyme initiate PCP signaling for alveolar development.
Among the Wnt ligands, WNT5A is a likely candidate in activating a Ror2–Vangl2 cascade in the lung mesenchyme. Wnt5a transcripts were detected in fibroblasts and myofibroblasts (Figure 2—figure supplement 3) and a very small number of alveolar epithelial cells by single cell RNA-Seq analysis of postnatal lungs (Guo et al., 2019). Moreover, Wnt5a-deficient lungs exhibit a shortened trachea (Li et al., 2002; Kishimoto et al., 2018), consistent with defective PCP signaling. Whether Wnt5a controls PCP signaling during alveolar development is unknown. We first performed PLISH (proximity ligation in situ hybridization) (Nagendran et al., 2018) on lungs from PdgfraH2BGFP mice (Hamilton et al., 2003) to examine the expression patterns of Wnt5a in postnatal lungs. Expression of the H2B-GFP fusion protein in the nucleus of Pdgfra-expressing cells (PdgfraH2BGFP) unambiguously marked myofibroblasts. We found that Wnt5a mRNA was mainly expressed in myofibroblasts and barely any signal was detected in the lung epithelium (Figure 2G).
To test the role of Wnt5a in activating a Ror2–Vangl2 cascade, we initially utilized Sox9-Cre, Pdgfra-Cre and Dermo1-Cre to convert a floxed allele of Wnt5a (Wnt5af) (Ryu et al., 2013) into a null allele. Unfortunately, Wnt5af/f; Sox9Cre/+, Wnt5af/f; PdgfraCre/+ and Wnt5af/f; Dermo1Cre/+ mice all died soon after birth due to craniofacial defects. The perinatal lethality prevented us from analyzing alveolar defects in these animals. To circumvent this problem, we employed Tbx4-Cre (Kumar et al., 2014) to inactivate Wnt5a selectively in the lung mesenchyme but not the mesenchyme of other tissues. Wnt5af/f; Tbx4Cre/+ mice were born alive but many displayed a smaller body size at postnatal day 4 or 5. Phenotypic analysis of Wnt5af/f; Tbx4Cre/+ lungs revealed defective alveolar formation (Figure 2F) albeit the alveolar defects were not as pervasive as those caused by loss of Ror2 or Vangl2. In other experimental settings, we have found that Tbx4-Cre is less efficient in conditional gene inactivation in comparison to other Cre lines.
Taken together, our genetic studies have established a Wnt5a–Ror2–Vangl2 axis in controlling alveolar formation (Figure 2H). In this process, mesenchymal Wnt5a triggers a Ror2/Vangl2–mediated cascade in both lung epithelium and mesenchyme.
In many studies where PCP signaling controls the collective cell behavior of epithelial sheets, PCP components display asymmetric distribution within individual epithelial cells. This is proposed to underlie the coordination between epithelial cells through organizing the cytoskeleton along the same axis among individual cells. We thus examined VANGL2 distribution in either lung epithelial cells or mesenchymal myofibroblasts. To our surprise, we found no apparent asymmetric localization of VANGL2 in alveolar type I cells, alveolar type II cells or myofibroblasts (Figure 2—figure supplement 4). This led to our new model in which a Wnt5a–Ror2–Vangl2 axis controls cellular properties of individual lung cells regardless of asymmetric activation of PCP components. We speculate that this cascade sets in motion PDGF signaling from alveolar type I and type II cells, morphological changes of alveolar type I cells and migration of myofibroblasts, all of which are required for alveolar formation. We will test these hypotheses in subsequent sections.
Loss of epithelial Vangl2 leads to defective PDGF signal reception in mesenchymal myofibroblasts
Lack of secondary septa in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice was associated with thin primary septa. This prompted us to investigate whether proliferation and function of myofibroblasts were affected in the absence of epithelial PCP signaling in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs. In wild-type lungs, fibroblast proliferation can be detected at P0; this is followed by SMA expression at P2/3 and subsequent migration while proliferation continues (Figure 2I). Indeed, we found that interstitial fibroblasts that expressed PDGFRA failed to proliferate as revealed by reduced EdU incorporation in Vangl2f/f; PdgfraH2BGFP/+; Sox9Cre/+ mice in comparison with PdgfraH2BGFP/+ mice (controls) (Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Myofibroblasts were labeled by H2BGFP. Moreover, myofibroblasts (SMA+) in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs failed to migrate to the prospective sites of secondary septa formation (Figure 3B). Decreased myofibroblast proliferation first appeared at postnatal day 2 when PDGFRA+ interstitial fibroblasts started to express SMA and became myofibroblasts. This suggests that expansion of fibroblasts prior to SMA expression and migration was disrupted in the absence of epithelial Vangl2. By postnatal day 3, the number of PDGFRA+ interstitial fibroblasts had vastly decreased in the mutant lungs (Figure 3C). This was associated with a major reduction in SMA+ cells. Myofibroblasts secrete elastin and collagen, which play an important role in promoting secondary septa formation. As expected, both SMA and elastin production was significantly curtailed in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs (Figure 3D).
Given the reciprocal interaction between the lung epithelium and mesenchyme, we speculate that aberrant myofibroblast development in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs stems from malfunction of the lung epithelium. We first tested whether perturbation of pathways that signal from the lung epithelium to the mesenchyme would have caused anomalous alveolar formation in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice and found that PDGF signaling was disrupted in myofibroblasts in these animals. PDGFA is produced primarily in alveolar type I and type II cells and signals to Pdgfra-expressing fibroblasts/myofibroblasts (Chen and Krasnow, 2012; Gouveia et al., 2017) to regulate their proliferation and migration. While loss of either Pdgfa (Boström et al., 1996; Lindahl et al., 1997) or Pdgfra (Sun et al., 2000) can result in loss of secondary septa (Noskovičová et al., 2015), we found no difference in PDGFA ligand production between control and Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs by both qPCR analysis and in situ hybridization. This conclusion was substantiated by a PDGFA reporter mouse line (Pdgfaex4COIN) (Andrae et al., 2014) that faithfully recapitulates the spatial and temporal expression of Pdgfa since no reliable PDGFA antibody is available to detect endogenous PDGFA in tissues (Gouveia et al., 2017; Andrae et al., 2014). In Pdgfaex4COIN/+; Sox2Cre/+ mice, Cre recombinase was broadly expressed and activated β-galactosidase (lacZ) expression (from the Pdgfaex4COIN allele) in Pdgfa-expressing cells, including AT1 (HOPX+) and AT2 (SPC+) cells (Figure 3E). LacZ expression in Pdgfa-expressing epithelial cells is indicative of PDGFA levels. We found that PDGFA was expressed more frequently in AT1 cells than AT2 cells and PDGFA expression levels were higher in AT1 cells than AT2 cells (Figure 3E), consistent with single-cell RNA-Seq data (Wang et al., 2018). We generated Vangl2f/f; Pdgfaex4COIN/+; Sox9Cre/+ to examine the effects of epithelial VANGL2 on PDGFA expression. PDGFA displayed a similar pattern and intensity between control and Vangl2-deficient lungs (Figure 3F), consistent with no reduction in Pdgfa transcript levels in the absence of Vangl2 (Figure 3F). These results pointed to defective PDGF ligand trafficking, secretion or delivery in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs after the PDGF ligand is made. It also predicts that PDGF fails to transduce its signal to mesenchymal myofibroblasts of Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs.
