Trypanosomes of the Trypanosoma genus are protozoan haemoflagellates that can infect animals from all vertebrate classes, including warm-blooded mammals and birds as well as cold-blooded amphibians, reptiles, and fish. This genus contains human and animal pathogens, including the intracellular Trypanosoma cruzi (causing Human American Trypanosomiasis or Chagas’ disease), the extracellular T. brucei rhodesiense and T. brucei gambiense (causing Human African Trypanosomiasis or Sleeping Sickness) and T. congolense, T. vivax and T. b. brucei (causing Animal African Trypanosomiasis or Nagana) (Radwanska et al., 2018; Simpson et al., 2006). Among these, salivarian trypanosomes such as T. brucei ssp. live extracellularly in the bloodstream or tissue fluids of their host. For example, T. vivax can multiply rapidly and is evenly distributed throughout the cardiovascular system, T. congolense tends to aggregate in small blood vessels, whereas T. brucei especially can extravasate and multiply in interstitial tissues (reviewed by Magez and Caljon, 2011). Pathologically, anaemia appears to be a factor common to infections with most if not all trypanosomes although with different underlying causative mechanisms. These include, among others, erythrophagocytosis by macrophages (Cnops et al., 2015; Guegan et al., 2013), hemodilution (Naessens, 2006), erythrolysis through intermembrane transfer of variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) from trypanosomes to erythrocytes (Rifkin and Landsberger, 1990), oxidative stress from free radicals (Mishra et al., 2017) and mechanical damage through direct interaction of trypanosomes with erythrocytes surface (Boada-Sucre et al., 2016).

Immunologically, infections with trypanosomes are often associated with dysfunction and pathology related to exacerbated innate and adaptive immune responses (reviewed by Radwanska et al., 2018; Stijlemans et al., 2016). Initially, it was believed that antibody-dependent complement-mediated lysis was the major protective mechanism involved in early parasite control (Krettli et al., 1979; Musoke and Barbet, 1977). However, later studies revealed that at low antibody levels, trypanosomes can efficiently remove surface-bound antibodies through an endocytosis-mediated mechanisms (Engstler et al., 2007), and that complement C5-deficient mice are able to control the first-peak parasitaemia similarly to wild-type mice (La Greca et al., 2014). Instead, innate immune mediators such as IFNγ, TNFα, and nitric oxide (NO) were shown to be indispensable for the control of first-peak parasitaemia, through direct and indirect mechanisms (reviewed by Radwanska et al., 2018). In the early phase of infection, the timely induction of IFNγ by NK, NKT, and CD8⁺ cells Cnops et al., 2015 followed by the production of TNFα and NO by IFNγ-primed macrophages (Baral et al., 2007; Iraqi et al., 2001; Lopez et al., 2008; Lucas et al., 1994; Magez et al., 1993; Magez et al., 2007; Magez et al., 2006; Magez et al., 2001; Magez et al., 1999; O'Gorman et al., 2006; Sternberg and Mabbott, 1996; Wu et al., 2017) leads to effective control of first-peak parasitaemia. Glycosyl-inositol-phosphate soluble variant surface glycoproteins (GPI-VSG) released from the surface of trypanosomes were found to be the major inducers of TNFα in macrophages, and that such response could be primed by IFNγ (Coller et al., 2003; Magez et al., 2002). When macrophages would encounter GPI-VSG prior to IFNγ exposure, however, their TNFα and NO response would dramatically be reduced (Coller et al., 2003) which, depending on the timing, could either lead to macrophage unresponsiveness or prevent exacerbated inflammatory responses during the first-peak of parasite clearance. Altogether, these data made clear that an early innate immune response is crucial to control the acute phase of trypanosome infection, but that its tight regulation is critical to ensure parasite control as opposed to pathology.

All the findings above took advantage of the availability of several mice models for trypanosome infection using trypanosusceptible or trypanotolerant as well as mutant ‘knock-out’ mice strains. Although mice cannot be considered natural hosts of trypanosomes and do not always recapitulate all features of natural infections, the availability of such models allowed to gain insights into the general biology of trypanosomes, their interaction with and evasion of the host immune system, as well as into various aspects related to vaccine failure, antigenic variation, and (uncontrolled) inflammation (Magez and Caljon, 2011). The use of knock-out strains for example, shed specific light on the role of various cytokines, particularly TNFα, IFNγ, and IL-10, in the control of parasitaemia and in the induction of pathological conditions during infection (reviewed in Magez and Caljon, 2011). It would be ideal to be able to follow, in vivo, the early host responses to the infection and visualise the trypanosome response to the host’s attack. However, due to the lack of transparency of most mammalian hosts, this has not yet been feasible.

