The cryo-EM structure of a pannexin 1 reveals unique motifs for ion selection and inhibition

  1. Kevin Michalski
  2. Johanna L Syrjanen
  3. Erik Henze
  4. Julia Kumpf
  5. Hiro Furukawa  Is a corresponding author
  6. Toshimitsu Kawate  Is a corresponding author
  1. Cornell University, United States
  2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, United States

Abstract

Pannexins are large-pore forming channels responsible for ATP release under a variety of physiological and pathological conditions. Although predicted to share similar membrane topology with other large-pore forming proteins such as connexins, innexins, and LRRC8, pannexins have minimal sequence similarity to these protein families. Here, we present the cryo-EM structure of a frog pannexin 1 (Panx1) channel at 3.0 Å. We find that Panx1 protomers harbor four transmembrane helices similar in arrangement to other large-pore forming proteins but assemble as a heptameric channel with a unique constriction formed by Trp74 in the first extracellular loop. Mutating Trp74 or the nearby Arg75 disrupt ion selectivity whereas altering residues in the hydrophobic groove formed by the two extracellular loops abrogates channel inhibition by carbenoxolone. Our structural and functional study establishes the extracellular loops as important structural motifs for ion selectivity and channel inhibition in Panx1.

Data availability

Cryo EM data and the pannexin model has been deposited in PDB under the accession code 6VD7.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kevin Michalski

    Molecular Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Johanna L Syrjanen

    WM Keck Structural Biology Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Erik Henze

    Molecular Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Julia Kumpf

    Molecular Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3813-1255
  5. Hiro Furukawa

    WM Keck Structural Biology Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, United States
    For correspondence
    furukawa@cshl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Toshimitsu Kawate

    Department of Molecular Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, United States
    For correspondence
    toshi.kawate@cornell.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5005-2031

Funding

National Institutes of Health (GM114379)

  • Toshimitsu Kawate

National Institutes of Health (NS113632)

  • Hiro Furukawa

National Institutes of Health (GM008267)

  • Kevin Michalski
  • Erik Henze
  • Julia Kumpf

National Institutes of Health (GM008267)

  • Kevin Michalski

Robertson funds at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

  • Hiro Furukawa

Doug Fox Alzheimer's fund

  • Hiro Furukawa

Austin's purpose

  • Hiro Furukawa

Heartfelt Wing Alzheimer's fund

  • Hiro Furukawa

Charles H Revson Foundation (Senior Fellowship in Biomedical Science)

  • Johanna L Syrjanen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Michalski et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,421
    views
  • 1,005
    downloads
  • 121
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kevin Michalski
  2. Johanna L Syrjanen
  3. Erik Henze
  4. Julia Kumpf
  5. Hiro Furukawa
  6. Toshimitsu Kawate
(2020)
The cryo-EM structure of a pannexin 1 reveals unique motifs for ion selection and inhibition
eLife 9:e54670.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54670

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54670

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Georgin Jacob, RT Pramod, SP Arun
    Research Article

    Most visual tasks involve looking for specific object features. But we also often perform property-based tasks where we look for specific property in an image, such as finding an odd item, deciding if two items are same, or if an object has symmetry. How do we solve such tasks? These tasks do not fit into standard models of decision making because their underlying feature space and decision process is unclear. Using well-known principles governing multiple object representations, we show that displays with repeating elements can be distinguished from heterogeneous displays using a property we define as visual homogeneity. In behavior, visual homogeneity predicted response times on visual search, same-different and symmetry tasks. Brain imaging during visual search and symmetry tasks revealed that visual homogeneity was localized to a region in the object-selective cortex. Thus, property-based visual tasks are solved in a localized region in the brain by computing visual homogeneity.

    1. Neuroscience
    Célian Bimbard, Flóra Takács ... Philip Coen
    Tools and Resources

    Electrophysiology has proven invaluable to record neural activity, and the development of Neuropixels probes dramatically increased the number of recorded neurons. These probes are often implanted acutely, but acute recordings cannot be performed in freely moving animals and the recorded neurons cannot be tracked across days. To study key behaviors such as navigation, learning, and memory formation, the probes must be implanted chronically. An ideal chronic implant should (1) allow stable recordings of neurons for weeks; (2) allow reuse of the probes after explantation; (3) be light enough for use in mice. Here, we present the ‘Apollo Implant’, an open-source and editable device that meets these criteria and accommodates up to two Neuropixels 1.0 or 2.0 probes. The implant comprises a ‘payload’ module which is attached to the probe and is recoverable, and a ‘docking’ module which is cemented to the skull. The design is adjustable, making it easy to change the distance between probes, the angle of insertion, and the depth of insertion. We tested the implant across eight labs in head-fixed mice, freely moving mice, and freely moving rats. The number of neurons recorded across days was stable, even after repeated implantations of the same probe. The Apollo implant provides an inexpensive, lightweight, and flexible solution for reusable chronic Neuropixels recordings.