Consistent with our model, while the levels of PDGFRA in a single myofibroblast were unaffected (Figure 3G), phosphorylation of PDGFRA in individual myofibroblasts upon PDGFA ligand binding was significantly reduced in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs (Figure 3H, Figure 3—figure supplement 2). In addition, activation of the downstream kinases, such as AKT (a serine-threonine kinase) (Demoulin and Essaghir, 2014), was drastically diminished in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs in comparison with controls by immunostaining (Figure 3—figure supplement 3). Disrupted PDGF signal transduction in myofibroblasts led to reduced proliferation and migration. These findings support our model in which the PDGFA ligand produced in Vangl2-deficient alveolar epithelial cells fails to transduce its signal to mesenchymal myofibroblasts.
Alveolar epithelial cells lacking VANGL2 fail to present the PDGF ligand to mesenchymal myofibroblasts
Our results indicate that loss of PCP signaling in alveolar epithelial cells disrupts their ability to transduce the PDGF signal to myofibroblasts in the mesenchyme. We envision that either the PDGF ligand failed to reach the cell surface of alveolar type I/II cells or failed to be delivered to target cells. To gain insight into this issue, we performed RNA-Seq analysis (Hrdlickova et al., 2017) of control and Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs collected at P2 and P5. Interestingly, pathways that regulate vesicular transport were perturbed in the mutant lungs (details below), suggesting their role in PDGF secretion. To explore this idea, we assayed intracellular trafficking and secretion of PDGFA in control and Vangl1/2-deficient cells. Control and Vangl1/2-deficient cells were derived from control and Vangl1gt/gt; Vangl2–/– embryos and subsequently lentivirally transduced with constructs that encode a fusion protein of PDGFA and 3xFLAG or GFP. Using this assay, we determined the amount of PDGFA-3xFLAG released from control and Vangl1/2-deficient cells. PDGFA-3xFLAG in the media incubated with Vangl1/2-deficient cells was significantly reduced (Figure 3I). These findings are consistent with a failure in vesicular transport and ligand release of PDGFA without Vangl1/2. Indeed, we found that the intracellular levels of PDGFA-GFP were increased in Vangl1/2-deficient cells (Figure 3J, Figure 3—figure supplement 4).
Consistent with our model in which the PDGF ligand fails to be released from alveolar epithelial cells in the absence of Vangl1/2, inactivation of Vangl1/2 in alveolar type II cells (Surfactant protein C [SP-C or SPC]+ encoded by Sftpc) led to alveolar defects. We generated Vangl1gt/gt; Vangl2f/f; SftpcCreER/+ mice and administered tamoxifen to these animals at P2. Activation of CreER by tamoxifen in SPC+ cells (Lin et al., 2012) induced Vangl2 removal. Analysis of lungs at P10 revealed areas of defective alveolar development that was associated with loss of Vangl1/2 (Figure 3K, Figure 3—figure supplement 5). This supports a critical role of Vangl1/2 in alveolar type II cells during alveologenesis.
We also discovered that the structure of the Golgi apparatus was altered in Vangl1/2-deficient cells. Compared to control cells in which the Golgi apparatus was properly polarized inside the cells, the Golgi stacks were dispersed in Vangl1/2-deficient cells (Figure 3L). We speculate that loss of the proper organization of the Golgi apparatus could contribute to disruption of the secretory pathways including PDGF ligand secretion.
Alveolar type II cells make direct cell-cell contacts with myofibroblasts via cellular processes that pass through the basement membrane (Figure 3M; Brody et al., 1982; Adamson and King, 1985). Such cell-cell contacts could facilitate PDGF signaling as supported by recent studies in which most, if not all, major signaling pathways are shown to require cell-cell contacts for ligand-receptor interactions and signal transduction (Kornberg, 2017; Kornberg, 2019). In this scenario, ablation of PCP signaling in alveolar epithelial cells would affect the actomyosin cytoskeleton, a common output of PCP signaling, and consequently either the formation or function of cellular processes that are required for transducing the PDGF signal. Interestingly, TEM studies revealed loss of cellular processes from alveolar type II cells in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs, which were no longer in direct contact with myofibroblasts (Figure 3M).
Taken together, our studies support a model in which alveolar type I and type II cells utilize a Wnt5a–Ror2–Vangl2 cascade to control PDGF ligand trafficking and release and contribute to secondary septa formation. We surmise that these effects are mediated by the actomyosin cytoskeleton.
WNT5A and PDGF forms a positive feedback loop to generate a pool of fibroblasts/myofibroblasts required for alveologenesis
In our model, a Wnt5a–Ror2–Vangl2 cascade operates in both the epithelial and mesenchymal compartments. We investigated how these signaling events are coordinated during postnatal lung development. We found that phosphorylation of PDGFRA in individual myofibroblasts upon PDGFA ligand binding was reduced in Wnt5af/f; Tbx4Cre/+ lungs (Figure 3—figure supplement 6), while the levels of PDGFRA were unaffected (Figure 3—figure supplement 6). Moreover, elimination of mesenchymal Wnt signaling (including WNT5A secretion from fibroblasts) prior to alveologenesis in Porcnf/f; Dermo1Cre/+ lungs led to reduced PDGF signal transduction without affecting PDGF ligand production or differentiation of alveolar type I and type II cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 7). This suggests that loss of mesenchymal Wnt5a compromises PDGF signal reception but not ligand production in fibroblasts/myofibroblasts. Conversely, loss of PDGF ligand resulted in depletion of WNT5A-producing fibroblasts/myofibroblasts and a reduction in Wnt5a transcript levels (Figure 3—figure supplement 8). These results support a positive feedback loop between WNT5A and PDGFA to generate an adequate number of fibroblasts/myofibroblasts required for alveologenesis (Figure 3N).
Components and regulators of the actomyosin cytoskeleton and vesicular transport show differential expression in Vangl2 and Ror2 mutant lungs by RNA-Seq analysis
We performed bulk RNA-Seq analysis of control and Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs collected at P2 and P5. Our phenotypic analysis has revealed a major effect of epithelial PCP signaling on myofibroblasts and perhaps other lung cell types as well. While it would be ideal to use sorted lung cells for RNA-Seq, it would be difficult to sort myofibroblasts away from airway smooth muscle cells and vascular smooth muscle cells since they express a similar set of markers. As expected, Pdgfra expression was downregulated in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs while Pdgfa expression was not reduced. Several other pathways that are perturbed were identified (Figure 4A and B, Figure 4—figure supplement 1). They include actomyosin cytoskeleton signaling, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, LXR/RXR signaling, CXCR4 signaling, CDK5 signaling, Toll-like receptor signaling and acute phase response signaling.
We also performed RNA-Seq analysis on control and Ror2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs collected at P2 and P5 (Figure 4C and D). We expect that many changes in transcriptional responses would follow a similar trend in lungs deficient in epithelial Vangl2 or Ror2, if Ror2 is responsible for mediating Vangl2 activity. Indeed, loss of Vangl2 and Ror2 showed similar changes in many pathways, affirming the genetic studies in which they function in the same axis.