We recently reported the establishment of an experimental trypanosome infection of zebrafish (Danio rerio) with the fish-specific trypanosome Trypanosoma carassii (Dóró et al., 2019). In the latter study, by combining T. carassii infection of transparent zebrafish with high-resolution high-speed microscopy, we were able to describe in detail the swimming behaviour of trypanosomes in vivo, in the natural environment of blood and tissues of a live vertebrate host. This led to the discovery of novel attachment mechanisms as well as trypanosome swimming behaviours that otherwise would not have been observed in vitro (Dóró et al., 2019). Previous studies in common carp (Cyprinus carpio), goldfish (Carrassius aurata) and more recently zebrafish, demonstrated that infections with T. carassii present many of the pathological features observed during human or animal trypanosomiasis, including a pro-inflammatory response during first-peak parasitaemia (Kovacevic et al., 2015; Oladiran et al., 2011; Oladiran and Belosevic, 2009) polyclonal B and T cell activation (Joerink et al., 2007; Joerink et al., 2004; Lischke et al., 2000; Ribeiro et al., 2010; Woo and Ardelli, 2014) and anaemia (Dóró et al., 2019; Islam and Woo, 1991; McAllister et al., 2019). These shared features among human and animal (including fish) trypanosomiases suggest a commonality in (innate) immune responses to trypanosomes across different vertebrates.

Zebrafish are fresh water cyprinid fish closely related to many of the natural hosts of T. carassii (Kent et al., 1993; Simpson et al., 2006) and are a powerful model species owing to, among others, their genetic tractability, large number of transgenic lines marking several immune cell types, knock-out mutant lines and most importantly, the transparency of developing embryos allowing high-resolution in vivo visualisation of cell behaviour (Benard et al., 2015; Bertrand et al., 2010; Ellett et al., 2011; Langenau et al., 2004; Lawson and Weinstein, 2002; Page et al., 2013; Petrie-Hanson et al., 2009; Renshaw et al., 2006; White et al., 2008). During the first 2–3 weeks of development, zebrafish are devoid of mature T and B lymphocytes and thus offer a window of opportunity to study innate immune responses (Torraca et al., 2014; Torraca and Mostowy, 2018), especially those driven by neutrophils and macrophages. The response of macrophages and neutrophilic granulocytes towards several viral, fungal and bacterial pathogens has been studied in detail using zebrafish (Cronan and Tobin, 2014; García-Valtanen et al., 2017; Nguyen-Chi et al., 2014; Palha et al., 2013; Ramakrishnan, 2013; Renshaw and Trede, 2012; Rosowski et al., 2018; Torraca and Mostowy, 2018) but never before in the context of trypanosome infections.

Taking advantage of the recently established zebrafish-T. carassii infection model and of the availability of zebrafish transgenic lines marking macrophages and neutrophils as well as il1b- and tnfa-expressing cells, in the current study, we describe the early events of the innate immune response of zebrafish to T. carassii infections. Based on a novel clinical scoring system relying, amongst other criteria, on in vivo real-time monitoring of parasitaemia, we could consistently segregate larvae in high- and low-infected individuals without having to sacrifice the larvae. Between these individuals we always observed a marked differential response between macrophages and neutrophils, especially with respect to their proliferative capacity and redistribution in tissues or major blood vessels during infection. Significant differences were observed in the inflammatory response of macrophages in high- and low-infected individuals and in their susceptibility to the infection. In low-infected individuals, despite an early increase in macrophage number, a mild inflammatory response strongly associated with control of parasitaemia and survival to the infection was observed. Conversely, exclusively in high-infected individuals, we describe the occurrence of large, granular macrophages, reminiscent of foamy macrophages (Vallochi et al., 2018), characterised by a strong inflammatory profile and association to susceptibility to the infection. This is the first report of the occurrence of foamy macrophages during an extracellular trypanosome infection.

In this study, we describe the differential response of macrophages and neutrophils in vivo, during the early phase of trypanosome infection of larval zebrafish. Considering the prominent role of innate immune factors in determining the balance between pathology and control of first-peak parasitaemia in mammalian models of trypanosomiasis (Magez and Caljon, 2011; Radwanska et al., 2018; Stijlemans et al., 2017), the use of transparent zebrafish larvae, devoid of a fully developed adaptive immune system, allowed us to investigate the early events of the innate immune response to T. carassii infection in vivo. After having established a clinical scoring system of infected larvae, we were able to consistently differentiate high- and low-infected individuals, each associated with opposing susceptibility to the infection. In high-infected larvae, which fail to control first-peak parasitaemia, we observed a strong inflammatory response associated with the occurrence of foamy macrophages and susceptibility to the infection. Conversely, in low-infected individuals, which succeeded in controlling parasitaemia, we observed a moderate inflammatory response associated with resistance to the infection. Altogether these data confirm that also during trypanosome infection of zebrafish, innate immunity is sufficient to control first-peak parasitaemia and that a controlled inflammatory response is beneficial to the host.

Using transgenic lines marking macrophages and neutrophils, total cell fluorescence and cell proliferation analysis revealed that T. carassii infection triggers macrophage division, particularly in low-infected individuals. Although to a much lesser extent, neutrophils also responded to the infection by dividing. The total number of neutrophils, however, was comparatively low and likely did not contribute to the total cell fluorescence measured in our whole larvae analysis. It cannot be excluded however, that neutrophils’ viability was affected by the infection and that the number of newly divided neutrophils is only slightly higher than the dying ones. Although neutrophils were recently implicated in promoting the onset of tsetse fly-mediated trypanosome infections in mouse dermis, macrophage-derived immune mediators, such as NO and TNFα were confirmed to played a more prominent role in the control of first-peak parasitaemia and in the regulation of the overall inflammatory response (Caljon et al., 2018).

