T cell-based immunotherapy, such as immune checkpoint blockade or adoptive T cell transfer, is limited by the ability of T cells to detect major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-presented antigen by tumor cells. Through selective immune pressure during tumorigenesis and progression and genomic instability, subpopulations of tumor cells acquire mutations that lead to defective type II interferon (IFN) responses and altered antigen processing and presentation (Sucker et al., 2014; TRACERx Consortium et al., 2017). The presence of these mutations predicts failure to respond to immune checkpoint blockade and adoptive T cell transfer immunotherapy (Doran et al., 2019; Shin et al., 2017; Zaretsky et al., 2016; Gao et al., 2016).

Natural killer (NK) cell-based immunotherapy may overcome genetic mechanisms of resistance to T cell-based immunotherapy through antigen- and MHC-independent recognition of malignant cells. NK cells express germ-line receptors that are either stimulatory or inhibitory, and the summation of these signals determines activation status (Caligiuri, 2008). NK-92 cells, derived from a Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patient, can be continuously expanded in culture and following irradiation, can be safely administered in high doses to patients with cancer (Gong et al., 1994; Williams et al., 2017; Tonn et al., 2013). High-affinity NK (haNK) cells are NK-92 cells engineered to express endoplasmic reticulum-retained IL-2(11), have demonstrated potent effector function in numerous pre-clinical models (Friedman et al., 2019; Friedman et al., 2018), and following irradiation, can also be safely administered in high doses to patients (Seery et al., 2019). haNKs represent an ‘off the shelf’ NK cellular therapy available for pre-clinical and clinical study. However, barriers within the tumor microenvironment that further limit T cell activation and function such as the presence of immunosuppressive myeloid cells also can limit the activation and function of NK cells (Condamine et al., 2016; Li et al., 2009). Thus, addressing the presence of immunosuppressive myeloid cell populations in the periphery and tumor microenvironment of patients with cancer is likely to be required for effective NK cell-based immunotherapy.

Here, we describe the pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo study of irradiated haNK cells engineered to express a second-generation chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). PD-L1 CAR haNKs induced cytotoxicity against human papillomavirus-positive and negative human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells as well as murine HNSCC cells. Killing of cells by PD-L1 CAR haNKs was both direct and PD-L1 CAR-mediated as CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of PD-L1 abrogated killing within individual models by 60–90%. Treatment of immune competent mice bearing syngeneic tumors resulted in tumor rejection or growth delay that was both PD-L1 and CD8⁺ cell dependent, demonstrating crosstalk between adaptive T cell immunity, tumor cell PD-L1 expression and sensitivity to PD-L1 CAR haNKs. Treatment also resulted in significant reduction in both peripheral and tumor infiltrating macrophages and neutrophilic and monocytic myeloid cells endogenously expressing high levels of PD-L1. Treatment of immunodeficient mice bearing human xenograft tumors also resulted in PD-L1-dependent tumor growth inhibition. The ability of PD-L1 CAR haNKs to reduce myeloid populations endogenously expressing high levels of PD-L1 was validated in co-incubation assays with peripheral blood from patients with advanced stage HNSCC. These results provide the pre-clinical data required for the phase I study of PD-L1 CAR haNKs in patients with relapsed malignancies.

haNKs were engineered to express a CAR targeting PD-L1. This second-generation CAR includes a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) derived from NANT-601, and IgG1 mAb targeting PD-L1, along with a CD8 hinge, a CD28 transmembrane domain and an intracellular FcεR1γ signaling domain (diagramed in Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). Expression of the PD-L1 CAR was verified on PD-L1 CAR haNK cells by flow cytometry (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). The ability of irradiated PD-L1 CAR haNKs to kill a panel of HPV-positive and -negative human HNSCC cells was directly compared to that of irradiated parental haNKs that do not express the CAR (Figure 1). To determine if increased PD-L1 expression on target cells would increase killing capacity by PD-L1 CAR haNKs, some cells were exposed to IFNγ. Exposure to IFNγ significantly increased PD-L1 expression on all cells (left panels, Figure 1A–E). Exposure of cells to IFNγ also consistently increased MHC class I expression, but variably decreased expression of NKG2D ligands MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence A/B (MICA/B) on target cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). As measured by real-time impedance analysis (middle and right panels, Figure 1A–E), killing of HNSCC cells by PD-L1 CAR haNKs at low effector-to-target ratios (0.5:1 or 1:1) was significantly greater compared to haNKs in the absence of IFNγ pre-treatment of target cells. Pre-treatment of target cells with IFNγ significantly increased killing by PD-L1 CAR haNKs but did not increase killing by haNKs. Killing of IFNγ pre-treated human target cells by PD-L1 CAR haNKs was durable as no tumor cell growth rebound was observed. No clear correlation between HLA class I or MICA/B expression and killing by PD-L1 CAR haNKs or haNKs existed. These data suggested that at matched effector-to-target ratios, PD-L1 CAR haNKs kill multiple human HNSCC targets to a greater degree than haNKs, and that susceptibility to PD-L1 CAR haNK killing can be increased with greater PD-L1 expression following IFNγ pre-treatment of target cells.

Figure 1 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

NK cell exhaustion can limit their effector function (Bi and Tian, 2017). To determine the effect of prior target cell engagement on effector killing capacity in PD-L1 CAR haNK cells, these cells were assayed for their ability to lyse HPV-negative UMSCC-1 or HPV-positive UMSCC-47 targets after a prior exposure to each cell line, respectively. Following efficient killing of target cells for a period of 4 hr, PD-L1 CAR haNKs retained their ability to kill target cells albeit at a reduced capacity compared to target-naïve PD-L1 CAR haNKs (Figure 1—figure supplement 3). Prior exposure to target cells partially reduces but does not abrogate the effector capacity of PD-L1 CAR haNKs.