Vangl2-deficient interstitial fibroblasts/myofibroblasts have disorganized actomyosin cytoskeletons and are defective in migration assays
We found that myofibroblast proliferation was also diminished in Vangl2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ lungs but only at later stages of postnatal development while the initial expansion of fibroblasts/myofibroblasts was unaffected (Figure 5A). This is in contrast to defective fibroblast/myofibroblast expansion in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs (Figure 3C). These results suggest that the primary role of mesenchymal PCP signaling is to control myofibroblast migration and function while epithelial PCP signaling plays a key role in the initial expansion of fibroblasts/myofibroblasts. Both SMA and elastin production was significantly reduced in Vangl2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ lungs (Figure 5B). It is expected that failure of myofibroblast migration to the prospective site of secondary septation deprived them of receiving the PDGF ligand for proliferation. It is interesting to note that myofibroblasts send out cellular extensions to form a network of myofibroblasts after expansion of the fibroblast/myofibroblast population (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). In this process, VANGL2 was found to colocalize with SMA on these cellular extensions, suggesting a critical role of PCP signaling in controlling motility of myofibroblasts (Figure 5—figure supplement 1).
We examined the actomyosin cytoskeleton in Vangl2-deficient myofibroblasts from Vangl2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ lungs in comparison with control myofibroblasts. Phalloidin staining of F-actin (filamentous) revealed a disorganized actomyosin cytoskeleton and smooth muscle actin failed to produce organized stress fibers in mutant myofibroblasts (Figure 5C). We also analyzed fibroblast/myofibroblast distribution in Vangl2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ lungs at P0 and P5 (Figure 5D). We found no difference in the distribution of PDGFRA+ fibroblasts at P0. However, at P5 while PDGFRA+/SMA+ myofibroblasts had migrated to the prospective sites of secondary septa in control lungs, PDGFRA+/SMA+ cells in the mutant lungs stayed in the primary septa.
These results predict that migration of Vangl2-deficient myofibroblasts would be compromised. To test this idea, we isolated myofibroblasts from control and Vangl2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ lungs and seeded them onto the migration chamber. The rate of myofibroblast migration into the cell-free area was measured. While control myofibroblasts occupied the cell-free area after 36–48 hr, only scant Vangl2-deficient myofibroblasts were detected in the cell-free area during this time period (Figure 5E and F). This indicates that the mobility of myofibroblasts was compromised due to loss of PCP signaling in these cells. Reduced myofibroblast proliferation and migration thus underlies defective alveolar development in Vangl2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ mice.
Alveolar type I cells devoid of VANGL2 are associated with disrupted cytoskeletons and fail to encase myofibroblasts necessary for secondary septa formation
Abnormal secondary septation in Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs due to loss of epithelial Vangl2 suggests that the primary defect originates from faulty alveolar epithelial cells. This is in contrast to the traditional view of secondary septa formation in which the main driving force of septa formation is derived from myofibroblast migration and elastin deposition by myofibroblasts (Chao et al., 2016). Having established a critical role of alveolar type I and type II cells in PDGF secretion during alveologenesis, we assessed the function of Vangl2 in alveolar type I cells during alveolar formation. We conjectured that abrogated PCP signaling in alveolar type I cells would perturb the actomyosin cytoskeleton and impair their ability to adopt the cell shape necessary for encasing myofibroblasts during secondary septation. To validate this model, we initially used phalloidin to label F-actin and examined the actomyosin cytoskeleton in alveolar type I cells of control and Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs. Due to the extended morphology of alveolar type I cells, it was very difficult to obtain a clear view of the actomyosin cytoskeleton. We then searched for other markers for the actomyosin cytoskeleton and found that phosphorylated Cofilin and LIM-kinase (LIMK) were significantly increased in Vangl2-deficient alveolar type I cells, compared to controls (Figure 6A, B and D). Phosphorylation of Cofilin by LIMK inhibited its ability to depolymerize actin, leading to a failure in actin bundle remodeling (Figure 6F). This would generate disorganized stress fibers in Vangl2-deficient AT1 cells.
Disruption of the actomyosin cytoskeleton in alveolar type I cells in the absence of PCP signaling raised the possibility that AT1 cells failed to undergo morphogenetic adjustment to sheathe myofibroblasts and capillaries during secondary septa formation. Indeed, immunohistochemical analysis revealed slender Vangl2-deficient AT1 cells that failed to fold up to encase myofibroblasts (Figure 6C and E). This observation was further validated by TEM studies of control and Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ lungs. For instance, AT1 cells in control lungs at P3 displayed folding to sheathe myofibroblasts that had migrated to the prospective sites of secondary septa formation (Figure 1C). By contrast, such coordinated morphological changes in AT1 cells did not occur in the mutant lungs (Figure 1C). These results imply an active role of AT1 cells in secondary septation likely through cell shape change, which would complement the action of myofibroblast migration and contraction in this highly coordinated process.
Taken together, we conclude that PCP signaling operates in both the lung epithelium and mesenchyme and control distinct aspects of cellular properties in each compartment necessary for alveologenesis. This includes ligand secretion, cell shape change and migration.
Alveolar type I cells lacking VANGL1/2 are compromised in alveolosphere formation
To further investigate the role of AT1 cells in alveolar formation, we adopted the alveolosphere assay (Barkauskas et al., 2013) and examined the cellular behavior of control and Vangl1/2-deficient alveolar cells in spheroid formation. This organoid system retains many important aspects of alveolar formation and would reveal the intrinsic cellular defects in AT1 cells during alveologenesis (Barkauskas et al., 2017). In this assay, fibroblasts/myofibroblasts are in direct contact with AT1 cells and obviate the need of PDGF-mediated migration.
We isolated alveolar type II cells (GFP+) from SftpcCreER/+; ROSA26mTmG/+ mice (Lin et al., 2012; Muzumdar et al., 2007) by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Tamoxifen was injected into SftpcCreER/+; ROSA26mTmG/+ mice to activate SftpcCreER and label SPC+ AT2 cells with GFP. Sorted alveolar type II cells were mixed with fibroblasts and cultured in 3D. In this process, AT2 (SPC+) cells proliferated and differentiated into AT1 (HOPX+) cells. After two weeks, lung organoids formed, in which alveolus-like structures expressing markers for alveolar type I cells were produced from alveolar type II cells in the presence of fibroblasts (Figure 6G and H). We performed a similar experiment using Vangl1/2-deficient AT2 cells purified from Vangl1gt/gt; Vangl2f/f; SftpcCreER/+; ROSA26mTmG/+ mice that had been administered with tamoxifen to delete Vangl2 in SPC+ AT2 cells and in all AT1 cells originated from AT2 cells. In the absence of Vangl1/2, differentiation of AT2 cells and proliferation of AT2 and AT1 cells were unaffected. However, although a similar number of alveolospheres was obtained, the size distribution of the alveolospheres derived from Vangl1/2-deficient AT1 cells was dominated by those with a smaller size (Figure 6G and H). In control spheres, HOPX+ AT1 cells are located inside the spheres and are surrounded by SPC+ AT2 cells. This organization was not observed in spheres, in particular, medium and small alveolospheres, derived from Vangl1/2-deficient cells. This is consistent with defective cellular properties in Vangl1/2-deficient AT1 cells required for morphogenesis.
