Vascular control of the CO2/H+ dependent drive to breathe

  1. Colin M Cleary
  2. Thiago S Moreira
  3. Ana C Takakura
  4. Mark T Nelson
  5. Thomas A Longden
  6. Daniel K Mulkey  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Connecticut, United States
  2. University of São Paulo, Brazil
  3. University of Vermont, United States
  4. University of Maryland, United States

Abstract

Respiratory chemoreceptors regulate breathing in response to changes in tissue CO2/H+. Blood flow is a fundamental determinant of tissue CO2/H+, yet little is known regarding how regulation of vascular tone in chemoreceptor regions contributes to respiratory behavior. Previously, we showed in rat that CO2/H+-vasoconstriction in the retrotrapezoid nucleus (RTN) supports chemoreception by a purinergic-dependent mechanism (Hawkins et al. 2017). Here, we show in mice that CO2/H+ dilates arterioles in other chemoreceptor regions, thus demonstrating CO2/H+ vascular reactivity in the RTN is unique. We also identify P2Y2 receptors in RTN smooth muscle cells as the substrate responsible for this response. Specifically, pharmacological blockade or genetic deletion of P2Y2 from smooth muscle cells blunted the ventilatory response to CO2, and re-expression of P2Y2 receptors only in RTN smooth muscle cells fully rescued the CO2/H+ chemoreflex. These results identify P2Y2 receptors in RTN smooth muscle cells as requisite determinants of respiratory chemoreception.

Data availability

Source data files are included for all data sets that do not have individual points on summary figures

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Colin M Cleary

    Department of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0305-1324
  2. Thiago S Moreira

    Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9789-8296
  3. Ana C Takakura

    Department of Pharmacology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Mark T Nelson

    Department of Pharmacology, University of Vermont, Burlington, United States
    Competing interests
    Mark T Nelson, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6608-8784
  5. Thomas A Longden

    Department of Physiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Daniel K Mulkey

    Department of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, United States
    For correspondence
    daniel.mulkey@uconn.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7040-3927

Funding

National Institutes of Health (HL104101)

  • Daniel K Mulkey

Sao Paulo Research Foundation (2015/23376-1)

  • Thiago S Moreira

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (408647/2018-3)

  • Ana C Takakura

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (301219/2016-8)

  • Ana C Takakura

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (301904/2015-4)

  • Thiago S Moreira

Fondation Leducq

  • Mark T Nelson

European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme

  • Mark T Nelson

Henry M. Jackson Foundation (HU0001-18-2-001)

  • Mark T Nelson

National Institutes of Health (HL137094)

  • Daniel K Mulkey

National Institutes of Health (NS099887)

  • Daniel K Mulkey

National Institutes of Health (NS110656)

  • Mark T Nelson

National Institutes of Health (HL140027)

  • Mark T Nelson

National Institutes of Health (HL142227)

  • Colin M Cleary

American Heart Association (17SDG33670237)

  • Thomas A Longden

American Heart Association (19IPLOI34660108)

  • Thomas A Longden

Sao Paulo Research Foundation (2016/23281-3)

  • Ana C Takakura

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were performed in accordance with National Institutes of Health and University of Connecticut Animal Care and Use Guidelines as described in protocols A19-048 and A20-016.

Copyright

© 2020, Cleary et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,337
    views
  • 243
    downloads
  • 28
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Colin M Cleary
  2. Thiago S Moreira
  3. Ana C Takakura
  4. Mark T Nelson
  5. Thomas A Longden
  6. Daniel K Mulkey
(2020)
Vascular control of the CO2/H+ dependent drive to breathe
eLife 9:e59499.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59499

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59499

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zachary Fournier, Leandro M Alonso, Eve Marder
    Research Article

    Circuit function results from both intrinsic conductances of network neurons and the synaptic conductances that connect them. In models of neural circuits, different combinations of maximal conductances can give rise to similar activity. We compared the robustness of a neural circuit to changes in their intrinsic versus synaptic conductances. To address this, we performed a sensitivity analysis on a population of conductance-based models of the pyloric network from the crustacean stomatogastric ganglion (STG). The model network consists of three neurons with nine currents: a sodium current (Na), three potassium currents (Kd, KCa, KA), two calcium currents (CaS and CaT), a hyperpolarization-activated current (H), a non-voltage-gated leak current (leak), and a neuromodulatory current (MI). The model cells are connected by seven synapses of two types, glutamatergic and cholinergic. We produced one hundred models of the pyloric network that displayed similar activities with values of maximal conductances distributed over wide ranges. We evaluated the robustness of each model to changes in their maximal conductances. We found that individual models have different sensitivities to changes in their maximal conductances, both in their intrinsic and synaptic conductances. As expected, the models become less robust as the extent of the changes increases. Despite quantitative differences in their robustness, we found that in all cases, the model networks are more sensitive to the perturbation of their intrinsic conductances than their synaptic conductances.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jacob A Miller
    Insight

    When navigating environments with changing rules, human brain circuits flexibly adapt how and where we retain information to help us achieve our immediate goals.