AirID, a novel proximity biotinylation enzyme, for analysis of protein-protein interactions

  1. Kohki Kido
  2. Satoshi Yamanaka
  3. Shogo Nakano
  4. Kou Motani
  5. Souta Shinohara
  6. Akira Nozawa
  7. Hidetaka Kosako
  8. Sohei Ito
  9. Tatsuya Sawasaki  Is a corresponding author
  1. Ehime University, Japan
  2. University of Shizuoka, Japan
  3. Tokushima University, Japan

Abstract

Proximity biotinylation based on Escherichia coli BirA enzymes like BioID (BirA*) and TurboID is a key technology for identifying proteins interacting with a target protein in a cell or organism. However, there have been some improvements in the enzymes for that purpose. Here, we demonstrate a novel BirA enzyme, AirID (ancestral BirA for proximity-dependent biotin identification), which was designed de novo using an ancestral enzyme reconstruction algorithm and metagenome data. AirID-fusion proteins like AirID-p53 or AirID-IκBα indicated biotinylation of MDM2 or RelA, respectively, in vitro and in cells, respectively. AirID-CRBN showed the pomalidomide-dependent biotinylation of IKZF1 and SALL4 in vitro. AirID-IκBα biotinylated the endogenous CUL4 and RBX1 in the CRL4CRBN complex based on the streptavidin pull-down assay. LC-MS/MS analysis of cells stably expressing AirID-IκBα showed top-level biotinylation of RelA proteins. These results indicate that AirID is a novel enzyme for analysing protein–protein interactions.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 3, 4, and 6.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kohki Kido

    Proteo-Science Center, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Satoshi Yamanaka

    Proteo-Science Center, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Shogo Nakano

    Graduate School of Integrated Pharmaceutical and Nutritional Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kou Motani

    Fujii Memorial Institute of Medical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Souta Shinohara

    Proteo-Science Center, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Akira Nozawa

    Proteo-Science Center, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hidetaka Kosako

    Fujii Memorial Institute of Medical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sohei Ito

    Graduate School of Integrated Pharmaceutical and Nutritional Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Tatsuya Sawasaki

    Proteo-Science Center, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan
    For correspondence
    sawasaki@ehime-u.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7952-0556

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP19am0101077)

  • Tatsuya Sawasaki

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP16H06579)

  • Tatsuya Sawasaki

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP16H04729)

  • Tatsuya Sawasaki

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP19H03218)

  • Tatsuya Sawasaki

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18KK0229)

  • Hidetaka Kosako

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19H04966)

  • Hidetaka Kosako

Takeda Science Foundation

  • Tatsuya Sawasaki

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Kido et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 25,594
    views
  • 3,519
    downloads
  • 105
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kohki Kido
  2. Satoshi Yamanaka
  3. Shogo Nakano
  4. Kou Motani
  5. Souta Shinohara
  6. Akira Nozawa
  7. Hidetaka Kosako
  8. Sohei Ito
  9. Tatsuya Sawasaki
(2020)
AirID, a novel proximity biotinylation enzyme, for analysis of protein-protein interactions
eLife 9:e54983.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54983

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54983

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Conor J Howard, Nathan S Abell ... Nathan B Lubock
    Research Article

    Deep Mutational Scanning (DMS) is an emerging method to systematically test the functional consequences of thousands of sequence changes to a protein target in a single experiment. Because of its utility in interpreting both human variant effects and protein structure-function relationships, it holds substantial promise to improve drug discovery and clinical development. However, applications in this domain require improved experimental and analytical methods. To address this need, we report novel DMS methods to precisely and quantitatively interrogate disease-relevant mechanisms, protein-ligand interactions, and assess predicted response to drug treatment. Using these methods, we performed a DMS of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R), a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) implicated in obesity and an active target of drug development efforts. We assessed the effects of >6600 single amino acid substitutions on MC4R’s function across 18 distinct experimental conditions, resulting in >20 million unique measurements. From this, we identified variants that have unique effects on MC4R-mediated Gαs- and Gαq-signaling pathways, which could be used to design drugs that selectively bias MC4R’s activity. We also identified pathogenic variants that are likely amenable to a corrector therapy. Finally, we functionally characterized structural relationships that distinguish the binding of peptide versus small molecule ligands, which could guide compound optimization. Collectively, these results demonstrate that DMS is a powerful method to empower drug discovery and development.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Meina He, Yongxin Tao ... Wenli Chen
    Research Article

    Copper is an essential enzyme cofactor in bacteria, but excess copper is highly toxic. Bacteria can cope with copper stress by increasing copper resistance and initiating chemorepellent response. However, it remains unclear how bacteria coordinate chemotaxis and resistance to copper. By screening proteins that interacted with the chemotaxis kinase CheA, we identified a copper-binding repressor CsoR that interacted with CheA in Pseudomonas putida. CsoR interacted with the HPT (P1), Dimer (P3), and HATPase_c (P4) domains of CheA and inhibited CheA autophosphorylation, resulting in decreased chemotaxis. The copper-binding of CsoR weakened its interaction with CheA, which relieved the inhibition of chemotaxis by CsoR. In addition, CsoR bound to the promoter of copper-resistance genes to inhibit gene expression, and copper-binding released CsoR from the promoter, leading to increased gene expression and copper resistance. P. putida cells exhibited a chemorepellent response to copper in a CheA-dependent manner, and CsoR inhibited the chemorepellent response to copper. Besides, the CheA-CsoR interaction also existed in proteins from several other bacterial species. Our results revealed a mechanism by which bacteria coordinately regulated chemotaxis and resistance to copper by CsoR.