To assess the role of AT1 cells in alveologenesis, we generated Vangl1gt/gt; Vangl2f/f; Aqp5CreER/+ mice and administered tamoxifen to these animals at P2. Activation of CreER by tamoxifen in Aquaporin 5 (AQP5)+ cells induced Vangl2 removal in AT1 cells. Analysis of lungs at P7 revealed areas of defective alveolar development due to loss of Vangl1/2 (Figure 6I). This suggests a vital function of Vangl1/2 in alveolar type I cells during alveologenesis. Together, our results support a central role of Vangl1/2 in controlling the cellular behavior of AT1 cells during alveolar formation.
Loss of Vangl1/2 in alveolar type I cells impairs their ability to form new alveoli following lung injury
To further assess the function of Vangl1/2 in AT1 cells during alveolar formation, we took advantage of the observation that bleomycin applied to adult mouse lungs induces formation of new alveoli (Walters and Kleeberger, 2008; Mouratis and Aidinis, 2011; Egger et al., 2013). In this setting, in response to bleomycin-induced loss of alveoli and fibrosis, alveolar type II cells produce alveolar type I cells, which contribute to new alveoli and lung repair in mice. This feature provided an ideal setup for testing how loss of Vangl1/2 in AT1 cells affects their ability in alveolar formation. To this end, we generated SftpcCreER/+; ROSA26mTmG/+ (control) and Vangl1gt/gt; Vangl2f/f; SftpcCreER/+; ROSA26mTmG/+ adult mice and injected them with tamoxifen to inactivate Vangl2 in alveolar type II cells, which were also labeled by GFP (from the ROSA26mTmG locus). Alveolar type I cells produced from alveolar type II cells would also be lineage-labeled by GFP. We then subjected these animals to bleomycin following the standard protocol. After 4 weeks post-bleomycin administration, lung repair was extensive in control lungs and newly formed alveoli had replaced the damaged lung tissues (Figure 6J and K). By contrast, fewer GFP+ alveoli in Vangl1gt/gt; Vangl2f/f; SftpcCreER/+; ROSA26mTmG/+ mice were found and they failed to reach the same size as that in control lungs (Figure 6J and K, Figure 6—figure supplement 1). This suggests that Vangl1/2-deficient AT1 cells were compromised in their ability to form new alveoli although Vangl1/2-deficient AT2 cells could also contribute to the observed defects in alveolar repair. While additional studies are required, these findings suggest a critical role of Vangl1/2 in controlling the cellular behavior of alveolar type I (and/or type II) cells during alveolar formation.
COPD patients have reduced levels of WNT5A and VANGL2 expression
To explore whether studies of PCP signaling in alveolar formation in mice recapitulate human diseases, we assessed PCP signaling in lung tissues of COPD/emphysema patients (Figure 7A and B). We found that the expression levels of WNT5A and VANGL2 were reduced (Figure 7C), suggesting a link between PCP signaling and alveolar loss/regeneration in these patients. This finding is consistent with other studies in the literature, in which VANGL2 expression was reported to be downregulated in a small cohort of COPD patient lungs (Poobalasingam et al., 2017). In addition, polymorphisms of human VANGL2 have been associated with negative smoking impacts on lung function in humans (Poobalasingam et al., 2017).
It is interesting to note that SERPINA3 (a protease inhibitor), SAA3 (serum amyloid A) and CD14, whose expression was increased in Vangl2-deficient murine lungs (Figure 4E), are activated in COPD patients and are biomarkers for COPD (Bozinovski et al., 2008; Wood et al., 2009; von Scheele et al., 2011). This supports the idea that the PCP pathway is compromised in COPD patients and may contribute to their inability to form new alveoli.
Taken together, our studies have provided new mechanistic insight into alveolar formation and PCP signaling (Figure 7D). They also form the basis for future work to understand how different signaling pathways are integrated during alveologenesis in development and following injury.
Discussion
Our studies have addressed a central question in alveolar development, the molecular basis of secondary septa formation (Figure 7D). Through genetic and molecular approaches, we decipher PCP signaling through a Wnt5a–Ror2–Vangl2 axis as a key element in mediating cell-cell interactions between alveolar cells (type I and type II) and myofibroblasts. The PCP pathway controls PDGF signaling from alveolar type I and II cells to fibroblasts/myofibroblasts to promote their proliferation. This essential step ensures the production an adequate number of fibroblasts/myofibroblasts required for alveologenesis. A positive feedback loop between WNT5A and PDGF facilitates expansion of fibroblasts/myofibroblasts. Subsequently, orchestrated movement between alveolar type I cells and myofibroblasts is regulated by PCP signaling, including cell shape change of alveolar type I cells and migration of myofibroblasts. As a result, they come in close proximity to each other and undergo coordinated morphogenesis to produce secondary septa and alveoli. In this process, myofibroblasts also send out cellular processes to form a network that likely functionally connects alveoli. These critical events require changes in cellular properties mediated by PCP signaling and reflect a novel facet of PCP function. We speculate that this new insight can serve as a paradigm for understanding PCP function in other tissues beyond the classical tissue polarity. Moreover, our findings suggest that the developmental programs executed by PCP are utilized for tissue repair in the lung. This establishes the foundation for elucidating disease mechanisms of BPD and COPD caused by alveolar loss.
Genetic and molecular analyses of Wnt5a, Ror2 and Vangl2-deficient lungs demonstrate a critical role of these PCP components in controlling the actomyosin cytoskeleton, which underlies ligand secretion/delivery, and cell migration and interaction during secondary septa formation. Surprisingly, these processes do not appear to involve the classical tissue polarity, in which asymmetric distribution of PCP components is associated with polarization of cells (Ossipova et al., 2015). Instead, the primary function of the Wnt5a–Ror2–Vangl2 axis is to modulate the cellular properties of lung cells required for alveolar formation. Thus, while the PCP pathway functions in many cellular processes that rely on the actomyosin cytoskeleton, our studies revealed that PCP activity is not confined to tissue polarity. Our work shows that PCP signaling exerts its effects at the subcellular levels via controlling the cytoskeleton in alveolar type I, type II cells and myofibroblasts. This notion is consistent with studies that reported a purported function of PCP in axonal guidance (Zou, 2012) or postsynaptic compartmentalization (Nagaoka and Kishi, 2016), in which PCP was proposed to also operate at the subcellular level. Moreover, our findings suggest that the PCP pathway controls important cellular processes beyond epithelial layers as demonstrated by the involvement of PCP signaling in myofibroblast migration. Hence, our investigation establishes novel modes of PCP function in tissue patterning. We anticipate that additional cellular processes that utilize similar modes of PCP signaling as reported here will be uncovered in other tissues.
Loss of Ror2 in either lung epithelium or mesenchyme recapitulates phenotypes due to lack of Vangl2. This supports a crucial role of ROR2 in activating VANGL2 and downstream events. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that a Fz receptor (Wang et al., 2016) is also involved in relaying the WNT5A signal to VANGL2. In this case, Fz and ROR2 would cooperate in a non-redundant manner to transduce the WNT5A signal. Identifying the putative Fz receptor and elucidating its functions would significantly increase our understanding of the signaling cascade that regulates secondary septa formation.