The observation that in low-infected individuals the number of macrophages was significantly increased by 4–5 dpi, the time point at which clear differences in parasitaemia were apparent between the two infected groups, suggests a role for macrophages, or for macrophage-derived factors in first-peak parasitaemia control. Phagocytosis however, can be excluded as one of the possible contributing factors since motile T. carassii, similar to other extracellular trypanosomes (Caljon et al., 2018; Saeij et al., 2003; Scharsack et al., 2003), cannot be engulfed by any innate immune cell (Video 7). A strong inflammatory response is also not required for trypanosomes control, since in low-infected individuals, only moderate il1b or tnfα expression was observed, mostly in macrophages, as assessed using transgenic zebrafish reporter lines. Our data are in agreement with several previous studies using trypanoresistant (BALB/c) or trypanosusceptible (C57Bl/6) mice that revealed the double-edge sword of pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNFα or IFNγ during trypanosome infection in mammalian models (reviewed by Radwanska et al., 2018; Stijlemans et al., 2007). These studies showed that a timely but controlled expression of IFNγ, TNFα, and NO, contributed to trypanosomes control via direct (Daulouède et al., 2001; Iraqi et al., 2001; Lucas et al., 1994) or indirect mechanisms (Kaushik et al., 1999; Magez et al., 2007; Magez et al., 2006; Mansfield and Paulnock, 2005; Namangala et al., 2001; Noël et al., 2002). Conversely, in individuals in which an uncontrolled inflammatory response took place, immunosuppression and inflammation-related pathology occurred (Namangala et al., 2009; Namangala et al., 2001; Noël et al., 2004; Stijlemans et al., 2016). The stark contrast between the mild inflammatory response observed in low-infected individuals and the exacerbated response observed in high-infected larvae, strongly resembles the opposing responses generally observed in the aforementioned studies in mice. Owing to the possibility to monitor the infection at the individual level, it was possible to observe such responses within a population of outbred zebrafish larvae. Although we were unable to investigate the specific role of Tnfα during T. carassii infection of zebrafish, due to the unavailability of tnfα-/- zebrafish lines or the unsuitability of morpholinos for transient knock-down at late stages of development, we previously reported that recombinant zebrafish (as well as carp and trout) Tnfα, are all able to directly lyse T. brucei (Forlenza et al., 2009). In the same study, we reported that also during Trypanoplasma borreli (kinetoplastid) infection of common carp, soluble as well as transmembrane carp Tnfα play a crucial role in both, trypanosome control and susceptibility to the infection. Thus, considering the evolutionary conservation of the lectin-like activity among vertebrate’s TNFα (Daulouède et al., 2001; Forlenza et al., 2009; Lucas et al., 1994; Magez et al., 1997), it is possible that the direct lytic activity of zebrafish Tnfα may have played a role in the control of first-peak parasitaemia in low-infected individuals. In the future, using tnfα-/- zebrafish lines, possibly in combination with ifnγ reporter or ifnγ-/- lines, it will be possible to investigate in detail the relative contribution of these inflammatory mediators in the control of parasitaemia as well as onset of inflammation.

Video 7

Download asset

There are multiple potential explanations for the inability of high-infected larvae to control parasitaemia and the overt inflammatory response. Using various comparative mice infection models, it became apparent that while TNFα production is required for parasitaemia control, a timely shedding of TNFα Receptor-2 (TNFR2) is necessary to limit TNFα-mediated infection-associated immunopathology (Radwanska et al., 2018). Furthermore, during T. brucei infection in mice and cattle, continuous cleavage of membrane glycosyl-phosphatidyl-inisotol (GPI)-anchored VSG (mVSG-GPI) leads to shedding of the soluble VSG-GIP (sVSG-GPI), while the di-myristoyl-glycerol compound (DMG) is left in the membrane. While the galactose-residues of sVSG-GPI constituted the minimal moiety required for optimal TNFα production, the DMG compound of mVSG contributed to macrophage overactivation (TNFα and IL-1β secretion) (Magez et al., 2002; Magez et al., 1998; Sileghem et al., 2001). Although T. carassii was shown to possess a surface dominated by GPI-anchored carbohydrate-rich mucin-like glycoproteins, not subject to antigenic variation (Lischke et al., 2000; Overath et al., 2001), components of its excreted/secreted proteome, together with phospholipase C-cleaved GPI-anchored surface proteins, have all been shown to play a role in immunogenicity (Joerink et al., 2007), inflammation (Oladiran and Belosevic, 2010; Oladiran and Belosevic, 2009; Ribeiro et al., 2010) as well as immunosuppression (Oladiran and Belosevic, 2012). Thus, the over-activation caused by the presence of elevated levels of pro-inflammatory trypanosome-derived moieties, combined with the lack of a timely secretion of regulatory molecules (e.g. soluble TNFR2) that could control the host response, may all have contributed to the exacerbated inflammation observed in high-infected individuals.

