Reconstitution reveals two paths of force transmission through the kinetochore

  1. Grace E Hamilton
  2. Luke A Helgeson
  3. Cameron L Noland
  4. Charles L Asbury  Is a corresponding author
  5. Yoana N Dimitrova  Is a corresponding author
  6. Trisha N Davis  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, United States
  2. Department of Structural Biology, Genentech Inc, United States
  3. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, United States
5 figures, 3 tables and 2 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 1 supplement
Reconstitution of a kinetochore from individually purified parts and an optical trap-based assay to test for self-assembly of functional chains of kinetochore subcomplexes.

(A) Schematic of the protein complexes of the budding yeast kinetochore. (B) Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gel of heterologously expressed budding yeast kinetochore proteins. The asterisk indicates a contaminating E. coli protein or degradation product. (C) Schematic of the optical trap assay used to test for assembly and microtubule attachment prior to quantification of load-bearing ability. (D) Representative force vs. time traces for ruptures in the force-ramp assay.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Schematic diagram, drawn approximately to scale, showing two possible bead-microtubule configurations.

Our rupture force assay quantifies the strength of end-on attachments. In this configuration, reconstituted kinetochores on only ~ 3.0% of the bead surface are capable of simultaneously binding to the microtubule. Assuming that the ~ 2900 protein complexes on each bead are evenly distributed,~86 would be capable of binding the microtubule surface. Lateral attachments likely predominate in our self-assembly and microtubule-binding assay. In this configuration, the bead rests against the side of a filament whose tip extends well past the point of contact, maximizing the amount of bead surface in close proximity to the microtubule. Thus, it provides an upper limit for the fraction of bead surface within 84 nm of the microtubule. Reconstituted kinetochores on ~ 9.4% of the bead surface,~270 protein complexes, would be capable of simultaneously binding to the microtubule in this lateral configuration.

OA-based chains assemble spontaneously and form load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubules.

(A) Percentages of free beads that bound microtubules under no external force. Error bars indicate the standard error of the sample proportion. Barnard’s test was used to compare contingency tables. n.s. indicates p>0.05. * indicates p<0.05. ** indicates p<0.01. (B) Boxplot of rupture forces observed with reconstituted kinetochores of increasing length. Each shaded circle is an individual rupture event. Boxes extend from the lower quartile to the upper quartile. Whiskers extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range beyond each quartile. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to compare probability distributions and calculate p-values. n.s. indicates p>0.05. * indicates p<0.05. ** indicates p<0.01. (C) Survival curves for Ndc80c linkages (grey), MIND/Ndc80c linkages (purple), OA/MIND/Ndc80c linkages (pink), OA/2D-MIND/Ndc80c linkages (turquoise), and OA/2D-MIND/Ndc80c/Dam1c linkages (blue). The dashed horizontal line indicates 50% survival (median rupture force). Raw data of all rupture events are included in Figure 2—source data 1. Exact p-values are included in Figure 2—source data 2.

Figure 2—source data 1

Raw rupture force data for OA-based linkers.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/56582/elife-56582-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 2—source data 2

Exact p-values for all comparisons of rupture force distributions.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/56582/elife-56582-fig2-data2-v2.xlsx
Mif2-based chains also assemble spontaneously and form load-bearing attachments to dynamic microtubule tips.

(A) Percentages of free beads that bound microtubules under no force. Error bars indicate the standard error of the sample proportion. Barnard’s test was used to compare contingency tables. n.s. indicates p > 0.05. * indicates p < 0.05. ** indicates p < 0.01. “2D” indicates that two phosphomimetic mutations (S240D, S250D) have been made to the MIND component Dsn1. (B) Boxplot of rupture forces observed with reconstituted kinetochores. Each shaded circle is an individual rupture event. Boxes extend from the lower quartile to the upper quartile. Whiskers extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range beyond each quartile. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to compare probability distributions and calculate p-values. n.s. indicates p > 0.05. * indicates p < 0.05. ** indicates p < 0.01. (C) Survival curves for OA/2D-MIND/Ndc80c linkages (turquoise) (repeated from Figure 2 for comparison), Mif2/2D-MIND/Ndc80c linkages (green), and Mif2/2D-MIND/Ndc80c/Dam1c linkages (yellow). The dashed horizontal line indicates 50% survival (median rupture force). Raw data of all rupture events are included in Figure 3—source data 1".

Figure 4 with 1 supplement
OA strengthens the Mif2/2D-MIND interface.

(A) Boxplot of rupture forces observed with reconstituted kinetochores. Each shaded circle is an individual rupture event. Boxes extend from the lower quartile to the upper quartile. Whiskers extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range beyond each quartile. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to compare probability distributions and calculate p-values. n.s. indicates p>0.05. * indicates p<0.05. ** indicates p<0.01. (B) Survival curves for Mif2/OA/2D-MIND/Ndc80c linkages (orange), Mif2/OA/2D-MIND/Ndc80c/Dam1c linkages (teal), and Mif2/ΔN-OA/2D-MIND/Ndc80c (maroon). The dashed horizontal line indicates 50% survival (median rupture force). Raw data of all rupture events are included in Figure 4—source data 1.

