Novel LOTUS-domain proteins are organizational hubs that recruit C. elegans Vasa to germ granules

  1. Patricia Giselle Cipriani
  2. Olivia Bay
  3. John Zinno
  4. Michelle Gutwein
  5. Hin Hark Gan
  6. Vinay K Mayya
  7. George Chung
  8. Jia-Xuan Chen
  9. Hala Fahs
  10. Yu Guan
  11. Thomas F Duchaine
  12. Matthias Selbach
  13. Fabio Piano
  14. Kristin C Gunsalus  Is a corresponding author
  1. New York University, United States
  2. McGill University, Canada
  3. Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Germany
  4. New York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Abstract

We describe MIP-1 and MIP-2, novel paralogous C. elegans germ granule components that interact with the intrinsically disordered MEG-3 protein. These proteins promote P granule condensation, form granules independently of MEG-3 in the postembryonic germ line, and balance each other in regulating P granule growth and localization. MIP-1 and MIP-2 each contain two LOTUS domains and intrinsically disordered regions and form homo- and heterodimers. They bind and anchor the Vasa homolog GLH-1 within P granules and are jointly required for coalescence of MEG-3, GLH-1, and PGL proteins. Animals lacking MIP-1 and MIP-2 show temperature-sensitive embryonic lethality, sterility, and mortal germ lines. Germline phenotypes include defects in stem cell self-renewal, meiotic progression, and gamete differentiation. We propose that these proteins serve as scaffolds and organizing centers for ribonucleoprotein networks within P granules that help recruit and balance essential RNA processing machinery to regulate key developmental transitions in the germ line.

Data availability

All mass spectrometry raw data have been deposited to the PRIDE repository with the dataset identifier PXD012852. All other data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 2A-C; Figure 2-figure supplement 2; Figure 6A,B; Figure 8E; Figure 9B; Figure 9-figure supplement 1; Figure 10C.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Patricia Giselle Cipriani

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Olivia Bay

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. John Zinno

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Michelle Gutwein

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Hin Hark Gan

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Vinay K Mayya

    Goodman Cancer Research Centre and Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. George Chung

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jia-Xuan Chen

    None, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Hala Fahs

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Yu Guan

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Thomas F Duchaine

    Goodman Cancer Research Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Matthias Selbach

    Department of Protein Dynamics, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Fabio Piano

    Department of Biology and Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Kristin C Gunsalus

    Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    kcg1@nyu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9769-4624

Funding

New York University Abu Dhabi (ADPHG CGSB)

  • Patricia Giselle Cipriani
  • Hala Fahs
  • Fabio Piano
  • Kristin C Gunsalus

New York University Abu Dhabi

  • Patricia Giselle Cipriani
  • Olivia Bay
  • John Zinno
  • Michelle Gutwein
  • Hin Hark Gan
  • George Chung
  • Fabio Piano
  • Kristin C Gunsalus

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 123352)

  • Vinay K Mayya
  • Thomas F Duchaine

Charlotte and Leo Karassik Foundation

  • Vinay K Mayya

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (0315362)

  • Jia-Xuan Chen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Cipriani et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,097
    views
  • 274
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Patricia Giselle Cipriani
  2. Olivia Bay
  3. John Zinno
  4. Michelle Gutwein
  5. Hin Hark Gan
  6. Vinay K Mayya
  7. George Chung
  8. Jia-Xuan Chen
  9. Hala Fahs
  10. Yu Guan
  11. Thomas F Duchaine
  12. Matthias Selbach
  13. Fabio Piano
  14. Kristin C Gunsalus
(2021)
Novel LOTUS-domain proteins are organizational hubs that recruit C. elegans Vasa to germ granules
eLife 10:e60833.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60833

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60833

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Róża K Przanowska, Yuechuan Chen ... Anindya Dutta
    Research Article

    The six-subunit ORC is essential for the initiation of DNA replication in eukaryotes. Cancer cell lines in culture can survive and replicate DNA replication after genetic inactivation of individual ORC subunits, ORC1, ORC2, or ORC5. In primary cells, ORC1 was dispensable in the mouse liver for endo-reduplication, but this could be explained by the ORC1 homolog, CDC6, substituting for ORC1 to restore functional ORC. Here, we have created mice with a conditional deletion of ORC2, which does not have a homolog. Although mouse embryo fibroblasts require ORC2 for proliferation, mouse hepatocytes synthesize DNA in cell culture and endo-reduplicate in vivo without ORC2. Mouse livers endo-reduplicate after simultaneous deletion of ORC1 and ORC2 both during normal development and after partial hepatectomy. Since endo-reduplication initiates DNA synthesis like normal S phase replication these results unequivocally indicate that primary cells, like cancer cell lines, can load MCM2-7 and initiate replication without ORC.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Pavan K Nayak, Arul Subramanian, Thomas F Schilling
    Research Article Updated

    Mechanical forces play a critical role in tendon development and function, influencing cell behavior through mechanotransduction signaling pathways and subsequent extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. Here, we investigate the molecular mechanisms by which tenocytes in developing zebrafish embryos respond to muscle contraction forces during the onset of swimming and cranial muscle activity. Using genome-wide bulk RNA sequencing of FAC-sorted tenocytes we identify novel tenocyte markers and genes involved in tendon mechanotransduction. Embryonic tendons show dramatic changes in expression of matrix remodeling associated 5b (mxra5b), matrilin 1 (matn1), and the transcription factor kruppel-like factor 2a (klf2a), as muscles start to contract. Using embryos paralyzed either by loss of muscle contractility or neuromuscular stimulation we confirm that muscle contractile forces influence the spatial and temporal expression patterns of all three genes. Quantification of these gene expression changes across tenocytes at multiple tendon entheses and myotendinous junctions reveals that their responses depend on force intensity, duration, and tissue stiffness. These force-dependent feedback mechanisms in tendons, particularly in the ECM, have important implications for improved treatments of tendon injuries and atrophy.