Abstract

Heterogeneity of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in pancreatic islets is physiologically important but poorly understood. Here, we utilize mouse islets to determine how microtubules affect secretion toward the vascular extracellular matrix at single cell and subcellular levels. Our data indicate that microtubule stability in the β-cell population is heterogenous, and that GSIS is suppressed in cells with highly stable microtubules. Consistently, microtubule hyper-stabilization prevents, and microtubule depolymerization promotes capacity of single β-cell for GSIS. Analysis of spatiotemporal patterns of secretion events shows that microtubule depolymerization activates otherwise dormant β-cells via initiation of secretion clusters (hot spots). Microtubule depolymerization also enhances secretion from individual cells, introducing both additional clusters and scattered events. Interestingly, without microtubules, the timing of clustered secretion is dysregulated, extending the first phase of GSIS and causing oversecretion. In contrast, glucose-induced Ca2+ influx was not affected by microtubule depolymerization yet required for secretion under these conditions, indicating that microtubule-dependent regulation of secretion hot spots acts in parallel with Ca2+ signaling. Our findings uncover a novel microtubule function in tuning insulin secretion hot spots, which leads to accurately measured and timed response to glucose stimuli and promotes functional β-cell heterogeneity.

Data availability

All numerical data generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for all figures. Code is provided for computational data.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kathryn P Trogden

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3288-3859
  2. Justin S Lee

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kai M Bracey

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kung-Hsien Ho

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Hudson McKinney

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Xiaodong Zhu

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Goker Arpag

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6893-2678
  8. Thomas G Folland

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Anna B Osipovich

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Mark A Magnusson

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Marija Zanic

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5127-5819
  12. Guoqiang Gu

    Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. William R Holmes

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Irina Kaverina

    Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    For correspondence
    irina.kaverina@vanderbilt.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4002-8599

Funding

National Institutes of Health (T32 DK07061)

  • Kathryn P Trogden

National Institutes of Health (1F32DK117529)

  • Kathryn P Trogden

National Institutes of Health (R35-GM127098)

  • Irina Kaverina

National Institutes of Health (R01-DK65949)

  • Guoqiang Gu

National Institutes of Health (DMS1562078)

  • William R Holmes

National Institutes of Health (R01-DK106228)

  • Guoqiang Gu
  • William R Holmes
  • Irina Kaverina

National Institutes of Health (R35-GM119552)

  • Marija Zanic

National Institutes of Health (F31 DK122650)

  • Kai M Bracey

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (protocol M1500060-00) of Vanderbilt University.

Copyright

© 2021, Trogden et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,435
    views
  • 342
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kathryn P Trogden
  2. Justin S Lee
  3. Kai M Bracey
  4. Kung-Hsien Ho
  5. Hudson McKinney
  6. Xiaodong Zhu
  7. Goker Arpag
  8. Thomas G Folland
  9. Anna B Osipovich
  10. Mark A Magnusson
  11. Marija Zanic
  12. Guoqiang Gu
  13. William R Holmes
  14. Irina Kaverina
(2021)
Microtubules regulate pancreatic β cell heterogeneity via spatiotemporal control of insulin secretion hot spots
eLife 10:e59912.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59912

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59912

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Yue Miao, Yongtao Du ... Mei Ding
    Research Article

    The spatiotemporal transition of small GTPase Rab5 to Rab7 is crucial for early-to-late endosome maturation, yet the precise mechanism governing Rab5-to-Rab7 switching remains elusive. USP8, a ubiquitin-specific protease, plays a prominent role in the endosomal sorting of a wide range of transmembrane receptors and is a promising target in cancer therapy. Here, we identified that USP8 is recruited to Rab5-positive carriers by Rabex5, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rab5. The recruitment of USP8 dissociates Rabex5 from early endosomes (EEs) and meanwhile promotes the recruitment of the Rab7 GEF SAND-1/Mon1. In USP8-deficient cells, the level of active Rab5 is increased, while the Rab7 signal is decreased. As a result, enlarged EEs with abundant intraluminal vesicles accumulate and digestive lysosomes are rudimentary. Together, our results reveal an important and unexpected role of a deubiquitinating enzyme in endosome maturation.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.