Figure 4—source data 1

Raw rupture force data for linkers containing both OA and Mif2.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/56582/elife-56582-fig4-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Mif2 does not strengthen the OA/2D-MIND interface.

(A) Boxplot of rupture forces observed with reconstituted kinetochores. Each shaded circle is an individual rupture event. Boxes extend from the lower quartile to the upper quartile. Whiskers extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range beyond each quartile. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to compare probability distributions and calculate p-values. * indicates p<0.05. (B) Survival curves for OA/2D-MIND/Ndc80c linkages (turquoise) and OA/Mif2/2D-MIND/Ndc80c linkages (purple). The dashed horizontal line indicates 50% survival (median rupture force). Raw data of all rupture events are included in Figure 4—source data 1.

Figure 5 with 2 supplements
Assemblies based on centromeric nucleosomes form load-bearing microtubule attachments through OA or Mif2 or both.

(A) Percentages of free beads that bound microtubules under no force. Error bars indicate the standard error of the sample proportion. Barnard’s test was used to compare contingency tables. n.s. indicates p>0.05. * indicates p<0.05. ** indicates p<0.01. (B) Boxplot of rupture forces observed with reconstituted kinetochores. Each shaded circle is an individual rupture event. Boxes extend from the lower quartile to the upper quartile. Whiskers extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range beyond each quartile. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to compare probability distributions and calculate p-values. n.s. indicates p>0.05. * indicates p<0.05. ** indicates p<0.01. (C) Survival curves for Cse4 NCP/OA/2D-MIND/Ndc80c linkages (yellow), Cse4 NCP/Mif2/2D-MIND/Ndc80c linkages (brown), and Cse4 NCP/OA/Mif2/2D-MIND/Ndc80c linkages (purple). Raw data of all rupture events are included in Figure 5—source data 1.

Figure 5—source data 1

Raw rupture force data for nucleosome core particle-based linkers.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/56582/elife-56582-fig5-data1-v2.xlsx
Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Load-bearing attachments between OA and Cse4-NCPs occur through the N-terminus of Cse4.

(A) Boxplot of rupture forces observed with reconstituted kinetochores. Each shaded circle is an individual rupture event. Boxes extend from the lower quartile to the upper quartile. Whiskers extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range beyond each quartile. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to compare probability distributions and calculate p-values. * indicates p < 0.05. (B) Survival curves for Cse4-NCP/ OA/2D-MIND/Ndc80c linkages (yellow), Cse4(1-50)/OA/2D-MIND/Ndc80c linkages (green), and Cse4(1-50)/ Mif2/ OA/ 2D-MIND/Ndc80c linkages (pink). The dashed horizontal line indicates 50% survival (median rupture force). Raw data of all rupture events are included in Figure 5—source data 1.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2
Neither Dam1c nor CI increases the rupture force of NCP-containing linkers.

(A) Boxplot of rupture forces observed with reconstituted kinetochores. Each shaded circle is an individual rupture event. Boxes extend from the lower quartile to the upper quartile. Whiskers extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range beyond each quartile. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to compare probability distributions and calculate p-values. * indicates p < 0.05. (B) Survival curves for Cse4-NCP/ OA/2D-MIND/Ndc80c linkages (yellow), Cse4-NCP/OA/2D-MIND/Ndc80c/Dam1c linkages (blue), and Cse4-NCP/CI/ Mif2/ OA/ 2D-MIND/Ndc80c/Dam1c linkages (pink). The dashed horizontal line indicates 50% survival (median rupture force). Raw data of all rupture events are included in Figure 5—source data 1.

