Abstract

Hydrogen peroxide is the preeminent chemical weapon that organisms use for combat. Individual cells rely on conserved defenses to prevent and repair peroxide-induced damage, but whether similar defenses might be coordinated across cells in animals remains poorly understood. Here, we identify a neuronal circuit in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans that processes information perceived by two sensory neurons to control the induction of hydrogen peroxide defenses in the organism. We found that catalases produced by Escherichia coli, the nematode's food source, can deplete hydrogen peroxide from the local environment and thereby protect the nematodes. In the presence of E. coli, the nematode's neurons signal via TGFβ-insulin/IGF1 relay to target tissues to repress expression of catalases and other hydrogen peroxide defenses. This adaptive strategy is the first example of a multicellular organism modulating its defenses when it expects to freeload from the protection provided by molecularly orthologous defenses from another species.

Data availability

Aligned mRNA-seq read files were made available under Sequence Read Archive (SRA) SUB7234259. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jodie A Schiffer

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Francesco A Servello

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. William R Heath

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Francis Raj Gandhi Amrit

    Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Stephanie V Stumbur

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Matthias Eder

    Systems Biology Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Olivier M F Martin

    Systems Biology Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Sean B Johnsen

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Julian A Stanley

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9193-3791
  10. Hannah Tam

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Sarah J Brennan

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Natalie G McGowan

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Abigail L Vogelaar

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Yuyan Xu

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. William T Serkin

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Arjumand Ghazi

    Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Nicholas Edward Stroustrup

    Systems Biology Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9530-7301
  18. Javier Apfeld

    Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    j.apfeld@northeastern.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9897-5671

Funding

National Science Foundation (1750065)

  • Javier Apfeld

National Institutes of Health (R01AG051659)

  • Arjumand Ghazi

Northeastern University (Tier 1 award)

  • Javier Apfeld

MEIC Excelencia award (BFU2017-88615-P)

  • Nicholas Edward Stroustrup

the CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya, and European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (852201)

  • Nicholas Edward Stroustrup

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Schiffer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,772
    views
  • 479
    downloads
  • 22
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jodie A Schiffer
  2. Francesco A Servello
  3. William R Heath
  4. Francis Raj Gandhi Amrit
  5. Stephanie V Stumbur
  6. Matthias Eder
  7. Olivier M F Martin
  8. Sean B Johnsen
  9. Julian A Stanley
  10. Hannah Tam
  11. Sarah J Brennan
  12. Natalie G McGowan
  13. Abigail L Vogelaar
  14. Yuyan Xu
  15. William T Serkin
  16. Arjumand Ghazi
  17. Nicholas Edward Stroustrup
  18. Javier Apfeld
(2020)
Caenorhabditis elegans processes sensory information to choose between freeloading and self-defense strategies
eLife 9:e56186.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56186

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56186

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sara Jaber, Eliana Eldawra ... Franck Toledo
    Research Article

    Missense ‘hotspot’ mutations localized in six p53 codons account for 20% of TP53 mutations in human cancers. Hotspot p53 mutants have lost the tumor suppressive functions of the wildtype protein, but whether and how they may gain additional functions promoting tumorigenesis remain controversial. Here, we generated Trp53Y217C, a mouse model of the human hotspot mutant TP53Y220C. DNA damage responses were lost in Trp53Y217C/Y217C (Trp53YC/YC) cells, and Trp53YC/YC fibroblasts exhibited increased chromosome instability compared to Trp53-/- cells. Furthermore, Trp53YC/YC male mice died earlier than Trp53-/- males, with more aggressive thymic lymphomas. This correlated with an increased expression of inflammation-related genes in Trp53YC/YC thymic cells compared to Trp53-/- cells. Surprisingly, we recovered only one Trp53YC/YC female for 22 Trp53YC/YC males at weaning, a skewed distribution explained by a high frequency of Trp53YC/YC female embryos with exencephaly and the death of most Trp53YC/YC female neonates. Strikingly, however, when we treated pregnant females with the anti-inflammatory drug supformin (LCC-12), we observed a fivefold increase in the proportion of viable Trp53YC/YC weaned females in their progeny. Together, these data suggest that the p53Y217C mutation not only abrogates wildtype p53 functions but also promotes inflammation, with oncogenic effects in males and teratogenic effects in females.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Mengjie Li, Aiguo Tian, Jin Jiang
    Research Advance

    Stem cell self-renewal often relies on asymmetric fate determination governed by niche signals and/or cell-intrinsic factors but how these regulatory mechanisms cooperate to promote asymmetric fate decision remains poorly understood. In adult Drosophila midgut, asymmetric Notch (N) signaling inhibits intestinal stem cell (ISC) self-renewal by promoting ISC differentiation into enteroblast (EB). We have previously shown that epithelium-derived Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) promotes ISC self-renewal by antagonizing N pathway activity (Tian and Jiang, 2014). Here, we show that loss of BMP signaling results in ectopic N pathway activity even when the N ligand Delta (Dl) is depleted, and that the N inhibitor Numb acts in parallel with BMP signaling to ensure a robust ISC self-renewal program. Although Numb is asymmetrically segregated in about 80% of dividing ISCs, its activity is largely dispensable for ISC fate determination under normal homeostasis. However, Numb becomes crucial for ISC self-renewal when BMP signaling is compromised. Whereas neither Mad RNA interference nor its hypomorphic mutation led to ISC loss, inactivation of Numb in these backgrounds resulted in stem cell loss due to precocious ISC-to-EB differentiation. Furthermore, we find that numb mutations resulted in stem cell loss during midgut regeneration in response to epithelial damage that causes fluctuation in BMP pathway activity, suggesting that the asymmetrical segregation of Numb into the future ISC may provide a fail-save mechanism for ISC self-renewal by offsetting BMP pathway fluctuation, which is important for ISC maintenance in regenerative guts.