1. Neuroscience
Download icon

Parkin contributes to synaptic vesicle autophagy in Bassoon-deficient mice

  1. Sheila Hoffmann-Conaway
  2. Marisa M Brockmann
  3. Katharina Schneider
  4. Anil Annamneedi
  5. Kazi Atikur Rahman
  6. Christine Bruns
  7. Kathrin Textoris-Taube
  8. Thorsten Trimbuch
  9. Karl-Heinz Smalla
  10. Christian Rosenmund
  11. Eckart D Gundelfinger
  12. Craig Curtis Garner  Is a corresponding author
  13. Carolina Montenegro-Venegas  Is a corresponding author
  1. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Germany
  2. Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Neurobiology, Germany
  3. NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
  4. Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Germany
  5. Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (CBBS), Germany
  6. Institute of Biology (IBIO), Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
  7. Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Germany
  8. Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Biochemistry, Core Facility High Throughput Mass Spectrometry, Germany
  9. Molecular Neurobiology, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, Germany
  10. Institute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, Germany
Research Article
  • Cited 0
  • Views 1,098
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e56590 doi: 10.7554/eLife.56590

Abstract

Mechanisms regulating the turnover of synaptic vesicle (SV) proteins are not well understood. They are thought to require poly-ubiquitination and degradation through proteasome, endo-lysosomal or autophagy-related pathways. Bassoon was shown to negatively regulate presynaptic autophagy in part by scaffolding Atg5. Here, we show that increased autophagy in Bassoon knockout neurons depends on poly-ubiquitination and that the loss of Bassoon leads to elevated levels of ubiquitinated synaptic proteins per se. Our data show that Bassoon knockout neurons have a smaller SV pool size and a higher turnover rate as indicated by a younger pool of SV2. The E3 ligase Parkin is required for increased autophagy in Bassoon-deficient neurons as the knockdown of Parkin normalized autophagy and SV protein levels and rescued impaired SV recycling. These data indicate that Bassoon is a key regulator of SV proteostasis and that Parkin is a key E3 ligase in the autophagy-mediated clearance of SV proteins.

Introduction

Presynaptic active zones, the sites of synaptic vesicle fusion, are comprised of a dense network of scaffold proteins. These function to coordinate the regulated release of neurotransmitters as well as the cellular machinery that maintains the function and integrity of presynaptic boutons and thus neuronal communication (Rangaraju et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2017). The post-mitotic nature of neurons and their long lifetimes likely contributes to their vulnerability to various kinds of stress (Bishop et al., 2010) often culminating in the accumulation of misfolded proteins and neuronal degeneration as clearance systems become exhausted. Recent studies point to the presence of several proteostatic mechanisms within or near synapses that function to remove non-functional and/or damaged proteins. These include the proteasome, the endo-lysosomal system and autophagy (Hoffmann et al., 2019; Kaushik and Cuervo, 2015; Lazarevic et al., 2011; Vijayan and Verstreken, 2017; Wang et al., 2017). Genetic or environmental insults to these clearance systems cannot only disrupt synaptic transmission but also trigger developmental and neurodegenerative disorders (Liang and Sigrist, 2018; Vijayan and Verstreken, 2017; Waites et al., 2013).

Recently, it has been shown that synaptic vesicle proteins can enter the autophagy pathway, e.g. after being damaged by reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Hoffmann et al., 2019). However, how exactly these proteins are labeled for degradation remains unknown. One tagging system involved in protein quality control is the ubiquitination system, which attaches specific ubiquitin chains to a substrate, potentially leading to its degradation through either the proteasome or the lysosome. In addition, recent evidence suggests that ubiquitination plays an essential role in the generation of autophagic structures (Ciechanover and Kwon, 2017; Deng et al., 2017).

Ubiquitination requires the regulated activation of several components of this tagging system, including the ubiquitin activating enzyme E1, E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzymes and E3 ubiquitin ligases (E3 ligases) (Ding and Shen, 2008; Nandi et al., 2006). E3 ubiquitin ligases, of which mammalian cells express several hundred (Li et al., 2008), are posited to be responsible for substrate and degradation pathway specificity (Kwon and Ciechanover, 2017). For example, K63-poly-ubiquitinated proteins can be recognized by the autophagy adaptor p62, leading to the engulfment of these proteins into autophagy organelles and their subsequent delivery to the lysosome (Linares et al., 2013). On the other hand, K48-poly-ubiquitinated proteins are generally recruited into the proteasome for degradation (Ji and Kwon, 2017).

Interestingly, at least two key regulators of synaptic transmission, RIM1 and Munc13, can be selectively removed by the proteasome in an E3 ubiquitin ligase-dependent manner (Jiang et al., 2010; Yao et al., 2007; Yi and Ehlers, 2005). Additionally, the knockdown of two multi-domain scaffold proteins at the active zone (AZ), Piccolo and Bassoon, led to the loss of SVs and overall synapse integrity (Okerlund et al., 2017; Waites et al., 2013). This dramatic effect was caused in part by the activation of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Siah1 (Waites et al., 2013). Intriguingly, hippocampal neurons from mice lacking Bassoon alone show a robust increase in autophagosomes throughout axons and within synapses (Okerlund et al., 2017). These findings suggest that Bassoon is a potent regulator of presynaptic proteostasis, to some extent through the scaffolding constituents of the autophagy pathway such as Atg5 (Okerlund et al., 2017).

At present, it is unclear which E3 ligases are critical for enhanced presynaptic autophagy observed in the absence of Bassoon as well as which presynaptic proteins ultimately become degraded when the autophagy system is activated. In this study, we sought to address several questions. Specifically, what is the cargo of autophagy induced by the lack of Bassoon? Is the ubiquitin system involved in the substrate tagging and delivery in Bassoon knockout (Bsn KO) mice? And which E3 ligases are required to drive Bassoon deficiency-triggered autophagy? Regarding the latter, we focused our studies on two ligases, the RING-type E3 ligase Siah1 and the RING-between-RING-type (RBR-type) E3 ligase Parkin, as both are known to ubiquitinate several SV-associated and other presynaptic proteins (Chung et al., 2001; Trempe et al., 2009; Wheeler et al., 2002). Parkin is particularly attractive, given its association with several neurodegenerative diseases including Parkinson’s disease (Corti et al., 2011; Nixon, 2013). Moreover, Parkin is well known for being involved in mitophagy, the autophagic clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria (Ashrafi et al., 2014; Pickrell and Youle, 2015) and to generate K63-poly-ubiquitinated substrates (Olzmann et al., 2007) that can be degraded by autophagy (Linares et al., 2013). Our analysis reveals that Bassoon deficiency-triggered presynaptic autophagy requires the ubiquitin system, which primarily ubiquitinates SV proteins through the activation of Parkin and to a lesser extent Siah1. Overactivation of this system has a negative impact on SV recycling and pool size, suggesting a novel role for the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin in SV clearance.

Results

Increased autophagy in Bassoon knockout neurons depends on poly-ubiquitination

The primary goal of this study was to understand how presynaptic boutons regulate the catabolism of SV proteins as they age. Our previous study identified the presynaptic active zone proteins Bassoon and Piccolo as key regulators of SV proteostasis as well as synaptic integrity (Okerlund et al., 2017; Waites et al., 2013). We could also show that Bassoon was involved in the local regulation of autophagy within presynaptic boutons in part by scaffolding the autophagy protein Atg5 (Okerlund et al., 2017), and that ROS-mediated damage of SV proteins can trigger their clearance via autophagy (Hoffmann et al., 2019). Conceptually, presynaptic autophagy could be trigged by the generation of ubiquitinated substrates (Kwon and Ciechanover, 2017), or via the activation of signaling systems that e.g. inactivate mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) (Codogno et al., 2012; Hernandez et al., 2012; Klionsky et al., 2012). At present, it is unclear whether Bassoon deficiency-induced autophagy is controlled by either or both. If the latter, one might anticipate that Bassoon loss of function only creates empty phagophore membranes, while the former should also trigger the creation of ubiquitinated substrates. Clearly the identification of such substrates could help to unravel the cellular program regulated by Bassoon, for instance whether it controls the catabolism of SV or other synaptic proteins.

Given that the N-terminal zinc fingers of Bassoon are known to bind and inhibit the RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase Siah1 (Waites et al., 2013), we designed a series of experiments to test the hypothesis that Bassoon loss of function promotes autophagy by increasing the production of ubiquitinated substrates via specific E3 ligases. As an initial test of this hypothesis, we explored whether the expression of the two N-terminal zinc fingers (ZnFs) of Bassoon could suppress autophagy in neurons lacking Bassoon. This was accomplished by lentivirally expressing a construct with the first 609 amino acids of the Bassoon protein including ZnF1 and ZnF2 (Bsn609) tagged with eGFP in cultured hippocampal neurons from both WT and Bsn KO mice. As reported previously (Dresbach et al., 2003), Bsn609-eGFP properly localizes to the synapse (Figure 1B, Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). Co-transduction with RFP-LC3 in this and following experiments allowed for the monitoring of autophagy and a staining with antibodies against Synaptophysin1 was used to label synapses. In Bsn KO neurons, the introduction of FU-Bsn609-eGFP reduces the number of RFP-LC3 puncta per axon unit length back to WT levels (Figure 1A,B and C). Strikingly, the number of Synaptophysin1 puncta was significantly increased when FU-Bsn609-eGFP was expressed in Bsn KO neurons (Figure 1A,B and D). These findings are in line with Waites et al., 2013, showing that the expression of the Bassoon ZnFs could increase the intensity of SV2-eGFP at synapses in neurons expressing either shRNAs against both Piccolo and Bassoon or scrambled shRNA controls (Waites et al., 2013).

Figure 1 with 2 supplements see all
Expression of the Bsn fragment 1–609 (Bsn609) spanning both ZnF domains is sufficient to block autophagy induction in Bassoon KO neurons.

(A–B) Representative images of hippocampal neurons from WT and Bsn KO mice expressing FU-RFP-LC3 only (A) or FU-RFP-LC3 and FU-Bsn609-eGFP (B) that were fixed and stained with antibodies against Synaptophysin1 (Syp). (C–E) Quantification of the number of RFP-LC3 puncta per 10 μm axon (C) (WT = 0.53 ± 0.067, n = 42 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 0.92 ± 0.066, n = 43 axons, 3 independent experiments; WT + Bsn609 = 0.53 ± 0.071, n = 26 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + Bsn609 = 0.55 ± 0.069, n = 29 axons, 3 independent experiments; p***=0.0001, p**=0,001, p**=0.0011), the number of Syp1 puncta per 10 μm axon (D) (WT = 2.02 ± 0.148, n = 42 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 1.69 ± 0.088, n = 43 axons, 3 independent experiments; WT + Bsn609 = 2.28 ± 0.138, n = 26 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + Bsn609 = 2.24 ± 0.210, n = 29 axons, 3 independent experiments; p*=0.0292, p*=0.0431) and the colocalization of RFP-LC3 and Syp1 (E) (WT = 7.45 ± 1.724, n = 42 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 23.71 ± 2.679, n = 43 axons, 3 independent experiments; WT + Bsn609 = 14.35 ± 2.796, n = 26 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + Bsn609 = 14.74 ± 4.095, n = 29 axons, 3 independent experiments; p****<0.0001). Scale bars: 5 μm. Error bars represent SEM. Data points represent axons. ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used to evaluate statistical significance.

To further strengthen our hypothesis that Bassoon is acting locally to control autophagy, we performed western blot experiments showing that LC3-II levels are significantly elevated in synaptosomal preparations from Bsn KO mice (Figure 1—figure supplement 2B and D), but not in total brain homogenates (Figure 1—figure supplement 2A and C). As LC3-II is conjugated to the autophagosome (Fleming et al., 2011), it is an excellent marker for autophagy detection as the slight shift in size can be easily detected in western blot experiments.

To explore a more direct role of enhanced ubiquitination driving autophagy in boutons lacking Bassoon, we expressed a recombinant ubiquitin, with all lysine residues involved in poly-ubiquitination mutated to arginine (UbK0), thus blocking the poly-ubiquitination of substrates (Okerlund et al., 2017; Waites et al., 2013), in hippocampal neurons from WT and Bsn KO mice. Although the endogenous ubiquitin is still present, this manipulation was sufficient to reduce the number of RFP-LC3 puncta (Figure 2A,B and C) and the colocalization of RFP-LC3 with Synaptophysin1 (Figure 2A,B and E) in Bsn KO neurons back to WT levels. Furthermore, we observed that inhibiting the E1 activating enzyme, by treatment of Bsn KO neurons with ziram (Chou et al., 2008; Rinetti and Schweizer, 2010), also reduces presynaptic autophagy levels back to control levels (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C, Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). These findings make a strong case that Bassoon may normally function to negatively regulate synaptic autophagy through its ability to inhibit enzymes involved in ubiquitination and/or poly-ubiquitination such as Siah1 (Waites et al., 2013).

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
Poly-ubiquitination is required for increased autophagy in Bassoon KO neurons.

(A–B) Representative images of hippocampal neurons from WT and Bsn KO mice expressing FU-RFP-LC3 only (A) or FU-RFP-LC3 and FU-UbK0 (B) that were fixed and stained with antibodies against Synaptophysin1 (Syp). FU-UbK0 vector co-expresses a soluble eGFP that enables the identification and quantification of axons from infected neurons only. (C–E) Quantification of the number of RFP-LC3 puncta per 10 μm axon (C) (WT = 0.50 ± 0.063, n = 46 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 1.10 ± 0.108, n = 47 axons, 3 independent experiments; WT + UbK0 = 0.70 ± 0.091, n = 40 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + UbK0 = 0.55 ± 0.055, n = 40 axons, 3 independent experiments; p****<0.0001, p**=0.0060, p****<0.0001), the number of Syp1 puncta per 10 μm axon (D) (WT = 1.68 ± 0.109, n = 46 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 1.33 ± 0.100, n = 47 axons, 3 independent experiments; WT + UbK0 = 1.52 ± 0.153, n = 40 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + UbK0 = 1.48 ± 0.102, n = 40 axons, 3 independent experiments) and the colocalization of RFP-LC3 and Syp1 (E) (WT = 9.23 ± 1.809, n = 46 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 38.19 ± 4.211, n = 47 axons, 3 independent experiments; WT + UbK0 = 16.04 ± 3.269, n = 40 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + UbK0 = 16.82 ± 3.014, n = 40 axons, 3 independent experiments; p****<0.0001, p****<0.0001, p****<0.0001). Scale bars: 5 μm. Error bars represent SEM. Data points represent axons. ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used to evaluate statistical significance.

Increased levels of ubiquitinated SV proteins in Bassoon knockout neurons

To directly examine whether Bassoon deficiency enhances ubiquitination, we performed mass spectrometry analyses on synaptosomal preparations from WT and Bsn KO cortices. Using antibodies against the ubiquitin remnant motif (K-ε-GG) (Udeshi et al., 2013), we immunoprecipitated trypsin digested ubiquitinated peptides from synaptic proteins from synaptosomes. A scatterplot of WT and Bsn KO samples revealed a general shift towards more ubiquitinated synaptic proteins, such as SV-associated and SNARE complex proteins, in Bsn KO synaptosomes (Figure 3), indicating that Bassoon indeed negatively regulates ubiquitination of presynaptic proteins. Importantly, the postsynaptic protein SynGAP and the ubiquitously expressed protein GAPDH were not altered in synaptosomes from Bsn KO mice, supporting a selective presynaptic change in ubiquitination.

Mass spectrometry analyses reveal high levels of ubiquitinated SV-associated proteins in synaptosomal preparations from Bassoon KO mice.

Before LC-MS/MS measurements, ubiquitinated peptides were immunoprecipitated with ubiquitin remnant motif antibody K-ε-GG. Scatterplot showing log2 intensities of detected ubiquitinated peptides (enriched for remnant GlyGly (K) sites) from synaptosomes prepared from cortices of 15-week-old WT and Bsn KO mice. Lysine-containing peptides can be ubiquitinated in more than one position (e.g. 5x Stx1b). Log2 intensities of IP enriched peptides from ubiquitously expressed and postsynaptic proteins in blue and presynaptic proteins in green (dark green = unambiguously identified, light green = ambiguously identified). Unambiguous identification equals Mascot score >40, ppep <0.001, ambiguous identification equals Mascot score <40 and ppep >0.001. The orange line describes a 2-fold and the red line a 4-fold increase. Data points represent ubiquitinated peptides. Three animals were used per genotype.