Tables

Table 1
Proteins of the kinetochore.
S. cerevisiaeH. sapiens
Dam1c/DASHHigher eukaryotic analog is the Ska complex
Ask1 (Associated with spindles and kinetochores)
Dad1 (Duo1 and Dam1 interacting)
Dad2 (Duo1 and Dam1 interacting)
Dad3 (Duo1 and Dam1 interacting)
Dad4 (Duo1 and Dam1 interacting)
Dam1 (Duo1 and Mps1 interacting)
Duo1 (Death upon overproduction)
Hsk3 (Helper of Ask1)
Spc19 (Spindle pole component)
Spc34 (Spindle pole component)
Functional analog is Dam1cSka Complex
Ska1
Ska2
Ska3
Spc105cKNL1 complex
Spc105 (Spindle component)KNL1
Kre28 (Killer toxin resistant)Zwint-1
Ndc80cNdc80c
Ndc80 (Nuclear division cycle)Hec1
Nuf2 (Nuclear filamentous protein)Nuf2
Spc24 (Spindle pole component)Spc24
Spc25 (Spindle pole component)Spc25
MINDMis12c
Mtw1 (Mis Twelve-like)Mis12
Dsn1 (Dosage suppressor of NNF1)Dsn1
Nnf1 (Necessary for nuclear function)Pmf1
Nsl1 (NNF1 synthetic lethal)Nsl1
Cnn1cCENP-TWSX
Cnn1 (Co-purified with Nnf1)CENP-T
Wip1 (W-like protein)CENP-W
Mhf1 (Mph1-associated histone-fold protein)CENP-S
Mhf2 (Mph1-associated histone-fold protein)CENP-X
OACENP-QU
Okp1 (Outer kinetochore protein)CENP-Q
Ame1 (Associated with microtubules and essential)CENP-U
Mif2CENP-C
Mif2 (Mitotic fidelity of chromosome transmission)CENP-C
CICENP-NL
Chl4 (Chromosome loss)CENP-N
Iml3 (Increased minichromosome loss)CENP-L
NN
Nkp1 (Non-essential kinetochore protein)No human homolog
Nkp2 (Non-essential kinetochore protein)
CMCENP-OP
Ctf19 (Chromosome transmission fidelity)CENP-O
Mcm21 (Mini-chromosome maintenance)CENP-P
No fungal homologCENP-R
Ctf3cCENP-HIKM
Ctf3 (Chromosome transmission fidelity)CENP-H
Mcm16 (Mini-chromosome maintenance)CENP-I
Mcm22 (Mini-chromosome maintenance)CENP-K
No fungal homologCENP-M
Centromeric histoneCentromeric histone
Cse4 (Chromosome segregation)CENP-A
Table 2
Plasmids used in this study.
Protein complexPlasmid nameNames used in this paperProteins expressed*VectorReferences
Mif2Sc_Mf_7Mif2Mif2-linker-(27-392)MBP-6XHis**pLICThis study
pGH52Mif2Mif2-linker-(27-392)MBP**pLICThis study
Sc_Mf_5BΔN-Mif2(41-549)Mif2-linker-(27-392)MBPpLICThis study
OApGH3OAAme1-6XHis, Okp1pST39This study
pGH4OAAme1-FLAG, Okp1pST39This study
pGH42ΔN-OA(21-324)Ame1-FLAG, Okp1pST39This study
pGH15ΔN-OA(21-324)Ame1-6XHis, Okp1pST39This study
MINDpGH632D-MIND6XHis-linker-Nsl1, S240D, S250D-Dsn1, Mtw1, Nnf1pST39This study
pGH622D-MINDFLAG-Nsl1, S240D, S250D-Dsn1, Mtw1, Nnf1pST39This study
pGH46MINDNsl1, FLAG-Dsn1, Mtw1, Nnf1pST39This study
Ndc80cpJT048Part of Ndc80cSpc24-Flag, Spc25pRSFDuetKudalkar et al., 2015
pEM033Part of Ndc80cSpc24-6XHis, Spc25pRSFDuetScarborough et al., 2019
Ndc80/Nuf2Part of Ndc80cNuf2, Ndc80pETDuetWei et al., 2005
Dam1cpJT044Dam1cDad1, Duo1, Spc34-FLAG, Dam1, Hsk3 and
Dad4, Dad3, Dad2, Spc19, Ask1
pST39Umbreit et al., 2014
CIpGH58CIFLAG-Chl4, Iml3pLICThis study
HistonespScKl2Cse4-NCPK.lactis 6XHis-H2A, K. lactis 6XHis-H2B, Cse4, K. lactis 6XHis-H4pLICMigl et al., 2020
pScKl4H3-NCPH3, 6XHis-H2A, H2B. K.lactis 6XHis-H4pLICMigl et al., 2020
pScHT4Cse4(1-50)6XHis-MBP-(1-50)Cse4pLICThis study
Key resources table
Reagent type
(species) or resource
DesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional
information
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli)Rosetta (DE3) pLys competent cellsNovagenCat#71403
Strain, strain background (Escherichia coli)Rosetta (DE3) competent cellsMillipore SigmaCat#70954
Biological sample
(Bos taurus)
Bovine brain tubulinLab purificationProtocol adopted from Castoldi and Popov, 2003
AntibodyPenta-HIS biotin conjugate, monoclonal mouseQiagenCat#34440
Chemical compound, drugGlucose oxidaseMillipore SigmaCat#345386
Chemical compound, drugCatalaseMillipore SigmaCat#219261
Chemical compound, drugBiotinylated bovine serum albumin (BSA)Vector laboratoriesCat#B-2007
Chemical compound, drugAvidin DNVector laboratoriesCat#A-3100
Chemical compound, drugTCEPThermo FischerCat#T2556
Software, algorithmLabviewNational InstrumentsRRID:SCR_014325
Software, algorithmIgor ProWavemetricsRRID:SCR_000325
Software, algorithmRR Foundation for Statistical Computing

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Grace E Hamilton
  2. Luke A Helgeson
  3. Cameron L Noland
  4. Charles L Asbury
  5. Yoana N Dimitrova
  6. Trisha N Davis
(2020)
Reconstitution reveals two paths of force transmission through the kinetochore
eLife 9:e56582.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56582