Our genetic and molecular studies support a new model in which morphological changes of AT1 cells induced by PCP signaling are required for secondary septa elongation. An active role of AT1 cells in secondary septation contrasts their passive role implied from the existing models in which myofibroblasts drive secondary septa formation. Nevertheless, further studies are required to define the functional consequence of PCP signaling in AT1 cells and delineate the relative contributions of AT1 and AT2 cells to alveologenesis. We also showed that morphological changes in myofibroblasts are also critical for secondary septa formation. Thus, secondary septa development relies on coordinated cell shape changes in both alveolar epithelial cells and myofibroblasts. A key element in this process is an altered actomyosin cytoskeleton controlled by the Wnt5a–Ror2–Vangl2 axis. How this axis is integrated with other regulators of the cytoskeleton requires further investigations. We also do not have the cellular resolution to discern the exact sequence of events. This would rely on improved microscopy and the ability to image lung slices for an extended period of time. New culture conditions are also needed to recapitulate alveolar formation in ex vivo lung explants or lung slices. Future development of fluorescent probes that enable monitoring lung development in vivo would be an important step forward to validate these models.
In this study, we have focused on AT1/2 cells and myofibroblasts in secondary septa formation. A third component of the secondary septa is endothelial cells. It is unclear whether PCP signaling controls capillary morphogenesis during alveolar development. This would require additional genetic and molecular studies, similar to those described in this work. Interestingly, PCP signaling has been implicated in network organization of vessels in other organs (Sewduth and Santoro, 2016).
Our analysis of Vangl2-deficient lungs revealed that PDGF ligands produced in alveolar cells fail to signal to myofibroblasts. Our data point to defective delivery of the PDGF ligand due to disrupted cytoskeleton in the absence of PCP signaling. Additional cell biological and biochemical studies are required to pinpoint the defects in PDGFA trafficking in alveolar type I and type II cells. We propose that PDGF signal reception is compromised by loss of cell-cell contacts between alveolar cells and mesenchymal myofibroblasts. Further validation of this model would require direct visualization of ligand–receptor interactions on juxtaposed membranes between ligand-producing and –receiving cells, for instance, using split GFP technology (Feinberg et al., 2008) where GFP signal is reconstituted at sites of ligand–receptor contact. An alternative possibility of cell-cell contacts between alveolar cells and mesenchymal myofibroblasts involves actin-based filopodia. This is similar to the cytonemes described in other systems including the mouse limb (Sanders et al., 2013). The function of cytonemes has been debated but recent data show that they are required for mediating ligand-receptor signaling for major signaling pathways in lieu of diffusion (Roy et al., 2014; Huang and Kornberg, 2015). Cytonemes originate from ligand-producing and receptor-producing cells, but cytonemes have not been reported in lung cells likely due to technical issues.
In conclusion, our work has provided key new insights into the cellular and molecular basis of secondary septation and alveolar formation. Moreover, we have revealed a novel mode of PCP signaling beyond tissue polarity. These studies set the stage for further investigation to obtain a complete mechanistic understanding of alveolar development and repair.
Materials and methods
Animal husbandry
Request a detailed protocolMouse strains used in this study are listed in the Key Resources table (Supplementary file 1). Matings were set up to obtain mice with the indicated genotypes described in this study. This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of California, San Francisco, approved all experiments performed in this study (protocol #AN173680-03).
Generation of Aqp5CreER mice
Request a detailed protocolTo produce the Aqp5CreER mouse line, the translational start ATG in the mouse Aqp5 genomic locus was replaced with a CreER-FRT-PGK-Neo-FRT cassette though gene targeting in E14 embryonic (ES) cells. The FRT-PGK-Neo-FRT cassette was subsequently removed by crosses with FLPe mice (Rodríguez et al., 2000).
Histology and immunohistochemistry
Request a detailed protocolMouse lungs were dissected at the indicated time points and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS on ice for 1 hr. Tissues were embedded in paraffin wax or OCT (frozen sections) and sectioned at 7 μm. Thick sections were prepared in a similar manner. Histological analysis, such as hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, was performed as described (Lin et al., 2017).
Elastin fiber staining was performed following Hart's staining method with minor modifications. Lung sections were deparaffinized with xylene, rehydrated with ethanol and water, and then placed in the working solution (10% Weigert's iron resorcin-fuchsin stock solution, 2% HCl and 70% ethanol) overnight at room temperature. After three washes in water, the sections were counterstained in 0.5% tartrazine/0.5% acetic acid for 3 min. Sections were rinsed three times in water and dehydrated with ethanol and xylene. The elastin fibers were stained black.
Immunohistochemistry was performed following standard procedures (Lin et al., 2017). Antibodies used in this study are listed in the Key Resources table (Supplementary file 1). The following primary antibodies were used for paraffin wax sections: rabbit anti-NKX2.1 (1:100, Epitomics), chicken anti-GFP (1:200, abcam), goat anti-CC10 (1:200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit anti-prosurfactant protein C (proSP-C) (1:200, MilliporeSigma), hamster anti-T1α (1:200, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), mouse anti-HOPX (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and rabbit anti-phospho-AKT (Ser473) (1:150, Cell Signaling Technology). The following primary antibodies were used for frozen sections: rat anti-E-cadherin (1:200, Invitrogen), chicken anti-GFP (1:300, abcam), mouse anti-ACTA2 (1:200, Thermo Scientific Lab Vision), rat anti-PECAM-1 (CD31) (1:150, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit anti-PDGFRA (1:150, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-phospho-PDGFRA (Tyr754) (1:100, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-Cofilin (1:150, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-phospho-Cofilin (Ser3) (1:100, Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit anti-phospho-LIMK1 (Thr508)/LIMK2 (Thr505) (1:100, Cell Signaling Technology), and rat anti-VANGL2 (1:150, MilliporeSigma). Secondary antibodies and conjugates used were donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 or 594 (1:1000, Life Technologies), donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor 488, donkey anti-chicken Alexa Fluor 488 or 647 (1:1000, Life Technologies), donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 or 594 (1:1000, Life Technologies), and donkey anti-rat Alexa Fluor 594 (1:1000, Life Technologies). For biotinylated secondary antibodies, goat anti-hamster (1:1000, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), donkey anti-rabbit (1:1000, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), donkey anti-rat (1:1000, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) and horse anti-mouse (1:1000, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) were used. The signal was detected using streptavidin-conjugated Alexa Fluor 488, 594, or 647 (1:1000, Life Technologies). For antibodies against PDGFRA, phospho-PDGFRA (Tyr754), phospho-Cofilin (Ser3), phospho-AKT, phospho-LIMK1 (Thr508)/LIMK2 (Thr505) and VANGL2, instead of using streptavidin-conjugated Alexa Fluor 488, 594, or 647 as the tertiary antibody, HRP-conjugated streptavidin (1:1000, Perkin-Elmer) was used in combination with fluorogenic substrate Alexa Fluor 594 tyramide for 30 s (1:200, TSA kit; Perkin Elmer). F-actin was stained with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin (1:200; Sigma).
