Abstract

The lymphatic vasculature is involved in the pathogenesis of acute cardiac injuries, but little is known about its role in chronic cardiac dysfunction. Here, we demonstrate that angiotensin II infusion induced cardiac inflammation and fibrosis at 1 week and caused cardiac dysfunction and impaired lymphatic transport at 6 weeks in mice, while co-administration of VEGFCc156s improved these parameters. To identify novel mechanisms underlying this protection, RNA sequencing analysis in distinct cell populations revealed that VEGFCc156s specifically modulated angiotensin II-induced inflammatory responses in cardiac and peripheral lymphatic endothelial cells. Furthermore, telemetry studies showed that while angiotensin II increased blood pressure acutely in all animals, VEGFCc156s-treated animals displayed a delayed systemic reduction in blood pressure independent of alterations in angiotensin II-mediated aortic stiffness. Overall, these results demonstrate that VEGFCc156s had a multifaceted therapeutic effect to prevent angiotensin II-induced cardiac dysfunction by improving cardiac lymphatic function, alleviating fibrosis and inflammation, and ameliorating hypertension.

Data availability

RNA-Seq data has been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE150041. All other data generated during the study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data has been provided for Figure 1-7.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. LouJin Song

    Internal Medicine Research Unit, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    LouJin Song, is an employee at Pfizer inc.
  2. Xian Chen

    Comparative Medicine, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Xian Chen, is an employee at Pfizer inc.
  3. Terri A Swanson

    Early Clinical Development, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Terri A Swanson, is an employee at Pfizer inc.
  4. Brianna LaViolette

    Comparative Medicine, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Brianna LaViolette, is an employee at Pfizer inc.
  5. Jincheng Pang

    Internal Medicine Research Unit, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Jincheng Pang, is an employee at Pfizer inc.
  6. Teresa Cunio

    Acceleron Pharma, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Teresa Cunio, was an employee at Pfizer inc and is currently an employee at Acceleron Pharma.
  7. Michael W Nagle

    Eisai Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Michael W Nagle, was an employee at Pfizer Inc. and is currently an employee at Eisai Inc.
  8. Shoh Asano

    Internal Medicine Research Unit, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Shoh Asano, is an employee at Pfizer Inc.
  9. Katherine Hales

    Internal Medicine Research Unit, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Katherine Hales, is an employee at Pfizer Inc.
  10. Arun Shipstone

    Inflammation and Immunology, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Arun Shipstone, is an employee at Pfizer Inc.
  11. Hanna Sobon

    Inflammation and Immunology, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Hanna Sobon, is an employee at Pfizer Inc.
  12. Sabra D Al-Harthy

    Comparative Medicine, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Sabra D Al-Harthy, is an employee at Pfizer Inc.
  13. Youngwook Ahn

    Emerging Science and Innovation, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Youngwook Ahn, is an employee at Pfizer Inc.
  14. Steven Kreuser

    Comparative Medicine, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Steven Kreuser, is an employee at Pfizer Inc.
  15. Andrew Robertson

    Drug Safety Research & Development, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Andrew Robertson, is an employee at Pfizer Inc.
  16. Casey Ritenour

    Drug Safety Research & Development, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Casey Ritenour, is an employee at Pfizer Inc.
  17. Frank Voigt

    Drug Safety Research & Development, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Frank Voigt, is an employee at Pfizer Inc.
  18. Magalie Boucher

    Drug Safety Research & Development, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Magalie Boucher, is an employee at Pfizer Inc.
  19. Furong Sun

    Early Clinical Development, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Furong Sun, is an employee at Pfizer Inc.
  20. William C Sessa

    Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5759-1938
  21. Rachel J Roth Flach

    Internal Medicine Research Unit, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    Rachel.RothFlach@pfizer.com
    Competing interests
    Rachel J Roth Flach, is an employee at Pfizer Inc.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2754-828X

Funding

Pfizer

  • Rachel J Roth Flach

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The ethics statement has been included in the method section of the manuscript as the following:"All animal experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with regulations and established guidelines and were reviewed and approved by the Pfizer Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee(AUP # KSQ-2013-00895)."

Copyright

© 2020, Song et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,619
    views
  • 310
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. LouJin Song
  2. Xian Chen
  3. Terri A Swanson
  4. Brianna LaViolette
  5. Jincheng Pang
  6. Teresa Cunio
  7. Michael W Nagle
  8. Shoh Asano
  9. Katherine Hales
  10. Arun Shipstone
  11. Hanna Sobon
  12. Sabra D Al-Harthy
  13. Youngwook Ahn
  14. Steven Kreuser
  15. Andrew Robertson
  16. Casey Ritenour
  17. Frank Voigt
  18. Magalie Boucher
  19. Furong Sun
  20. William C Sessa
  21. Rachel J Roth Flach
(2020)
Lymphangiogenic therapy prevents cardiac dysfunction by ameliorating inflammation and hypertension
eLife 9:e58376.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58376

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58376

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.

    1. Cell Biology
    Fatima Tleiss, Martina Montanari ... C Leopold Kurz
    Research Article

    Multiple gut antimicrobial mechanisms are coordinated in space and time to efficiently fight foodborne pathogens. In Drosophila melanogaster, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) together with intestinal cell renewal play a key role in eliminating gut microbes. A complementary mechanism would be to isolate and treat pathogenic bacteria while allowing colonization by commensals. Using real-time imaging to follow the fate of ingested bacteria, we demonstrate that while commensal Lactiplantibacillus plantarum freely circulate within the intestinal lumen, pathogenic strains such as Erwinia carotovora or Bacillus thuringiensis, are blocked in the anterior midgut where they are rapidly eliminated by antimicrobial peptides. This sequestration of pathogenic bacteria in the anterior midgut requires the Duox enzyme in enterocytes, and both TrpA1 and Dh31 in enteroendocrine cells. Supplementing larval food with hCGRP, the human homolog of Dh31, is sufficient to block the bacteria, suggesting the existence of a conserved mechanism. While the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway is essential for eliminating the trapped bacteria, it is dispensable for the blockage. Genetic manipulations impairing bacterial compartmentalization result in abnormal colonization of posterior midgut regions by pathogenic bacteria. Despite a functional IMD pathway, this ectopic colonization leads to bacterial proliferation and larval death, demonstrating the critical role of bacteria anterior sequestration in larval defense. Our study reveals a temporal orchestration during which pathogenic bacteria, but not innocuous, are confined in the anterior part of the midgut in which they are eliminated in an IMD-pathway-dependent manner.