The ability of PD-L1 CAR haNKs or haNKs to kill HPV negative murine HNSCC cells in the presence or absence of IFNγ pre-treatment was next determined. PD-L1 CAR haNKs killed IFNγ pre-treated murine HNSCC cells in a dose-dependent fashion, with 70–80% cell killing at a 1:1 effector-to-target ratio (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). In the absence of IFNγ pre-treatment, baseline expression of PD-L1 on murine HNSCC cells was low, and PD-L1 CAR haNks and haNKs killed targets to a similar degree at 1:1 effector-to-target ratios (Figure 2A&B). IFNγ pre-treatment significantly increased expression of PD-L1 and killing by PD-L1 CAR haNKs, but no increase in killing by haNKs was observed. PD-L1 CAR haNK killing of IFN pre-treated murine target cells was less durable compared to human target cells, with a degree of rebound of target cell growth by 72 hr. These data revealed that PD-L1 CAR haNKs also kill murine HNSCC cells to a greater degree than haNKs, and that PD-L1 CAR haNK killing can be increased with IFNγ-induced PD-L1 expression.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

To determine the relative contribution of direct and PD-L1 CAR-mediated killing of human and murine HNSCC targets by PD-L1 CAR haNKs, CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing was used to generate PD-L1 knockout cell variants of human UMSCC-1, human UMSCC-11A and murine MOC1 cells. Exposure of these PD-L1 knockout cells to IFNγ demonstrated a lack of baseline and IFNγ-inducible PD-L1 expression (compared to isotype control staining) but retained baseline and IFNγ-inducible HLA class I expression, demonstrating that overall IFNγ responses remained intact (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Impedance analysis was next used to determine the ability of PD-L1 CAR haNKs to kill IFNγ pre-treated parental cells, PD-L1 knockout cells, or mixtures of these cells at different ratios (Figure 3A–C). Although killing of IFNγ pre-treated parental cells was nearly complete, killing of PD-L1 knockout cells ranged from 10–40%, suggesting that 10–40% of PD-L1 CAR haNK killing is due to direct NK cytotoxicity and independent of the PD-L1 CAR. Increased PD-L1 CAR haNK killing of targets correlated with increased ratios of parental-to-PD-L1 knockout cells. These data demonstrated that PD-L1 CAR haNKs utilize both direct and PD-L1 CAR-dependent killing of human and murine HNSCC cells.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

The ability of PD-L1 CAR haNKs to kill murine HNSCC allows the in vivo study of efficacy and changes in immune correlatives in a syngeneic system. Immune-competent mice bearing established (100–200 mm³) MOC1 tumors were treated with irradiated PD-L1 CAR haNKs, and the ability of these cells to induce tumor growth inhibition or changes in peripheral or tumor immune composition was measured. PD-L1 CAR haNKs (1 × 10⁷) were administered twice weekly given their short lifespan following irradiation. PD-L1 CAR haNK monotherapy induced tumor rejection in 30% of treated mice and tumor growth inhibition in a subset of remaining mice (Figure 4A). No weight loss, alterations in select blood chemistries, or other measurable forms of toxicity were observed with systemic PD-L1 CAR haNK treatment administered via intravenous or intraperitoneal routes (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Tumor rejection was abrogated in mice bearing PD-L1 knockout MOC1 tumors (Figure 4B), but heterogeneous tumor growth inhibition was still observed. IFNγ is a primary driver of PD-L1 expression on MOC1 tumor cells (Shah et al., 2016). To determine if IFNγ is the major driver of PD-L1 being targeted by PD-L1 CAR haNKs and if CD8 T cells are the major source of IFNγ, treatments were repeated in the presence or absence of antibody depletions. IFNγ or CD8 depletion abrogated the anti-tumor effect of PD-L1 CAR haNKs (Figure 4C). Depletion of TNFα did not alter the anti-tumor effect of PD-L1 CAR haNKs. This data suggested that IFNγ produced by CD8 T cells was the major driver of tumor cell PD-L1 expression being targeted by PD-L1 CAR haNKs. Tumor cell-specific PD-L1 expression was significantly increased after PD-L1 CAR haNKs, and this increase was abrogated in the presence of CD8 depletion (Figure 4D). These data suggested that PD-L1 CAR haNKs can induce PD-L1-dependent tumor rejection in a syngeneic murine system, and that CD8 T cells are a primary source of IFNγ driving tumor cell PD-L1 expression in this model.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Circulating and tumor infiltrating immune cells can express high levels of PD-L1. To determine if treatment of MOC1 tumor bearing mice altered immune constituency, splenic and tumor immune subsets were measured by flow cytometry following PD-L1 CAR haNK administration (Figure 5A). In the periphery of tumor bearing mice, PD-L1 was uniformly expressed on macrophages and Ly6G^hi neutrophilic myeloid cells to a greater degree compared to other cells types. Quantification of splenic immune cell fractions revealed that macrophages and neutrophilic myeloid cells endogenously expressing high levels of PD-L1 were decreased compared to control following treatment, whereas no changes were observed in other immune subsets (Figure 5B&C). In the tumor microenvironment, PD-L1 was expressed to a greater degree on macrophages, neutrophilic and monocytic myeloid cells compared to tumor cells or other immune subsets. Flow cytometric analysis 1 hr after treatment verified the presence of adoptively transferred PD-L1 CAR haNKs in the blood, spleens and tumors of MOC1 tumor bearing mice (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Quantification of tumor immune infiltration revealed decreased macrophages, neutrophilic and monocytic myeloid cells, increased CD8 and CD4 T-lymphocytes, and no change in Tregs or NK cells following treatment (Figure 5B&D). To validate these findings in an ex vivo setting, peripheral or tumor leukocytes were isolated from mice bearing MOC1 tumors, co-incubated with PD-L1 CAR haNKs and flow cytometry was used to determine immune constituency. Similar to results observed in vivo, immune cell subsets from the periphery and tumor that expressed comparatively greater levels of PD-L1 were reduced following 24 hr of co-incubation with PD-L1 CAR haNKs (Figure 5—figure supplement 2). Cumulatively, these data exhibited that PD-L1 CAR haNKs can mediate reduction of immune cells endogenously expressing high levels of PD-L1 in the periphery and tumor microenvironment of MOC1 tumor-bearing wild-type mice.