Given the differential response observed in low- and high-infected individuals, especially with respect to macrophage distribution and activation, we attempted to investigate the specific role of macrophages in the protection or susceptibility to T. carassii infection. To this end, the use of a cross between the Tg(mpeg1:Gal4FF)^gl2 (Ellett et al., 2011) and the Tg(UAS-E1b:Eco.NfsB-mCherry)^c26 (Davison et al., 2007) line, which would have allowed the timed metronidazole (MTZ)-mediated depletion of macrophages in zebrafish larvae, was considered. Unfortunately, in vitro analysis of the effect of MTZ on the trypanosome itself, revealed that trypanosomes are susceptible to MTZ, rendering the nfsB line not suitable to investigate the role of macrophages (nor neutrophils) during this particular type of infection. Alternatively, we attempted to administer liposome-encapsulated clodronate (Lipo-clodronate) as described previously (Nguyen-Chi et al., 2017; Phan et al., 2018; Travnickova et al., 2015). In our hands, however, administration of 5 mg/ml Lipo-clodronate (3 nl) to five dpf larvae (instead of 2–3 dpf larvae), led to the rapid development of oedema.

Besides differences between the overall macrophage and neutrophil (inflammatory) response, the differential distribution of these cells was also investigated in vivo during infection utilising the transparency of the zebrafish and the availability of transgenic lines marking the vasculature. Neutrophils were never observed inside the cardinal caudal vein although in infected individuals they were certainly recruited and were observed in close contact with the outer vessel’s endothelium. Conversely, macrophages could be seen both outside and inside the vessel and the total proportion differed between high- and low-infected individuals. While in low-infected individuals the majority of macrophages recruited to the cardinal caudal vein remained outside the vessel in close contact with the endothelium, in high-infected individuals the majority of macrophages were recruited inside the caudal vein and were tightly attached to the luminal vessel wall. To our knowledge, such detailed description of the relative (re)distribution of neutrophils and macrophages, in vivo, during a trypanosome infection, has not been reported before.

Interestingly, exclusively in high-infected individuals, by 4 dpi large, round, dark, and granular cells were observed, already under the bright field view, in the lumen of the cardinal caudal vein. These cells were confirmed to be foamy macrophages with high cytoplasmic lipid content. Foam cells, or foamy macrophages have been named after the lipid bodies accumulated in their cytoplasm leading to their typical enlarged morphological appearance (Dvorak et al., 1983), but are also distinguished by the presence of diverse cytoplasmic organelles (Melo et al., 2003). Foam cells have been shown to be typical of atherosclerotic plaques associated to various inflammatory metabolic diseases (e.g. hyperlipidemia, diabetes, insulin resistance and obesity) as well as cancer (e.g. Papillary renal cell carcinoma, Esophageal xanthoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma) and autoimmune diseases e.g. multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis (reviewed in Guerrini and Gennaro, 2019; Saka and Valdivia, 2012). Besides inflammatory diseases, they have also been associated with several (intracellular) infectious diseases, including Leishmaniasis, Chagas disease, experimental malaria, toxoplasmosis, tuberculosis and other intracellular bacterial infections (reviewed in Guerrini and Gennaro, 2019; López-Muñoz et al., 2018; Vallochi et al., 2018) but never before with (extracellular) trypanosome infection. For example, during T. cruzi infection of rat, increased numbers of activated monocytes or macrophages were reported in the blood or heart (Melo and Machado, 2001). Interestingly, trypanosome uptake was shown to directly initiate the formation of lipid bodies in macrophages, leading to the appearance of foamy macrophages (D'Avila et al., 2011). During human Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections, foamy macrophages play a role in sustaining the presence of bacteria and contribute to tissue cavitation enabling the spread of the infection (Russell et al., 2009). Independently of the disease, it is clear that foamy macrophages are generally associated with inflammation, since their cytoplasmic lipid bodies are a source of eicosanoids, strong mediators of inflammation (Melo et al., 2006; Wymann and Schneiter, 2008). In turn, inflammatory mediators such as Prostaglandin E2 benefit trypanosome survival, as shown in Trypanosoma, Leishmania, Plasmodium, and Toxoplasma infections (reviewed in Vallochi et al., 2018). Our results are consistent with these reports as we show the occurrence of foamy macrophages exclusively in individuals that developed high parasitaemia, characterised by a strong pro-inflammatory response, and ultimately succumbed to the infection. Although we did not systematically investigate the exact kinetics of parasitaemia development in correlation with foamy macrophages occurrence, during our in vivo monitoring, we consistently observed that the increase in trypanosome number preceded the appearance of foamy macrophages. It is possible that, in high-infected individuals, foamy macrophages are formed due to the necessity to clear the increasing concentration of circulating trypanosome-derived moieties or of dying trypanosomes. The interaction with trypanosome-derived molecules, including soluble surface (glyco)proteins or trypanosome DNA, may not only be responsible for the activation of pro-inflammatory pathways, but also for a change in cell metabolism. The occurrence of foamy macrophages has been reported for intracellular trypanosomatids (T. cruzi, Leishmania), and arachidonic acid-derived lipids were reported to act as regulators of the host immune response and trypanosome burden during T. brucei infections (López-Muñoz et al., 2018). To our knowledge, our study is the first to report the presence of foamy macrophages during an extracellular trypanosome infection.

The possibility to detect the occurrence of large, granular cells already in the bright field and the availability of transgenic lines that allowed us to identify these cells as macrophages, further emphasizes the power of the zebrafish model. It allowed us to visualise in vivo, in real time, not only their occurrence but also their differential distribution with respect to other macrophages or neutrophils. Observations that we might have missed if we for example were to bleed an animal, perform immunohistochemistry or gene expression analysis. Thus, the possibility to separate high- and low-infected animals without the need to sacrifice them, allowed us to follow at the individual level the progression of the infection and the ensuing differential immune response.

