Abstract

Hydrogen peroxide is the preeminent chemical weapon that organisms use for combat. Individual cells rely on conserved defenses to prevent and repair peroxide-induced damage, but whether similar defenses might be coordinated across cells in animals remains poorly understood. Here, we identify a neuronal circuit in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans that processes information perceived by two sensory neurons to control the induction of hydrogen peroxide defenses in the organism. We found that catalases produced by Escherichia coli, the nematode's food source, can deplete hydrogen peroxide from the local environment and thereby protect the nematodes. In the presence of E. coli, the nematode's neurons signal via TGFβ-insulin/IGF1 relay to target tissues to repress expression of catalases and other hydrogen peroxide defenses. This adaptive strategy is the first example of a multicellular organism modulating its defenses when it expects to freeload from the protection provided by molecularly orthologous defenses from another species.

Data availability

Aligned mRNA-seq read files were made available under Sequence Read Archive (SRA) SUB7234259. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jodie A Schiffer

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Francesco A Servello

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. William R Heath

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Francis Raj Gandhi Amrit

    Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Stephanie V Stumbur

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Matthias Eder

    Systems Biology Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Olivier M F Martin

    Systems Biology Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sean B Johnsen

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Julian A Stanley

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9193-3791
  10. Hannah Tam

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Sarah J Brennan

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Natalie G McGowan

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Abigail L Vogelaar

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Yuyan Xu

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. William T Serkin

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Arjumand Ghazi

    Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Nicholas Edward Stroustrup

    Systems Biology Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9530-7301
  18. Javier Apfeld

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    j.apfeld@northeastern.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9897-5671

Funding

National Science Foundation (1750065)

  • Javier Apfeld

National Institutes of Health (R01AG051659)

  • Arjumand Ghazi

Northeastern University (Tier 1 award)

  • Javier Apfeld

MEIC Excelencia award (BFU2017-88615-P)

  • Nicholas Edward Stroustrup

the CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya, and European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (852201)

  • Nicholas Edward Stroustrup

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Oliver Hobert, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: February 20, 2020
  2. Accepted: April 21, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 5, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 11, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Schiffer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,302
    Page views
  • 449
    Downloads
  • 12
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jodie A Schiffer
  2. Francesco A Servello
  3. William R Heath
  4. Francis Raj Gandhi Amrit
  5. Stephanie V Stumbur
  6. Matthias Eder
  7. Olivier M F Martin
  8. Sean B Johnsen
  9. Julian A Stanley
  10. Hannah Tam
  11. Sarah J Brennan
  12. Natalie G McGowan
  13. Abigail L Vogelaar
  14. Yuyan Xu
  15. William T Serkin
  16. Arjumand Ghazi
  17. Nicholas Edward Stroustrup
  18. Javier Apfeld
(2020)
Caenorhabditis elegans processes sensory information to choose between freeloading and self-defense strategies
eLife 9:e56186.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56186

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Developmental Biology
    Virginia L Pimmett, Mounia Lagha
    Insight

    Imaging experiments reveal the complex and dynamic nature of the transcriptional hubs associated with Notch signaling.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Simon Schneider, Andjela Kovacevic ... Hubert Schorle
    Research Article

    Cylicins are testis-specific proteins, which are exclusively expressed during spermiogenesis. In mice and humans, two Cylicins, the gonosomal X-linked Cylicin 1 (Cylc1/CYLC1) and the autosomal Cylicin 2 (Cylc2/CYLC2) genes, have been identified. Cylicins are cytoskeletal proteins with an overall positive charge due to lysine-rich repeats. While Cylicins have been localized in the acrosomal region of round spermatids, they resemble a major component of the calyx within the perinuclear theca at the posterior part of mature sperm nuclei. However, the role of Cylicins during spermiogenesis has not yet been investigated. Here, we applied CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in zygotes to establish Cylc1- and Cylc2-deficient mouse lines as a model to study the function of these proteins. Cylc1 deficiency resulted in male subfertility, whereas Cylc2-/-, Cylc1-/yCylc2+/-, and Cylc1-/yCylc2-/- males were infertile. Phenotypical characterization revealed that loss of Cylicins prevents proper calyx assembly during spermiogenesis. This results in decreased epididymal sperm counts, impaired shedding of excess cytoplasm, and severe structural malformations, ultimately resulting in impaired sperm motility. Furthermore, exome sequencing identified an infertile man with a hemizygous variant in CYLC1 and a heterozygous variant in CYLC2, displaying morphological abnormalities of the sperm including the absence of the acrosome. Thus, our study highlights the relevance and importance of Cylicins for spermiogenic remodeling and male fertility in human and mouse, and provides the basis for further studies on unraveling the complex molecular interactions between perinuclear theca proteins required during spermiogenesis.