Figure 5 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

To determine if adoptive transfer of PD-L1 CAR haNKs could mediate tumor growth inhibition in a xenograft system lacking immunity, treatment was performed in severely immunodeficient NSG mice bearing UMSCC-1 human tumors. Tumor growth inhibition was observed, but no tumors were rejected (Figure 6A). Tumor growth inhibition following PD-L1 CAR haNK treatment was abrogated in NSG mice bearing PD-L1 knockout UMSCC-1 tumors (Figure 6B). Flow cytometry and immunofluorescence were used to verify that tumor cell-specific PD-L1 expression within UMSCC-1 tumors was increased following treatment with PD-L1 CAR haNKs (Figure 6—figure supplement 1A&B). PD-L1 CAR haNKs produce IFNγ at rest, and to a higher degree following target engagement (Figure 6—figure supplement 1C). These data suggested that the PD-L1 CAR haNKs may be the source of the IFNγ leading to increased expression of PD-L1 on the UMSCC-1 tumor cells. Cumulatively, these data demonstrated that PD-L1 CAR haNKs can also mediate PD-L1-dependent tumor growth inhibition in immunodeficient mice bearing human HNSCCs, possibly through the ability of PD-L1 CAR haNKs to induce IFNγ-dependent PD-L1 expression on tumor cells.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

The ability of PD-L1 CAR haNKs to reduce the frequency of immune subsets endogenously expressing high levels of PD-L1 may be an important complementary mechanism of action to tumor cell killing. To explore whether this phenomenon can also be observed in patients with cancer, peripheral leukocytes from patients with advanced stage HPV negative HNSCC were co-incubated ex vivo with PD-L1 CAR haNK and changes in immune cell frequency were determined by flow cytometry (Figure 7A). In the peripheral blood of HNSCC patients, macrophages expressed the greatest levels of PD-L1, and CD14+ and CD15+ myeloid subsets expressed greater levels of PD-L1 compared to lymphoid or NK cells. PD-L1 high macrophages and CD14+/CD15+ myeloid cell subsets were significantly reduced following 24 hr of co-incubation with PD-L1 CAR haNKs (Figure 7B&C). These results validated that PD-L1 CAR haNKs possess the ability to reduce the cell frequency of leukocytes endogenously expressing high PD-L1 from patients with HNSCC.

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

As our understanding of the limitations of T cell-based immunotherapy increases, it is evident that alternative immunotherapy approaches to be used in lieu of or in combination with immune checkpoint blockade or T cell cellular therapies are needed. As NK cells detect and eliminate tumor cells via MHC- and antigen-independent mechanisms, NK cell-based immunotherapy may overcome some mechanisms of resistance to T cell-based immunotherapy, including selection of tumor subclones lacking antigen or harboring antigen processing/presentation defects (reviewed in Greene et al., 2019). The presence of genomic alterations in one or more of these antigen processing and presentation pathways predicts response to all forms of T cell-based immunotherapy including immune checkpoint blockade and adoptive transfer cell therapies (Doran et al., 2019; Shin et al., 2017; Zaretsky et al., 2016; Gao et al., 2016). Most existing data have explored whole tumor biopsies for the presence of one or more of these genomic alterations and correlation to response to immunotherapy. However, high degrees in tumor heterogeneity within epithelial malignancies result in multiple subclones of tumor cells (Morris et al., 2016). The number of tumor subclones present within an individual tumor that harbors one or more of these genomic alterations is unknown. This may be an important predictor of whom would most benefit from NK cell-based immunotherapy as an alternative or adjunct to T cell-based immunotherapy.

The development of the NK-92 cell line from a patient with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma allowed a continuously cultured effector NK cell line to be used as an ‘off the shelf’ cell therapy product (Gong et al., 1994). Repeat infusions of high doses of NK-92 cells had a promising safety profile and induced clinical benefit in some patients (Williams et al., 2017; Tonn et al., 2013). NK-92 cells lack most inhibitory killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) but require exogenous IL-2 for proliferation in culture (Yan et al., 1998; Maki et al., 2001). To overcome this requirement, haNKs, or high-affinity NK cells, are NK-92 cells engineered to express endoplasmic reticulum-retained IL-2(11). haNKs have demonstrated the ability to efficiently kill carcinoma cells at low effector-to-target ratios (Friedman et al., 2019; Friedman et al., 2018). Irradiation of haNKs and haNK-derived cell products ensures short life span of these cells and allows for repeat administration with no risk of cellular engraftment and low risk of cytopenias in treated hosts (Seery et al., 2019; Brudno and Kochenderfer, 2016).