For determining VANGL2 localization and distribution in the lung, frozen sections (at 20 and 50 μm) were prepared from the lungs of Sox9Cre/+; ROSA26mTmG/+ and PdgfraCreER/+; ROSA26mTmG/+ mice. Sections were incubated with chicken anti-GFP and rat anti-VANGL2 at 4°C overnight. Donkey anti-chicken Alexa Fluor 488 and biotinylated donkey anti-rat secondary antibodies were incubated at 4°C overnight. Streptavidin-conjugated HRP tertiary antibody was incubated at room temperature for 2 hr to detect the VANGL2 signal.
For visualizing PDGFA localization and distribution in the lung, lungs from Pdgfaex4COIN/+; Sox2Cre/+ mice at P2 were collected and fixed in 4% PFA on ice for 1 hr. Lungs were washed in 0.02% NP40 in PBS for 2 hr, and placed in X-gal staining solution (5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.01% sodium deoxycholate, 0.02% NP-40, 1 mg/ml X-gal) for 16 hr at 37°C. LacZ-stained lungs were paraffin embedded and sectioned. Immunohistochemistry was subsequently performed on LacZ-stained sections using antibodies against HOPX (AT1 cell marker) and SPC (AT2 cell marker).
Images for H&E staining, elastin staining and LacZ staining were taken using a SPOT 2.3 CCD camera connected to a Nikon Eclipse E1000 microscope. Confocal images were captured on a Leica SPE laser-scanning confocal microscope. Adjustment of red/green/blue/grey histograms and channel merges were performed using LAS AF Lite (Leica Microsystems).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Request a detailed protocolLungs from Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice and their littermate controls were infused with EM fixative (2% glutaraldehyde and 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS) through the trachea. Dissected lungs were immersed in ice-cold EM fixative for at least 2 hr. The samples were trimmed to 1 mm cubes and sectioned at 0.1 μm. The ultrathin sections were placed on copper grids and post-stained. Grids were viewed and photographed with a JEOL JEM-1400 Transmission Electron Microscope at the Cell Sciences Imaging Facility at Stanford University.
Measurement of the mean linear intercept (MLI)
Request a detailed protocolThe mean linear intercept (MLI) (Lm) was measured according to the previously reported methods (Nagendran et al., 2018) with minor modification. In brief, for each animal 15 fields of hematoxylin and eosin-stained lung sections from three different slides were imaged at 20x magnification using a Nikon Eclipse E1000 Microscope. Fields that contained visible blood vessels or airways were excluded. A grid with 10 horizontal and 10 vertical lines was superimposed on the images using ImageJ. The number of times that the alveolar walls (the primary and secondary septa) intercepted the grid lines was counted. Lm was calculated using the following equation: Lm = (Lh + Lv)/m, where Lh is the total length of horizontal line, Lv is the total length of vertical line, and m is the total number of intercepts.
Cell proliferation assays
Request a detailed protocolThe rate of cell proliferation was determined through a short pulse of EdU labeling (Lin et al., 2017). Briefly, mouse pups at postnatal day 0, 2, 5 and 7 were intraperitoneally injected with 0.25 mg of EdU (50 μl of EdU/PBS solution at 5 mg/ml) and lungs were collected 1 hr following EdU injection. Assessment of EdU incorporation was performed on paraffin-embedded lung sections using the Click-iT EdU Alexa Fluor 488 Imaging Kit (Life Technologies). These lung sections were co-stained with antibodies against NKX2.1 or GFP.
For quantifying proliferation of alveolar fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, proliferating cells were labeled by EdU while fibroblasts/myofibroblasts were distinguished by H2BGFP expressed from the Pdgfra locus (the PdgfraH2BGFP allele). The proliferation rate of alveolar fibroblasts/myofibroblasts was calculated as the ratio of (EdU+H2BGFP+ cells)/(H2BGFP+ cells).
Alternatively, alveolar fibroblasts and myofibroblasts were identified by anti-PDGFRA antibodies. In this case, the proliferation rate of alveolar fibroblasts/myofibroblasts was calculated as the ratio of (EdU+PDGFRA+ cells)/(PDGFRA+ cells).
Proximity Ligation In Situ Hybridization (PLISH)
Request a detailed protocolIn situ hybridization was performed following the procedure of Proximity Ligation In Situ Hybridization (PLISH) (Nagendran et al., 2018) with minor modifications. Lungs from PdgfraH2BGFP/+ mice were dissected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and embedded in OCT for frozen sections at 16 μm. Lung sections were incubated with H probe pairs, which were targeted to the adjacent positions in a tiled manner along the mRNA of interest. Nine H probe pairs for mouse Wnt5a and ten H probe pairs for mouse Ror2 were used (see Supplementary file 2). In the circularization reaction, the barcode sequences in the paired probes hybridized to the 'bridge' (phosphorylated VB02) and 'circle' (phosphorylated CCC2.1) oligonucleotides to form a closed circle, which underwent rolling circle replication to generate a long single-stranded amplicon of tandem repeats. Fluorescently-labeled oligonucleotides were hybridized to the complementary tandem repeats and generated bright puncta for visualization.
For combined in situ hybridization/immunohistochemistry, samples were washed 3 times in PBST (0.05% Tween-20 and 5 mM EDTA in PBS) after PLISH and incubated in blocking buffer (3% BSA, 0.1% Triton X-100 and 5 mM EDTA in PBS) for 30 min. The sections were then incubated with primary antibodies (goat anti-CC10 or chicken anti-GFP in blocking buffer) for 2 hr at room temperature, washed in PBST and then incubated with secondary antibodies (donkey anti-goat Alexa Fluor 488 or donkey anti-chicken Alexa Fluor 488) for 1 hr at room temperature.
Lentivirus production and transduction
Request a detailed protocolcDNAs encoding PDGFA-3xFLAG and PDGFA-eGFP fusions were cloned into the modified pSECC lentiviral vector. The mouse PDGFA (NM_008808.4) coding sequence was amplified from mouse P3 lung cDNA library.
Lentiviruses were produced in HEK293T cells grown in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 1x penicillin/streptomycin and 1x L-glutamine. One day before transfection, HEK293T cells were seeded at 50–60% confluence in a 6 cm dish; cells reached 80–90% confluence for transfection the following day. For HEK293T cells on one 6 cm dish, 1 μg of pMD2.G, 1 μg of psPAX2 and 2 μg of the plasmid of interest (PDGFA-3xFLAG or PDGFA-eGFP) were mixed in 500 μl OPTI-MEM and 30 μl of polyethylenimine (PEI) (1 μg/μl, transfection reagent) was added. Media were replaced 24 hr post-transfection and viral supernatants were harvested 48 hr post-transfection. The viral supernatants were filtered through 0.45 μm PVDF filters and then added to control and Vangl1gt/gt; Vangl2–/– adherent mouse cells together with 8 μg/ml polybrene. 12 hr after transduction, the media were replaced with regular culture media (DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin).
