How oscillating aerodynamic forces explain the timbre of the hummingbird’s hum and other animals in flapping flight
Abstract
How hummingbirds hum is not fully understood, but its biophysical origin is encoded in the acoustic nearfield. Hence, we studied six freely hovering Anna's hummingbirds, performing acoustic nearfield holography using a 2176 microphone array in vivo, while also directly measuring the 3D aerodynamic forces using a new aerodynamic force platform. We corroborate the acoustic measurements by developing an idealized acoustic model that integrates the aerodynamic forces with wing kinematics, which shows how the timbre of the hummingbird's hum arises from the oscillating lift and drag forces on each wing. Comparing birds and insects, we find that the characteristic humming timbre and radiated power of their flapping wings originates from the higher harmonics in the aerodynamic forces that support their bodyweight. Our model analysis across insects and birds shows that allometric deviation makes larger birds quieter and elongated flies louder, while also clarifying complex bioacoustic behavior.
Data availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions presented in the paper are available on Dryad, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.73n5tb2vs.
-
Data from: How Oscillating Aerodynamic Forces Explain the Timbre of the Hummingbird's Hum and Other Animals in Flapping FlightDryad Digital Repository, 10.5061/dryad.73n5tb2vs.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Science Foundation (Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award,1552419)
- David Lentink
National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship)
- Ben J Hightower
Stanford University (Stanford Graduate Fellowship)
- Ben J Hightower
Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (Research Program ZERO (P15-06))
- Patrick W A Wijnings
Stanford University (Stanford Graduate Fellowship)
- Diana D Chin
National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (Graduate Fellowship)
- Diana D Chin
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Gordon J Berman, Emory University, United States
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All bird training and experimental procedures were approved by Stanford's Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care (APLAC-31426).
Version history
- Received: September 15, 2020
- Accepted: February 28, 2021
- Accepted Manuscript published: March 16, 2021 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: April 19, 2021 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2021, Hightower et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,524
- views
-
- 352
- downloads
-
- 5
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
Specific aerodynamic forces created by its wings explain the hum of the Hummingbird
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Evolutionary Biology
The emergence of new protein functions is crucial for the evolution of organisms. This process has been extensively researched for soluble enzymes, but it is largely unexplored for membrane transporters, even though the ability to acquire new nutrients from a changing environment requires evolvability of transport functions. Here, we demonstrate the importance of environmental pressure in obtaining a new activity or altering a promiscuous activity in members of the amino acid-polyamine-organocation (APC)-type yeast amino acid transporters family. We identify APC members that have broader substrate spectra than previously described. Using in vivo experimental evolution, we evolve two of these transporter genes, AGP1 and PUT4, toward new substrate specificities. Single mutations on these transporters are found to be sufficient for expanding the substrate range of the proteins, while retaining the capacity to transport all original substrates. Nonetheless, each adaptive mutation comes with a distinct effect on the fitness for each of the original substrates, illustrating a trade-off between the ancestral and evolved functions. Collectively, our findings reveal how substrate-adaptive mutations in membrane transporters contribute to fitness and provide insights into how organisms can use transporter evolution to explore new ecological niches.