Intriguingly, a variety of ubiquitinated presynaptic peptides are increased at least 4-fold in Bsn KO compared to WT neurons (Figure 3, Figure 3—source data 1): SNAP2576, Syt1119, SV2b333, SV2a143, Syt1173, V-ATPase E110. A second set with a ~ 2 fold increase in ubiquitination (e.g. Vamp239,52,54, Stx1b69, Stx1b188, Stx1b71, Stx1b93, Syt11124, SV2b341, Stx1b55, Syt563, Syt1133) suggests that they may also be candidates for Bassoon-regulated ubiquitination. In experiments presented later, we were particularly drawn to SV2b and Vamp2 for further analysis of Bassoon-regulated SV turnover, as peptides from these SV proteins were increased in Bsn KO synaptosomes (Figure 3).

A further standout is E2N, for which we found ubiquitinated peptides that were more than 4-fold increased in Bsn KO synaptosomes (Figure 3). E2N is a ubiquitin conjugating enzyme directly involved in creating K63-poly-ubiquitin chains, known to tag proteins for degradation via autophagy (Linares et al., 2013). Increased levels of E2N ubiquitination would be consistent with its normal, yet higher, functional activity. Together these data support the concept that Bassoon loss of function drives the poly-ubiquitination of SV proteins down this clearance pathway.

SV2b and Vamp2 levels as well as SV cycling are reduced in Bassoon knockout neurons and can be restored by the inhibition of autophagy

As the loss of Bassoon leads to increased ubiquitination levels of presynaptic proteins (Figure 3) while simultaneously inducing autophagy in the presynaptic compartment and throughout the axon, we anticipated that autophagy organelles could reduce the synaptic levels of these SV proteins by engulfing and delivering them to lysosomes for destruction. To test this concept, we quantified the synaptic levels of two SV proteins, SV2b and Vamp2, exhibiting increased ubiquitination in Bsn KO synaptosomes (Figure 3). Indeed, both SV2b and Vamp2 levels were reduced in Bsn KO neurons compared to WT neurons (Figure 4A,D,B and E). This effect was abolished by treating cultures with 1 μM of the autophagy inhibitor wortmannin (Klionsky et al., 2012; Ravikumar et al., 2010; Figure 4A,D,B and E), indicating that the loss of SV2b and Vamp2 in Bsn-deficient neurons is autophagy-dependent. To further strengthen these results, we performed similar experiments with SAR405, a highly specific Vps34 inhibitor (Ronan et al., 2014), to block autophagy. As expected, the treatment prevented autophagy induction as well as the decrease of SV2b levels in Bsn KO neurons (Figure 4—figure supplement 1).

Figure 4 with 2 supplements see all
Bassoon KO neurons display a loss of SV2b and Vamp2 as well as a reduced uptake of Synaptotagmin1 antibody in an autophagy-dependent manner.

(A–C) Representative images of hippocampal neurons from WT and Bsn KO mice, either left untreated or treated with 1 μM wortmannin (wtm) for 16 hr, stained with antibodies against SV2b (A) and Vamp2 (B) or live labeled with Synaptotagmin1 antibody (Syt1 uptake) (C). (D–F) Quantification of the normalized fluorescence intensities of SV2b (D) (WT = 1.00 ± 0.062, n = 26 images, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 0.65 ± 0.027, n = 30 images, 3 independent experiments; WT + wtm = 1.19 ± 0.063, n = 30 images, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + wtm = 1.09 ± 0.059, n = 25 images, 3 independent experiments; p****<0.0001, p****<0.0001, p****<0.0001), Vamp2 (E) (WT = 1.00 ± 0.038, n = 25 images, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 0.79 ± 0.034, n = 24 images, 3 independent experiments; WT + wtm = 1.12 ± 0.052, n = 33 images, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + wtm = 1.02 ± 0.046, n = 22 images, 3 independent experiments; p**=0.0077, p****<0.0001, p**=0.0042) and Syt1 uptake (F) (WT = 1.00 ± 0.056, n = 36 images, 4 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 0.61 ± 0.030, n = 33 images, 4 independent experiments; WT + wtm = 1.18 ± 0.049, n = 34 images, 4 independent experiments; Bsn KO + wtm = 0.95 ± 0.041, n = 48 images, 4 independent experiments; p****<0.0001, p*=0.0429, p****<0.0001, p****<0.0001, p**=0.0017). Scale bars: 20 μm (A), 5 μm (A zoom, B and C). Error bars represent SEM. Data points represent images. ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used to evaluate statistical significance.

The reduction in SV proteins such as SV2b and Vamp2 in Bsn KO neurons could be either caused by their specific elimination through autophagy (and other degradative pathways) or by the wholesale removal of SVs. Both concepts could lead to an altered vesicle cycle function. Given that fluorophore-conjugated Synaptotagmin1 antibodies label SVs that underwent an exo-/endocytosis cycle (Hoopmann et al., 2010; Truckenbrodt et al., 2018), the amount of Synaptotagmin1 antibody uptake (Syt1 uptake) can be used as a measure of vesicle cycle efficiency under the assumption that the total amount of Synaptotagmin1 is unchanged. In a control experiment, there were no overt changes in Synaptotagmin1 levels in Bsn KO compared to WT neurons (Figure 4—figure supplement 2A and B) indicating that Syt1 uptake can be used as a measure of SV cycling. Interestingly, in Bsn KO neurons, we observed that the amount of activity-associated Syt1 uptake was significantly reduced. This could be rescued to WT levels by treating cultures with wortmannin, indicating that the reduced recycling of SVs in Bsn KO neurons is associated with increased autophagy (Figure 4C and F). Strikingly, the treatment with wortmannin alone in the WT background leads to a slight increase in Syt1 uptake (Figure 4C and F). This suggests that the acute inhibition of autophagy can increase SV cycles by itself, though the mechanism is unclear.

Together these findings imply that the increased ubiquitination of SV proteins, and in particular SV2b and Vamp2, in Bsn KO neurons reduces their levels through autophagy-mediated clearance. Conceptually, this could also lead to a decrease in the total uptake of Synaptotagmin1 antibody as there are fewer SVs to undergo recycling. However, as we also found enhanced ubiquitination of peptides from the t-SNARES, SNAP25 and Syntaxin1b, and the SV calcium sensor Synaptotagmin1 (Figure 3), the reduced exo-/endocytosis of SVs could be due to lower levels of these critical SV fusion-related molecules.

Bassoon knockout neurons show an accumulation of autophagic vacuoles in presynaptic terminals and an autophagy-dependent decrease in SV numbers

High numbers of RFP-LC3 puncta in axons from Bsn KO neurons suggest that the loss of Bassoon leads to increased autophagosome formation, as previously observed (Okerlund et al., 2017). Given the presynaptic localization of Bassoon and the ubiquitination of presynaptic proteins (Figure 3), we hypothesized that autophagosomes are being formed locally at the presynaptic terminal to engulf SV-related cargos. To explore this hypothesis, we used cryo-electron microscopy (EM) to quantify the presence of double-membraned autophagic vacuoles (AVs) in WT and Bsn KO boutons, as described previously (Hoffmann et al., 2019). Consistent with our studies using fluorescent microscopy (Okerlund et al., 2017), significantly more AVs per presynaptic bouton were detected in Bsn KO compared to WT neurons (Figure 5A and C). This effect was rescued by the addition of wortmannin (Figure 5A,B and C). Intriguingly, AVs filled with SV-sized vesicles were observed in Bsn KO samples, indicating a possible wholesale removal of SVs (Figure 5A, zoom). In contrast, we could detect only small but not significant differences in the number of multivesicular bodies (MVBs) (Figure 5A,B and D), a hallmark of the endo-lysosomal pathway (Raiborg and Stenmark, 2009). These data provide compelling evidence that Bassoon-regulated ubiquitination of integral presynaptic membrane proteins leads to their clearance through autophagy rather than the endo-lysosomal system.

Loss of Bassoon leads to the accumulation of autophagic vacuoles and the autophagy-dependent decrease in SV pool size.

(A–B) Representative EM micrographs from WT and Bsn KO neurons, either left untreated (A) or treated with 1 μM wortmannin (wtm) for 16 hr (B). Arrowheads indicate double-membraned AVs and asterisk indicates ~50 nm vesicles within AV, the latter are also depicted in the zoom. (C–E) Quantification of the normalized number of autophagic vacuoles (AVs) (C) (WT = 1.00 ± 0.453, n = 178 synapses, 2 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 4.84 ± 1.448, n = 143 synapses, 2 independent experiments; WT + wtm = 0.87 ± 0.521, n = 143 synapses, 2 independent experiments; Bsn KO + wtm = 0.65 ± 0.507, n = 143 synapses, 2 independent experiments; p**=0.0035, p**=0.0044, p**=0.0022) and multi-vesicular bodies (MVBs) per presynaptic terminal (D) (WT = 1.00 ± 0.355, n = 178 synapses, 2 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 1.95 ± 0.656, n = 143 synapses, 2 independent experiments; WT + wtm = 1.35 ± 0.556, n = 143 synapses, 2 independent experiments; Bsn KO + wtm = 0.75 ± 0.427, n = 143 synapses, 2 independent experiments) and synaptic vesicles (SVs) per terminal area (E) (WT = 111.20 ± 4.416, n = 137 synapses, 2 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 83.63 ± 4.913, n = 132 synapses, 2 independent experiments; WT + wtm = 160.00 ± 4.828, n = 139 synapses, 2 independent experiments; Bsn KO + wtm = 117.70 ± 7.042, n = 124 synapses, 2 independent experiments; p**=0.0014, p****<0.0001, p****<0.0001, p****<0.0001, p****<0.0001). Scale bars: 300 nm, 50 nm (A zoom). Error bars represent SEM. Data points represent synapses. ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used to evaluate statistical significance.

Importantly, our EM data also show that the number of SVs per presynaptic area is reduced in Bsn KO neurons (Figure 5A and E). This is in line with our findings that SV2b and Vamp2 levels and Syt1 uptake are decreased in neurons lacking Bassoon compared to WT boutons (Figure 4). Conceptually, these data indicate that Bassoon normally controls the tagging of SV proteins with ubiquitin and their clearance through the autophagy system. Consistent with this concept, we observed that treating neurons with wortmannin to inhibit autophagy prior to EM processing increased the number of SVs per terminal area in Bsn KO and WT neurons (Figure 5A,B and E) further supporting the argument that autophagy plays a role in the maintenance of SVs within presynaptic boutons.

Bassoon deficiency-dependent autophagy leads to an overall younger pool of SV2

The depletion of Bassoon does not only lead to increased ubiquitination and a loss of SV proteins (Figure 4) but simultaneously to increased autophagy levels. Previous studies have shown that the induction of autophagy through the naturally occurring polyamine spermidine is able to expand the lifespan of various animal models (Eisenberg et al., 2009). Along these lines, we posited that the increased autophagy in boutons lacking Bassoon would not only increase the rate of SV clearance but also lead to an overall younger pool of SV proteins. Given that SV2 levels are substantially lower in Bsn KO boutons, we explored whether this is related to increased protein turnover and accordingly a shift in the age of SV2 molecules. This was accomplished by creating a fusion protein between SV2 and a recombinant version of GFP that changes its emission from blue to red with time (Subach et al., 2009). For these studies, we chose a medium fluorescent timer (Subach et al., 2009) (mFT-SV2) that changes its fluorescence with a maximum of blue intensity after 21 hr and a maximum of red intensity after 197 hr. Hippocampal neurons from Bsn KO and WT animals, expressing FU-mFT-SV2, show a punctate pattern of both red and blue fluorescence (Figure 6). Quantifying the ratio between old (red) and young (blue) SV2, we were able to detect a significant decrease of the red/blue ratio in Bsn KO compared to WT neurons (Figure 6A and B). This difference is also visible in frequency histograms (Figure 6C). These data indicate that indeed the SV2 pool is shifted towards younger proteins in Bsn-deficient synapses.

Increased autophagy in Bassoon KO neurons leads to a younger SV2 protein pool.

(A) Representative images of hippocampal neurons from WT and Bsn KO mice expressing medium fluorescent timer (mFT)-tagged SV2 protein (FU-mFT-SV2). The mFT changes its color from blue to red over time. (B–C) Quantification of the normalized red/blue ratio (fluorescence intensities), depicted in a bar graph (B) (WT = 1.00 ± 0.076, n = 32 images, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 0.68 ± 0.051, n = 31 images, 3 independent experiments, p***=0.0008) and as a histogram (C). Note that Bsn KO neurons have significantly more blue, thus younger SV2 pools. Scale bars: 10 μm. Error bars represent SEM. Data points represent images. Unpaired t test was used to evaluate statistical significance.

Parkin is a key regulator of Bassoon deficiency-triggered presynaptic autophagy and SV pool size

The increase in abundance of ubiquitinated synaptic proteins (Figure 3) as well as the ability of UbK0 expression to diminish autophagy in Bsn KO neurons (Figure 2) suggest that functional poly-ubiquitination of SV proteins is required to create the autophagy phenotype in these neurons. An open question is which E3 ubiquitin ligase might be critical for these Bassoon-dependent phenotypes. Our previous studies of neurons lacking both Bassoon and Piccolo revealed that Siah1 was an important E3 ligase controlling SV pool size, but perhaps not elevated autophagy in these cells (Okerlund et al., 2017). In revisiting this problem, we initially sought to confirm these results in hippocampal neurons from Bsn KO mice. This was accomplished by first verifying in immunoblot analyses that the previously reported shRNAs against Siah1 (shSiah1) efficiently knocked down Siah1 (Okerlund et al., 2017; Waites et al., 2013). In these new experiments, we observed that when ~ 80% of hippocampal neurons were infected with FU-shSiah1, Siah1 levels decreased to ~50% (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A and C), indicating that the shRNA is indeed functional. To ensure that any change in autophagy is cell-autonomous and associated with the down regulation of Siah1, Bsn KO neurons were either singly or double infected with lentiviruses expressing RFP-LC3, a reporter for autophagy, and FU-shSiah1. Using the soluble eGFP in FU-shSiah1 to identify shSiah1-expressing axons, we observed that reducing Siah1 levels by ~50% was not sufficient to reduce the number of RFP-LC3 puncta present along the axons of neurons lacking Bassoon (Figure 7A,B and C). Intriguingly, it slightly reduces the percentage of RFP-LC3 puncta that colocalized with Synaptophysin1 (Figure 7A,B and E) indicating that Siah1 does play a role in Bassoon deficiency-triggered autophagy within presynaptic boutons.

Figure 7 with 1 supplement see all
Siah1-ubiquitination contributes to increased presynaptic autophagy in Bassoon KO neurons.

(A–B) Representative images of hippocampal neurons from WT and Bsn KO mice expressing FU-RFP-LC3 only (A) or FU-RFP-LC3 and shRNA against Siah1 (FU-shSiah1) (B) that were fixed and stained with antibodies against Synaptophysin1 (Syp). FU-shSiah1 vector co-expresses a soluble eGFP that enables the identification and quantification of axons from infected neurons only. (C–E) Quantification of the number of RFP-LC3 puncta per 10 μm axon (C) (WT = 0.50 ± 0.063, n = 46 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 1.10 ± 0.108, n = 47 axons, 3 independent experiments; WT + shSiah1 = 0.52 ± 0.056, n = 42 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + shSiah1 = 0.96 ± 0.106, n = 41 axons, 3 independent experiments; p****<0.0001, p**=0.0019, p****<0.0001, p**=0.0035), the number of Syp1 puncta per 10 μm axon (D) (WT = 1.68 ± 0.109, n = 46 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 1.33 ± 0.100, n = 47 axons, 3 independent experiments; WT + shSiah1 = 1.49 ± 0.101, n = 42 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + shSiah1 = 1.49 ± 0.152, n = 41 axons, 3 independent experiments) and the colocalization of RFP-LC3 and Syp1 (E) (WT = 9.23 ± 1.809, n = 46 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 38.19 ± 4.211, n = 47 axons, 3 independent experiments; WT + shSiah1 = 14.93 ± 3.046, n = 42 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + shSiah1 = 25.28 ± 3.902, n = 41 axons, 3 independent experiments; p****<0.0001, p**=0.0056, p****<0.0001, p*=0.0379). Scale bars: 5 μm. Error bars represent SEM. Data points represent axons. ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used to evaluate statistical significance.

Given the ability of RBR-type E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin to also ubiquitinate SV-associated and other presynaptic proteins (Chung et al., 2001; Huynh et al., 2003; Martinez et al., 2017; Trempe et al., 2009), we performed a similar set of experiments with an shRNA generated against Parkin. In western blots, our Parkin shRNA (shParkin) was able to reduce Parkin protein levels in infected neurons by ~70% (Figure 7—figure supplement 1B and D). It also dramatically reduced the number of RFP-LC3 puncta per 10 μm axon (Figure 8A,B and C) as well as the colocalization of RFP-LC3 and Synaptophysin1 puncta (Figure 8A,B and E, Figure 1—figure supplement 1E) to WT levels. These data indicate that Parkin is a potent mediator of presynaptic autophagy caused by the absence of Bassoon. Additionally, lentiviral expression of shParkin significantly increases the number and intensity of Synaptophysin1 puncta along axons compared to the Bsn KO alone (Figure 8A,B and D).