In the future, it will be interesting to analyse the transcription profiles of sorted macrophage populations from low- and high-infected larvae. Given the marked heterogeneity in macrophage activation observed especially within high-infected individuals, single-cell transcriptome analysis, of foamy macrophages in particular, may provide insights in the differential activation state of the various macrophage phenotypes. Furthermore, the zebrafish has already emerged as a valuable animal model to study inflammation and host-pathogen interaction and can be a powerful complementary tool to examine macrophage plasticity and polarisation in vivo, by truly reflecting the complex nature of the environment during an ongoing infection in a live host. Finally, the availability of (partly) transparent adult zebrafish lines (Antinucci and Hindges, 2016; White et al., 2008), may aid the in vivo analysis of macrophage activation in adult individuals.

Altogether, in this study, we describe the innate immune response of zebrafish larvae to T. carassii infection. The transparency and availability of various transgenic zebrafish lines, enabled us to establish a clinical scoring system that allowed us to monitor parasitaemia development and describe the differential response of neutrophils and macrophages at the individual level. Interestingly, for the first time in an extracellular trypanosome infection, we report the occurrence of foamy macrophages, characterised by a high-lipid content and strong inflammatory profile, associated with susceptibility to the infection. Our model paves the way to investigate which mediators of the trypanosomes are responsible for the induction of such inflammatory response as well as study the conditions that lead to the formation of foamy macrophages in vivo.

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9.

1. 1. Antinucci P
   2. Hindges R

   (2016) A crystal-clear zebrafish for in vivo imaging

   Scientific Reports 6:29490.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29490

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Baral TN
   2. De Baetselier P
   3. Brombacher F
   4. Magez S

   (2007) Control of Trypanosoma evansi infection is IgM mediated and does not require a type I inflammatory response

   The Journal of Infectious Diseases 195:1513–1520.

   https://doi.org/10.1086/515577

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Benard EL
   2. Racz PI
   3. Rougeot J
   4. Nezhinsky AE
   5. Verbeek FJ
   6. Spaink HP
   7. Meijer AH

   (2015) Macrophage-expressed perforins mpeg1 and mpeg1.2 have an anti-bacterial function in zebrafish

   Journal of Innate Immunity 7:136–152.

   https://doi.org/10.1159/000366103

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Bertrand JY
   2. Chi NC
   3. Santoso B
   4. Teng S
   5. Stainier DY
   6. Traver D

   (2010) Haematopoietic stem cells derive directly from aortic endothelium during development

   Nature 464:108–111.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08738

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Boada-Sucre AA
   2. Rossi Spadafora MS
   3. Tavares-Marques LM
   4. Finol HJ
   5. Reyna-Bello A

   (2016) Trypanosoma vivax adhesion to red blood cells in experimentally infected sheep

   Pathology Research International 2016:1–9.

   https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4503214

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Caljon G
   2. Mabille D
   3. Stijlemans B
   4. De Trez C
   5. Mazzone M
   6. Tacchini-Cottier F
   7. Malissen M
   8. Van Ginderachter JA
   9. Magez S
   10. De Baetselier P
   11. Van Den Abbeele J

   (2018) Neutrophils enhance early Trypanosoma brucei infection onset

   Scientific Reports 8:11203.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29527-y

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Carten JD
   2. Bradford MK
   3. Farber SA

   (2011) Visualizing digestive organ morphology and function using differential fatty acid metabolism in live zebrafish

   Developmental Biology 360:276–285.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.09.010

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Chi NC
   2. Shaw RM
   3. De Val S
   4. Kang G
   5. Jan LY
   6. Black BL
   7. Stainier DY

   (2008) Foxn4 directly regulates tbx2b expression and atrioventricular canal formation

   Genes & Development 22:734–739.

   https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1629408

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Cnops J
   2. De Trez C
   3. Stijlemans B
   4. Keirsse J
   5. Kauffmann F
   6. Barkhuizen M
   7. Keeton R
   8. Boon L
   9. Brombacher F
   10. Magez S

   (2015) NK-, NKT- and CD8-Derived ifnγ drives myeloid cell activation and Erythrophagocytosis, resulting in Trypanosomosis-Associated acute Anemia

   PLOS Pathogens 11:e1004964.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004964

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Coller SP
    2. Mansfield JM
    3. Paulnock DM

    (2003) Glycosylinositolphosphate soluble variant surface glycoprotein inhibits IFN-γ-Induced nitric oxide production via reduction in STAT1 phosphorylation in african trypanosomiasis

    The Journal of Immunology 171:1466–1472.

    https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.171.3.1466

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Cronan MR
    2. Tobin DM

    (2014) Fit for consumption: zebrafish as a model for tuberculosis

    Disease Models & Mechanisms 7:777–784.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.016089

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. D'Avila H
    2. Freire-de-Lima CG
    3. Roque NR
    4. Teixeira L
    5. Barja-Fidalgo C
    6. Silva AR
    7. Melo RC
    8. Dosreis GA
    9. Castro-Faria-Neto HC
    10. Bozza PT

