Anti-Cancer Drugs: The mitochondrial paradox
A structural motif that is found in two cancer drugs may be responsible for their ability to tackle cancers and for the side-effects caused by the drugs.
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
Organelles called mitochondria are often referred to as the powerhouse of a cell because they make the molecules of ATP that the cell uses as a source of energy. The toxic side-effects of some medicines are caused by the drug inadvertently disrupting the workings of mitochondria (Nadanaciva and Will, 2011). The heart is particularly susceptible to such side-effects because cardiac cells contain large numbers of mitochondria to meet the energy demands of heart tissue (Park et al., 2014; Varga et al., 2015). Understanding how this toxicity arises is important so it can be avoided when designing and developing new treatments. However, it can be diffucult to determine which part of the drug causes these toxic side-effects.
Now, in eLife, Anne Willis (University of Cambridge) and colleagues – including Zoë Stephenson as first author – report details of a chemical structure in the anti-cancer drug mubritinib, which inhibits the mitochondria of cardiac cells and causes an unintended rise in toxicity (Stephenson et al., 2020). Previous work had shown that mubritinib disrupts the phosphorylation of a protein called HER2 that is known to promote the growth of cancer cells (Nagasawa et al., 2006). However, during tests, Stephenson et al. found that increasing the concentration of mubritinib did not hinder this protein to the same degree as a drug called lapatinib, which is known to work by inhibiting HER2. This suggested that mubritinib does not directly inhibit HER2 and that another mechanism is likely to be responsible for its anti-cancer effects.
As mubritinib is known to affect pathways that are linked to cellular energy, the researchers – who are based at University of Cambridge and the University of Nottingham – decided to investigate how this drug impacted the production of ATP in cardiac cells cultured in two media: glucose and galactose. Cells cultured in galactose rely more heavily on mitochondria for ATP production than cells cultured in glucose, so are more susceptible to compounds that target this organelle (Marroquin et al., 2007). Stephenson et al. found that, following drug treatment, the cells in galactose produced less ATP and had a lower frequency of beating than the cells in glucose. This suggests that mubritinib impairs the activity of the electron transport chain which drives the synthesis of ATP (Figure 1). Further analysis revealed that mubritinib inhibits a particular structure within this chain called 'complex I'.
Figure 1
A structural motif in two anti-cancer drugs disrupts the production of ATP.
Mitochondria (top left) make the ATP molecules that provide cells with energy. Chains of protein complexes called electron transporters (purple; labelled I, II, III, IV and V) are embedded in the inner membrane of mitochondria. The first complex in this chain (complex I) converts NADH to NAD+ by removing an electron (middle panel), which then gets shuttled between the different complexes in the chain. This allows the complexes to actively transport protons (H+) into the space between the inner and outer membrane of the mitochondrion. The diffusion of these protons back across the inner membrane (downward black arrow) drives the enzyme that synthesizes ATP molecules. Two anti-cancer drugs, mubritinib and carboxyamidotriazole, contain a motif (top right) which inhibits complex I and consequently disrupts the production of ATP. Stephenson et al. found that inhibiting complex I in cancer cells led to reduced growth and increased death (bottom left), whereas inhibiting complex I in cardiac cells caused the cells to beat less frequently due to the reduction in ATP (bottom right).
Image credit: Sophie Penman.
Next, Stephenson et al. investigated a library of compounds which have a similar structure to mubritinib to identify the 'toxicophore' – the region of the drug that is causing the side-effects. This revealed that a region called the heterocyclic 1,3 nitrogen motif was responsible for inhibiting complex I and reducing the production of ATP (Figure 1).
The researchers then investigated the effects of an anti-cancer drug called carboxyamidotriazole that contains the same toxicophore structure. This drug is thought to block the progress of cancer by inhibiting specific ion channels that transport calcium ions into the cell (Singh et al., 2017). However, Stephenson et al. found that carboxyamidotriazole did not significantly bind to calcium channels. Instead, they discovered that the drug reduced the production of ATP in galactose media and decreased the amount of oxygen taken up by cardiac cells.
Finally, to identify whether the heterocyclic 1,3 nitrogen motif was responsible for the anti-cancer effects of both drugs, Stephenson et al. measured the growth and death rate of cancer cells following treatment. Cell lines representing five different cancer types were treated with mubritinib, carboxyamidotriazole, or structurally similar compounds which lacked the toxicophore. In each cell line they tested, the presence of the toxicophore resulted in increased levels of cell death and reduced rates of cell growth (Figure 1). This suggests that the toxicophore in these two drugs is also partially responsible for their anti-cancer effects.
These findings provide evidence of a chemical motif which increases the toxicity of cardiac cells by inadvertently targeting mitochondria. The identification of this motif could help design safer and more effective anti-cancer treatments. Furthermore, the method used in this study could be used to identify other chemical motifs which specifically disrupt the activity of mitochondria. Future research should test a larger collection of compounds containing this toxicophore to confirm whether the loss in mitochondrial activity is linked to adverse side effects. Furthermore, it is important to assess whether these effects only cause toxicity in the heart or whether other organs, such as the liver and kidney, may also be susceptible.
References
-
New insights in drug-induced mitochondrial toxicityCurrent Pharmaceutical Design 17:2100–2112.https://doi.org/10.2174/138161211796904795
-
Cardiac, skeletal, and smooth muscle mitochondrial respiration: are all mitochondria created equal?American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 307:H346–H352.https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00227.2014
-
Phosphorylation: implications in cancerThe Protein Journal 36:1–6.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-017-9696-z
-
Drug-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and cardiotoxicityAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 309:H1453–H1467.https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00554.2015
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2020, Penman et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,167
- views
-
- 207
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Anti-Cancer Drugs: The mitochondrial paradox
eLife 9:e59140.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59140
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.
