Abstract

Bone marrow mesenchymal lineage cells are a heterogeneous cell population involved in bone homeostasis and diseases such as osteoporosis. While it is long postulated that they originate from mesenchymal stem cells, the true identity of progenitors and their in vivo bifurcated differentiation routes into osteoblasts and adipocytes remain poorly understood. Here, by employing large scale single cell transcriptome analysis, we computationally defined mesenchymal progenitors at different stages and delineated their bi-lineage differentiation paths in young, adult and aging mice. One identified subpopulation is a unique cell type that expresses adipocyte markers but contains no lipid droplets. As non-proliferative precursors for adipocytes, they exist abundantly as pericytes and stromal cells that form a ubiquitous 3D network inside the marrow cavity. Functionally they play critical roles in maintaining marrow vasculature and suppressing bone formation. Therefore, we name them marrow adipogenic lineage precursors (MALPs) and conclude that they are a new component of marrow adipose tissue.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE145477

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Leilei Zhong

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lutian Yao

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0652-2075
  3. Robert Joel Tower

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yulong Wei

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Zhen Miao

    Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jihwan Park

    Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division of Department of Medicine, and Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5728-912X
  7. Rojesh Shrestha

    Medicine and Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Luqiang Wang

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Wei Yu

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Nicholas Holdreith

    Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Xiaobin Huang

    Translational Research Program in Pediatric Orthopaedics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yejia Zhang

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Wei Tong

    Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Yanqing Gong

    Division of Transnational Medicine and Human Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Jaimo Ahn

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Katalin Susztak

    Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division of Department of Medicine, and Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Nathanial Dyment

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8708-112X
  18. Mingyao Li

    Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Fanxin Long

    Translational Research Program in Pediatric Orthopaedics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Chider Chen

    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2899-1208
  21. Patrick Seale

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Ling Qin

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    For correspondence
    qinling@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2582-0078

Funding

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR066098)

  • Ling Qin

National Institutes of Health (R03DE028026)

  • Chider Chen

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK095803)

  • Ling Qin

Penn Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders (P30AR069619)

  • Ling Qin

National Institutes of Health (R21AR074570)

  • Ling Qin

American Heart Association (17GRNT33650029)

  • Yanqing Gong

National Institutes of Health (R01HL095675)

  • Wei Tong

National Institutes of Health (R01HL133828)

  • Wei Tong

Nihon University (F31HL139091)

  • Nicholas Holdreith

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R00DE025915)

  • Chider Chen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal work performed in this report was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Pennsylvania under Protocol 804112. University Laboratory Animal Resources (ULAR) of the University of Pennsylvania is responsible for the procurement, care, and use of all university-owned animals as approved by IACUC. Animal facilities in the University of Pennsylvania meet federal, state, and local guidelines for laboratory animal care and are accredited by the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International.

Copyright

© 2020, Zhong et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 18,713
    views
  • 2,773
    downloads
  • 257
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Leilei Zhong
  2. Lutian Yao
  3. Robert Joel Tower
  4. Yulong Wei
  5. Zhen Miao
  6. Jihwan Park
  7. Rojesh Shrestha
  8. Luqiang Wang
  9. Wei Yu
  10. Nicholas Holdreith
  11. Xiaobin Huang
  12. Yejia Zhang
  13. Wei Tong
  14. Yanqing Gong
  15. Jaimo Ahn
  16. Katalin Susztak
  17. Nathanial Dyment
  18. Mingyao Li
  19. Fanxin Long
  20. Chider Chen
  21. Patrick Seale
  22. Ling Qin
(2020)
Single cell transcriptomics identifies a unique adipose lineage cell population that regulates bone marrow environment
eLife 9:e54695.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54695

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54695

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Róża K Przanowska, Yuechuan Chen ... Anindya Dutta
    Research Article

    The six-subunit ORC is essential for the initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotes. Cancer cell lines in culture can survive and replicate DNA replication after genetic inactivation of individual ORC subunits, ORC1, ORC2, or ORC5. In primary cells, ORC1 was dispensable in the mouse liver for endo-reduplication, but this could be explained by the ORC1 homolog, CDC6, substituting for ORC1 to restore functional ORC. Here, we have created mice with a conditional deletion of ORC2, which does not have a homolog. Although mouse embryo fibroblasts require ORC2 for proliferation, mouse hepatocytes synthesize DNA in cell culture and endo-reduplicate in vivo without ORC2. Mouse livers endo-reduplicate after simultaneous deletion of ORC1 and ORC2 both during normal development and after partial hepatectomy. Since endo-reduplication initiates DNA synthesis like normal S phase replication these results unequivocally indicate that primary cells, like cancer cell lines, can load MCM2-7 and initiate replication without ORC.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Pavan K Nayak, Arul Subramanian, Thomas F Schilling
    Research Article Updated

    Mechanical forces play a critical role in tendon development and function, influencing cell behavior through mechanotransduction signaling pathways and subsequent extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. Here, we investigate the molecular mechanisms by which tenocytes in developing zebrafish embryos respond to muscle contraction forces during the onset of swimming and cranial muscle activity. Using genome-wide bulk RNA sequencing of FAC-sorted tenocytes we identify novel tenocyte markers and genes involved in tendon mechanotransduction. Embryonic tendons show dramatic changes in expression of matrix remodeling associated 5b (mxra5b), matrilin 1 (matn1), and the transcription factor kruppel-like factor 2a (klf2a), as muscles start to contract. Using embryos paralyzed either by loss of muscle contractility or neuromuscular stimulation we confirm that muscle contractile forces influence the spatial and temporal expression patterns of all three genes. Quantification of these gene expression changes across tenocytes at multiple tendon entheses and myotendinous junctions reveals that their responses depend on force intensity, duration, and tissue stiffness. These force-dependent feedback mechanisms in tendons, particularly in the ECM, have important implications for improved treatments of tendon injuries and atrophy.