    (2011) Host cell lipid bodies triggered by Trypanosoma cruzi infection and enhanced by the uptake of apoptotic cells are associated with prostaglandin E₂ generation and increased parasite growth

    The Journal of Infectious Diseases 204:951–961.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir432

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Daulouède S
    2. Bouteille B
    3. Moynet D
    4. De Baetselier P
    5. Courtois P
    6. Lemesre JL
    7. Buguet A
    8. Cespuglio R
    9. Vincendeau P

    (2001) Human macrophage tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha production induced by Trypanosoma brucei gambiense and the role of TNF-alpha in parasite control

    The Journal of Infectious Diseases 183:988–991.

    https://doi.org/10.1086/319257

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Davison JM
    2. Akitake CM
    3. Goll MG
    4. Rhee JM
    5. Gosse N
    6. Baier H
    7. Halpern ME
    8. Leach SD
    9. Parsons MJ

    (2007) Transactivation from Gal4-VP16 transgenic insertions for tissue-specific cell labeling and ablation in zebrafish

    Developmental Biology 304:811–824.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.033

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Dóró É
    2. Jacobs SH
    3. Hammond FR
    4. Schipper H
    5. Pieters RP
    6. Carrington M
    7. Wiegertjes GF
    8. Forlenza M

    (2019) Visualizing trypanosomes in a vertebrate host reveals novel swimming behaviours, adaptations and attachment mechanisms

    eLife 8:e48388.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48388

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Dvorak AM
    2. Dvorak HF
    3. Peters SP
    4. Shulman ES
    5. MacGlashan DW
    6. Pyne K
    7. Harvey VS
    8. Galli SJ
    9. Lichtenstein LM

    (1983)

    Lipid bodies: cytoplasmic organelles important to arachidonate metabolism in macrophages and mast cells

    Journal of Immunology 131:2965–2976.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Ellett F
    2. Pase L
    3. Hayman JW
    4. Andrianopoulos A
    5. Lieschke GJ

    (2011) mpeg1 promoter transgenes direct macrophage-lineage expression in zebrafish

    Blood 117:e49–e56.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-10-314120

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Engstler M
    2. Pfohl T
    3. Herminghaus S
    4. Boshart M
    5. Wiegertjes G
    6. Heddergott N
    7. Overath P

    (2007) Hydrodynamic flow-mediated protein sorting on the cell surface of trypanosomes

    Cell 131:505–515.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.046

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Forlenza M
    2. Magez S
    3. Scharsack JP
    4. Westphal A
    5. Savelkoul HF
    6. Wiegertjes GF

    (2009) Receptor-mediated and lectin-like activities of carp (Cyprinus carpio) TNF-alpha

    Journal of Immunology 183:5319–5332.

    https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0901780

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Forlenza M
    2. Kaiser T
    3. Savelkoul HF
    4. Wiegertjes GF

    (2012) The use of real-time quantitative PCR for the analysis of cytokine mRNA levels

    Methods in Molecular Biology 820:7–23.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-439-1_2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. García-Valtanen P
    2. Martínez-López A
    3. López-Muñoz A
    4. Bello-Perez M
    5. Medina-Gali RM
    6. Ortega-Villaizán MD
    7. Varela M
    8. Figueras A
    9. Mulero V
    10. Novoa B
    11. Estepa A
    12. Coll J

    (2017) Zebra fish lacking adaptive immunity acquire an antiviral alert state characterized by upregulated gene expression of apoptosis, multigene families, and interferon-related genes

    Frontiers in Immunology 8:121.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00121

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Guegan F
    2. Plazolles N
    3. Baltz T
    4. Coustou V

    (2013) Erythrophagocytosis of desialylated red blood cells is responsible for anaemia during Trypanosoma vivax infection

    Cellular Microbiology 15:1285–1303.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12123

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Guerrini V
    2. Gennaro ML

    (2019) Foam cells: one size Doesn't fit all

    Trends in Immunology 40:1163–1179.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2019.10.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Iraqi F
    2. Sekikawa K
    3. Rowlands J
    4. Teale A

    (2001) Susceptibility of tumour necrosis factor-alpha genetically deficient mice to Trypanosoma congolense infection

    Parasite Immunology 23:445–451.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3024.2001.00401.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Islam A
    2. Woo PTK

    (1991) Anemia and its mechanism in goldfish Carassius auratus infected with Trypanosoma danilewskyi

    Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 11:37–43.

    https://doi.org/10.3354/dao011037

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Jin SW
    2. Beis D
    3. Mitchell T
    4. Chen JN
    5. Stainier DY

    (2005) Cellular and molecular analyses of vascular tube and lumen formation in zebrafish

    Development 132:5199–5209.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02087

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. Conference

    1. Joerink M
    2. Saeij J
    3. Stafford J
    4. Belosevic M
    5. Wiegertjes G

    (2004)

    Animal models for the study of innate immunity: protozoan infections in fish

    Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology. pp. 67–89.

