Plasmodium falciparum translational machinery condones polyadenosine repeats

  1. Slavica Pavlovic Djuranovic  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jessey Erath
  3. Ryan J Andrews
  4. Peter O Bayguinov
  5. Joyce J Chung
  6. Douglas L Chalker
  7. James AJ Fitzpatrick
  8. Walter N Moss
  9. Pawel Szczesny  Is a corresponding author
  10. Sergej Djuranovic  Is a corresponding author
  1. Washington University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Iowa State University, United States
  3. Washington University in St Louis, United States
  4. Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland

Abstract

Plasmodium falciparum is causative agent of human malaria. Sixty percent of mRNAs from its extremely AT-rich (81%) genome harbor long polyadenosine (polyA) runs within their ORFs, distinguishing the parasite from its hosts and other sequenced organisms. Recent studies indicate polyA runs cause ribosome stalling and frameshifting, triggering mRNA surveillance pathways and attenuating protein synthesis. Here, we show that the P. falciparum is an exception to this rule. We demonstrate that both endogenous genes and reporter sequences containing long polyA runs are efficiently and accurately translated in P. falciparum cells. We show that polyA runs do not elicit any response from No Go Decay (NGD) or result in the production of frameshifted proteins. This is in stark contrast to what we observe in human cells or T. thermophile, an organism with similar AT-content. Finally, using stalling reporters we show that Plasmodium cells evolved not to have a fully functional NGD pathway.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript, supporting files or referenced. Source data files have been referenced for Figures 1, 3 and 5, as well as for supplementary figures.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Slavica Pavlovic Djuranovic

    Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States
    For correspondence
    spavlov@wustl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jessey Erath

    Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Ryan J Andrews

    Roy J Carver Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0275-0019
  4. Peter O Bayguinov

    Washington University Center for Cellular Imaging, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Joyce J Chung

    Biology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Douglas L Chalker

    Biology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0285-3344
  7. James AJ Fitzpatrick

    Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Walter N Moss

    Roy J Carver Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6419-5570
  9. Pawel Szczesny

    Department of Bioinformatics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
    For correspondence
    szczesny.pawel@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sergej Djuranovic

    Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States
    For correspondence
    sergej.djuranovic@wustl.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9417-0822

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM112824)

  • Sergej Djuranovic

Washington University in St. Louis (CDI-CORE-2015-505)

  • James AJ Fitzpatrick

National Science Foundation (MCB 1412336)

  • Douglas L Chalker

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM112877)

  • Walter N Moss

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM007067)

  • Jessey Erath

Washington University in St. Louis (CDI-CORE-2019-813)

  • James AJ Fitzpatrick

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Pavlovic Djuranovic et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,649
    views
  • 367
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Slavica Pavlovic Djuranovic
  2. Jessey Erath
  3. Ryan J Andrews
  4. Peter O Bayguinov
  5. Joyce J Chung
  6. Douglas L Chalker
  7. James AJ Fitzpatrick
  8. Walter N Moss
  9. Pawel Szczesny
  10. Sergej Djuranovic
(2020)
Plasmodium falciparum translational machinery condones polyadenosine repeats
eLife 9:e57799.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57799

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57799

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Mai Nguyen, Elda Bauda ... Cecile Morlot
    Research Article

    Teichoic acids (TA) are linear phospho-saccharidic polymers and important constituents of the cell envelope of Gram-positive bacteria, either bound to the peptidoglycan as wall teichoic acids (WTA) or to the membrane as lipoteichoic acids (LTA). The composition of TA varies greatly but the presence of both WTA and LTA is highly conserved, hinting at an underlying fundamental function that is distinct from their specific roles in diverse organisms. We report the observation of a periplasmic space in Streptococcus pneumoniae by cryo-electron microscopy of vitreous sections. The thickness and appearance of this region change upon deletion of genes involved in the attachment of TA, supporting their role in the maintenance of a periplasmic space in Gram-positive bacteria as a possible universal function. Consequences of these mutations were further examined by super-resolved microscopy, following metabolic labeling and fluorophore coupling by click chemistry. This novel labeling method also enabled in-gel analysis of cell fractions. With this approach, we were able to titrate the actual amount of TA per cell and to determine the ratio of WTA to LTA. In addition, we followed the change of TA length during growth phases, and discovered that a mutant devoid of LTA accumulates the membrane-bound polymerized TA precursor.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Shinichi Kawaguchi, Xin Xu ... Toshie Kai
    Research Article

    Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.