Therapeutic genetic variation revealed in diverse Hsp104 homologs

  1. Zachary M March
  2. Katelyn Sweeney
  3. Hanna Kim
  4. Xiaohui Yan
  5. Laura M Castellano
  6. Meredith E Jackrel
  7. JiaBei Lin
  8. Edward Chuang
  9. Edward Gomes
  10. Corey W Willicott
  11. Karolina Michalska
  12. Robert P Jedrzejczak
  13. Andrzej Joachimiak
  14. Kim A Caldwell
  15. Guy A Caldwell
  16. Ophir Shalem
  17. James Shorter  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Pennsylvania, United States
  2. The University of Alabama, United States
  3. Washington University in St Louis, United States
  4. Argonne National Laboratory, United States

Abstract

The AAA+ protein disaggregase, Hsp104, increases fitness under stress by reversing stress-induced protein aggregation. Natural Hsp104 variants might exist with enhanced, selective activity against neurodegenerative disease substrates. However, natural Hsp104 variation remains largely unexplored. Here, we screened a cross-kingdom collection of Hsp104 homologs in yeast proteotoxicity models. Prokaryotic ClpG reduced TDP-43, FUS, and a-synuclein toxicity, whereas prokaryotic ClpB and hyperactive variants were ineffective. We uncovered therapeutic genetic variation among eukaryotic Hsp104 homologs that specifically antagonized TDP-43 condensation and toxicity in yeast and TDP-43 aggregation in human cells. We also uncovered distinct eukaryotic Hsp104 homologs that selectively antagonized a-synuclein condensation and toxicity in yeast and dopaminergic neurodegeneration in C. elegans. Surprisingly, this therapeutic variation did not manifest as enhanced disaggregase activity, but rather as increased passive inhibition of aggregation of specific substrates. By exploring natural tuning of this passive Hsp104 activity, we elucidated enhanced, substrate-specific agents that counter proteotoxicity underlying neurodegeneration.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zachary M March

    Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2441-899X
  2. Katelyn Sweeney

    Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Hanna Kim

    Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Xiaohui Yan

    Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Laura M Castellano

    Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Meredith E Jackrel

    Department of Chemistry, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4406-9504
  7. JiaBei Lin

    Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Edward Chuang

    Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Edward Gomes

    Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Corey W Willicott

    Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Karolina Michalska

    Midwest Center for Structural Genomics, Biosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Robert P Jedrzejczak

    Midwest Center for Structural Genomics, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Andrzej Joachimiak

    Midwest Center for Structural Genomics, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Kim A Caldwell

    Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1580-6122
  15. Guy A Caldwell

    Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Ophir Shalem

    Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. James Shorter

    Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    For correspondence
    jshorter@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
    Competing interests
    James Shorter, J.S. is a consultant for Dewpoint Therapeutics..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5269-8533

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM099836)

  • James Shorter

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, March et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,983
    views
  • 266
    downloads
  • 24
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zachary M March
  2. Katelyn Sweeney
  3. Hanna Kim
  4. Xiaohui Yan
  5. Laura M Castellano
  6. Meredith E Jackrel
  7. JiaBei Lin
  8. Edward Chuang
  9. Edward Gomes
  10. Corey W Willicott
  11. Karolina Michalska
  12. Robert P Jedrzejczak
  13. Andrzej Joachimiak
  14. Kim A Caldwell
  15. Guy A Caldwell
  16. Ophir Shalem
  17. James Shorter
(2020)
Therapeutic genetic variation revealed in diverse Hsp104 homologs
eLife 9:e57457.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57457

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57457

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Conor J Howard, Nathan S Abell ... Nathan B Lubock
    Research Article

    Deep Mutational Scanning (DMS) is an emerging method to systematically test the functional consequences of thousands of sequence changes to a protein target in a single experiment. Because of its utility in interpreting both human variant effects and protein structure-function relationships, it holds substantial promise to improve drug discovery and clinical development. However, applications in this domain require improved experimental and analytical methods. To address this need, we report novel DMS methods to precisely and quantitatively interrogate disease-relevant mechanisms, protein-ligand interactions, and assess predicted response to drug treatment. Using these methods, we performed a DMS of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R), a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) implicated in obesity and an active target of drug development efforts. We assessed the effects of >6600 single amino acid substitutions on MC4R’s function across 18 distinct experimental conditions, resulting in >20 million unique measurements. From this, we identified variants that have unique effects on MC4R-mediated Gαs- and Gαq-signaling pathways, which could be used to design drugs that selectively bias MC4R’s activity. We also identified pathogenic variants that are likely amenable to a corrector therapy. Finally, we functionally characterized structural relationships that distinguish the binding of peptide versus small molecule ligands, which could guide compound optimization. Collectively, these results demonstrate that DMS is a powerful method to empower drug discovery and development.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Jiale Zhou, Ding Zhao ... Zhanjun Li
    Research Article

    5-Methylcytosine (m5C) is one of the posttranscriptional modifications in mRNA and is involved in the pathogenesis of various diseases. However, the capacity of existing assays for accurately and comprehensively transcriptome-wide m5C mapping still needs improvement. Here, we develop a detection method named DRAM (deaminase and reader protein assisted RNA methylation analysis), in which deaminases (APOBEC1 and TadA-8e) are fused with m5C reader proteins (ALYREF and YBX1) to identify the m5C sites through deamination events neighboring the methylation sites. This antibody-free and bisulfite-free approach provides transcriptome-wide editing regions which are highly overlapped with the publicly available bisulfite-sequencing (BS-seq) datasets and allows for a more stable and comprehensive identification of the m5C loci. In addition, DRAM system even supports ultralow input RNA (10 ng). We anticipate that the DRAM system could pave the way for uncovering further biological functions of m5C modifications.