Knockdown of Parkin rescues the autophagy phenotype in Bassoon KO neurons.

(A–B) Representative images of hippocampal neurons from WT and Bsn KO mice expressing FU-RFP-LC3 only (A) or FU-RFP-LC3 and shRNA against Parkin (FU-shParkin) (B) that were fixed and stained with antibodies against Synaptophysin1 (Syp). FU-shParkin vector co-expresses a soluble eGFP that enables the identification and quantification of axons from infected neurons only. (C–E) Quantification of the number of RFP-LC3 puncta per 10 μm axon (C) (WT = 0.58 ± 0.060, n = 44 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 1.25 ± 0.090, n = 45 axons, 3 independent experiments; WT + shParkin = 0.29 ± 0.046, n = 35 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + shParkin = 0.45 ± 0.063, n = 41 axons, 3 independent experiments; p****<0.0001, p*=0.0285, p****<0.0001, p****<0.0001), the number of Syp1 puncta per 10 μm axon (D) (WT = 1.86 ± 0.121, n = 44 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 1.55 ± 0.139, n = 45 axons, 3 independent experiments; WT + shParkin = 1.57 ± 0.104, n = 35 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + shParkin = 2.09 ± 0.127, n = 41 axons, 3 independent experiments; p*=0.0119, p*=0.0302) and the colocalization of RFP-LC3 and Syp1 (E) (WT = 16.75 ± 2.82, n = 44 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 40.42 ± 4.134, n = 45 axons, 3 independent experiments; WT + shParkin = 7.38 ± 2.382, n = 35 axons, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + shParkin = 8.72 ± 1.736, n = 41 axons, 3 independent experiments; p****<0.0001, p****<0.0001, p****<0.0001). Scale bars: 5 μm. Error bars represent SEM. Data points represent axons. ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used to evaluate statistical significance.

These data indicate that Bassoon and Parkin work in concert to regulate SV pool size within presynaptic boutons. To explore the relationship of Bassoon and Parkin to SV function and turnover, we examined whether the knockdown of Parkin in Bsn KO neurons is sufficient to rescue SV protein levels back to WT levels. Using antibodies to monitor the synaptic levels of the SV proteins, SV2b and Vamp2, both hyper-ubiquitinated in the absence of Bassoon (Figure 3), we could show a significant increase in SV2b and Vamp2 levels in Bsn KO neurons expressing shParkin (Figure 9A,B,D and E). Furthermore, in Syt1 uptake experiments, the depletion of the E3 ligase Parkin in Bsn KO neurons fully prevented the reduced cycling of SV pools (Figure 9C and F). These latter data suggest that Parkin plays a fundamental role in the ubiquitin-dependent clearance of SV proteins and thus the integrity and maintenance of functional SV pools.

Decreased SV2b, Vamp2 and Synaptotagmin1 antibody uptake in Bassoon KO neurons are rescued by the downregulation of Parkin.

(A–C) Representative images of hippocampal neurons from WT and Bsn KO mice, either uninfected or expressing shRNA against Parkin (FU-shParkin) that were fixed and stained with antibodies against SV2b (A) and Vamp2 (B) or live labeled with Synaptotagmin1 antibody (Syt1 uptake) (C). (D–F) Quantification of the normalized fluorescence intensities of SV2b (D) (WT = 1.00 ± 0.039, n = 29 images, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 0.78 ± 0.037, n = 27 images, 3 independent experiments; WT + shParkin = 1.00 ± 0.039, n = 29 images, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + shParkin = 1.06 ± 0.049, n = 29 images, 3 independent experiments; p**=0.0014, p**=0.0012, p****<0.0001), Vamp2 (E) (WT = 1.00 ± 0.038, n = 34 images, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 0.75 ± 0.035, n = 35 images, 3 independent experiments; WT + shParkin = 1.20 ± 0.066, n = 34 images, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + shParkin = 0.93 ± 0.038, n = 35 images, 3 independent experiments; p**=0.0011, p*=0.0126, p****<0.0001, p*=0.0319, p***=0.0003) and Syt1 uptake (F) (WT = 1.00 ± 0.072, n = 27 images, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO = 0.60 ± 0.035, n = 27 images, 3 independent experiments; WT + shParkin = 1.25 ± 0.062, n = 18 images, 3 independent experiments; Bsn KO + shParkin = 1.15 ± 0.065, n = 27 images, 3 independent experiments; p****<0.0001, p*=0.0343, p****<0.0001, p****<0.0001). Scale bars: 5 μm. Error bars represent SEM. Data points represent images. ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used to evaluate statistical significance.

Discussion

Although essential for the integrity of the synapse, mechanisms regulating the targeted clearance of SV proteins are not well understood. In this study, we investigate mechanisms regulating the turnover of SV proteins using the loss of the AZ protein Bassoon as a driver of local autophagy (Okerlund et al., 2017). Specifically, our data suggest that Bassoon negatively regulates ubiquitination of a number of SV proteins and that the enhanced ubiquitination of presynaptic proteins is a potent driver of presynaptic autophagy in Bsn-deficient neurons, leading to smaller pools of SVs with apparently younger proteins. Our findings also suggest that two E3 ligases, Siah1 and Parkin, become overactive in boutons lacking Bassoon and contribute to the enhanced clearance of SV proteins via the autophagy degradative system, implying that they normally operate to remove non-functional proteins, a feature compromised in neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease.

Although previous studies had shown that Bassoon was able to modulate the activity of Atg5, a protein critical for the generation of autophagosomal membranes (Okerlund et al., 2017), several lines of evidence collected in this study indicate that the enhanced autophagy seen in boutons lacking Bassoon requires the enhanced ubiquitination of SV-associated proteins. These include data showing that blocking poly-ubiquitination by the over-expression of UbK0 (Figure 2; Okerlund et al., 2017; Waites et al., 2013) or the addition of the E1 inhibitor ziram (Figure 2—figure supplement 1; Chou et al., 2008; Rinetti and Schweizer, 2010) suppresses autophagy in boutons lacking Bassoon (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Moreover, over-expressing the amino-terminal ZnFs of Bassoon, known to bind and inhibit the activity of the E3 ligase Siah1 (Waites et al., 2013) not only suppressed autophagy in Bsn KO neurons, but restored the number of Synaptophysin1 puncta (Figure 1). Furthermore, knocking down either Siah1 or Parkin, two E3 ubiquitin ligases known to ubiquitinate SV-associated and other presynaptic proteins (Chung et al., 2001; Huynh et al., 2003; Kabayama et al., 2017; Martinez et al., 2017; Sassone et al., 2017; Trempe et al., 2009; Wheeler et al., 2002), also impaired the induction of autophagy in Bsn KO neurons (Figures 7 and 8). Intriguingly, while the loss of Bassoon function leads to the selective activation of autophagy and reduction in SV pool size, synapse integrity is not compromised (Figure 5). This is in stark contrasts to the situation in neurons, in which the expression of both Bassoon and Piccolo are reduced. Here, not only SV pools are drastically reduced, but also synaptic integrity is disrupted (Okerlund et al., 2017; Waites et al., 2013). This later situation also involves enhanced poly-ubiquitination of presynaptic proteins and the overactivation of the E3 ligase Siah1 (Okerlund et al., 2017; Waites et al., 2013). This additional effect seems to be attributable to loss of Piccolo function, which was recently shown to regulate the maintenance of SV pools through Rab5 and Rab7, components of the endo-lysosomal system (Ackermann et al., 2019).

Several studies point to the importance of autophagy during health and disease. For instance, reduced autophagy leads to neurodegeneration (Hara et al., 2006; Komatsu et al., 2006) while enhanced autophagy is correlated with an extended lifespan and an attenuation of age-related memory impairment (Gupta et al., 2016; Vijayan and Verstreken, 2017). Defining its role and determining potential substrates is essential to understand the impact that autophagy has on the integrity of the synapse.

To better understand how Bassoon regulates SV pool size, we performed mass spectrometry analyses of synaptosomes purified from WT and Bsn KO mice. These data revealed a remarkable 2- to 4-fold increase in ubiquitination levels of several SV proteins when Bassoon is depleted (Figure 3). Levels of ubiquitinated postsynaptic proteins such as SynGAP were not changed in these mice, supporting earlier conclusions that Bassoon is regulating autophagy and/or ubiquitination on a local presynaptic level (Okerlund et al., 2017). One limitation of our mass spectrometry findings is that we cannot distinguish between mono-ubiquitination and poly-ubiquitination, nor can we identify which lysine residues in the ubiquitin poly-peptide are used to create longer ubiquitin chains. Given the high variety of how poly-ubiquitin molecules can be attached to any given substrate (Kwon and Ciechanover, 2017), we cannot discriminate whether mainly changes in K63- or K48-poly-ubiquitination do occur. For instance, while Synaptagmin1 is highly ubiquitinated in Bsn KO neurons, this modification did not lead to a significant loss of protein (Figure 4—figure supplement 2B), making it particularly important to study more synaptic proteins and their unique ubiquitination patterns in future studies.

Nonetheless, the requirement for ubiquitination for the induction of autophagy and the loss of SVs in Bsn KO boutons in combination with the appearance of ubiquitinated SV proteins imply that at least some of the attached poly-ubiquitin chains must be K63-conjugated. Given the cytoplasmic location of the ubiquitin machinery (Hoffmann et al., 2019), one can anticipate that loss of Bassoon function increases the poly-ubiquitination on cytoplasmic sites of various SV proteins. Consistently, we found that the ubiquitinated residues on each analyzed peptide occurred on the cytoplasmic site of the corresponding protein (Figure 3). For example, the ubiquitination sites on SV2a and SV2b (SV2a143 and SV2b333) were located on their cytoplasmic tails (Bartholome et al., 2017), further strengthening our hypothesis that the observed ubiquitination of SV proteins tags them for degradation. Additionally, we could detect ubiquitinated peptides from E2N, a ubiquitin conjugating enzyme, known to be involved in K63-poly-ubiquitination (David et al., 2010). This suggests that the absence of Bassoon selectively activates E2N, which then transfers ubiquitin to substrates in the context of specific E3 ligases, a concept that supports our hypothesis that the autophagy phenotype in Bsn KO neurons is attributable to increased K63-ubiquitination.

Recent evidence has shown that ROS-damaged SV proteins can enter the autophagy pathway (Hoffmann et al., 2019). Thus, a fundamental question raised by our study is whether increasing autophagy through Bassoon loss of function also leads to the clearance of SV proteins. Light level quantification of SV2b and Vamp2 revealed a significant decrease of both proteins (Figure 4) in Bsn KO neurons in an autophagy-dependent manner. Similarly, the appearance of autophagic vacuoles containing ~50 nm vesicles as assessed by cryo-EM and loss of SVs in Bsn KO boutons (Figure 5) makes a strong argument that SV proteins or even whole SVs can enter the autophagic pathway for their clearance. The latter observation is not surprising, as the knockdown of Bassoon in a Piccolo KO mouse model drives the loss of SVs in boutons of cortical cultures as well (Mukherjee et al., 2010). These findings are consistent with previous data showing a severe reduction of eGFP-SV2 intensities in the boutons lacking Bassoon and Piccolo (Okerlund et al., 2017; Waites et al., 2013) and further indicate that (ubiquitinated) SV proteins could become cargo of Bassoon deficiency-triggered autophagy.

One prediction of enhanced autophagy in neurons lacking Bassoon is that primarily old proteins are being removed. Consistently, we found that, when SV2 was tagged with a medium fluorescent timer (Subach et al., 2009), a significantly younger pool of SV2 could be detected at synapses from Bsn KO neurons compared to WT neurons (Figure 6). Accordingly, the absence of Bassoon seems to enhance autophagic degradation of SV proteins.

Another important question raised by our study is which degradative system is preferentially turned on in our model system? Given that inhibition of the proteasome induces autophagy to compensate for the reduced clearance of soluble proteins (Ding et al., 2007) and that autophagosomes can fuse with endosomes (Klionsky et al., 2014), it becomes clear that these three degradative pathways are strongly co-regulated to ensure synaptic health (Lamark and Johansen, 2010; Lilienbaum, 2013; Vijayan and Verstreken, 2017). This interdependence makes it difficult to distinguish the contribution of any one of them. To meet this challenge, we quantified the presence of both AVs as a measure of autophagy (Ericsson, 1969; Klionsky et al., 2012) and MVBs as a measure of the endo-lysosomal machinery (Raiborg and Stenmark, 2009) per presynaptic terminal in WT and Bsn KO neurons. Here, we could detect an increase of AVs in Bsn KO neurons, with no profound changes in the number of MVBs (Figure 5). This suggests that Bassoon deficiency regulates the clearance of synaptic proteins primarily through the autophagy rather than the endo-lysosomal system. At present, we cannot rule out potential roles for Bassoon in other degradative pathways such as the proteasomal or the endo-lysosomal system; an interesting topic for future studies.

In a previous study, we found that the loss of SVs and synaptic integrity associated with the loss of Piccolo and Bassoon required both poly-ubiquitination and the RING-type E3 ligase Siah1 (Waites et al., 2013). A follow-up study revealed that the loss of both active zone proteins also triggered the induction of autophagy, but found no strong evidence that this required Siah1 (Okerlund et al., 2017), perhaps because this condition activated multiple E3 ligases generating ubiquitinated substrates that promote autophagy independent of Siah1. The subsequent finding that Bassoon, rather than Piccolo, was a local active zone regulator of autophagy, allowed us in the present study to revisit the question of whether substrates generated by Siah1 promote presynaptic autophagy in the absence of Bassoon. Here, we found a significant reduction in presynaptic autophagosomes, identified with RFP-LC3 colocalizing with Synaptophysin1, in neurons with a 50% reduction in the expression of Siah1. But, this manipulation did not significantly affect the total pool of autophagosomes that appeared in axons (Figure 7), suggesting either that the 50% reduction of Siah1 is not sufficient to block its activity or that other ubiquitin ligases may contribute to this phenotype. The data also indicate that Siah1-mediated ubiquitination of SV proteins, such as Synaptophysin (Wheeler et al., 2002), may contribute to the elimination of SV proteins through other degradative systems.

Importantly, our studies show that the RBR-type E3 ligase Parkin is required for elevated autophagy levels in Bsn KO mice (Figure 8). Parkin not only plays an important role in mitophagy (Ashrafi et al., 2014; Pickrell and Youle, 2015) but it can also generate K63-poly-ubiquitinated substrates in general (Olzmann et al., 2007). Another study showed that, in Drosophila neurons, Parkin strongly mediates K6- and K63-poly-ubiquitination (Martinez et al., 2017). Increased K6-ubiquitination through Parkin could be explained by the fact that Parkin auto-ubiquitinates itself via K6-ubiquitin for stability regulation (Durcan et al., 2014). Besides being involved in mitophagy, there have been reports that Parkin ubiquitinates several substrates that are abundant at the synapse, such as Synphilin-1 (Chung et al., 2001), Synaptotagmin11 (Huynh et al., 2003), Synaptotagmin4 (Kabayama et al., 2017), CDCrel-1 (Zhang et al., 2000), Syntaxin5 (Martinez et al., 2017) and Endophilin-A (Murdoch et al., 2016; Trempe et al., 2009). Intriguingly, our mass spectrometry analysis revealed a strong increase in the ubiquitinated Parkin substrate Synaptotagmin11 (Figure 3). We further identified increased ubiquitination in other SV proteins (SV2, Vamp2, Synaptotagmin1) as well as components of the SNARE SV fusion complex (SNAP25 and Syntaxin1b), raising the possibility that they are also substrates for Parkin-mediated ubiquitination. Future studies will help resolve these possibilities. Recently, it has also been shown that Parkin can be activated independently of the mitophagy-related PINK1 protein (Balasubramaniam et al., 2019). The significant rescue of synaptic autophagy with shParkin and the observation that Parkin is involved in ubiquitination of several synaptic proteins strongly suggest that Parkin is involved in autophagy induced by the absence of Bassoon.