Here, we demonstrated the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of haNKs modified to express a PD-L1 CAR. Although PD-L1 CAR haNKs mediated cytotoxicity through both direct and PD-L1 CAR-dependent mechanisms, killing of targets was primary PD-L1-dependent as tumor cell PD-L1 knockout reduced in vitro killing capacity by 60–90% and abrogated in vivo tumor rejection or growth inhibition. This suggests that PD-L1 CAR haNK monotherapy may be most effective in patients harboring PD-L1+ tumors with evidence of genomic alterations or expression defects predicted to lead to insensitivity to T cell detection or elimination. Greater than 80% of patients with HNSCC have a combined positive score of >1 indicative of PD-L1 positivity (Chow et al., 2016), but significant heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression exists within individual tumors (Rasmussen et al., 2019). PD-L1-dependent and independent mechanisms of killing by PD-L1 CAR haNKs are likely to be required for maximum treatment efficacy.

Our data demonstrated that mouse and human peripheral and tumor infiltrating myeloid cells express greater levels of PD-L1 compared to other immune cells populations, and that PD-L1 CAR haNKs can reduce accumulation of these PD-L1 high myeloid cell populations. The selective elimination of PD-L1 high myeloid cells by PD-L1 CAR haNKs may be an important complimentary mechanism of action to direct or PD-L1-dependent tumor cell killing. Macrophages, neutrophilic myeloid cells and monocytic myeloid cells are immunosuppressive through multiple independent mechanisms, especially upon trafficking into the tumor microenvironment, and limit effective baseline and immunotherapy-induced T cell and NK cell anti-tumor immunity (Condamine et al., 2016; Li et al., 2009; Noguchi et al., 2017; Arlauckas et al., 2017). PD-L1 expression on myeloid cells is sufficient and may even be required for immunosuppression mediated by PD-pathway signaling (Noguchi et al., 2017; Lau et al., 2017). We and others have demonstrated that elimination of myeloid cells or inhibition of their trafficking into tumors has little effect as a monotherapy but enhances T cell cell-based immunotherapy when used in combination (Sun et al., 2019; Highfill et al., 2014; Steele et al., 2016). A natural extension of the work presented here is to combine PD-L1 CAR haNKs with different T cell or NK cell-based immunotherapies to explore if reduction in myeloid cell populations can enhance responses to other immunotherapies. This treatment approach deserves further study and is ongoing in our and other laboratories.

The decision to introduce a PD-L1 CAR into haNKs was made based upon the known immunosuppressive mechanism of PD-L1 and the possibility that both tumor and PD-L1 positive immune cell subsets would be targeted. CAR expression in haNKs may be advantageous over introduction of CARs into autologous T cells as haNK cells lack expression of a native TCR that could mediate an allogeneic immune reaction such as graft-vs-host disease (Olson et al., 2010; Miller et al., 2005). This suggests that haNK-based CAR immunotherapy may be useful across populations of patients with cancer and not just in individual patients (reviewed in Mehta and Rezvani, 2018).

A major limitation of the conclusions of our data was the use of subcutaneous flank xenograft and syngeneic models that do not metastasize. The use of an orthotopic metastatic model transplanted into the oral cavity region could provide valuable insight into the ability of PD-L1 CAR haNKs to prevent or delay the development or the progression of metastases. This requires further study. Another limitation of our study is our technical inability to detect PD-L1 CAR haNKs in resected malignant tissues by immunofluorescence. This data could provide valuable insight into the localization of adoptively transferred cells that trafficking to the tumor. Work to develop validated assays to determine tumor special localization of NK cell products is ongoing.

Based upon our data along with the data of others, CAR targeting of NK cells appears to enhance their killing efficacy (Ingegnere et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2018). To date, most progress has been made in the treatment of hematologic malignancy, with cord blood NK cells engineered to express a CD19-targeting CAR demonstrating high response rates in patients with relapsed CD19+ leukemia or lymphoma (Liu et al., 2020). CARs targeting other molecules constitutively expressed on tumor cells from solid epithelial malignancies such as EGFR and HER2 may also be useful and deserve further study (Chen et al., 2016; Nowakowska et al., 2018). With all CAR-based therapies targeting surface molecules that have wide expression patterns in patients, careful phase I monotherapy study is required to determine if limiting on-target but off-tumor toxicities exist. Targeting PD-L1 may allow selective targeting of tumor cells and immunosuppressive, PD-L1 high immune cells, and side effect profiles would be predicted to be similar to profiles observed with PD-1/L1 immune checkpoint blockade. The data presented here provides the pre-clinical rationale needed to perform early phase clinical trials to explore the safety profile of PD-L1 CAR haNKs in patients with relapsed or metastatic cancer.

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files has been uploaded into Dryad in the form of GraphPad Prism file. One Prism file contains the raw data for all of the figures.

1. 1. Robbins Y
   2. Greene S
   3. Friedman J
   4. Clavijo PE
   5. Van Waes C
   6. Fabian KP
   7. Padget MR
   8. Abdul Sater H
   9. Lee JH
   10. Soon-Shiong P
   11. Gulley J
   12. Schlom J
   13. Hodge JW
   14. Allen CT

   (2020) Dryad Digital Repository

   Data from: Tumor control via targeting PD-L1 with chimeric antigen receptor modified NK cells.

   https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.sf7m0cg3k

1. 1. Arlauckas SP
   2. Garris CS
   3. Kohler RH
   4. Kitaoka M
   5. Cuccarese MF
   6. Yang KS
   7. Miller MA
   8. Carlson JC
   9. Freeman GJ
   10. Anthony RM
   11. Weissleder R
   12. Pittet MJ

   (2017) In vivo imaging reveals a tumor-associated macrophage-mediated resistance pathway in anti-PD-1 therapy

   Science Translational Medicine 9:eaal3604.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aal3604

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Bi J
   2. Tian Z

   (2017) NK cell exhaustion

   Frontiers in Immunology 8:760.

