Novel LOTUS-domain proteins are organizational hubs that recruit C. elegans Vasa to germ granules

  1. Patricia Giselle Cipriani
  2. Olivia Bay
  3. John Zinno
  4. Michelle Gutwein
  5. Hin Hark Gan
  6. Vinay K Mayya
  7. George Chung
  8. Jia-Xuan Chen
  9. Hala Fahs
  10. Yu Guan
  11. Thomas F Duchaine
  12. Matthias Selbach
  13. Fabio Piano
  14. Kristin C Gunsalus  Is a corresponding author
  1. New York University, United States
  2. McGill University, Canada
  3. Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Germany
  4. New York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Abstract

We describe MIP-1 and MIP-2, novel paralogous C. elegans germ granule components that interact with the intrinsically disordered MEG-3 protein. These proteins promote P granule condensation, form granules independently of MEG-3 in the postembryonic germ line, and balance each other in regulating P granule growth and localization. MIP-1 and MIP-2 each contain two LOTUS domains and intrinsically disordered regions and form homo- and heterodimers. They bind and anchor the Vasa homolog GLH-1 within P granules and are jointly required for coalescence of MEG-3, GLH-1, and PGL proteins. Animals lacking MIP-1 and MIP-2 show temperature-sensitive embryonic lethality, sterility, and mortal germ lines. Germline phenotypes include defects in stem cell self-renewal, meiotic progression, and gamete differentiation. We propose that these proteins serve as scaffolds and organizing centers for ribonucleoprotein networks within P granules that help recruit and balance essential RNA processing machinery to regulate key developmental transitions in the germ line.

Data availability

All mass spectrometry raw data have been deposited to the PRIDE repository with the dataset identifier PXD012852. All other data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 2A-C; Figure 2-figure supplement 2; Figure 6A,B; Figure 8E; Figure 9B; Figure 9-figure supplement 1; Figure 10C.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Patricia Giselle Cipriani

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Olivia Bay

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. John Zinno

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Michelle Gutwein

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Hin Hark Gan

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Vinay K Mayya

    Goodman Cancer Research Centre and Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. George Chung

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jia-Xuan Chen

    None, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Hala Fahs

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Yu Guan

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Thomas F Duchaine

    Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Matthias Selbach

    Department of Protein Dynamics, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Fabio Piano

    Department of Biology and Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Kristin C Gunsalus

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    kcg1@nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9769-4624

Funding

New York University Abu Dhabi (ADPHG CGSB)

  • Patricia Giselle Cipriani
  • Hala Fahs
  • Fabio Piano
  • Kristin C Gunsalus

New York University Abu Dhabi

  • Patricia Giselle Cipriani
  • Olivia Bay
  • John Zinno
  • Michelle Gutwein
  • Hin Hark Gan
  • George Chung
  • Fabio Piano
  • Kristin C Gunsalus

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 123352)

  • Vinay K Mayya
  • Thomas F Duchaine

Charlotte and Leo Karassik Foundation

  • Vinay K Mayya

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (0315362)

  • Jia-Xuan Chen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Michael Buszczak, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Version history

  1. Received: July 8, 2020
  2. Accepted: June 27, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 5, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 3, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Cipriani et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,997
    Page views
  • 191
    Downloads
  • 7
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Patricia Giselle Cipriani
  2. Olivia Bay
  3. John Zinno
  4. Michelle Gutwein
  5. Hin Hark Gan
  6. Vinay K Mayya
  7. George Chung
  8. Jia-Xuan Chen
  9. Hala Fahs
  10. Yu Guan
  11. Thomas F Duchaine
  12. Matthias Selbach
  13. Fabio Piano
  14. Kristin C Gunsalus
(2021)
Novel LOTUS-domain proteins are organizational hubs that recruit C. elegans Vasa to germ granules
eLife 10:e60833.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60833

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Shuxian Li, Lingbing Li ... Xietong Wang
    Research Article

    Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is associated with adverse obstetric and postnatal metabolic health outcomes, but the mechanism remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the toxicological pathways by which PM2.5 damaged placental trophoblasts in vivo and in vitro. We confirmed that PM2.5 induced adverse gestational outcomes such as increased fetal mortality rates, decreased fetal number and weight, damaged placental structure, and increased apoptosis of trophoblasts. Additionally, PM2.5 induced dysfunction of the trophoblast cell line HTR8/SVneo, including in its proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, migration and angiogenesis. Moreover, we comprehensively analyzed the transcriptional landscape of HTR8/SVneo cells exposed to PM2.5 through RNA-Seq and observed that PM2.5 triggered overexpression of pathways involved in oxidative stress and mitochondrial apoptosis to damage HTR8/SVneo cell biological functions through CYP1A1. Mechanistically, PM2.5 stimulated KLF9, a transcription factor identified as binding to CYP1A1 promoter region, which further modulated the CYP1A1-driven downstream phenotypes. Together, this study demonstrated that the KLF9/CYP1A1 axis played a crucial role in the toxic progression of PM2.5 induced adverse pregnancy outcomes, suggesting adverse effects of environmental pollution on pregnant females and putative targeted therapeutic strategies.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Heledd Davies, Hugo Belda ... Moritz Treeck
    Tools and Resources

    Reverse genetics is key to understanding protein function, but the mechanistic connection between a gene of interest and the observed phenotype is not always clear. Here we describe the use of proximity labeling using TurboID and site-specific quantification of biotinylated peptides to measure changes to the local protein environment of selected targets upon perturbation. We apply this technique, which we call PerTurboID, to understand how the P. falciparum exported kinase, FIKK4.1, regulates the function of the major virulence factor of the malaria causing parasite, PfEMP1. We generated independent TurboID fusions of 2 proteins that are predicted substrates of FIKK4.1 in a FIKK4.1 conditional KO parasite line. Comparing the abundance of site-specific biotinylated peptides between wildtype and kinase deletion lines reveals the differential accessibility of proteins to biotinylation, indicating changes to localization, protein-protein interactions, or protein structure which are mediated by FIKK4.1 activity. We further show that FIKK4.1 is likely the only FIKK kinase that controls surface levels of PfEMP1, but not other surface antigens, on the infected red blood cell under standard culture conditions. We believe PerTurboID is broadly applicable to study the impact of genetic or environmental perturbation on a selected cellular niche.