In an attempt to further investigate the role of Parkin in synaptic vesicle autophagy, we were able to rescue SV2b and Vamp2 levels, as well as SV cycling, by knocking down Parkin (Figure 9). Given that total Synaptotagmin1 levels are not changed, the reduction in the Synaptotagmin1 antibody uptake driven by endogenous network activity observed in Bsn KO neurons can be either caused by the decrease of total SV number (Figure 5), by the contribution of Bassoon to SV release (Altrock et al., 2003) or reloading into release sites (Hallermann et al., 2010), or its role in the recruitment of voltage-dependent CaV2.1 channels to the presynaptic membrane (Davydova et al., 2014). Alternatively, exocytosis could be impaired by the removal of the highly ubiquitinated SNARE proteins, SNAP25 and Syntaxin1b (Figure 3). Together these data provide strong evidence that Parkin is one of the major E3 ligases that are required for Bassoon deficiency-triggered SV autophagy. An open question is how Bassoon influences Parkin activity. As for Siah1 (Waites et al., 2013), we have performed various biochemical studies to assess whether Bassoon directly interacts with Parkin. However, such an interaction was not detectable in immunoprecipitation experiments performed with either full-length recombinant Bassoon or various of its subdomains (data not shown). Nonetheless, both proteins could be part of a larger assembly, in which Bassoon regulates Parkin activity. Alternatively, the absence of Bassoon could trigger indirectly pathways that enhance Parkin activity. Future experiments will have to address these issues.

In conclusion, our data suggest that SV proteins are indeed cargos of Bassoon deficiency-triggered autophagy and that the E3 ligases Siah1 and more potently Parkin are crucial ligases promoting the ubiquitination of SV proteins and their removal via the autophagy system. Clearly, the overactivation of this system by the loss of Bassoon can have adverse effects on the function of presynaptic boutons, arguing that a balanced regulation is necessary to maintain the functional integrity of SV and other presynaptic proteins. Future studies investigating Parkin’s role in SV degradation would be worthwhile given its strong involvement in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease (Nixon, 2013; Pickrell and Youle, 2015).

Importantly, the data presented here raise several fundamental questions regarding the contribution of other degradative systems, such as the proteasome and the endo-lysosomal system, to the maintenance of presynaptic proteostasis. Previous studies have shown that the proteasome can utilize specific E3 ligase such as SCRAPPER or Fbxo45 to mediate the removal of specific AZ proteins such as RIM1 and Munc13, sculpting the efficiency of synaptic transmission (Jiang et al., 2010; Speese et al., 2003; Tada et al., 2010; Yao et al., 2007; Yi and Ehlers, 2005). Evidence has also emerged that homeostatic activity-dependent changes in synaptic function engage the endo-lysosomal system for the removal of subsets of SV proteins (Jin et al., 2018; Sheehan et al., 2016). It has also been found that nutrient starvation can trigger the degradation of a broad range of neuronal as well as synaptic proteins to reduce metabolic demand for cells during periods of stress (Catanese et al., 2018). This suggests that these degradative systems function in synchrony to modulate the composition of synaptic proteins to a broad range of physiological conditions. Less clear is whether there is functional redundancy within these systems that can compensate for the loss of one, during for example neurodegenerative disorders. Understanding the fundamental mechanisms that regulate each will be critical to sorting this out. Based on our observations concerning Parkin, we can anticipate that though there are approximately 600 different E3 ligases, each can likely operate in unique ways and on different substrates depending on the microenvironment.

Materials and methods

Key resources table
Reagent type
(species) or
resource
DesignationSource or
reference
IdentifiersAdditional
information
Strain, strain
background Mus musculus both sexes)
Bassoon
knockout mice
Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, laboratory of Eckart Gundelfinger; Hallermann et al., 2010; Davydova et al., 2014Omnibank ES cell line OST486029 by Lexicon Pharmaceuticals (The Woodlands, TX; USA)Bsn/Bassoon KO mice created by gene trap
Strain, strain
background
Mus musculus both sexes)
WT mice (C57BL/6J)Research Institutes
for experimental Medicine (FEM), Charité Berlin
RRID:IMSR_JAX:000664
Transfected construct (Rattus norvegicus)FU-RFP-LC3Waites et al., 2013; Okerlund et al., 2017Lentiviral construct to infect and express autophagy reporter
Transfected construct (Rattus norvegicus)FU-UbK0Waites et al., 2013; Okerlund et al., 2017Lentiviral construct to infect and express recombinant ubiquitin
Transfected construct
Mus musculus
FU-shSiah1Waites et al., 2013; Okerlund et al., 2017Lentiviral construct to infect and express shRNA against Siah1
Transfected construct Mus musculusFU-shParkinThis paper;
Viral Core Facility (VCF), Charité Berlin
Lentiviral construct to infect and express shRNA against Parkin ‘gcaaCgtgccAattgaaaattcaagagattttcaatTggcacGttgc
Transfected construct Mus musculusFU-mFT-SV2This paper;
Viral Core Facility
(VCF), Charité Berlin
medium fluorescent timer from Subach et al., 2009
 tTransfected construct Mus musculusFU-Bsn609-eGFPThis paper;
Viral Core Facility (VCF), Charité Berlin
Lentiviral construct to infect and express
Bsn609
Antibodyanti-Synaptophysin (mouse monoclonal)Synaptic SystemsCat# 101011; RRID:AB_8878241:1000
Antibodyanti-Vamp2 (rabbit polyclonal)Synaptic SystemsCat# 104202;
RRID:AB_887810
1:1000
Antibodyanti-SV2b (rabbit polyclonal)Synaptic SystemsCat# 119102; RRID:AB_8878031:1000
Antibodyanti-Synaptotagmin1 (mouse monoclonal)Synaptic SystemsCat# 105011; RRID:AB_8878321:1000
Antibodyanti-Synaptotagmin1 lumenal (rabbit polyclonal)Synaptic SystemsCat# 105103C3; RRID:AB_8878291:70 (Cy3-labeled for live labeling)
Antibodyanti-Parkin (mouse monoclonal)abcamCat# ab77924; RRID:AB_15665591:500
Antibodyanti-Siah1 (rabbit polyclonal)abcamCat# ab203198; RRID:AB_28332411:500
Antibodyanti-LC3 (rabbit monoclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 12741; RRID:AB_2617131*Updated1:1000
Antibodyanti-GAPDH (rabbit monoclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 2118; RRID:AB_561053*Updated1:1000
Antibodyanti-Actin (rabbit polyclonal)Sigma-AldrichCat# A2066; RRID:AB_4766931:1000
AntibodyAlexa Fluor 647 goat anti-mouse secondary antibodyThermoFisher ScientificCat# A21236; RRID:AB_25358051:1000
AntibodyAlexa Fluor 647 goat anti-rabbit
secondary antibody
ThermoFisher ScientificCat# A21245;
RRID:AB_2535813
1:1000
AntibodyAlexa Fluor 568 goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodyThermoFisher ScientificCat# A11036; RRID:AB_105635661:2000
AntibodyCy3 donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibodyDianova/Jackson ImmunoResearchCat# 711-165-152; RRID:AB_23074431:2000
Chemical compound, drugWortmanninInvivoGenCat# tlrl-wtm;
CAS Number 19545-26-7
1 μM, 16 hr
Chemical compound, drugZiram PESTANALSigma-AldrichCat# 45708;
CAS Number 137-30-4
1 μM, 16 hr
Chemical compound, drugSAR405HycultecCat# HY12481A;
CAS Number 1946010–7902
1 μM, 16 hr
Commercial assay or kitUbiquitin Remnant Motif (K-ε-GG) KitCell Signaling TechnologyCat# 5562
Commercial assay or kitSyn-PER Synaptic Protein Extraction ReagentThermo ScientificCat# 87793
Software, algorithmOpenViewTsuriel et al., 2006N/AWritten by Prof. Noam Ziv
Software, algorithmImageJNational Institute of Healthhttps://Imagej.nih.gov/
RRID:SCR_003070
Software,
algorithm
PrismGraphPad Softwarehttps://www.graphpad.com/
RRID:SCR_002798
Software, algorithmMascot software version 2.6.1Matrix Science Ltd., London, UKRRID:SCR_014322
Software, algorithmMaxQuant software version 1.6.0.1Max-Planck-Institute of BiochemistryRRID:SCR_014485

Animals

Bassoon (Bsn) knockout (KO) mice, created by gene trap resulting in a knockout of Bsn in most neurons with some residual protein expressed, e.g. in the cochlea (Frank et al., 2010; Hallermann et al., 2010; Jing et al., 2013), are called Bsn KO mice throughout this study. These animals were used to obtain tissues and cells used in this study. Breeding of animals and experiments using animal material were carried out in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive (2010/63/EU) and approved by the local animal care committees of Sachsen-Anhalt or the animal welfare committee of Charité Medical University and the Berlin state government (protocol number: T0036/14, O0208/16).

Lentiviral vectors

Request a detailed protocol

The lentiviral vectors FU-RFP-LC3, FU-UbK0 and FU-shSiah1 were published previously (Okerlund et al., 2017; Waites et al., 2013). In brief, FU-RFP-LC3 expresses RFP-tagged LC3 under the ubiquitin promotor, FU-UbK0 expresses soluble eGFP and a recombinant ubiquitin without lysine residues under the ubiquitin promotor and FU-shSiah1 expresses soluble eGFP under the ubiquitin promotor as well as an shRNA against Siah1 under a U6 promotor. The vector FU-shParkin co-expresses soluble eGFP under a ubiquitin promotor as well as an shRNA against Parkin under a U6 promotor (‘gcaaCgtgccAattgaaaattcaagagattttcaatTggcacGttgc’) (Cortese et al., 2016), adapted for mouse. The vector FU-mFT-SV2 was designed to express a medium fluorescent timer (Subach et al., 2009) linked to the cytoplasmic tail of SV2 via a Glycine linker. The vector FU-Bsn609-eGFP expresses the N-terminal 609 amino acids of Bassoon tagged at the C-terminus with eGFP (Dresbach et al., 2003) under the ubiquitin promoter; the fusion peptide is efficiently targeted to presynaptic boutons (Altrock et al., 2003; Figure 1). All vectors are based on the commercially available vector FUGW (Addgene).

Preparation of cultured hippocampal neurons and viral infections

Request a detailed protocol

To assess the efficiency of shRNA-mediated knockdown in western blot experiments, wild type (WT) hippocampi were dissected from mice P0-2 (postnatal day 0–2) brains in cold Hanks’ Salt Solution (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), followed by a 30 min incubation in enzyme solution (DMEM (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA), 3.3 mM Cystein, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 20 U/ml Papain (Worthington, Lakewood, USA)) at 37°C. Papain reaction was inhibited by the incubation of hippocampi in inhibitor solution DMEM, 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 38 mM BSA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) and 95 mM Trypsin Inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min. Afterwards, cells were triturated in NBA (Neurobasal-A Medium, 2% B27, 1% Glutamax, 0.2% P/S) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) by gentle pipetting up and down. Dissociated hippocampal neurons were plated directly onto 6-well culture dishes at a density of 25 k per 1 cm2 and maintained in NBA at 37°C, 5% CO2, for 13–15 days in vitro (DIV) before starting experiments. For viral infections the cultures were transduced with lentiviral particles with nearly 100% efficiency of transduction on 1–2 DIV and cells harvested for western blotting at 13–15 DIV.

For live cell imaging and immunocytochemistry, hippocampal neuron cultures were prepared as described previously (Davydova et al., 2014; Okerlund et al., 2017) from P0-1 Bsn KO mice and their wildtype littermates and plated on glass coverslips using the Banker protocol (Banker and Goslin, 1988; Meberg and Miller, 2003). Briefly, astrocytes from mouse WT cortices P0-1 were seeded on 5 cm plates 5–7 d before neuron preparation to create a 60–70% confluent monolayer of astrocytes on the day of neuronal plating. After trypsin treatment and mechanical trituration, hippocampal neurons were plated in densities of 35,000 cells per 18 mm diameter coverslip. One hour after plating, coverslips were transferred upside down into dishes containing astrocytes and Neurobasal A medium supplemented with B27, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 4 mM Glutamax and antibiotics (P/S). At DIV 1 and DIV 3, Cytosine β-D-arabinofuranoside (Ara-C, Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the cells to reach a final concentration of 1.2 μM. The co-culture was kept in NBA at 37°C, 5% CO2, for 14–15 DIV before starting experiments. For viral infections the cultures were transduced with lentiviral particles with nearly 100% efficiency of transduction on 1–2 DIV and experiments were performed at 14–15 DIV.

Lentivirus production

Request a detailed protocol

All lentiviral particles were provided by the Viral Core Facility of the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (vcf.charite.de) and were prepared as described previously (Hoffmann et al., 2019). Briefly, HEK293T cells were cotransfected with 10 μg of shuttle vector, 5 μg of helper plasmid pCMVdR8.9, and 5 μg of pVSV.G with X-tremeGENE 9 DNA transfection reagent (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Virus containing cell culture supernatant was collected after 72 hr and filtered for purification. Aliquots were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.

Immunocytochemistry of hippocampal neurons

Request a detailed protocol

Primary hippocampal neurons from Bsn KO and WT mice were fixed at 14–15 DIV with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 4 min and washed twice with PBS (10 min each). Afterwards, cells were quenched with 25 mM glycine in PBS for 20 min and permeabilized with blocking solution (2% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 5% normal goat serum (NGS) in PBS) + 0.2% Triton X100 for 1 hr. Then, neurons were incubated with primary antibodies, diluted in blocking solution, for 1 hr at RT. The following antibodies were used: primary antibodies against Synaptophysin1 (1:1000; mouse; Synaptic Systems, Göttingen, Germany; Cat# 101011), Vamp2 (1:1000; rabbit; Synaptic Systems; Cat# 104202), SV2b (1:1000; rabbit; Synaptic Systems; Cat# 119102) and Synaptotagmin1 (1:1000; mouse; Synaptic Systems; Cat# 105011). Afterwards cells were washed three times in blocking solution for 10 min each, incubated with the secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 647 goat-anti mouse IgG, Cat# A-21236, Alexa Fluor 647 goat-anti rabbit IgG, Cat# A-21245, Alexa Fluor 568 goat-anti rabbit IgG, Cat# A-11036, Thermo Fisher Scientific; Cy3 donkey-anti rabbit IgG, Cat# 711-165-152, Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) diluted in blocking solution 1:1000 or 1:2000 for 60 min and washed once with blocking solution and twice with PBS 10 min each. Finally, coverslips were dipped in H2O and mounted in ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific). To inhibit autophagy, 1 μM wortmannin (InvivoGen, San Diego, USA) or 1 μM SAR405 (Hycultec, Beutelsbach, Germany), and to inhibit ubiquitination, 1 μM ziram (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to neurons 16 hr before fixation.

Western blot analyses

Request a detailed protocol

Cultured hippocampal neurons, either infected with lentivirus at 1 DIV or uninfected (control), were grown on 6-well-plates with a density of 25 k per 1 cm2 until 13–15 DIV. All following steps were performed at 4°C. Neurons were kept on ice and washed twice with cold PBS. Subsequently, cells were detached by mechanical force. Isolated cells were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min and resuspended in 100 μl lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.9, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1% NP-40, 0.5% Deoxycholate, protease inhibitor cOmplete Tablets 1x) and incubated for 5 min on ice. Afterwards, cell suspension was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min after which the supernatant was transferred into a new tube. Subsequently, the protein concentration was determined using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Synaptosomes were prepared as described previously (Smalla et al., 2013). In brief, brains were homogenized in homogenization buffer (5 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 320 mM sucrose and protease inhibitor cOmplete Tablets 1x), centrifuged at 1,000 g for 10 min and the pellet re-homogenized before an additional 10 min at 1,000 g. The supernatants were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 20 min. Subsequently, the pellet was re-homogenized in homogenization buffer and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 20 min resulting in the membrane fraction P2. Afterwards, the P2 fraction in 5 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.1 containing 320 mM sucrose was loaded on a sucrose density step gradient (0.85M, 1.0M, 1.2M). Subcellular fractionation was achieved by centrifugation at 85,000 g for 2 hr. Synaptosomes were harvested from the 1.0/1.2M interface. Next, protein concentrations were determined by BCA assay (Sigma-Aldrich), sucrose was removed by two centrifugation steps at 100,000 g for 30 min each and the resulting pellet was solubilized in an appropriate volume of SDS-PAGE loading buffer.

The same amount of total protein was then separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a PVDF or nitrocellulose membrane. Afterwards, the membrane was blocked in 5% milk powder in tris buffered saline (TBS) with Tween-20 (TBS-T) (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) for 1 hr followed by primary antibody incubation (1:1000 in 3% milk powder in TBS-T) over night at 4°C. The following antibodies were used: primary antibodies against Parkin (1:500; mouse; abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat# ab77924), Siah1 (1:500; rabbit; abcam; Cat# ab203198), LC3 (1:1000; rabbit; Cell Signaling Technology, Cambridge, UK; Cat# 12741S), GAPDH (1:1000; rabbit; Cell Signaling Technology; Cat# 2118S) and Actin (1:1000; rabbit; Sigma-Aldrich; Cat# A2066). Afterwards, the membrane was washed three times with TBS-T for 10 min each and incubated with the secondary antibody (1:2500 in 3% milk powder in TBS-T) for 1 hr at RT. Horse radish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies were diluted 1:25000 (Sigma-Aldrich). Afterwards, the membrane was washed three times with TBS-T and bands were visualized using 20x LumiGLO Reagent and 20x Peroxidase (Cell Signaling Technology).