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Joerink M
    2. Groeneveld A
    3. Ducro B
    4. Savelkoul HF
    5. Wiegertjes GF

    (2007) Mixed infection with Trypanoplasma borreli and Trypanosoma carassii induces protection: involvement of cross-reactive antibodies

    Developmental & Comparative Immunology 31:903–915.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2006.12.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Kaushik RS
    2. Uzonna JE
    3. Gordon JR
    4. Tabel H

    (1999) Innate resistance to Trypanosoma congolense infections: differential production of nitric oxide by macrophages from susceptible BALB/c and resistant C57Bl/6 mice

    Experimental Parasitology 92:131–143.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/expr.1999.4408

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Kent ML
    2. Lom J
    3. Dyková I
    4. Dykova I

    (1993) Protozoan parasites of fishes

    The Journal of Parasitology 79:673.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/3283600

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Kovacevic N
    2. Hagen MO
    3. Xie J
    4. Belosevic M

    (2015) The analysis of the acute phase response during the course of Trypanosoma carassii infection in the goldfish (Carassius auratus L.)

    Developmental & Comparative Immunology 53:112–122.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2015.06.009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Krettli AU
    2. Weisz-Carrington P
    3. Nussenzweig RS

    (1979)

    Membrane-bound antibodies to bloodstream Trypanosoma cruzi in mice: strain differences in susceptibility to complement-mediated lysis

    Clinical and Experimental Immunology 37:416–423.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. La Greca F
    2. Haynes C
    3. Stijlemans B
    4. De Trez C
    5. Magez S

    (2014) Antibody-mediated control of Trypanosoma vivax infection fails in the absence of tumour necrosis factor

    Parasite Immunology 36:271–276.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/pim.12106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Langenau DM
    2. Ferrando AA
    3. Traver D
    4. Kutok JL
    5. Hezel JP
    6. Kanki JP
    7. Zon LI
    8. Look AT
    9. Trede NS

    (2004) In vivo tracking of T cell development, ablation, and engraftment in transgenic zebrafish

    PNAS 101:7369–7374.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402248101

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Lawson ND
    2. Weinstein BM

    (2002) In vivo imaging of embryonic vascular development using transgenic zebrafish

    Developmental Biology 248:307–318.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2002.0711

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Lischke A
    2. Klein C
    3. Stierhof YD
    4. Hempel M
    5. Mehlert A
    6. Almeida IC
    7. Ferguson MA
    8. Overath P

    (2000) Isolation and characterization of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored, mucin-like surface glycoproteins from bloodstream forms of the freshwater-fish parasite Trypanosoma carassii

    Biochemical Journal 345:693–700.

    https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3450693

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Lopez R
    2. Demick KP
    3. Mansfield JM
    4. Paulnock DM

    (2008) Type I IFNs play a role in early resistance, but subsequent susceptibility, to the african trypanosomes

    The Journal of Immunology 181:4908–4917.

    https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.181.7.4908

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. López-Muñoz RA
    2. Molina-Berríos A
    3. Campos-Estrada C
    4. Abarca-Sanhueza P
    5. Urrutia-Llancaqueo L
    6. Peña-Espinoza M
    7. Maya JD

    (2018) Inflammatory and Pro-resolving lipids in trypanosomatid infections: a key to understanding parasite control

    Frontiers in Microbiology 9:1961.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01961

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Lucas R
    2. Magez S
    3. De Leys R
    4. Fransen L
    5. Scheerlinck JP
    6. Rampelberg M
    7. Sablon E
    8. De Baetselier P

    (1994) Mapping the lectin-like activity of tumor necrosis factor

    Science 263:814–817.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8303299

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Magez S
    2. Lucas R
    3. Darji A
    4. Songa EB
    5. Hamers R
    6. De Baetselier P

    (1993) Murine tumour necrosis factor plays a protective role during the initial phase of the experimental infection with Trypanosoma brucei brucei

    Parasite Immunology 15:635–641.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3024.1993.tb00577.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Magez S
    2. Geuskens M
    3. Beschin A
    4. del Favero H
    5. Verschueren H
    6. Lucas R
    7. Pays E
    8. de Baetselier P

    (1997) Specific uptake of tumor necrosis factor-alpha is involved in growth control of Trypanosoma brucei

    Journal of Cell Biology 137:715–727.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.137.3.715

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Magez S
    2. Stijlemans B
    3. Radwanska M
    4. Pays E
    5. Ferguson MA
    6. De Baetselier P

    (1998)

    The Glycosyl-Inositol-Phosphate and dimyristoylglycerol moieties of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor of the trypanosome Variant-Specific surface glycoprotein are distinct Macrophage-Activating factors

    Journal of Immunology 160:1949–1956.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Magez S
    2. Radwanska M
    3. Beschin A
    4. Sekikawa K
    5. De Baetselier P

    (1999) Tumor necrosis factor alpha is a key mediator in the regulation of experimental Trypanosoma brucei infections

    Infection and Immunity 67:3128–3132.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.67.6.3128-3132.1999

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Magez S
    2. Radwanska M
    3. Stijlemans B
    4. Xong HV
    5. Pays E
    6. De Baetselier P

    (2001) A conserved flagellar pocket exposed high mannose moiety is used by african trypanosomes as a host cytokine binding molecule

    Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:33458–33464.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M103412200

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Magez S
    2. Stijlemans B
    3. Baral T
    4. De Baetselier P

    (2002) VSG-GPI anchors of african trypanosomes: their role in macrophage activation and induction of infection-associated immunopathology

    Microbes and Infection 4:999–1006.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1286-4579(02)01617-9