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00760

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Brenner JC
   2. Graham MP
   3. Kumar B
   4. Saunders LM
   5. Kupfer R
   6. Lyons RH
   7. Bradford CR
   8. Carey TE

   (2010) Genotyping of 73 UM-SCC head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines

   Head & Neck 32:417–426.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21198

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Brudno JN
   2. Kochenderfer JN

   (2016) Toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor T cells: recognition and management

   Blood 127:3321–3330.

   https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-04-703751

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Caligiuri MA

   (2008) Human natural killer cells

   Blood 112:461–469.

   https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-09-077438

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Chen X
   2. Han J
   3. Chu J
   4. Zhang L
   5. Zhang J
   6. Chen C
   7. Chen L
   8. Wang Y
   9. Wang H
   10. Yi L
   11. Elder JB
   12. Wang QE
   13. He X
   14. Kaur B
   15. Chiocca EA
   16. Yu J

   (2016) A combinational therapy of EGFR-CAR NK cells and oncolytic herpes simplex virus 1 for breast Cancer brain metastases

   Oncotarget 7:27764–27777.

   https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8526

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Chow LQM
   2. Haddad R
   3. Gupta S
   4. Mahipal A
   5. Mehra R
   6. Tahara M
   7. Berger R
   8. Eder JP
   9. Burtness B
   10. Lee SH
   11. Keam B
   12. Kang H
   13. Muro K
   14. Weiss J
   15. Geva R
   16. Lin CC
   17. Chung HC
   18. Meister A
   19. Dolled-Filhart M
   20. Pathiraja K
   21. Cheng JD
   22. Seiwert TY

   (2016) Antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in Biomarker-Unselected patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: results from the phase ib KEYNOTE-012 expansion cohort

   Journal of Clinical Oncology 34:3838–3845.

   https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.68.1478

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Clavijo PE
   2. Moore EC
   3. Chen J
   4. Davis RJ
   5. Friedman J
   6. Kim Y
   7. Van Waes C
   8. Chen Z
   9. Allen CT

   (2017) Resistance to CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibition reversed through selective elimination of granulocytic myeloid cells

   Oncotarget 8:55804–55820.

   https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18437

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Condamine T
   2. Dominguez GA
   3. Youn JI
   4. Kossenkov AV
   5. Mony S
   6. Alicea-Torres K
   7. Tcyganov E
   8. Hashimoto A
   9. Nefedova Y
   10. Lin C
   11. Partlova S
   12. Garfall A
   13. Vogl DT
   14. Xu X
   15. Knight SC
   16. Malietzis G
   17. Lee GH
   18. Eruslanov E
   19. Albelda SM
   20. Wang X
   21. Mehta JL
   22. Bewtra M
   23. Rustgi A
   24. Hockstein N
   25. Witt R
   26. Masters G
   27. Nam B
   28. Smirnov D
   29. Sepulveda MA
   30. Gabrilovich DI

   (2016) Lectin-type oxidized LDL receptor-1 distinguishes population of human polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells in Cancer patients

   Science Immunology 1:aaf8943.

   https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.aaf8943

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Doran SL
    2. Stevanović S
    3. Adhikary S
    4. Gartner JJ
    5. Jia L
    6. Kwong MLM
    7. Faquin WC
    8. Hewitt SM
    9. Sherry RM
    10. Yang JC
    11. Rosenberg SA
    12. Hinrichs CS

    (2019) T-Cell receptor gene therapy for human Papillomavirus-Associated epithelial cancers: a First-in-Human, phase I/II study

    Journal of Clinical Oncology 37:2759–2768.

    https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.02424

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Friedman J
    2. Morisada M
    3. Sun L
    4. Moore EC
    5. Padget M
    6. Hodge JW
    7. Schlom J
    8. Gameiro SR
    9. Allen CT

    (2018) Inhibition of WEE1 kinase and cell cycle checkpoint activation sensitizes head and neck cancers to natural killer cell therapies

    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer 6:59.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0374-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Friedman J
    2. Padget M
    3. Lee J
    4. Schlom J
    5. Hodge J
    6. Allen C

    (2019) Direct and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells by high-affinity natural killer cells

    Oral Oncology 90:38–44.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.01.017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Gao J
    2. Shi LZ
    3. Zhao H
    4. Chen J
    5. Xiong L
    6. He Q
    7. Chen T
    8. Roszik J
    9. Bernatchez C
    10. Woodman SE
    11. Chen PL
    12. Hwu P
    13. Allison JP
    14. Futreal A
    15. Wargo JA
    16. Sharma P

    (2016) Loss of IFN-γ pathway genes in tumor cells as a mechanism of resistance to Anti-CTLA-4 therapy

    Cell 167:397–404.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.069

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Gong JH
    2. Maki G
    3. Klingemann HG

    (1994)

    Characterization of a human cell line (NK-92) with phenotypical and functional characteristics of activated natural killer cells

    Leukemia 8:652–658.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Greene S
    2. Patel P
    3. Allen CT

    (2019) How patients with an intact immune system develop head and neck Cancer

    Oral Oncology 92:26–32.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.03.010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Highfill SL
    2. Cui Y
    3. Giles AJ
    4. Smith JP
    5. Zhang H
    6. Morse E
    7. Kaplan RN
    8. Mackall CL