Synaptotagmin1 uptake experiments

Request a detailed protocol

Primary hippocampal neurons from Bsn KO and WT mice (uninfected or infected with FU-shParkin) were washed two times with Tyrodes buffer (119 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 30 mM glucose, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) and then incubated with Oyster 550-labeled Synaptotagmin1 antibody (1:70; rabbit; Synaptic Systems; Cat# 105103C3) in Tyrodes buffer for 20 min at 37°C. Afterwards, cells were washed twice with Tyrodes buffer and subsequently fixed in 4% PFA in PBS. To inhibit autophagy, 1 μM wortmannin (InvivoGen) was added to neurons 16 hr before the assay. To quantify total Synaptotagmin1 levels, cells were stained post-hoc with antibodies against Synaptotagmin1 as described in Immunocytochemistry of hippocampal neurons.

Electron microscopy

Request a detailed protocol

Cultured hippocampal neurons from Bsn KO and WT were plated on astrocytes grown on 6 mm sapphire disks at a density of 50 k per 1 cm2. After a total of 14–17 days in culture, 1 μM wortmannin (InvivoGen) was added to specific samples 16 hr before cryo-fixation to inhibit autophagy. Then, all sapphire disks were cryo-fixed using a high pressure freezing machine (EM-ICE, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) in Base+-solution containing the following: 140 mM NaCl, 2.4 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, 2 mM CaCl2, and 4 mM MgCl2, pH7.4 (~300 mOsm). After freezing, samples were cryo-substituted in anhydrous acetone containing 1% glutaraldehyde, 1% osmium tetroxide and 1% milliQ water in an automated freeze-substitution device (AFS2, Leica). The temperature was kept for 4 hr at −90°C, brought to −20°C (5 °C/h), kept for 12 hr at −20°C and then brought from −20°C to +20°C. Once at room temperature, samples were en-bloc stained in 0.1% uranyl acetate, infiltrated in increasing concentration of Epoxy resin (Epon 812, EMS Adhesives, Delaware, USA) in acetone and finally embedded in Epon for 48 hr at 65°C. Sapphire disks were removed from the cured resin block by thermal shock. 50 nm thick sections were obtained using an Ultracut ultramicrotome (UCT, Leica) equipped with an Ultra 45 diamond knife (Ultra 45, DiATOME, Hatfield, USA) and collected on formvar-coated 200-mesh copper grids (EMS). Sections were counterstained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and imaged in a FEI Tecnai G20 Transmission Electron Microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, USA) operated at 80–200 keV and equipped with a Veleta 2K × 2K CCD camera (Olympus, Hamburg, Germany). Around 150 electron micrographs were collected (pixel size = 0.7 nm) for each sample from at least two different experiments. Data were analyzed blindly using the ImageJ software. Double-membraned structures (autophagic vacuoles; AVs), single-membraned structures with vesicles inside (multivesicular bodies; MVBs) and synaptic vesicles (SVs) per synaptic junction were counted.

Mass spectrometry

Request a detailed protocol

Synaptic protein extraction was performed using Syn-PER Synaptic Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, frozen cortices from 15-week-old WT and Bsn KO animals were diluted in 1 ml Syn-PER per 100 μg of tissue. Dounce homogenization was performed on ice using 10 slow strokes and the homogenate was transferred into a fresh tube. Centrifugation was performed twice at 1,200 g for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatant transferred into a fresh tube. Next, two centrifugation steps of 15,000 g for 20 min at 4°C resulted in a pellet which was resuspended in 200 µl urea buffer (6M Urea (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA), 2M Thiourea (GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA), 10 mM HEPES (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), pH 8). Protein concentration was determined using Pierce 660 nm Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were adjusted to 2,2 mg per 200 µl urea buffer. Disulfide bonds were reduced and alkylated by first adding Dithiothreitol (DTT, AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) with a final concentration of 6 mM in ABC (ammonium bicarbonate, Sigma-Aldrich) buffer (50 mM) for 30 min at RT. 2-chloracetamide (Honeywell Fluka, Charlotte, USA) was added with a final concentration of 10 mM in ABC buffer for 20 min at RT in the dark. 1 µg Lys-C (Wako Chemicals, Neuss, Germany) was added to 50 µg protein for 4 hr at RT. Subsequently, samples were diluted in 50 mM ABC buffer (1:4) and 1 µg Trypsin (Promega, Madison, USA) was added per 50 µg protein. Samples were digested overnight at RT in a ThermoMixer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Trypsin digestion was stopped by acidifying the samples with trifluoracetic acid (TFA) (VWR, Radnor, USA) with a final concentration of 0.5%. For solid-phase extraction, SEP-Pak Vac 1cc (50 mg) C18 cartridges (WAT054955, Waters, Milford, USA) were used. Cartridges were washed with 600 µl of 70% Acetonitril (ACN) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and equilibrated with 600 µl of 0.1% TFA. Samples were loaded and washed with 600 µl of 0.1% TFA and then eluted using 400 µl of 50% ACN/0.1% TFA and 400 µl of 70% ACN/0.1% TFA. The eluates were collected into fresh tubes and frozen at −80°C for at least 2 hr and subsequently lyophilized. Immunoaffinity purification was performed with PTMScan Ubiquitin Remnant Motif (K-ε-GG) Kit (#5562, Cell Signaling Technology) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the following adjustments: After washing with PBS, antibody beads (280 µl) were split into 7 equal parts of 40 µl each and transferred into fresh tubes for sample binding for 3 hr at 4°C. Afterwards, samples were loaded twice onto the SEP-Pak Vac 1cc (50 mg) C18 cartridges. After the purification procedure, samples were eluted into fresh tubes and frozen at −80°C overnight. Samples were lyophilized for 48 hr.

Enriched samples were analyzed by online nanoflow liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) on a Q Exactive Plus Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Briefly, nano LC–MS/MS-experiments were performed on an Ultimate 3000RSC LC system connected to a Q Exactive Plus (Thermo Fisher Scientific) through a nanoelectrospray ion source. The enriched peptides were trapped on a precolumn (PepMap C18, 5 mm x 300 μm x 5 μm, 100Å, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 2:98 (v/v) acetonitrile/water containing 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid at a flow rate of 20 μl/min for 3 min and then separated by a 250 mm nano LC column (Acclaim PepMap C18, 2 μm; 100 Å; 75 µm, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The mobile phase (A) was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water, and (B) 80% acetonitrile in water containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid. A gradient 3–40% (B) in 120´ with a flow rate of 300 nl / min was used. Total acquisition time was 155 min. The Q Exactive Plus instrument was operated in the data dependent mode to automatically switch between full scan MS and MS/MS acquisition. Survey full scan MS spectra (m/z 400–1650) were acquired in the Orbitrap with 70,000 resolution after accumulation of ions to a 3 × 106 target value based on predictive AGC from the previous full scan. Dynamic exclusion was set to 20 s. The eight most intense multiply charged ions (z ≥ 2) were sequentially isolated and fragmented in the octopole collision cell by higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) with a fixed injection time of 200 ms and 17,500 resolution. The MS/MS ion selection threshold was set to 1 × 105 counts.

Proteins and peptides were identified by Mascot software version 2.6.1. (Matrix Science Ltd., London, UK) using the following search parameter set: SwissProt database, taxonomy Mus musculus enzyme: trypsin/P with three missed cleavages, static modification: Carbamidomethylation (C), variable modifications: Deamidation (NQ); GlyGly (K); Oxidation (M) and Acetyl (Protein N-term), mass tolerances for MS and MS/MS: 5 ppm and 0.02 Da, a calculated peptide FDR 1%, and identification threshold of p<0.001 (unambiguous) or >0.001 (ambiguous) was set.

Relative label-free quantification was performed with MaxQuant software version 1.6.0.1 (Cox et al., 2014) and default Andromeda LFQ parameter. Spectra were matched to a Mus musculus database (17,016 reviewed entries, downloaded from uniprot.org), a contaminant, and decoy database. Search parameters as described above were used. The logarithm to the base 2 from the average of three animals per genotype (0.00 were excluded before averaging) was plotted.

Image acquisition and quantification

Request a detailed protocol

Images were acquired on a spinning disc confocal microscope (Zeiss Axio Oberserver.Z1 with Andor spinning disc and cobolt, omricron, i-beam laser) (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using either a 40x or 63 × 1.4 NA Plan-Apochromat oil objective and an iXon ultra (Andor, Belfast, UK) camera controlled by iQ software (Andor). Or images were acquired on a Zeiss Axio Imager A2 microscope with Cool Snap EZ camera (Visitron Systems GmbH, Puchheim, Germany) controlled by VisiView (Visitron Systems GmbH) software. Or images were acquired on an Olympus microscope IX83 (Olympus) with a Zyla camera (Andor) controlled by iQ software (Andor). Approximately 10 images of each sample per culture were processed using ImageJ and OpenView software (written by Dr. Noam Ziv, Technion Institute, Haifa, Israel) (Tsuriel et al., 2006). In brief with the OpenView software, multichannel intensities were measured using a semi-automatically box routine associated with individual boutons. Boxes were about 0.8 μm x 0.8 μm in size, whereas settings were kept the same (e.g. thresholds). The average fluorescence intensity was calculated from all quantified puncta per image. Afterwards, the average fluorescence intensities per image were normalized to the control group (WT) for each experiment. For quantification of number of puncta, approximately 10 images of each sample per culture were taken. From each image, 1–2 separated axonal segments, defined by the thin and smooth (i.e. protrusion-free) morphology and the alignment with Synaptophysin1 puncta present on uninfected neurons, were randomly picked and the number of puncta per unit length was counted manually.

Experimental Design and statistical Analyses

Request a detailed protocol

Statistical design for all experiments can be found in the figure legends. Independent experiments equal independent cultures. For western blot and mass spectrometry analyses, 3–4 animals per genotype were used. All data were included in the final quantification, except for electron microscopy analyses, where 3 outliers for SVs/μm2 were excluded (446.81 in Bsn KO; 596.19 in WT + wtm; 539.44 in Bsn KO + wtm). All data representations and statistical analyses were performed with Graph-pad Prism.

References

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
  37. 37
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
    1. DJ Klionsky
    2. FC Abdalla
    3. H Abeliovich
    4. RT Abraham
    5. A Acevedo-Arozena
    6. K Adeli
    7. L Agholme
    8. M Agnello
    9. P Agostinis
    10. JA Aguirre-Ghiso
    11. HJ Ahn
    12. O Ait-Mohamed
    13. S Ait-Si-Ali
    14. T Akematsu
    15. S Akira
    16. HM Al-Younes
    17. MA Al-Zeer
    18. ML Albert
    19. RL Albin
    20. J Alegre-Abarrategui
    21. MF Aleo
    22. M Alirezaei
    23. A Almasan
    24. M Almonte-Becerril
    25. A Amano
    26. R Amaravadi
    27. S Amarnath
    28. AO Amer
    29. N Andrieu-Abadie
    30. V Anantharam
    31. DK Ann
    32. S Anoopkumar-Dukie
    33. H Aoki
    34. N Apostolova
    35. G Arancia
    36. JP Aris
    37. K Asanuma
    38. NY Asare
    39. H Ashida
    40. V Askanas
    41. DS Askew
    42. P Auberger
    43. M Baba
    44. SK Backues
    45. EH Baehrecke
    46. BA Bahr
    47. XY Bai
    48. Y Bailly
    49. R Baiocchi
    50. G Baldini
    51. W Balduini
    52. A Ballabio
    53. BA Bamber
    54. ET Bampton
    55. G Bánhegyi
    56. CR Bartholomew
    57. DC Bassham
    58. RC Bast
    59. H Batoko
    60. BH Bay
    61. I Beau
    62. DM Béchet
    63. TJ Begley
    64. C Behl
    65. C Behrends
    66. S Bekri
    67. B Bellaire
    68. LJ Bendall
    69. L Benetti
    70. L Berliocchi
    71. H Bernardi
    72. F Bernassola
    73. S Besteiro
    74. I Bhatia-Kissova
    75. X Bi
    76. M Biard-Piechaczyk
    77. JS Blum
    78. LH Boise
    79. P Bonaldo
    80. DL Boone
    81. BC Bornhauser
    82. KR Bortoluci
    83. I Bossis
    84. F Bost
    85. JP Bourquin
    86. P Boya
    87. M Boyer-Guittaut
    88. PV Bozhkov
    89. NR Brady
    90. C Brancolini
    91. A Brech
    92. JE Brenman
    93. A Brennand
    94. EH Bresnick
    95. P Brest
    96. D Bridges
    97. ML Bristol
    98. PS Brookes
    99. EJ Brown
    100. JH Brumell
    101. N Brunetti-Pierri
    102. UT Brunk
    103. DE Bulman
    104. SJ Bultman
    105. G Bultynck
    106. LF Burbulla
    107. W Bursch
    108. JP Butchar
    109. W Buzgariu
    110. SP Bydlowski
    111. K Cadwell
    112. M Cahová
    113. D Cai
    114. J Cai
    115. Q Cai
    116. B Calabretta
    117. J Calvo-Garrido
    118. N Camougrand
    119. M Campanella
    120. J Campos-Salinas
    121. E Candi
    122. L Cao
    123. AB Caplan
    124. SR Carding
    125. SM Cardoso
    126. JS Carew
    127. CR Carlin
    128. V Carmignac
    129. LA Carneiro
    130. S Carra
    131. RA Caruso
    132. G Casari
    133. C Casas
    134. R Castino
    135. E Cebollero
    136. F Cecconi
    137. J Celli
    138. H Chaachouay
    139. HJ Chae
    140. CY Chai
    141. DC Chan
    142. EY Chan
    143. RC Chang
    144. CM Che
    145. CC Chen
    146. GC Chen
    147. GQ Chen
    148. M Chen
    149. Q Chen
    150. SS Chen
    151. W Chen
    152. X Chen
    153. X Chen
    154. X Chen
    155. YG Chen
    156. Y Chen
    157. Y Chen
    158. YJ Chen
    159. Z Chen
    160. A Cheng
    161. CH Cheng
    162. Y Cheng
    163. H Cheong
    164. JH Cheong
    165. S Cherry
    166. R Chess-Williams
    167. ZH Cheung
    168. E Chevet
    169. HL Chiang
    170. R Chiarelli
    171. T Chiba
    172. LS Chin
    173. SH Chiou
    174. FV Chisari
    175. CH Cho
    176. DH Cho
    177. AM Choi
    178. D Choi
    179. KS Choi
    180. ME Choi
    181. S Chouaib
    182. D Choubey
    183. V Choubey
    184. CT Chu
    185. TH Chuang
    186. SH Chueh
    187. T Chun
    188. YJ Chwae
    189. ML Chye
    190. R Ciarcia
    191. MR Ciriolo
    192. MJ Clague
    193. RS Clark
    194. PG Clarke
    195. R Clarke
    196. P Codogno
    197. HA Coller
    198. MI Colombo
    199. S Comincini
    200. M Condello
    201. F Condorelli
    202. MR Cookson
    203. GH Coombs
    204. I Coppens
    205. R Corbalan
    206. P Cossart
    207. P Costelli
    208. S Costes
    209. A Coto-Montes
    210. E Couve
    211. FP Coxon
    212. JM Cregg
    213. JL Crespo
    214. MJ Cronjé
    215. AM Cuervo
    216. JJ Cullen
    217. MJ Czaja
    218. M D'Amelio
    219. A Darfeuille-Michaud
    220. LM Davids
    221. FE Davies
    222. M De Felici
    223. JF de Groot
    224. CA de Haan
    225. L De Martino
    226. A De Milito
    227. V De Tata
    228. J Debnath
    229. A Degterev
    230. B Dehay
    231. LM Delbridge
    232. F Demarchi
    233. YZ Deng
    234. J Dengjel
    235. P Dent
    236. D Denton
    237. V Deretic
    238. SD Desai
    239. RJ Devenish
    240. M Di Gioacchino
    241. G Di Paolo
    242. C Di Pietro
    243. G Díaz-Araya
    244. I Díaz-Laviada
    245. MT Diaz-Meco
    246. J Diaz-Nido
    247. I Dikic
    248. SP Dinesh-Kumar
    249. WX Ding
    250. CW Distelhorst
    251. A Diwan
    252. M Djavaheri-Mergny
    253. S Dokudovskaya
    254. Z Dong
    255. FC Dorsey
    256. V Dosenko
    257. JJ Dowling
    258. S Doxsey
    259. M Dreux
    260. ME Drew
    261. Q Duan
    262. MA Duchosal
    263. K Duff
    264. I Dugail
    265. M Durbeej
    266. M Duszenko
    267. CL Edelstein
    268. AL Edinger
    269. G Egea
    270. L Eichinger
    271. NT Eissa
    272. S Ekmekcioglu
    273. WS El-Deiry
    274. Z Elazar
    275. M Elgendy
    276. LM Ellerby
    277. KE Eng
    278. AM Engelbrecht
    279. S Engelender
    280. J Erenpreisa
    281. R Escalante
    282. A Esclatine
    283. EL Eskelinen
    284. L Espert
    285. V Espina
    286. H Fan
    287. J Fan
    288. QW Fan
    289. Z Fan
    290. S Fang
    291. Y Fang
    292. M Fanto
    293. A Fanzani
    294. T Farkas
    295. JC Farré
    296. M Faure
    297. M Fechheimer
    298. CG Feng
    299. J Feng
    300. Q Feng
    301. Y Feng
    302. L Fésüs
    303. R Feuer
    304. ME Figueiredo-Pereira
    305. GM Fimia
    306. DC Fingar
    307. S Finkbeiner
    308. T Finkel
    309. KD Finley
    310. F Fiorito
    311. EA Fisher
    312. PB Fisher
    313. M Flajolet
    314. ML Florez-McClure
    315. S Florio
    316. EA Fon
    317. F Fornai
    318. F Fortunato
    319. R Fotedar
    320. DH Fowler
    321. HS Fox
    322. R Franco
    323. LB Frankel
    324. M Fransen
    325. JM Fuentes
    326. J Fueyo
    327. J Fujii
    328. K Fujisaki
    329. E Fujita
    330. M Fukuda
    331. RH Furukawa
    332. M Gaestel
    333. P Gailly
    334. M Gajewska
    335. B Galliot
    336. V Galy
    337. S Ganesh
    338. B Ganetzky
    339. IG Ganley
    340. FB Gao
    341. GF Gao
    342. J Gao
    343. L Garcia
    344. G Garcia-Manero
    345. M Garcia-Marcos
    346. M Garmyn
    347. AL Gartel
    348. E Gatti
    349. M Gautel
    350. TR Gawriluk
    351. ME Gegg
    352. J Geng
    353. M Germain
    354. JE Gestwicki
    355. DA Gewirtz
    356. S Ghavami
    357. P Ghosh
    358. AM Giammarioli
    359. AN Giatromanolaki
    360. SB Gibson
    361. RW Gilkerson
    362. ML Ginger
    363. HN Ginsberg
    364. J Golab
    365. MS Goligorsky
    366. P Golstein
    367. C Gomez-Manzano
    368. E Goncu
    369. C Gongora
    370. CD Gonzalez
    371. R Gonzalez
    372. C González-Estévez
    373. RA González-Polo
    374. E Gonzalez-Rey
    375. NV Gorbunov
    376. S Gorski
    377. S Goruppi
    378. RA Gottlieb
    379. D Gozuacik
    380. GE Granato
    381. GD Grant
    382. KN Green
    383. A Gregorc
    384. F Gros
    385. C Grose
    386. TW Grunt
    387. P Gual
    388. JL Guan
    389. KL Guan
    390. SM Guichard
    391. AS Gukovskaya
    392. I Gukovsky
    393. J Gunst
    394. AB Gustafsson
    395. AJ Halayko
    396. AN Hale
    397. SK Halonen
    398. M Hamasaki
    399. F Han
    400. T Han
    401. MK Hancock
    402. M Hansen
    403. H Harada
    404. M Harada
    405. SE Hardt
    406. JW Harper
    407. AL Harris
    408. J Harris
    409. SD Harris
    410. M Hashimoto
    411. JA Haspel
    412. S Hayashi
    413. LA Hazelhurst
    414. C He
    415. YW He
    416. MJ Hébert
    417. KA Heidenreich
    418. MH Helfrich
    419. GV Helgason
    420. EP Henske
    421. B Herman
    422. PK Herman
    423. C Hetz
    424. S Hilfiker
    425. JA Hill
    426. LJ Hocking
    427. P Hofman
    428. TG Hofmann
    429. J Höhfeld
    430. TL Holyoake
    431. MH Hong
    432. DA Hood
    433. GS Hotamisligil
    434. EJ Houwerzijl
    435. M Høyer-Hansen
    436. B Hu
    437. CA Hu
    438. HM Hu
    439. Y Hua
    440. C Huang
    441. J Huang
    442. S Huang
    443. WP Huang
    444. TB Huber
    445. WK Huh
    446. TH Hung
    447. TR Hupp
    448. GM Hur
    449. JB Hurley
    450. SN Hussain
    451. PJ Hussey
    452. JJ Hwang
    453. S Hwang
    454. A Ichihara
    455. S Ilkhanizadeh
    456. K Inoki
    457. T Into
    458. V Iovane
    459. JL Iovanna
    460. NY Ip
    461. Y Isaka
    462. H Ishida
    463. C Isidoro
    464. K Isobe
    465. A Iwasaki
    466. M Izquierdo
    467. Y Izumi
    468. PM Jaakkola
    469. M Jäättelä
    470. GR Jackson
    471. WT Jackson
    472. B Janji
    473. M Jendrach
    474. JH Jeon
    475. EB Jeung
    476. H Jiang
    477. H Jiang
    478. JX Jiang
    479. M Jiang
    480. Q Jiang
    481. X Jiang
    482. X Jiang
    483. A Jiménez
    484. M Jin
    485. S Jin
    486. CO Joe
    487. T Johansen
    488. DE Johnson
    489. GV Johnson
    490. NL Jones
    491. B Joseph
    492. SK Joseph
    493. AM Joubert
    494. G Juhász
    495. L Juillerat-Jeanneret
    496. CH Jung
    497. YK Jung
    498. K Kaarniranta
    499. A Kaasik
    500. T Kabuta
    501. M Kadowaki
    502. K Kagedal
    503. Y Kamada
    504. VO Kaminskyy
    505. HH Kampinga
    506. H Kanamori
    507. C Kang
    508. KB Kang
    509. KI Kang
    510. R Kang
    511. YA Kang
    512. T Kanki
    513. TD Kanneganti
    514. H Kanno
    515. AG Kanthasamy
    516. A Kanthasamy
    517. V Karantza
    518. GP Kaushal
    519. S Kaushik
    520. Y Kawazoe
    521. PY Ke
    522. JH Kehrl
    523. A Kelekar
    524. C Kerkhoff
    525. DH Kessel
    526. H Khalil
    527. JA Kiel
    528. AA Kiger
    529. A Kihara
    530. DR Kim
    531. DH Kim
    532. DH Kim
    533. EK Kim
    534. HR Kim
    535. JS Kim
    536. JH Kim
    537. JC Kim
    538. JK Kim
    539. PK Kim
    540. SW Kim
    541. YS Kim
    542. Y Kim
    543. A Kimchi
    544. AC Kimmelman
    545. JS King
    546. TJ Kinsella
    547. V Kirkin
    548. LA Kirshenbaum
    549. K Kitamoto
    550. K Kitazato
    551. L Klein
    552. WT Klimecki
    553. J Klucken
    554. E Knecht
    555. BC Ko
    556. JC Koch
    557. H Koga
    558. JY Koh
    559. YH Koh
    560. M Koike
    561. M Komatsu
    562. E Kominami
    563. HJ Kong
    564. WJ Kong
    565. VI Korolchuk
    566. Y Kotake
    567. MI Koukourakis
    568. JB Kouri Flores
    569. AL Kovács
    570. C Kraft
    571. D Krainc
    572. H Krämer
    573. C Kretz-Remy
    574. AM Krichevsky
    575. G Kroemer
    576. R Krüger
    577. O Krut
    578. NT Ktistakis
    579. CY Kuan
    580. R Kucharczyk
    581. A Kumar
    582. R Kumar
    583. S Kumar
    584. M Kundu
    585. HJ Kung
    586. T Kurz
    587. HJ Kwon
    588. AR La Spada
    589. F Lafont
    590. T Lamark
    591. J Landry
    592. JD Lane
    593. P Lapaquette
    594. JF Laporte
    595. L László
    596. S Lavandero
    597. JN Lavoie
    598. R Layfield
    599. PA Lazo
    600. W Le
    601. L Le Cam
    602. DJ Ledbetter
    603. AJ Lee
    604. BW Lee
    605. GM Lee
    606. J Lee
    607. JH Lee
    608. M Lee
    609. MS Lee
    610. SH Lee
    611. C Leeuwenburgh
    612. P Legembre
    613. R Legouis
    614. M Lehmann
    615. HY Lei
    616. QY Lei
    617. DA Leib
    618. J Leiro
    619. JJ Lemasters
    620. A Lemoine
    621. MS Lesniak
    622. D Lev
    623. VV Levenson
    624. B Levine
    625. E Levy
    626. F Li
    627. JL Li
    628. L Li
    629. S Li
    630. W Li
    631. XJ Li
    632. YB Li
    633. YP Li
    634. C Liang
    635. Q Liang
    636. YF Liao
    637. PP Liberski
    638. A Lieberman
    639. HJ Lim
    640. KL Lim
    641. K Lim
    642. CF Lin
    643. FC Lin
    644. J Lin
    645. JD Lin
    646. K Lin
    647. WW Lin
    648. WC Lin
    649. YL Lin
    650. R Linden
    651. P Lingor
    652. J Lippincott-Schwartz
    653. MP Lisanti
    654. PB Liton
    655. B Liu
    656. CF Liu
    657. K Liu
    658. L Liu
    659. QA Liu
    660. W Liu
    661. YC Liu
    662. Y Liu
    663. RA Lockshin
    664. CN Lok
    665. S Lonial
    666. B Loos
    667. G Lopez-Berestein
    668. C López-Otín
    669. L Lossi
    670. MT Lotze
    671. P Lőw
    672. B Lu
    673. B Lu
    674. B Lu
    675. Z Lu
    676. F Luciano
    677. NW Lukacs
    678. AH Lund
    679. MA Lynch-Day
    680. Y Ma
    681. F Macian
    682. JP MacKeigan
    683. KF Macleod
    684. F Madeo
    685. L Maiuri
    686. MC Maiuri
    687. D Malagoli
    688. MC Malicdan
    689. W Malorni
    690. N Man
    691. EM Mandelkow
    692. S Manon
    693. I Manov
    694. K Mao
    695. X Mao
    696. Z Mao
    697. P Marambaud
    698. D Marazziti
    699. YL Marcel
    700. K Marchbank
    701. P Marchetti
    702. SJ Marciniak
    703. M Marcondes
    704. M Mardi
    705. G Marfe
    706. G Mariño
    707. M Markaki
    708. MR Marten
    709. SJ Martin
    710. C Martinand-Mari
    711. W Martinet
    712. M Martinez-Vicente
    713. M Masini
    714. P Matarrese
    715. S Matsuo
    716. R Matteoni
    717. A Mayer
    718. NM Mazure
    719. DJ McConkey
    720. MJ McConnell
    721. C McDermott
    722. C McDonald
    723. GM McInerney
    724. SL McKenna
    725. B McLaughlin
    726. PJ McLean
    727. CR McMaster
    728. GA McQuibban
    729. AJ Meijer
    730. MH Meisler
    731. A Meléndez
    732. TJ Melia
    733. G Melino
    734. MA Mena
    735. JA Menendez
    736. RF Menna-Barreto
    737. MB Menon
    738. FM Menzies
    739. CA Mercer
    740. A Merighi
    741. DE Merry
    742. S Meschini
    743. CG Meyer
    744. TF Meyer
    745. CY Miao
    746. JY Miao
    747. PA Michels
    748. C Michiels
    749. D Mijaljica
    750. A Milojkovic
    751. S Minucci
    752. C Miracco
    753. CK Miranti
    754. I Mitroulis
    755. K Miyazawa
    756. N Mizushima
    757. B Mograbi
    758. S Mohseni
    759. X Molero
    760. B Mollereau
    761. F Mollinedo
    762. T Momoi
    763. I Monastyrska
    764. MM Monick
    765. MJ Monteiro
    766. MN Moore
    767. R Mora
    768. K Moreau
    769. PI Moreira
    770. Y Moriyasu
    771. J Moscat
    772. S Mostowy
    773. JC Mottram
    774. T Motyl
    775. CE Moussa
    776. S Müller
    777. S Muller
    778. K Münger
    779. C Münz
    780. LO Murphy
    781. ME Murphy
    782. A Musarò
    783. I Mysorekar
    784. E Nagata
    785. K Nagata
    786. A Nahimana
    787. U Nair
    788. T Nakagawa
    789. K Nakahira
    790. H Nakano
    791. H Nakatogawa
    792. M Nanjundan
    793. NI Naqvi
    794. DP Narendra
    795. M Narita
    796. M Navarro
    797. ST Nawrocki
    798. TY Nazarko
    799. A Nemchenko
    800. MG Netea
    801. TP Neufeld
    802. PA Ney
    803. IP Nezis
    804. HP Nguyen
    805. D Nie
    806. I Nishino
    807. C Nislow
    808. RA Nixon
    809. T Noda
    810. AA Noegel
    811. A Nogalska
    812. S Noguchi
    813. L Notterpek
    814. I Novak
    815. T Nozaki
    816. N Nukina
    817. T Nürnberger
    818. B Nyfeler
    819. K Obara
    820. TD Oberley
    821. S Oddo
    822. M Ogawa
    823. T Ohashi
    824. K Okamoto
    825. NL Oleinick
    826. FJ Oliver
    827. LJ Olsen
    828. S Olsson
    829. O Opota
    830. TF Osborne
    831. GK Ostrander
    832. K Otsu
    833. JH Ou
    834. M Ouimet
    835. M Overholtzer
    836. B Ozpolat
    837. P Paganetti
    838. U Pagnini
    839. N Pallet
    840. GE Palmer
    841. C Palumbo
    842. T Pan
    843. T Panaretakis
    844. UB Pandey
    845. Z Papackova
    846. I Papassideri
    847. I Paris
    848. J Park
    849. OK Park
    850. JB Parys
    851. KR Parzych
    852. S Patschan
    853. C Patterson
    854. S Pattingre
    855. JM Pawelek
    856. J Peng
    857. DH Perlmutter
    858. I Perrotta
    859. G Perry
    860. S Pervaiz
    861. M Peter
    862. GJ Peters
    863. M Petersen
    864. G Petrovski
    865. JM Phang
    866. M Piacentini
    867. P Pierre
    868. V Pierrefite-Carle
    869. G Pierron
    870. R Pinkas-Kramarski
    871. A Piras
    872. N Piri
    873. LC Platanias
    874. S Pöggeler
    875. M Poirot
    876. A Poletti
    877. C Poüs
    878. M Pozuelo-Rubio
    879. M Prætorius-Ibba
    880. A Prasad
    881. M Prescott
    882. M Priault
    883. N Produit-Zengaffinen
    884. A Progulske-Fox
    885. T Proikas-Cezanne
    886. S Przedborski
    887. K Przyklenk
    888. R Puertollano
    889. J Puyal
    890. SB Qian
    891. L Qin
    892. ZH Qin
    893. SE Quaggin
    894. N Raben
    895. H Rabinowich
    896. SW Rabkin
    897. I Rahman
    898. A Rami
    899. G Ramm
    900. G Randall
    901. F Randow
    902. VA Rao
    903. JC Rathmell
    904. B Ravikumar
    905. SK Ray
    906. BH Reed
    907. JC Reed
    908. F Reggiori
    909. A Régnier-Vigouroux
    910. AS Reichert
    911. JJ Reiners
    912. RJ Reiter
    913. J Ren
    914. JL Revuelta
    915. CJ Rhodes
    916. K Ritis
    917. E Rizzo
    918. J Robbins
    919. M Roberge
    920. H Roca
    921. MC Roccheri
    922. S Rocchi
    923. HP Rodemann
    924. S Rodríguez de Córdoba
    925. B Rohrer
    926. IB Roninson
    927. K Rosen
    928. MM Rost-Roszkowska
    929. M Rouis
    930. KM Rouschop
    931. F Rovetta
    932. BP Rubin
    933. DC Rubinsztein
    934. K Ruckdeschel
    935. EB Rucker
    936. A Rudich
    937. E Rudolf
    938. N Ruiz-Opazo
    939. R Russo
    940. TE Rusten
    941. KM Ryan
    942. SW Ryter
    943. DM Sabatini
    944. J Sadoshima
    945. T Saha
    946. T Saitoh
    947. H Sakagami
    948. Y Sakai
    949. GH Salekdeh
    950. P Salomoni
    951. PM Salvaterra
    952. G Salvesen
    953. R Salvioli
    954. AM Sanchez
    955. JA Sánchez-Alcázar
    956. R Sánchez-Prieto
    957. M Sandri
    958. U Sankar
    959. P Sansanwal
    960. L Santambrogio
    961. S Saran
    962. S Sarkar
    963. M Sarwal
    964. C Sasakawa
    965. A Sasnauskiene
    966. M Sass
    967. K Sato
    968. M Sato
    969. AH Schapira
    970. M Scharl
    971. HM Schätzl
    972. W Scheper
    973. S Schiaffino
    974. C Schneider
    975. ME Schneider
    976. R Schneider-Stock
    977. PV Schoenlein
    978. DF Schorderet
    979. C Schüller
    980. GK Schwartz
    981. L Scorrano
    982. L Sealy
    983. PO Seglen
    984. J Segura-Aguilar
    985. I Seiliez
    986. O Seleverstov
    987. C Sell
    988. JB Seo
    989. D Separovic
    990. V Setaluri
    991. T Setoguchi
    992. C Settembre
    993. JJ Shacka
    994. M Shanmugam
    995. IM Shapiro
    996. E Shaulian
    997. RJ Shaw
    998. JH Shelhamer
    999. HM Shen
    1000. WC Shen
    1001. ZH Sheng
    1002. Y Shi
    1003. K Shibuya
    1004. Y Shidoji
    1005. JJ Shieh
    1006. CM Shih
    1007. Y Shimada
    1008. S Shimizu
    1009. T Shintani
    1010. OS Shirihai
    1011. GC Shore
    1012. AA Sibirny
    1013. SB Sidhu
    1014. B Sikorska
    1015. EC Silva-Zacarin
    1016. A Simmons
    1017. AK Simon
    1018. HU Simon
    1019. C Simone
    1020. A Simonsen
    1021. DA Sinclair
    1022. R Singh
    1023. D Sinha
    1024. FA Sinicrope
    1025. A Sirko
    1026. PM Siu
    1027. E Sivridis
    1028. V Skop
    1029. VP Skulachev
    1030. RS Slack
    1031. SS Smaili
    1032. DR Smith
    1033. MS Soengas
    1034. T Soldati
    1035. X Song
    1036. AK Sood
    1037. TW Soong
    1038. F Sotgia
    1039. SA Spector
    1040. CD Spies
    1041. W Springer
    1042. SM Srinivasula
    1043. L Stefanis
    1044. JS Steffan
    1045. R Stendel
    1046. H Stenmark
    1047. A Stephanou
    1048. ST Stern
    1049. C Sternberg
    1050. B Stork
    1051. P Strålfors
    1052. CS Subauste
    1053. X Sui
    1054. D Sulzer
    1055. J Sun
    1056. SY Sun
    1057. ZJ Sun
    1058. JJ Sung
    1059. K Suzuki
    1060. T Suzuki
    1061. MS Swanson
    1062. C Swanton
    1063. ST Sweeney
    1064. LK Sy
    1065. G Szabadkai
    1066. I Tabas
    1067. H Taegtmeyer
    1068. M Tafani
    1069. K Takács-Vellai
    1070. Y Takano
    1071. K Takegawa
    1072. G Takemura
    1073. F Takeshita
    1074. NJ Talbot
    1075. KS Tan
    1076. K Tanaka
    1077. K Tanaka
    1078. D Tang
    1079. D Tang
    1080. I Tanida
    1081. BA Tannous
    1082. N Tavernarakis
    1083. GS Taylor
    1084. GA Taylor
    1085. JP Taylor
    1086. LS Terada
    1087. A Terman
    1088. G Tettamanti
    1089. K Thevissen
    1090. CB Thompson
    1091. A Thorburn
    1092. M Thumm
    1093. F Tian
    1094. Y Tian
    1095. G Tocchini-Valentini
    1096. AM Tolkovsky
    1097. Y Tomino
    1098. L Tönges
    1099. SA Tooze
    1100. C Tournier
    1101. J Tower
    1102. R Towns
    1103. V Trajkovic
    1104. LH Travassos
    1105. TF Tsai
    1106. MP Tschan
    1107. T Tsubata
    1108. A Tsung
    1109. B Turk
    1110. LS Turner
    1111. SC Tyagi
    1112. Y Uchiyama
    1113. T Ueno
    1114. M Umekawa
    1115. R Umemiya-Shirafuji
    1116. VK Unni
    1117. MI Vaccaro
    1118. EM Valente
    1119. G Van den Berghe
    1120. IJ van der Klei
    1121. W van Doorn
    1122. LF van Dyk
    1123. M van Egmond
    1124. LA van Grunsven
    1125. P Vandenabeele
    1126. WP Vandenberghe
    1127. I Vanhorebeek
    1128. EC Vaquero
    1129. G Velasco
    1130. T Vellai
    1131. JM Vicencio
    1132. RD Vierstra
    1133. M Vila
    1134. C Vindis
    1135. G Viola
    1136. MT Viscomi
    1137. OV Voitsekhovskaja
    1138. C von Haefen
    1139. M Votruba
    1140. K Wada
    1141. R Wade-Martins
    1142. CL Walker
    1143. CM Walsh
    1144. J Walter
    1145. XB Wan
    1146. A Wang
    1147. C Wang
    1148. D Wang
    1149. F Wang
    1150. F Wang
    1151. G Wang
    1152. H Wang
    1153. HG Wang
    1154. HD Wang
    1155. J Wang
    1156. K Wang
    1157. M Wang
    1158. RC Wang
    1159. X Wang
    1160. X Wang
    1161. YJ Wang
    1162. Y Wang
    1163. Z Wang
    1164. ZC Wang
    1165. Z Wang
    1166. DG Wansink
    1167. DM Ward
    1168. H Watada
    1169. SL Waters
    1170. P Webster
    1171. L Wei
    1172. CC Weihl
    1173. WA Weiss
    1174. SM Welford
    1175. LP Wen
    1176. CA Whitehouse
    1177. JL Whitton
    1178. AJ Whitworth
    1179. T Wileman
    1180. JW Wiley
    1181. S Wilkinson
    1182. D Willbold
    1183. RL Williams
    1184. PR Williamson
    1185. BG Wouters
    1186. C Wu
    1187. DC Wu
    1188. WK Wu
    1189. A Wyttenbach
    1190. RJ Xavier
    1191. Z Xi
    1192. P Xia
    1193. G Xiao
    1194. Z Xie
    1195. Z Xie
    1196. DZ Xu
    1197. J Xu
    1198. L Xu
    1199. X Xu
    1200. A Yamamoto
    1201. A Yamamoto
    1202. S Yamashina
    1203. M Yamashita
    1204. X Yan
    1205. M Yanagida
    1206. DS Yang
    1207. E Yang
    1208. JM Yang
    1209. SY Yang
    1210. W Yang
    1211. WY Yang
    1212. Z Yang
    1213. MC Yao
    1214. TP Yao
    1215. B Yeganeh
    1216. WL Yen
    1217. JJ Yin
    1218. XM Yin
    1219. OJ Yoo
    1220. G Yoon
    1221. SY Yoon
    1222. T Yorimitsu
    1223. Y Yoshikawa
    1224. T Yoshimori
    1225. K Yoshimoto
    1226. HJ You
    1227. RJ Youle
    1228. A Younes
    1229. L Yu
    1230. L Yu
    1231. SW Yu
    1232. WH Yu
    1233. ZM Yuan
    1234. Z Yue
    1235. CH Yun
    1236. M Yuzaki
    1237. O Zabirnyk
    1238. E Silva-Zacarin
    1239. D Zacks
    1240. E Zacksenhaus
    1241. N Zaffaroni
    1242. Z Zakeri
    1243. HJ Zeh
    1244. SO Zeitlin
    1245. H Zhang
    1246. HL Zhang
    1247. J Zhang
    1248. JP Zhang
    1249. L Zhang
    1250. L Zhang
    1251. MY Zhang
    1252. XD Zhang
    1253. M Zhao
    1254. YF Zhao
    1255. Y Zhao
    1256. ZJ Zhao
    1257. X Zheng
    1258. B Zhivotovsky
    1259. Q Zhong
    1260. CZ Zhou
    1261. C Zhu
    1262. WG Zhu
    1263. XF Zhu
    1264. X Zhu
    1265. Y Zhu
    1266. T Zoladek
    1267. WX Zong
    1268. A Zorzano
    1269. J Zschocke
    1270. B Zuckerbraun
    (2012)
    Autophagy 8:445–544.
    https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.19496
  41. 41
  42. 42
  43. 43
  44. 44
  45. 45
  46. 46
  47. 47
  48. 48
    Relationship between the proteasomal system and autophagy
    1. A Lilienbaum
    (2013)
    International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 4:1–26.
  49. 49
  50. 50
  51. 51
  52. 52
  53. 53
  54. 54
  55. 55
  56. 56
  57. 57
  58. 58
  59. 59
  60. 60
  61. 61
  62. 62
  63. 63
  64. 64
  65. 65
  66. 66
    The Cytoskeleton: Imaging, Isolation, and Interaction
    1. K-H Smalla
    2. P Klemmer
    3. U Wyneken
    (2013)
    265–280, Isolation of the postsynaptic density: a specialization of the subsynaptic cytoskeleton, The Cytoskeleton: Imaging, Isolation, and Interaction, Springer Nature, 10.1007/978-1-62703-266-7_11.
  67. 67
  68. 68
  69. 69
  70. 70
  71. 71
  72. 72
  73. 73
  74. 74
  75. 75
  76. 76
  77. 77
  78. 78
  79. 79
  80. 80