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Magez S
    2. Radwanska M
    3. Drennan M
    4. Fick L
    5. Baral TN
    6. Brombacher F
    7. De Baetselier P

    (2006) Interferon-gamma and nitric oxide in combination with antibodies are key protective host immune factors during Trypanosoma congolense Tc13 infections

    The Journal of Infectious Diseases 193:1575–1583.

    https://doi.org/10.1086/503808

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Magez S
    2. Radwanska M
    3. Drennan M
    4. Fick L
    5. Baral TN
    6. Allie N
    7. Jacobs M
    8. Nedospasov S
    9. Brombacher F
    10. Ryffel B
    11. De Baetselier P

    (2007) Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-1 (TNFp55) signal transduction and macrophage-derived soluble TNF are crucial for nitric oxide-mediated Trypanosoma congolense parasite killing

    The Journal of Infectious Diseases 196:954–962.

    https://doi.org/10.1086/520815

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Magez S
    2. Caljon G

    (2011) Mouse models for pathogenic african trypanosomes: unravelling the immunology of host-parasite-vector interactions

    Parasite Immunology 33:423–429.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3024.2011.01293.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Mansfield JM
    2. Paulnock DM

    (2005) Regulation of innate and acquired immunity in african trypanosomiasis

    Parasite Immunology 27:361–371.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3024.2005.00791.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Marjoram L
    2. Alvers A
    3. Deerhake ME
    4. Bagwell J
    5. Mankiewicz J
    6. Cocchiaro JL
    7. Beerman RW
    8. Willer J
    9. Sumigray KD
    10. Katsanis N
    11. Tobin DM
    12. Rawls JF
    13. Goll MG
    14. Bagnat M

    (2015) Epigenetic control of intestinal barrier function and inflammation in zebrafish

    PNAS 112:2770–2775.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424089112

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. McAllister M
    2. Phillips N
    3. Belosevic M

    (2019) Trypanosoma carassii infection in goldfish (Carassius auratus L.): changes in the expression of erythropoiesis and Anemia regulatory genes

    Parasitology Research 118:1147–1158.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06246-5

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Melo RC
    2. D'Avila H
    3. Fabrino DL
    4. Almeida PE
    5. Bozza PT

    (2003) Macrophage lipid body induction by chagas disease in vivo: putative intracellular domains for eicosanoid formation during infection

    Tissue and Cell 35:59–67.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-8166(02)00105-2

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Melo RC
    2. Fabrino DL
    3. Dias FF
    4. Parreira GG

    (2006) Lipid bodies: structural markers of inflammatory macrophages in innate immunity

    Inflammation Research 55:342–348.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-006-5205-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Melo RC
    2. Machado CR

    (2001) Trypanosoma cruzi: peripheral blood monocytes and heart macrophages in the resistance to acute experimental infection in rats

    Experimental Parasitology 97:15–23.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/expr.2000.4576

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Mishra RR
    2. Senapati SK
    3. Sahoo SC

    (2017)

    Trypanosomiasis induced oxidative stress and hemato-biochemical alteration in cattle

    Artic J Entomol Zool Stud 5:721–727.

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Musoke AJ
    2. Barbet AF

    (1977) Activation of complement by variant-specific surface antigen of Trypanosoma brucei

    Nature 270:438–440.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/270438a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Naessens J

    (2006) Bovine trypanotolerance: a natural ability to prevent severe anaemia and haemophagocytic syndrome?

    International Journal for Parasitology 36:521–528.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.02.012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Namangala B
    2. Noël W
    3. De Baetselier P
    4. Brys L
    5. Beschin A

    (2001) Relative contribution of interferon-gamma and interleukin-10 to resistance to murine african trypanosomosis

    The Journal of Infectious Diseases 183:1794–1800.

    https://doi.org/10.1086/320731

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Namangala B
    2. De Baetselier P
    3. Beschin A

    (2009) Both type-I and type-II responses contribute to murine trypanotolerance

    Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 71:313–318.

    https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.71.313

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Nguyen-Chi M
    2. Phan QT
    3. Gonzalez C
    4. Dubremetz JF
    5. Levraud JP
    6. Lutfalla G

    (2014) Transient infection of the zebrafish notochord with E. coli induces chronic inflammation

    Disease Models & Mechanisms 7:871–882.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.014498

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Nguyen-Chi M
    2. Laplace-Builhe B
    3. Travnickova J
    4. Luz-Crawford P
    5. Tejedor G
    6. Phan QT
    7. Duroux-Richard I
    8. Levraud JP
    9. Kissa K
    10. Lutfalla G
    11. Jorgensen C
    12. Djouad F

    (2015) Identification of polarized macrophage subsets in zebrafish

    eLife 4:e07288.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07288

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Nguyen-Chi M
    2. Laplace-Builhé B
    3. Travnickova J
    4. Luz-Crawford P
    5. Tejedor G
    6. Lutfalla G
    7. Kissa K
    8. Jorgensen C
    9. Djouad F

    (2017) TNF signaling and macrophages govern fin regeneration in zebrafish larvae

    Cell Death & Disease 8:e2979.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2017.374

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Noël W
    2. Hassanzadeh G
    3. Raes G
    4. Namangala B
    5. Daems I
    6. