Viral Maturation: How to package the RNA of HIV-1
Interactions between viral RNA and the integrase enzyme are required for HIV-1 particles to become infectious, a process that can be disrupted through multiple mechanisms.
- HIV Dynamics and Replication Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, United States
Virus particles rely on host cells to replicate and infect other cells. Key steps in this process include entry into the host cell, gene expression, and the production of new viral particles. For some viruses, including HIV-1, this last step starts with the assembly of immature, non-infectious virus particles; the complex process by which these particles mature is not fully understood.
Successful HIV-1 maturation culminates in the assembly of a conical-shaped core structure called the capsid, which encloses the viral RNA (vRNA) as well as two viral enzymes: reverse transcriptase, which produces DNA from vRNA, and integrase, which is best known for catalyzing the integration of vDNA into the genome of the host. It was shown many years ago that some deletions in the gene that codes for integrase result in a curious, eccentric core phenotype: empty capsids are formed and an electron-dense material, which is presumed to contain the vRNA, is present outside of the capsid (Engelman et al., 1995; Figure 1). This phenotype is associated with defects in multiple steps of the virus replication cycle, including reverse transcription.
Figure 1
Class II mutant viral integrases and eccentric core formation.
HIV-1 initially assembles into an immature virus particle (left; schematic diagram and electron micrograph), which subsequently undergoes a series of changes that result in the assembly of a mature capsid core (top right). Wild-type integrase (yellow circles) plays a key role during maturation by forming tetramers that interact with the viral RNA (pink strands) and ensure that it is packaged inside the capsid. Class II mutant integrases cause aberrant maturation (bottom right) due to direct or indirect loss of the interaction between the enzyme and the viral RNA: this results in the production of an eccentric complex containing the viral RNA outside the capsid. In these eccentric particles, the location of the integrases and whether they form tetramers is not known.
Image credit: Figure modified from Kleinpeter and Freed, 2020 (CC BY 4.0).
Following this discovery, numerous integrase mutants – known as class II mutants – were shown to display a similar wide-ranging phenotype (Jurado et al., 2013; Quillent et al., 1996). Multiple studies have suggested that these class II mutants have defects in reverse transcription, possibly because they have lost their vRNA, or because reverse transcriptase becomes physically separated from the genetic information upon infection of a target cell (Koneru et al., 2019; Madison et al., 2017). Now, in eLife, Sebla Kutluay of Washington University in St. Louis and colleagues – including Jennifer Elliot as first author – report how class II integrase substitutions impair the maturation of HIV-1 particles (Elliott et al., 2020).
First, Elliott et al. confirmed a previous observation: that the binding of integrase to vRNA may underpin its role during HIV-1 maturation (Kessl et al., 2016). The team examined replication defects induced by a panel of more than 25 class II integrase substitutions and, as expected, particle infectivity and reverse transcription products dropped in all mutants. Moreover, the class II substitutions disrupted the interactions between integrase and vRNA in three distinct ways.
For one subset of substitutions, the levels of integrase in both cells and virus particles were significantly decreased, suggesting that these mutations prevent the expression of integrase or its packaging inside new virus particles. The other two subsets involved the disruption of integrase binding to vRNA, rather than the packaging of the enzyme into the particles. Interestingly, many substitutions involve integrase residues outside the region previously implicated in RNA binding (Kessl et al., 2016). The second subset of mutations resulted in the interaction between the enzyme and vRNA being directly blocked, while the third subset led to interactions between integrase enzymes being impaired. In particular, fewer enzymes were able to form tetramers, the structures containing four copies of integrase that normally bind to vRNA.
Finally, Elliott et al. confirmed that the eccentric core phenotype was present in each of the mutants, and they observed lower amounts of vRNA in target cells just after infection. This suggests that without the protection of the capsid shell, exposure to the intracellular environment decreases the stability of the vRNA.
The recent discovery of a new class of HIV-1 inhibitors, known as ALLINIs (allosteric integrase inhibitors), is making these results particularly relevant (reviewed in Elliott and Kutluay, 2020; Engelman, 2019; Kleinpeter and Freed, 2020). These compounds induce aberrant integrase multimerization and therefore disrupt the binding of the enzyme to vRNA, resulting in particles with eccentric cores reminiscent of those found in class II mutants. Further characterization of these mutants, and of the role of integrase during HIV-1 maturation, may help in the development of ALLINIs as potential HIV-1 therapeutics.
This work also raises several questions. First, it is still unclear whether the integrase only helps the vRNA to be packaged into the capsid, or if it also participates in the construction of the capsid itself. While Elliott et al. show that capsids assembled in particles with mutant integrase are as stable as those assembled with the normal version of the enzyme, it was previously reported that ALLINIs and a class II integrase mutation disrupt the formation of the capsid (Fontana et al., 2015). Second, what happens to integrase when ‘empty’ capsids are assembled? The experiments by Elliott et al. reveal that mutant integrase enzymes, while physically associated with the capsid, are rapidly degraded after infection – potentially because they are located, unprotected, on the outside of the capsid. This suggests that in the absence of an interaction between integrase and vRNA, neither the enzyme nor the genetic material is packaged into the capsid, raising further questions about the molecular mechanisms driving packaging. Next, the fact that ALLINIs act by inducing aberrant integrase multimerization suggests that other classes of small molecules could be developed, which interfere with the packaging of vRNA into the capsid through different mechanisms. Finally, it remains unclear whether integrase enzymes in viruses related to HIV-1 also promote vRNA packaging into the capsid during maturation. Answering these questions will allow a greater understanding of how HIV-1 and related viruses mature, with implications for basic biology and new drug development.
References
-
Multifaceted HIV integrase functionalities and therapeutic strategies for their inhibitionJournal of Biological Chemistry 294:15137–15157.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.REV119.006901
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
- Version of Record published: November 17, 2020 (version 1)
Copyright
This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Metrics
-
- 828
- Page views
-
- 116
- Downloads
-
- 0
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Viral Maturation: How to package the RNA of HIV-1
eLife 9:e63585.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63585
Further reading
-
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Bacterial pneumonia in neonates can cause significant morbidity and mortality when compared to other childhood age groups. To understand the immune mechanisms that underlie these age-related differences, we employed a mouse model of E. coli pneumonia to determine the dynamic cellular and molecular differences in immune responsiveness between neonates (PND 3-5) and juveniles (PND 12-18), at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Cytokine gene expression from whole lung extracts was also quantified at these time points, using qRT-PCR. E. coli challenge resulted in rapid and significant increases in neutrophils, monocytes, and γδT cells, along with significant decreases in dendritic cells and alveolar macrophages in the lungs of both neonates and juveniles. E. coli challenged juvenile lung had significant increases in interstitial macrophages and recruited monocytes that were not observed in neonatal lungs. Expression of IFNg-responsive genes was positively correlated with the levels and dynamics of MHCII-expressing innate cells in neonatal and juvenile lungs. Several facets of immune responsiveness in the wild-type neonates were recapitulated in juvenile MHCII-/- juveniles. Employing a pre-clinical model of E. coli pneumonia, we identified significant differences in the early cellular and molecular dynamics in the lungs that likely contribute to the elevated susceptibility of neonates to bacterial pneumonia and could represent targets for intervention to improve respiratory outcomes and survivability of neonates.
-
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
tRNAs in bacteriophage genomes are widespread across bacterial host genera, but their exact function has remained unclear for more than 50 years. Several hypotheses have been proposed, and the most widely accepted one is codon compensation, which suggests that phages encode tRNAs that supplement codons that are less frequently used by the host. Here, we combine several observations and propose a new hypothesis that phage-encoded tRNAs counteract the tRNA-depleting strategies of the host using enzymes such as VapC, PrrC, Colicin D, and Colicin E5 to defend from viral infection. Based on mutational patterns of anticodon loops of tRNAs encoded by phages, we predict that these tRNAs are insensitive to host tRNAses. For phage-encoded tRNAs targeted in the anticodon itself, we observe that phages typically avoid encoding these tRNAs. Further supporting the hypothesis that phage tRNAs are selected to be insensitive to host anticodon nucleases. Altogether our results support the hypothesis that phage-encoded tRNAs have evolved to be insensitive to host anticodon nucleases.