    (2014) Disruption of CXCR2-Mediated MDSC tumor trafficking enhances Anti-PD1 efficacy

    Science Translational Medicine 6:237ra67.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3007974

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Ingegnere T
    2. Mariotti FR
    3. Pelosi A
    4. Quintarelli C
    5. De Angelis B
    6. Tumino N
    7. Besi F
    8. Cantoni C
    9. Locatelli F
    10. Vacca P
    11. Moretta L

    (2019) Human CAR NK cells: a new Non-viral method allowing high efficient transfection and strong tumor cell killing

    Frontiers in Immunology 10:957.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00957

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Jochems C
    2. Hodge JW
    3. Fantini M
    4. Fujii R
    5. Morillon YM
    6. Greiner JW
    7. Padget MR
    8. Tritsch SR
    9. Tsang KY
    10. Campbell KS
    11. Klingemann H
    12. Boissel L
    13. Rabizadeh S
    14. Soon-Shiong P
    15. Schlom J

    (2016) An NK cell line (haNK) expressing high levels of granzyme and engineered to express the high affinity CD16 allele

    Oncotarget 7:86359–86373.

    https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13411

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Judd NP
    2. Winkler AE
    3. Murillo-Sauca O
    4. Brotman JJ
    5. Law JH
    6. Lewis JS
    7. Dunn GP
    8. Bui JD
    9. Sunwoo JB
    10. Uppaluri R

    (2012) ERK1/2 regulation of CD44 modulates oral Cancer aggressiveness

    Cancer Research 72:365–374.

    https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1831

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Lau J
    2. Cheung J
    3. Navarro A
    4. Lianoglou S
    5. Haley B
    6. Totpal K
    7. Sanders L
    8. Koeppen H
    9. Caplazi P
    10. McBride J
    11. Chiu H
    12. Hong R
    13. Grogan J
    14. Javinal V
    15. Yauch R
    16. Irving B
    17. Belvin M
    18. Mellman I
    19. Kim JM
    20. Schmidt M

    (2017) Tumour and host cell PD-L1 is required to mediate suppression of anti-tumour immunity in mice

    Nature Communications 8:14572.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14572

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Li H
    2. Han Y
    3. Guo Q
    4. Zhang M
    5. Cao X

    (2009) Cancer-expanded myeloid-derived suppressor cells induce anergy of NK cells through membrane-bound TGF-beta 1

    The Journal of Immunology 182:240–249.

    https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.182.1.240

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Liu E
    2. Tong Y
    3. Dotti G
    4. Shaim H
    5. Savoldo B
    6. Mukherjee M
    7. Orange J
    8. Wan X
    9. Lu X
    10. Reynolds A
    11. Gagea M
    12. Banerjee P
    13. Cai R
    14. Bdaiwi MH
    15. Basar R
    16. Muftuoglu M
    17. Li L
    18. Marin D
    19. Wierda W
    20. Keating M
    21. Champlin R
    22. Shpall E
    23. Rezvani K

    (2018) Cord blood NK cells engineered to express IL-15 and a CD19-targeted CAR show long-term persistence and potent antitumor activity

    Leukemia 32:520–531.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.226

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Liu E
    2. Marin D
    3. Banerjee P
    4. Macapinlac HA
    5. Thompson P
    6. Basar R
    7. Nassif Kerbauy L
    8. Overman B
    9. Thall P
    10. Kaplan M
    11. Nandivada V
    12. Kaur I
    13. Nunez Cortes A
    14. Cao K
    15. Daher M
    16. Hosing C
    17. Cohen EN
    18. Kebriaei P
    19. Mehta R
    20. Neelapu S
    21. Nieto Y
    22. Wang M
    23. Wierda W
    24. Keating M
    25. Champlin R
    26. Shpall EJ
    27. Rezvani K

    (2020) Use of CAR-Transduced natural killer cells in CD19-Positive lymphoid tumors

    New England Journal of Medicine 382:545–553.

    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1910607

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Maki G
    2. Klingemann HG
    3. Martinson JA
    4. Tam YK

    (2001) Factors regulating the cytotoxic activity of the human natural killer cell line, NK-92

    Journal of Hematotherapy & Stem Cell Research 10:369–383.

    https://doi.org/10.1089/152581601750288975

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Mehta RS
    2. Rezvani K

    (2018) Chimeric antigen receptor expressing natural killer cells for the immunotherapy of Cancer

    Frontiers in Immunology 9:283.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00283

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Miller JS
    2. Soignier Y
    3. Panoskaltsis-Mortari A
    4. McNearney SA
    5. Yun GH
    6. Fautsch SK
    7. McKenna D
    8. Le C
    9. Defor TE
    10. Burns LJ
    11. Orchard PJ
    12. Blazar BR
    13. Wagner JE
    14. Slungaard A
    15. Weisdorf DJ
    16. Okazaki IJ
    17. McGlave PB

    (2005) Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical NK cells in patients with Cancer

    Blood 105:3051–3057.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-07-2974

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Morris LG
    2. Riaz N
    3. Desrichard A
    4. Şenbabaoğlu Y
    5. Hakimi AA
    6. Makarov V
    7. Reis-Filho JS
    8. Chan TA

    (2016) Pan-cancer analysis of intratumor heterogeneity as a prognostic determinant of survival

    Oncotarget 7:10051–10063.

    https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7067

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Noguchi T
    2. Ward JP
    3. Gubin MM
    4. Arthur CD
    5. Lee SH
    6. Hundal J
    7. Selby MJ
    8. Graziano RF
    9. Mardis ER
    10. Korman AJ
    11. Schreiber RD