PDGFA secretion assay
Request a detailed protocolControl and Vangl1gt/gt; Vangl2–/– cells were derived from mouse embryos at 13.5 and 18.5 dpc, authenticated by methods such as PCR and STR profiling, and tested negative for mycoplasma contamination. Loss of Vangl1/2 ensures a complete removal of signaling through VANGL1/2, These cell lines were lentivirally transduced with constructs that expressed 3xFLAG-tagged PDGFA as described above. Cells were seeded onto 6 cm dishes. Once cells reached 100% confluence, the media were replaced with OPTI-MEM supplemented with insulin, transferrin and selenium (ITS) and cells were cultured for another 16 hr. The supernatants were then collected and filtered through 0.45 μm filters. Protein inhibitor cocktails were added to the filtrates, which were centrifuged at high speed (>12000 rpm) for 15 min at 4° to remove cell debris and protein aggregates. The filtrates were further concentrated in protein concentration columns (Millipore CENTRICON YM-10 Centrifugal Filter Unit 2 mL 10 kDa) through centrifugation at 2000 g for 1 hr at 4°C. In parallel, cells on the 6 cm dishes were scraped for lysis. Immunoprecipitation (IP) buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 2 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1x protein inhibitor cocktail) was added to the concentrated filtrates or scraped cells in a total volume of 500 μl. Immunoprecipitation was performed using FLAG-M2 beads following standard procedures. SDS-PAGE sample buffer was added to the immunoprecipitates for western blot analysis. PDGFA secretion was calculated using the following equation: Psecretion = Ps/(Ps + Pc) where Ps = PDGFA in supernatant/medium, Pc = PDGFA in the cell lysate.
Alveolosphere assays
Request a detailed protocolAlveolosphere assays were performed as previously described (Barkauskas et al., 2013) with minor modifications. Briefly, SftpcCreER/+; ROSA26mTmG/+ and Vangl1gt/gt; Vangl2f/f; SftpcCreER/+; ROSA26mTmG/+ mice were injected with tamoxifen to label alveolar type II (AT2) cells with eGFP. One month post-tamoxifen injection, lungs were dissected and digested in dispase (1.2 U/ml), collagenase B (0.5 mg/ml) together with 50 U/ml DNase at 37°C. After incubation for 1 hr, an equal volume of sorting media (phenol red free DMEM with 2% FBS and 2% penicillin/streptomycin) was added to the dissociated cells. The mixture was then passed through 70 μm cell strainers and centrifuged at 600 g for 10 min. Cell pellets were resuspended in 3 ml RBC lysis buffer (Invitrogen) for 2 min on ice and 5 ml sorting medium was added. The mixture was passed through the 40 μm cell strainer. After centrifugation at 600 g for 10 min, cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml sorting buffer for fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). eGFP-labeled AT2 cells were isolated using a BD FACSAria III sorter. 5 × 103 sorted AT2 cells and 5 × 104 Mlg 2908 cells (ATCC CCL-206, a lung fibroblast cell line) were added to 100 μl culture medium (DMEM/F12 supplemented with Glutamax, 10% FBS, 1x insulin/transferrin/selenium, 2x penicillin/streptomycin, 0.25 μg/ml Amphotericin B, 0.04 μg/ml EGF, 0.05 μg/ml bFGF, 0.02 μg/ml KGF, and 0.02 μg/ml HGF), mixed with an equal volume of Matrigel (BD Biosciences), and then seeded into a 0.4 μm Transwell insert (Corning) in a 24-well plate. The medium was replaced every two days. After three weeks of culture, the Transwell inserts were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C overnight and embedded in OCT. The organoid/Matrigel-containing inserts were sectioned at 50 μm for immunohistochemistry.
RNA-Seq analysis
Request a detailed protocolRNA-Seq was performed as previously described (Lin et al., 2017). In brief, the left lung lobe from control, Vangl2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ and Ror2f/f; Sox9Cre/+ mice were homogenized in 1 ml TRIzol (Life Technologies) and 200 μl chloroform was then added. After centrifugation, the upper aqueous layer was removed and mixed with an equal volume of 70% ethanol. RNA was extracted with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quality was evaluated using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Samples were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 or HiSeq4000. Functional enrichment analysis was performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (version 7.1). Differential gene expression and gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses were performed with RStudio. The barplot of gene ontology enrichment was created in order to visualize differentially expressed genes that are associated with a certain biological process (BP). Datasets have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus database and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE140779.
qPCR analysis
Request a detailed protocolRNAs extracted from lung tissues were reverse-transcribed with the Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was carried out on the ABI Prism 7900HT Sequence Detection System. Primers for qPCR are listed in the Sequence-based reagent table.
Cell migration (wound recovery or healing) assay
Request a detailed protocolThe migratory capacity of lung myofibroblasts was determined using the Culture-Insert 2 Well system (ibidi). Briefly, lungs from control and Vangl2f/f; PdgfraCre/+ mice at P3 were dissected and digested in dispase (1.2 U/ml) and collagenase B (0.5 mg/ml) at 37°C to release single cells. After incubation for 1 hr, an equal volume of culture medium (DMEM with 10% FBS and 2% penicillin/streptomycin) was added to dissociated cells. The mixture was then passed through a 40 μm cell strainer and centrifuged at 600 g for 10 min. Cell pellets were resuspended in 200 μl culture medium and seeded into wells (100 μl per well). Myofibroblasts were allowed to attach to fibronectin–coated plates for 2–3 hr. Non-adherent cells were washed out and myofibroblasts were cultured to reach 100% confluence in ~2–3 days. Confluent myofibroblasts were switched to starvation medium (DMEM with 0.2% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin) for 16 hr prior to removal of the insert. Migration of myofibroblasts into the wounded area (insert) was allowed to continue for another 36–48 hr.
Human lung tissues
Request a detailed protocolLung samples were obtained at the time of lung transplantation performed for severe emphysema (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Criteria, stages III or IV) during the study period 2015‐2019. Control lung tissues were obtained from donor lungs not utilized for lung transplantation. Our studies indicate that these lungs are physiologically and pathologically normal (Ware et al., 2002). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects and the study was approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board (IRB approval # 13–10738).
Statistical analysis
Request a detailed protocolBoth technical replicates and biological replicates (using different cell lines and mice) were performed. All results were presented as mean ± SEM. Two-tailed Student’s t-tests were used to calculate the P values. Statistical significance was considered only when the P value was less than 0.05.
Data availability
RNA-Seq data have been deposited in GEO (Series accession number GSE140779).
-
NCBI Gene Expression OmnibusID GSE140779. A mammalian Wnt5a-Ror2-Vangl2 axis controls the cytoskeleton and confers cellular properties required for alveologenesis.
-
NCBI Gene Expression OmnibusID GSE122332. Single cell RNA analysis identifies cellular heterogeneity and adaptive responses of the lung at birth.
