Abstract

Bone marrow mesenchymal lineage cells are a heterogeneous cell population involved in bone homeostasis and diseases such as osteoporosis. While it is long postulated that they originate from mesenchymal stem cells, the true identity of progenitors and their in vivo bifurcated differentiation routes into osteoblasts and adipocytes remain poorly understood. Here, by employing large scale single cell transcriptome analysis, we computationally defined mesenchymal progenitors at different stages and delineated their bi-lineage differentiation paths in young, adult and aging mice. One identified subpopulation is a unique cell type that expresses adipocyte markers but contains no lipid droplets. As non-proliferative precursors for adipocytes, they exist abundantly as pericytes and stromal cells that form a ubiquitous 3D network inside the marrow cavity. Functionally they play critical roles in maintaining marrow vasculature and suppressing bone formation. Therefore, we name them marrow adipogenic lineage precursors (MALPs) and conclude that they are a new component of marrow adipose tissue.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE145477

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Leilei Zhong

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lutian Yao

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0652-2075
  3. Robert Joel Tower

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yulong Wei

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Zhen Miao

    Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jihwan Park

    Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division of Department of Medicine, and Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5728-912X
  7. Rojesh Shrestha

    Medicine and Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Luqiang Wang

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Wei Yu

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Nicholas Holdreith

    Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Xiaobin Huang

    Translational Research Program in Pediatric Orthopaedics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yejia Zhang

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Wei Tong

    Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Yanqing Gong

    Division of Transnational Medicine and Human Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Jaimo Ahn

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Katalin Susztak

    Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division of Department of Medicine, and Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Nathanial Dyment

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8708-112X
  18. Mingyao Li

    Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Fanxin Long

    Translational Research Program in Pediatric Orthopaedics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Chider Chen

    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2899-1208
  21. Patrick Seale

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Ling Qin

    Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    For correspondence
    qinling@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2582-0078

Funding

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR066098)

  • Ling Qin

National Institutes of Health (R03DE028026)

  • Chider Chen

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK095803)

  • Ling Qin

Penn Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders (P30AR069619)

  • Ling Qin

National Institutes of Health (R21AR074570)

  • Ling Qin

American Heart Association (17GRNT33650029)

  • Yanqing Gong

National Institutes of Health (R01HL095675)

  • Wei Tong

National Institutes of Health (R01HL133828)

  • Wei Tong

Nihon University (F31HL139091)

  • Nicholas Holdreith

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R00DE025915)

  • Chider Chen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. J Gage Crump, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal work performed in this report was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Pennsylvania under Protocol 804112. University Laboratory Animal Resources (ULAR) of the University of Pennsylvania is responsible for the procurement, care, and use of all university-owned animals as approved by IACUC. Animal facilities in the University of Pennsylvania meet federal, state, and local guidelines for laboratory animal care and are accredited by the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International.

Version history

  1. Received: December 23, 2019
  2. Accepted: April 11, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 14, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 13, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: March 18, 2024 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Zhong et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 16,165
    views
  • 2,521
    downloads
  • 190
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Leilei Zhong
  2. Lutian Yao
  3. Robert Joel Tower
  4. Yulong Wei
  5. Zhen Miao
  6. Jihwan Park
  7. Rojesh Shrestha
  8. Luqiang Wang
  9. Wei Yu
  10. Nicholas Holdreith
  11. Xiaobin Huang
  12. Yejia Zhang
  13. Wei Tong
  14. Yanqing Gong
  15. Jaimo Ahn
  16. Katalin Susztak
  17. Nathanial Dyment
  18. Mingyao Li
  19. Fanxin Long
  20. Chider Chen
  21. Patrick Seale
  22. Ling Qin
(2020)
Single cell transcriptomics identifies a unique adipose lineage cell population that regulates bone marrow environment
eLife 9:e54695.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54695

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54695

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Mathieu C Husser, Nhat P Pham ... Alisa Piekny
    Tools and Resources

    Endogenous tags have become invaluable tools to visualize and study native proteins in live cells. However, generating human cell lines carrying endogenous tags is difficult due to the low efficiency of homology-directed repair. Recently, an engineered split mNeonGreen protein was used to generate a large-scale endogenous tag library in HEK293 cells. Using split mNeonGreen for large-scale endogenous tagging in human iPSCs would open the door to studying protein function in healthy cells and across differentiated cell types. We engineered an iPS cell line to express the large fragment of the split mNeonGreen protein (mNG21-10) and showed that it enables fast and efficient endogenous tagging of proteins with the short fragment (mNG211). We also demonstrate that neural network-based image restoration enables live imaging studies of highly dynamic cellular processes such as cytokinesis in iPSCs. This work represents the first step towards a genome-wide endogenous tag library in human stem cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.