    (2017) Temporally distinct PD-L1 expression by tumor and host cells contributes to immune escape

    Cancer Immunology Research 5:106–117.

    https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0391

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Nowakowska P
    2. Romanski A
    3. Miller N
    4. Odendahl M
    5. Bonig H
    6. Zhang C
    7. Seifried E
    8. Wels WS
    9. Tonn T

    (2018) Clinical grade manufacturing of genetically modified, CAR-expressing NK-92 cells for the treatment of ErbB2-positive malignancies

    Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 67:25–38.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-017-2055-2

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Olson JA
    2. Leveson-Gower DB
    3. Gill S
    4. Baker J
    5. Beilhack A
    6. Negrin RS

    (2010) NK cells mediate reduction of GVHD by inhibiting activated, alloreactive T cells while retaining GVT effects

    Blood 115:4293–4301.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-05-222190

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Onken MD
    2. Winkler AE
    3. Kanchi KL
    4. Chalivendra V
    5. Law JH
    6. Rickert CG
    7. Kallogjeri D
    8. Judd NP
    9. Dunn GP
    10. Piccirillo JF
    11. Lewis JS
    12. Mardis ER
    13. Uppaluri R

    (2014) A surprising cross-species conservation in the genomic landscape of mouse and human oral Cancer identifies a transcriptional signature predicting metastatic disease

    Clinical Cancer Research 20:2873–2884.

    https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0205

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Rasmussen JH
    2. Lelkaitis G
    3. Håkansson K
    4. Vogelius IR
    5. Johannesen HH
    6. Fischer BM
    7. Bentzen SM
    8. Specht L
    9. Kristensen CA
    10. von Buchwald C
    11. Wessel I
    12. Friborg J

    (2019) Intratumor heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

    British Journal of Cancer 120:1003–1006.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0449-y

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Seery TE
    2. Lee JH
    3. Sender LS
    4. Jones FR
    5. Shinde AM
    6. Annamalai A
    7. Kistler M
    8. Jafari O
    9. Soon-Shiong P

    (2019) NANT Cancer vaccine an orchestration of immunogenic cell death by overcoming immune suppression and activating NK and T cell therapy in patients with third line or greater metastatic pancreatic Cancer

    Journal of Clinical Oncology 37:TPS463.

    https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.TPS463

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Shah S
    2. Caruso A
    3. Cash H
    4. Waes CV
    5. Allen CT

    (2016) Pools of programmed death-ligand within the oral cavity tumor microenvironment: variable alteration by targeted therapies

    Head & Neck 38:1176–1186.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24269

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Shin DS
    2. Zaretsky JM
    3. Escuin-Ordinas H
    4. Garcia-Diaz A
    5. Hu-Lieskovan S
    6. Kalbasi A
    7. Grasso CS
    8. Hugo W
    9. Sandoval S
    10. Torrejon DY
    11. Palaskas N
    12. Rodriguez GA
    13. Parisi G
    14. Azhdam A
    15. Chmielowski B
    16. Cherry G
    17. Seja E
    18. Berent-Maoz B
    19. Shintaku IP
    20. Le DT
    21. Pardoll DM
    22. Diaz LA
    23. Tumeh PC
    24. Graeber TG
    25. Lo RS
    26. Comin-Anduix B
    27. Ribas A

    (2017) Primary resistance to PD-1 blockade mediated by JAK1/2 Mutations

    Cancer Discovery 7:188–201.

    https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-1223

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Steele CW
    2. Karim SA
    3. Leach JDG
    4. Bailey P
    5. Upstill-Goddard R
    6. Rishi L
    7. Foth M
    8. Bryson S
    9. McDaid K
    10. Wilson Z
    11. Eberlein C
    12. Candido JB
    13. Clarke M
    14. Nixon C
    15. Connelly J
    16. Jamieson N
    17. Carter CR
    18. Balkwill F
    19. Chang DK
    20. Evans TRJ
    21. Strathdee D
    22. Biankin AV
    23. Nibbs RJB
    24. Barry ST
    25. Sansom OJ
    26. Morton JP

    (2016) CXCR2 inhibition profoundly suppresses metastases and augments immunotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

    Cancer Cell 29:832–845.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2016.04.014

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Sucker A
    2. Zhao F
    3. Real B
    4. Heeke C
    5. Bielefeld N
    6. Maβen S
    7. Horn S
    8. Moll I
    9. Maltaner R
    10. Horn PA
    11. Schilling B
    12. Sabbatino F
    13. Lennerz V
    14. Kloor M
    15. Ferrone S
    16. Schadendorf D
    17. Falk CS
    18. Griewank K
    19. Paschen A

    (2014) Genetic evolution of T-cell resistance in the course of melanoma progression

    Clinical Cancer Research 20:6593–6604.

    https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0567

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Sun L
    2. Moore E
    3. Berman R
    4. Clavijo PE
    5. Saleh A
    6. Chen Z
    7. Van Waes C
    8. Davies J
    9. Friedman J
    10. Allen CT

    (2018) WEE1 kinase inhibition reverses G2/M cell cycle checkpoint activation to sensitize Cancer cells to immunotherapy

    OncoImmunology 7:e1488359.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2018.1488359

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Sun L
    2. Clavijo PE
    3. Robbins Y
    4. Patel P
    5. Friedman J
    6. Greene S
    7. Das R
    8. Silvin C
    9. Van Waes C
    10. Horn LA
    11. Schlom J
    12. Palena C
    13. Maeda D
    14. Zebala J
    15. Allen CT