References
-
Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in postnatal rat lung growthExperimental Lung Research 8:261–274.https://doi.org/10.3109/01902148509087808
-
The planar cell polarity Vangl2 protein: from genetics to cellular and molecular functionsSeminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 81:62–70.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.10.030
-
Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lungJournal of Clinical Investigation 123:3025–3036.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI68782
-
Lung organoids: current uses and future promiseDevelopment 144:986–997.https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.140103
-
Big roles for fat cadherinsCurrent Opinion in Cell Biology 51:73–80.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2017.11.006
-
Serum amyloid A is a biomarker of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 177:269–278.https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200705-678OC
-
A three-dimensional study of alveologenesis in mouse lungDevelopmental Biology 409:429–441.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.11.017
-
Alterations in alveolar basement membranes during postnatal lung growthThe Journal of Cell Biology 95:394–402.https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.95.2.394
-
Planar cell polarity in development and diseaseNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 18:375–388.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.11
-
Wnt signaling from development to disease: insights from model systemsCold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 1:a002881.https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a002881
-
Development and dynamics of cell polarity at a glanceJournal of Cell Science 130:1201–1207.https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.188599
-
Alveologenesis: key cellular players and fibroblast growth factor 10 signalingMolecular and Cellular Pediatrics 3:17.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40348-016-0045-7
-
PDGF receptor signaling networks in normal and Cancer cellsCytokine & Growth Factor Reviews 25:273–283.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.03.003
-
Evolutionary divergence of platelet-derived growth factor alpha receptor signaling mechanismsMolecular and Cellular Biology 23:4013–4025.https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.11.4013-4025.2003
-
RNA-Seq methods for transcriptome analysisWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: RNA 8:e1364.https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1364
-
From instruction to output: wnt/PCP signaling in development and CancerCurrent Opinion in Cell Biology 51:110–116.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2017.12.005
-
Distributing signaling proteins in space and time: the province of cytonemesCurrent Opinion in Genetics & Development 45:22–27.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2017.02.010
-
Scripting a place in timeDevelopmental Biology 447:24–27.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.09.014
-
Wnt5a participates in distal lung morphogenesisDevelopmental Biology 248:68–81.https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2002.0729
-
Non-canonical WNT signalling in the lungJournal of Biochemistry 158:355–365.https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvv081
-
Alveogenesis failure in PDGF-A-deficient mice is coupled to lack of distal spreading of alveolar smooth muscle cell progenitors during lung developmentDevelopment 124:3943–3953.
-
Modeling pulmonary fibrosis with bleomycinCurrent Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine 17:355–361.https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0b013e328349ac2b
-
Platelet-derived growth factor signaling in the lung from lung development and disease to clinical studiesAmerican Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology 52:263–284.https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2014-0294TR
-
Asymmetric protein localization in planar cell polarity: mechanisms, puzzles, and challengesCurrent Topics in Developmental Biology 101:33–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394592-1.00002-8
-
High-efficiency deleter mice show that FLPe is an alternative to Cre-loxPNature Genetics 25:139–140.https://doi.org/10.1038/75973
-
Understanding alveolarization to induce lung regenerationRespiratory Research 19:148.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0837-5
-
The transcriptome of retinal müller glial cellsThe Journal of Comparative Neurology 509:225–238.https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21730
-
An autocrine Wnt5a-Ror signaling loop mediates sympathetic target innervationDevelopmental Biology 377:79–89.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.02.013
-
Development of the lungCell and Tissue Research 367:427–444.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-016-2545-0
-
"Decoding" Angiogenesis: New Facets Controlling Endothelial Cell BehaviorFrontiers in Physiology 7:306.https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00306
-
Recent advances in the mechanisms of lung alveolarization and the pathogenesis of bronchopulmonary dysplasiaAmerican Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 309:L1239–L1272.https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00268.2015
-
Spatial and temporal aspects of wnt signaling and planar cell polarity during vertebrate embryonic developmentSeminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 42:78–85.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.05.002
-
A human YAC transgene rescues craniofacial and neural tube development in PDGFRalpha knockout mice and uncovers a role for PDGFRalpha in prenatal lung growthDevelopment 127:4519–4529.
-
An expanding role of vangl proteins in embryonic developmentCurrent Topics in Developmental Biology 101:237–261.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394592-1.00005-3
-
Toll-like receptor expression in smokers with and without COPDRespiratory Medicine 105:1222–1230.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2011.02.012
-
Mouse models of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosisCurrent Protocols in Pharmacology Chapter 5:46.https://doi.org/10.1002/0471141755.ph0546s40
-
Frizzled receptors in development and diseaseCurrent Topics in Developmental Biology 117:113–139.https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.11.028
-
Alveolar development and diseaseAmerican Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology 53:1–7.https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2015-0128PS
-
The PCP genes Celsr1 and Vangl2 are required for normal lung branching morphogenesisHuman Molecular Genetics 19:2251–2267.https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq104
-
Does planar cell polarity signaling steer growth cones?Current Topics in Developmental Biology 101:141–160.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394592-1.00009-0
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institutes of Health (HL142876)
- Pao-Tien Chuang
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Acknowledgements
We thank Yingzi Yang, Mark Krasnow, Maya Kumar and Johanna Andrae for sharing mouse strains; Monica Nagendran and Tatsuya Tsukui for advice on PLISH; Jau-Nian Chen and Andy Chang for critical reading of the manuscript. Some data for this study were acquired at the Nikon Imaging Center and the Laboratory for Cell Analysis at UCSF. This work was supported with a grant (R01 HL142876) from the National Institutes of Health to PTC.
Ethics
Human subjects: Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects and the study was approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board 851 (IRB approval # 13-10738).
Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of California, San Francisco, approved all experiments performed in this study (protocol #AN173680-02).
Copyright
© 2020, Zhang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,373
- views
-
- 346
- downloads
-
- 37
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Developmental Biology
Rhythmic and sequential segmentation of the growing vertebrate body relies on the segmentation clock, a multi-cellular oscillating genetic network. The clock is visible as tissue-level kinematic waves of gene expression that travel through the presomitic mesoderm (PSM) and arrest at the position of each forming segment. Here, we test how this hallmark wave pattern is driven by culturing single maturing PSM cells. We compare their cell-autonomous oscillatory and arrest dynamics to those we observe in the embryo at cellular resolution, finding similarity in the relative slowing of oscillations and arrest in concert with differentiation. This shows that cell-extrinsic signals are not required by the cells to instruct the developmental program underlying the wave pattern. We show that a cell-autonomous timing activity initiates during cell exit from the tailbud, then runs down in the anterior-ward cell flow in the PSM, thereby using elapsed time to provide positional information to the clock. Exogenous FGF lengthens the duration of the cell-intrinsic timer, indicating extrinsic factors in the embryo may regulate the segmentation clock via the timer. In sum, our work suggests that a noisy cell-autonomous, intrinsic timer drives the slowing and arrest of oscillations underlying the wave pattern, while extrinsic factors in the embryo tune this timer’s duration and precision. This is a new insight into the balance of cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms driving tissue patterning in development.
-
- Developmental Biology
The structural integrity of the sperm is crucial for male fertility, defects in sperm head-tail linkage and flagellar axoneme are associated with acephalic spermatozoa syndrome (ASS) and the multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella (MMAF). Notably, impaired head-tail coupling apparatus (HTCA) often accompanies defects in the flagellum structure, however, the molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain elusive. Here, we identified an evolutionarily conserved coiled-coil domain-containing (CCDC) protein, CCDC113, and found the disruption of CCDC113 produced spermatozoa with disorganized sperm flagella and HTCA, which caused male infertility. Further analysis revealed that CCDC113 could bind to CFAP57 and CFAP91, and function as an adaptor protein for the connection of radial spokes, nexin-dynein regulatory complex (N-DRC), and doublet microtubules (DMTs) in the sperm axoneme. Moreover, CCDC113 was identified as a structural component of HTCA, collaborating with SUN5 and CENTLEIN to connect sperm head to tail during spermiogenesis. Together, our studies reveal that CCDC113 serve as a critical hub for sperm axoneme and HTCA stabilization in mice, providing insights into the potential pathogenesis of infertility associated with human CCDC113 mutations.