Peroxiredoxin promotes longevity and H2O2-resistance in yeast through redox-modulation of protein kinase A

  1. Friederike Roger
  2. Cecilia Picazo
  3. Wolfgang Reiter
  4. Marouane Libiad
  5. Chikako Asami
  6. Sarah Hanzén
  7. Chunxia Gao
  8. Gilles Lagniel
  9. Niek Welkenhuysen
  10. Jean Labarre
  11. Thomas Nyström
  12. Morten Grotli
  13. Markus Hartl
  14. Michel B Toledano
  15. Mikael Molin  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Gothenburg, Sweden
  2. Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
  3. University of Vienna, Austria
  4. CEA Saclay, France
  5. IBITECS, SBIGEM, CEA-Saclay, France

Abstract

Peroxiredoxins are H2O2 scavenging enzymes that also carry H2O2 signaling and chaperone functions. In yeast, the major cytosolic peroxiredoxin, Tsa1 is required for both promoting resistance to H2O2 and extending lifespan upon caloric restriction. We show here that Tsa1 effects both these functions not by scavenging H2O2, but by repressing the nutrient signaling Ras-cAMP-PKA pathway at the level of the protein kinase A (PKA) enzyme. Tsa1 stimulates sulfenylation of cysteines in the PKA catalytic subunit by H2O2 and a significant proportion of the catalytic subunits are glutathionylated on two cysteine residues. Redox modification of the conserved Cys243 inhibits the phosphorylation of a conserved Thr241 in the kinase activation loop and enzyme activity, and preventing Thr241 phosphorylation can overcome the H2O2 sensitivity of Tsa1-deficient cells. Results support a model of aging where nutrient signaling pathways constitute hubs integrating information from multiple aging-related conduits, including a peroxiredoxin-dependent response to H2O2.

Data availability

Proteomics data have been deposited in the PRIDE repository.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Friederike Roger

    Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Cecilia Picazo

    Dept of Biology and Biological Engineering, Systems and Synthetic Biology, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Wolfgang Reiter

    Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marouane Libiad

    Oxidative stress and cancer laboratory, Integrative Biology and Molecular Genetics Unit (SBiGEM), CEA Saclay, Gif sur Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Chikako Asami

    Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sarah Hanzén

    Department of Chemistry and Molecular BIology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Chunxia Gao

    Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Gilles Lagniel

    Oxidative Stress and Cancer Laboratory, Integrative Biology and Molecular Genetics Unit, CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Niek Welkenhuysen

    Dept of Biology and Biological Engineering, Systems and Synthetic Biology, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jean Labarre

    Oxidative Stress and Cancer Laboratory, Integrative Biology and Molecular Genetics Unit, CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Thomas Nyström

    Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5489-2903
  12. Morten Grotli

    Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3621-4222
  13. Markus Hartl

    Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4970-7336
  14. Michel B Toledano

    Oxidative Stress and Cancer, IBITECS, SBIGEM, CEA-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3079-1179
  15. Mikael Molin

    Dept of Biology and Biological Engineering, Systems and Synthetic Biology, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
    For correspondence
    mikael.molin@chalmers.se
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3903-8503

Funding

Cancerfonden

  • Mikael Molin

Vetenskapsrådet

  • Mikael Molin

Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmästare

  • Mikael Molin

Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning

  • Mikael Molin

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (PrxAge)

  • Michel B Toledano

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ERRed2)

  • Michel B Toledano

Swedish Research Council (NT 2019-03937)

  • Thomas Nyström

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (2017-0091 and 2015-0272)

  • Thomas Nyström

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Roger et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,515
    views
  • 761
    downloads
  • 23
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Friederike Roger
  2. Cecilia Picazo
  3. Wolfgang Reiter
  4. Marouane Libiad
  5. Chikako Asami
  6. Sarah Hanzén
  7. Chunxia Gao
  8. Gilles Lagniel
  9. Niek Welkenhuysen
  10. Jean Labarre
  11. Thomas Nyström
  12. Morten Grotli
  13. Markus Hartl
  14. Michel B Toledano
  15. Mikael Molin
(2020)
Peroxiredoxin promotes longevity and H2O2-resistance in yeast through redox-modulation of protein kinase A
eLife 9:e60346.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60346

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60346

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Marina Dajka, Tobias Rath ... Benesh Joseph
    Research Article

    Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) confer resistance against harsh conditions, including antibiotics, in Gram-negative bacteria. The lipopolysaccharide transport (Lpt) complex, consisting of seven proteins (A-G), exports LPS across the cellular envelope. LptB2FG forms an ATP-binding cassette transporter that transfers LPS to LptC. How LptB2FG couples ATP binding and hydrolysis with LPS transport to LptC remains unclear. We observed the conformational heterogeneity of LptB2FG and LptB2FGC in micelles and/or proteoliposomes using pulsed dipolar electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Additionally, we monitored LPS binding and release using laser-induced liquid bead ion desorption mass spectrometry. The β-jellyroll domain of LptF stably interacts with the LptG and LptC β-jellyrolls in both the apo and vanadate-trapped states. ATP binding at the cytoplasmic side is allosterically coupled to the selective opening of the periplasmic LptF β-jellyroll domain. In LptB2FG, ATP binding closes the nucleotide binding domains, causing a collapse of the first lateral gate as observed in structures. However, the second lateral gate, which forms the putative entry site for LPS, exhibits a heterogeneous conformation. LptC binding limits the flexibility of this gate to two conformations, likely representing the helix of LptC as either released from or inserted into the transmembrane domains. Our results reveal the regulation of the LPS entry gate through the dynamic behavior of the LptC transmembrane helix, while its β-jellyroll domain is anchored in the periplasm. This, combined with long-range ATP-dependent allosteric gating of the LptF β-jellyroll domain, may ensure efficient and unidirectional transport of LPS across the periplasm.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Jaskamaljot Kaur Banwait, Liana Islam, Aaron L Lucius
    Research Article

    Escherichia coli ClpB and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hsp104 are AAA+ motor proteins essential for proteome maintenance and thermal tolerance. ClpB and Hsp104 have been proposed to extract a polypeptide from an aggregate and processively translocate the chain through the axial channel of its hexameric ring structure. However, the mechanism of translocation and if this reaction is processive remains disputed. We reported that Hsp104 and ClpB are non-processive on unfolded model substrates. Others have reported that ClpB is able to processively translocate a mechanically unfolded polypeptide chain at rates over 240 amino acids (aa) per second. Here, we report the development of a single turnover stopped-flow fluorescence strategy that reports on processive protein unfolding catalyzed by ClpB. We show that when translocation catalyzed by ClpB is challenged by stably folded protein structure, the motor enzymatically unfolds the substrate at a rate of ~0.9 aa s−1 with a kinetic step-size of ~60 amino acids at sub-saturating [ATP]. We reconcile the apparent controversy by defining enzyme catalyzed protein unfolding and translocation as two distinct reactions with different mechanisms of action. We propose a model where slow unfolding followed by fast translocation represents an important mechanistic feature that allows the motor to rapidly translocate up to the next folded region or rapidly dissociate if no additional fold is encountered.