    (2019) Inhibiting myeloid-derived suppressor cell trafficking enhances T cell immunotherapy

    JCI Insight 4:e126853.

    https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.126853

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Tonn T
    2. Schwabe D
    3. Klingemann HG
    4. Becker S
    5. Esser R
    6. Koehl U
    7. Suttorp M
    8. Seifried E
    9. Ottmann OG
    10. Bug G

    (2013) Treatment of patients with advanced Cancer with the natural killer cell line NK-92

    Cytotherapy 15:1563–1570.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.06.017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. TRACERx Consortium
    2. Jamal-Hanjani M
    3. Wilson GA
    4. McGranahan N
    5. Birkbak NJ
    6. Watkins TBK
    7. Veeriah S
    8. Shafi S
    9. Johnson DH
    10. Mitter R
    11. Rosenthal R
    12. Salm M
    13. Horswell S
    14. Escudero M
    15. Matthews N
    16. Rowan A
    17. Chambers T
    18. Moore DA
    19. Turajlic S
    20. Xu H
    21. Lee SM
    22. Forster MD
    23. Ahmad T
    24. Hiley CT
    25. Abbosh C
    26. Falzon M
    27. Borg E
    28. Marafioti T
    29. Lawrence D
    30. Hayward M
    31. Kolvekar S
    32. Panagiotopoulos N
    33. Janes SM
    34. Thakrar R
    35. Ahmed A
    36. Blackhall F
    37. Summers Y
    38. Shah R
    39. Joseph L
    40. Quinn AM
    41. Crosbie PA
    42. Naidu B
    43. Middleton G
    44. Langman G
    45. Trotter S
    46. Nicolson M
    47. Remmen H
    48. Kerr K
    49. Chetty M
    50. Gomersall L
    51. Fennell DA
    52. Nakas A
    53. Rathinam S
    54. Anand G
    55. Khan S
    56. Russell P
    57. Ezhil V
    58. Ismail B
    59. Irvin-Sellers M
    60. Prakash V
    61. Lester JF
    62. Kornaszewska M
    63. Attanoos R
    64. Adams H
    65. Davies H
    66. Dentro S
    67. Taniere P
    68. O'Sullivan B
    69. Lowe HL
    70. Hartley JA
    71. Iles N
    72. Bell H
    73. Ngai Y
    74. Shaw JA
    75. Herrero J
    76. Szallasi Z
    77. Schwarz RF
    78. Stewart A
    79. Quezada SA
    80. Le Quesne J
    81. Van Loo P
    82. Dive C
    83. Hackshaw A
    84. Swanton C

    (2017) Tracking the evolution of Non-Small-Cell lung Cancer

    New England Journal of Medicine 376:2109–2121.

    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1616288

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Williams BA
    2. Law AD
    3. Routy B
    4. denHollander N
    5. Gupta V
    6. Wang XH
    7. Chaboureau A
    8. Viswanathan S
    9. Keating A

    (2017) A phase I trial of NK-92 cells for refractory hematological malignancies relapsing after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation shows safety and evidence of efficacy

    Oncotarget 8:89256–89268.

    https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19204

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Yan Y
    2. Steinherz P
    3. Klingemann HG
    4. Dennig D
    5. Childs BH
    6. McGuirk J
    7. O'Reilly RJ

    (1998)

    Antileukemia activity of a natural killer cell line against human leukemias

    Clinical Cancer Research 4:2859–2868.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Zaretsky JM
    2. Garcia-Diaz A
    3. Shin DS
    4. Escuin-Ordinas H
    5. Hugo W
    6. Hu-Lieskovan S
    7. Torrejon DY
    8. Abril-Rodriguez G
    9. Sandoval S
    10. Barthly L
    11. Saco J
    12. Homet Moreno B
    13. Mezzadra R
    14. Chmielowski B
    15. Ruchalski K
    16. Shintaku IP
    17. Sanchez PJ
    18. Puig-Saus C
    19. Cherry G
    20. Seja E
    21. Kong X
    22. Pang J
    23. Berent-Maoz B
    24. Comin-Anduix B
    25. Graeber TG
    26. Tumeh PC
    27. Schumacher TN
    28. Lo RS
    29. Ribas A

    (2016) Mutations associated with acquired resistance to PD-1 blockade in melanoma

    New England Journal of Medicine 375:819–829.

    https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1604958

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Yvette Robbins

   Translational Tumor Immunology Program, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

2. Sarah Greene

   Translational Tumor Immunology Program, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Jay Friedman

   Translational Tumor Immunology Program, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Paul E Clavijo

   Translational Tumor Immunology Program, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Carter Van Waes

   Tumor Biology Section, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Supervision, Project administration, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Kellsye P Fabian

   Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Michelle R Padget

   Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

8. Houssein Abdul Sater

   Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

9. John H Lee

   NantKWest, Culver City, United States

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Resources, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   Employed by NantKWest

10. Patrick Soon-Shiong

    NantKWest, Culver City, United States

    Contribution

    Resources, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing

    Competing interests

    Employed by NantKWest

11. James Gulley

    Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

    Contribution

    Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

    "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6569-2912

12. Jeffrey Schlom

    Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

    Contribution

    Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

13. James W Hodge

    Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States

    Contribution

    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

14. Clint T Allen

    1. Translational Tumor Immunology Program, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States

    Contribution

    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing

    For correspondence

    clint.allen@nih.gov

    Competing interests

    No competing interests declared

    "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6586-5804

• 3,878

  views

• 624

  downloads

• 37

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.