Decision letter

  1. Eunjoon Kim
    Reviewing Editor; Institute for Basic Science, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea
  2. Richard W Aldrich
    Senior Editor; The University of Texas at Austin, United States
  3. Volker Haucke
    Reviewer; Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie (FMP), Germany

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

Acceptance summary:

This study finds that Bassoon, a presynaptic active zone protein, inhibits the clearance of presynaptic vesicle proteins through the ubiquitin and autophagy pathways. In addition, the authors also find that the autophagy-mediated ubiquitination and clearance of synaptic vesicle proteins is critically mediated by the E3 ligase Parkin.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Parkin contributes to synaptic vesicle autophagy in Bassoon-deficient mice" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Richard Aldrich as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Volker Haucke (Reviewer #3).

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

We would like to draw your attention to changes in our revision policy that we have made in response to COVID-19 (https://elifesciences.org/articles/57162). Specifically, we are asking editors to accept without delay manuscripts, like yours, that they judge can stand as eLife papers without additional data, even if they feel that they would make the manuscript stronger. Thus the revisions requested below only address clarity and presentation.

In revising the manuscript, please read the following review comments carefully and address all of them, except for those requiring additional experiments, either by toning down the main conclusions, performing additional analyses of existing datasets, or clarifying the text and presentation. In addition, Reviewer #3 suggested for you to check your existing EM images to see if there are any changes in mitochondrial patterns in Bassoon knockout mice. Please let us know if you have any questions in revising the manuscript.

Reviewer #1:

The study reports the key role of Bassoon, a presynaptic active zone protein, in the regulation of presynaptic autophagy and presynaptic vesicle (SV) proteostasis. The novelty of this study lies in that they found that autophagic, but not proteasomal or endo-lysosomal, pathway critically regulates SV proteins. Another point of novelty is that they found Parkin, among the ~six hundred known E3 ligases including Siah1, is a critical mediator of Bassoon deletion-dependent autophagic removal of SV proteins. The findings are again quite novel, and the datasets are in general of high quality.

1) Parkin knockdown and related results constitute a critical part of the main conclusions. The Parkin knockdown construct decreases the levels of Parkin in cultured neurons by ~70% (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). However, it is unclear whether this knockdown construct does not have off-target effects. This could be addressed by the rescue of the knockdown effects by an shRNA-resistant Parkin expression construct. The rescue effects could be monitored using either RFP-LC3 puncta or levels of SV proteins.

Reviewer #2:

This work addresses an important question: what are the mechanisms, at synapses, that degrade proteins to maintain function? Specifically, it examines the role of the synaptic protein Bassoon in its regulation of the autophagy pathway. The authors build on the findings from their two previous papers (Waites, 2013 and Okerlund, 2017) in which they established that loss of Bassoon promotes autophagy. In this manuscript the authors extend these findings, demonstrating Bassoon-dependent degradation of synaptic vesicles through the E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin (and to a lesser extent Siah1). The manuscript addresses important questions, and we make suggestions below to strengthen the conclusions in the context of the findings.

1) The authors claim that Bassoon negatively regulates synaptic autophagy through its ability to inhibit enzymes involved in ubiquitination. But could defects in ubiquitination of the synaptic machinery also result from general problems in the structure of the synapse due to losing of Bassoon? For example, how specific are the reported ubiquitination defects in Bassoon as compared to Piccolo?

2) Along the same lines, can the authors discuss how they envision Bassoon regulates Parkin? E.g. is parkin expression level increased in Bassoon KO? If the level of Parkin is not increased, are known substrates of Parkin increased? I don't think these analyses will require additional experiments, just examination of their data and discussion.

3) Could the authors report the effect size for the quantifications?

4) It is hard to deconvolve the effects of reduced co-localization with a general reduction on the expression of the proteins. In that sense the conclusions for co-localization are confusing for some of the variables (like KO + Bsn609 in Figure 1E). If co-localization is to be analyzed, and a conclusion drawn, it would be good to control for the reduced fluorescence, and do analyses/plots similar to those in Okerlund, 2017.

5) In Figure 2D, adding UbK0 does not increase Syp level, does that indicate the Bsn609 may also induce other degradative pathways other than ubiquitination to break down Syp?

6) In Figure 4C, by live labeling Synaptotagmin1 antibody, the author intended to show the synaptic vesicle cycling in Bassoon KO can be rescued by blocking autophagy. How did they know if the Bassoon KO does not affect Syt1 degradation?

7) EM data is consistent with a loss of SVs. FM dyes showing less synaptic vesicle or less material internalization may be useful. Or authors can normalize 'uptaken' syt-1 to total syt-1, if those quantifications are available.These results are explained well in the Discussion, but authors should similarly explain the conclusions and the limitations of the experiment in the Results.

8) In Figure 5A, the text reads "AVs filled with SV-sized vesicles were readily observed in Bsn KO samples", but we had a hard time finding the SV-sized vesicles in the images. Zoomed in images with notations are recommended.

9) Are the differences in Figure 6C significant? Is there a positive control for it/baseline?

10) In Figure 6, did the authors examine WT and KO + wortmannin (or Bsn-ZnF overexpression, or by inhibiting poly-ubiquitinylation) to examine if this effect is specific to Bassoon-regulated autophagy?

11) Figures 7 and 8, Parkin instead of Siah1 is the major E3 ligase in Bassoon KO. Yet Bsn609 rescues the Bassoon phenotype and interacts with Siah1, and Bassoon did not interact with Parkin. Can the authors discuss this?Or Include a diagram of the model of Bassoon, Siah1, Parkin, and autophagy?

12) Knockdown efficiency for siah-1 is lower than that for Parkin. Were the effects normalized to the observed knockdown levels, i.e, how can authors rule out the possibility that the bigger effect by Parkin is due to better KD efficiency?

Reviewer #3:

In their manuscript Hoffmann-Conaway et al. follow-up from recent studies by the same group of authors (Okerlund et al., 2017; Hoffmann et al., 2019) on the role of the giant active zone protein Bassoon in the regulation of presynaptic autophagy and synaptic vesicle turnover. The authors compellingly demonstrate that Bassoon loss triggers the ubiquitination of a variety of presynaptic proteins including a subset of SV proteins such as SV2B and VAMP/ Synaptobrevin 2. Further studies by light and electron microscopy as well as lentiviral depletion of candidate E3 ligases suggests a role for Bassoon in restricting (via an unknown mechanism) the activity of the E3 ligase Parkin, which, when hyperactivated in Bassoon KO neurons triggers the ubiquitination and autophagic turnover of synaptic vesicles. Consistent with this they find elevated numbers of autophagic structures containing SV-like entities in Bassoon KO synapses, a phenotype that is repressed by the lipid kinase inhibitor wortmannin.

This is a well-written manuscript on an important, yet, under-researched topic in synaptic physiology that should be of broad interest to the neuroscience and cell biology communities. Most of the experiments are carefully designed and executed and support the authors' conclusions, although the mechanisms underlying the observed phenotypes remain to be determined. I have a number of points that need to be considered prior to publication of this manuscript in eLife.

1) Wortmannin is a rather non-specific irreversible PI kinase inhibitor that targets all PI 3-kinases and some PI 4-kinases. I suggest to repeat some of the key experiments using available specific Vps34 inhibitors (e.g. SAR-405, VPS34-IN1, Compound 19) or, alternatively, block autophagy by KD of key components such as ATG5, ATG7, or Vps34.

2) The authors propose a model based on their EM data according to which Bassoon-regulated Parkin-triggered autophagy targets entire SVs for lysosomal turnover. If this was the case the majority of SV proteins should display similar changes in their steady-state levels and half-life. I suggest that the authors examine SV proteins other than SV2B and VAMP/ Synaptobrevin 2 in Figure 4, e.g. SV2A, Syt1, vGLUT1, Synaptophysin. Do these behave similarly and, if so, are their levels rescued by autophagy inhibition in the presence of a specific Vps34 inhibitor (see above)? What happens to the steady-state levels of the many non-SV proteins detected in the mass spec analysis of ubiquitinated peptides, for example SNAP-25 and Syntaxin 1?

3) A large body of literature has implicated Parkin in mitophagy. What are the effects of Bassoon loss and concomitant inhibition of either Parkin or Vps34 on the levels of synaptic mitochondria detectable by light and electron microscopy?

4) Statistics: n appears to be axons rather than experiments. Some explanations are needed why this is justified and how axons are distinguished from dendrites in these cultures.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56590.sa1

Author response

Reviewer #1:

[…] 1) Parkin knockdown and related results constitute a critical part of the main conclusions. The Parkin knockdown construct decreases the levels of Parkin in cultured neurons by ~70% (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). However, it is unclear whether this knockdown construct does not have off-target effects. This could be addressed by the rescue of the knockdown effects by an shRNA-resistant Parkin expression construct. The rescue effects could be monitored using either RFP-LC3 puncta or levels of SV proteins.

We agree that using an shRNA-resistant Parkin as a control is an excellent idea and would have improved our manuscript. However, we did not do these experiments and cannot do them in the near future due to the current Covid-19 situation.

Reviewer #2:

[…] The manuscript addresses important questions, and we make suggestions below to strengthen the conclusions in the context of the findings.

1) The authors claim that Bassoon negatively regulates synaptic autophagy through its ability to inhibit enzymes involved in ubiquitination. But could defects in ubiquitination of the synaptic machinery also result from general problems in the structure of the synapse due to losing of Bassoon? For example, how specific are the reported ubiquitination defects in Bassoon as compared to Piccolo?

This is an interesting idea. On the one hand, we could not see any profound structural changes in our electron micrographs (Figure 5) suggesting that the overall synaptic ultra-structure is unaltered. This is in line with previous findings that normal basic electrophysiological measurements are unchanged in Bsn-deficient neurons (Altrock et al., 2003). On the other hand, Bsn KO animals are epileptic and changes in plasticity and in molecular organization were observed upon strong stimulation (e.g. Hallermann et al., 2010; for review see: Gundelfinger et al., fnsyn.2015.00019). Binding to Atg-5 argues for a direct involvement of Bassoon in autophagic regulation (Okerlund et al., 2017). But, indeed, the mode how Parkin is activated in the absence of Bassoon remains unclear. Concerning Piccolo-deficiency much milder phenotypes were observed in Piccolo-mutant mice (Mukherjee et al., 2010). More over our analysis of Piccolo KO rats, reveal no significant changes in the structure of the active zone, though defects in SV recycling were detected (Ackermann et al., 2019). The idea of analyzing the ubiquitination levels in these KO animals is a great one, which we plan to pursue in the future. Unfortunately, at present, we cannot make any assumptions on the specificity of ubiquitination in loss of Bassoon versus loss of Piccolo. Nonetheless, to address the justified comment of the reviewer, we have modified our wording concerning autophagy triggered by the absence of Bassoon throughout the manuscript.

2) Along the same lines, can the authors discuss how they envision Bassoon regulates Parkin? E.g. is parkin expression level increased in Bassoon KO? If the level of Parkin is not increased, are known substrates of Parkin increased? I don't think these analyses will require additional experiments, just examination of their data and discussion.

We agree that in future studies it would be worthwhile investigating the exact mechanisms by which Bassoon can regulate Parkin activity. Unfortunately, in western blot analyses we could not find any differences in Parkin expression levels between synaptosomes or homogenates of Bsn KO mice compared to WT animals, nor could we co-immuno-precipitate these two potential partners. This leads us to envision Bassoon and Parkin as parts of a larger assembly complex, or that the absence of Bassoon, induces an alternative Parkin-activating pathway (Discussion, eleventh paragraph). Intriguingly, one described substrate of Parkin, Synaptotagmin11 (Discussion, tenth paragraph), was highly ubiquitinated in Bsn KO neurons, further indicating that the loss of Bassoon could lead to an over-activation of Parkin. This latter concept is supported by the rescue of Bassoon related autophagy phenotypes in neurons with reduced levels of Parkin (Figure 9).

3) Could the authors report the effect size for the quantifications?

Actually the effect sizes are given in all relevant figure legends.

4) It is hard to deconvolve the effects of reduced co-localization with a general reduction on the expression of the proteins. In that sense the conclusions for co-localization are confusing for some of the variables (like KO + Bsn609 in Figure 1E). If co-localization is to be analyzed, and a conclusion drawn, it would be good to control for the reduced fluorescence, and do analyses/plots similar to those in Okerlund, 2017.

Thank you for reminding us of this work. Actually, in the Okerlund et al., 2017 study, the quantification of colocalization was performed as follows: “Synaptic puncta (SV2, synapsin1a or synaptophysin) and autophagic puncta (LC3 or Atg5) were counted, and the number of overlapping puncta between the synaptic and autophagic puncta were counted and calculated as ratio of colocalized puncta to synaptic puncta.” In the current study, we used the same approach. However, we strongly agree that line scans, as shown in Okerlund et al., 2017, can help to visualize colocalization. Therefore, we prepared a new supplementary figure (Figure 1—figure supplement 1) showing line scans for all analyzed colocalizations.

5) In Figure 2D, adding UbK0 does not increase Syp level, does that indicate the Bsn609 may also induce other degradative pathways other than ubiquitination to break down Syp?

At this point, we do not know why Bsn609 increases Synaptophysin levels, while the UbK0 does not. One possibility is the ubiquitination-independent degradation of Synaptophysin. On the other hand, the N-terminal fragment of Bsn609 associates with SVs and accumulates in presynaptic boutons (Dresbach et al., 2003), which might have an additional effect on the local clearance rates of SV proteins. How this is mediated mechanistically is unclear and would require additional experiments beyond the Covid-19 constraints.

6) In Figure 4C, by live labeling Synaptotagmin1 antibody, the author intended to show the synaptic vesicle cycling in Bassoon KO can be rescued by blocking autophagy. How did they know if the Bassoon KO does not affect Syt1 degradation?

We agree that lower levels of Synaptotagmin1 per se could also lead to a decrease in Synaptotagmin1 antibody uptake. Fortunately, we were able to analyze already performed experiments that are also related to query 7. In particular, Synaptotagmin1 uptake cultures were post-hoc stained with antibodies against Synaptotagmin1 to visualize total Synaptotagmin1 pools. Interestingly, while Synaptotagmin1 antibody uptake was significantly decreased in Bsn KO neurons compared to WT neurons, total Synaptotagmin1 levels were not (new supplementary Figure 4—figure supplement 2). This observation leads us to the assumption that Synaptotagmin1 antibody uptake can be used as a measure of SV cycling in these animals.

7) EM data is consistent with a loss of SVs. FM dyes showing less synaptic vesicle or less material internalization may be useful. Or authors can normalize 'uptaken' syt-1 to total syt-1, if those quantifications are available.These results are explained well in the Discussion, but authors should similarly explain the conclusions and the limitations of the experiment in the Results.

This is a very interesting idea related to query 6. As described above, we were able to add new supplementary data (from already performed experiments) showing not only that total Synaptotagmin1 levels were unchanged, but also that normalized Synaptotagmin1 uptake was significantly decreased in Bsn KO neurons (Figure 4—figure supplement 2). Using FM dyes to verify Synaptotagmin1 antibody uptake results is an excellent idea, which we will definitely consider for future studies after the Covid-19 situation is resolved.

8) In Figure 5A, the text reads "AVs filled with SV-sized vesicles were readily observed in Bsn KO samples", but we had a hard time finding the SV-sized vesicles in the images. Zoomed in images with notations are recommended.

To increase visibility of the structures in EM, we increased the size of the images by 15% and added a zoom (Figure 5A) of the double-membraned structure that appears to have engulfed vesicles with diameters of approx. 50nm.

9) Are the differences in Figure 6C significant? Is there a positive control for it/baseline?

To clarify, the histogram in Figure 6C is only an additional way of illustrating the data shown in Figure 6B, where a t test was used to determine significant changes between WT and Bsn KO (p***=0.0008). We modified the text to express that more accurately.

As the images were taken from fixed samples, the ratio of old/young protein in WT synapses functions as a control. However, in initial control experiments, we did check that timer molecules function robustly. Here, we treated WT cells with cycloheximide, a protein synthesis inhibitor, which led to an overall older pool of SV2 (data not shown).

10) In Figure 6, did the authors examine WT and KO + wortmannin (or Bsn-ZnF overexpression, or by inhibiting poly-ubiquitinylation) to examine if this effect is specific to Bassoon-regulated autophagy?

Yes, we were starting to look into these important questions. However, we were not able to acquire enough data to verify these results, due to the current Covid-19 situation and the subsequent restricted access to our labs. Future studies addressing these will be very interesting.

11) Figures 7 and 8, Parkin instead of Siah1 is the major E3 ligase in Bassoon KO. Yet Bsn609 rescues the Bassoon phenotype and interacts with Siah1, and Bassoon did not interact with Parkin. Can the authors discuss this?Or Include a diagram of the model of Bassoon, Siah1, Parkin, and autophagy?

This is an important question. Specifically, as the reviewer noted below, one could explain the weaker impact of Siah1 KD versus Parkin KD as being simply due to a better KD efficiency. Further hints that Siah1 is perhaps yet more important are suggested by the data with Bsn609, which we previously have shown to bind and efficiently inhibit Siah1 (Waites et al., 2013). As Bsn609 does not appear to bind Parkin, and yet Parkin KD efficiently rescues, we anticipate that either a different region of Bassoon binds and regulates the activity of Parkin, or Bassoon acts to regulate Parkin via an indirect mechanisms. Clearly, sorting out these important issues will require deeper evaluation, something we would endeavor to explore after the Covid-19 situation is resolved.

12) Knockdown efficiency for siah-1 is lower than that for Parkin. Were the effects normalized to the observed knockdown levels, i.e., how can authors rule out the possibility that the bigger effect by Parkin is due to better KD efficiency?

This is an important question and related to query 11. Given the stronger effect of Bsn609 and its ability to bind and inhibit the activity of Siah1, we would agree with the reviewer’s suggestion that the bigger effect by KD of Parkin is due to a higher KD efficiency. We adjusted the Discussion accordingly.

Reviewer #3:

[…] I have a number of points that need to be considered prior to publication of this manuscript in eLife.

1) Wortmannin is a rather non-specific irreversible PI kinase inhibitor that targets all PI 3-kinases and some PI 4-kinases. I suggest to repeat some of the key experiments using available specific Vps34 inhibitors (e.g. SAR-405, VPS34-IN1, Compound 19) or, alternatively, block autophagy by KD of key components such as ATG5, ATG7, or Vps34.

This is an excellent suggestion. We already performed a few control experiments quantifying RFP-LC3 puncta and SV2b intensities, with and without the specific Vps34 inhibitor SAR405. We made a small supplementary figure to strengthen our wortmannin results (Figure 4—figure supplement 1).

2) The authors propose a model based on their EM data according to which Bassoon-regulated Parkin-triggered autophagy targets entire SVs for lysosomal turnover. If this was the case the majority of SV proteins should display similar changes in their steady-state levels and half-life. I suggest that the authors examine SV proteins other than SV2B and VAMP/ Synaptobrevin 2 in Figure 4, e.g. SV2A, Syt1, vGLUT1, Synaptophysin. Do these behave similarly and, if so, are their levels rescued by autophagy inhibition in the presence of a specific Vps34 inhibitor (see above)? What happens to the steady-state levels of the many non-SV proteins detected in the mass spec analysis of ubiquitinated peptides, for example SNAP-25 and Syntaxin 1?

We strongly agree that the analysis of other SV and non-SV proteins would have improved our manuscript. Unfortunately, we did not do the majority of these experiments and cannot do them in the near future due to lab lock-down in the current Covid-19 situation. Nevertheless, we were able to add a new supplementary figure (Figure 4—figure supplement 2) showing the analysis of already performed experiments. Interestingly, we observed no significant changes in Synaptotagmin1 levels between Bsn KO and WT neurons indicating that not all SV proteins are decreased in Bsn KO neurons. This finding demonstrates how important it is to investigate more proteins in the future. We plan on addressing these open questions once experimental work can be conducted normally again.

3) A large body of literature has implicated Parkin in mitophagy. What are the effects of Bassoon loss and concomitant inhibition of either Parkin or Vps34 on the levels of synaptic mitochondria detectable by light and electron microscopy?

This is a very interesting idea. We acknowledge that Parkin is not only involved in the ubiquitination of synaptic and SV proteins, but was predominantly described to be required for mitophagy. We have preliminary data indicating that the loss of Bsn causes a trend towards decreased numbers of mitochondria per terminal. We plan to follow-up on this in future studies.

4) Statistics: n appears to be axons rather than experiments. Some explanations are needed why this is justified and how axons are distinguished from dendrites in these cultures.

Yes, the depicted n number is either the number of axonal segments or the number of images that were used for analysis. It is common practice to show axons, cells or images as data points because these can be seen as the unit of variation. We added a more detailed description of our n numbers and how axons are distinguished from dendrites in the Materials and methods section. Another important feature of our analysis is that we pick RFP-LC3 expressing axons on top of uninfected neurons to avoid dendritic background. This way, and by strong colocalization of Synaptophysin1 along axons filled with soluble RFP (not conjugated to autophagosomes), we are certain to quantify puncta from axons only.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56590.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sheila Hoffmann-Conaway

    German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  2. Marisa M Brockmann

    1. Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Neurobiology, Berlin, Germany
    2. NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1386-5359
  3. Katharina Schneider

    German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  4. Anil Annamneedi

    1. Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany
    2. Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (CBBS), Magdeburg, Germany
    3. Institute of Biology (IBIO), Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  5. Kazi Atikur Rahman

    1. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
    2. Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8124-6026
  6. Christine Bruns

    German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  7. Kathrin Textoris-Taube

    Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Biochemistry, Core Facility High Throughput Mass Spectrometry, Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  8. Thorsten Trimbuch

    1. Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Neurobiology, Berlin, Germany
    2. NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Viral construct preparation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  9. Karl-Heinz Smalla

    1. Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany
    2. Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (CBBS), Magdeburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  10. Christian Rosenmund

    1. Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Neurobiology, Berlin, Germany
    2. NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3905-2444
  11. Eckart D Gundelfinger

    1. Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany
    2. Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (CBBS), Magdeburg, Germany
    3. Molecular Neurobiology, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9377-7414
  12. Craig Curtis Garner

    1. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
    2. Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Neurobiology, Berlin, Germany
    3. NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing
    For correspondence
    craig.garner@dzne.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1970-5417
  13. Carolina Montenegro-Venegas

    1. Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany
    2. Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (CBBS), Magdeburg, Germany
    3. Institute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing
    For correspondence
    cmontene@lin-magdeburg.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

Funding

Federal Government of Germany (SFB958)

  • Craig Curtis Garner

Federal Government of Germany (SFB779/B09)

  • Eckart D Gundelfinger

BMBF (20150065)

  • Karl-Heinz Smalla
  • Eckart D Gundelfinger

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Richard J Reimer and Prof. Noam E Ziv for discussion and valuable comments on the manuscript, Beatriz Villafranca Magdalena, Anny Kretschmer, Katja Czieselsky, Bettina Brokowski, Katja Poetschke, Janina Juhle, Kathrin Pohlmann, Peggy Patella and the animal facility at LIN Magdeburg for technical assistance, the Virus Core Facility of the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin for virus production and the Core Facility High Throughput Mass Spectrometry of the Charité for mass spectrometry.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Breeding of animals and experiments using animal material were carried out in accordance with the European Communities Council Directive (2010/63/EU) and approved by the local animal care committees of Sachsen-Anhalt or the animal welfare committee of Charité Medical University and the Berlin state government (protocol number: T0036/14, O0208/16).

Senior Editor

  1. Richard W Aldrich, The University of Texas at Austin, United States

Reviewing Editor

  1. Eunjoon Kim, Institute for Basic Science, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea

Reviewer

  1. Volker Haucke, Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie (FMP), Germany

Publication history

  1. Received: March 3, 2020
  2. Accepted: May 2, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 4, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 14, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Hoffmann-Conaway et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,098
    Page views
  • 228
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)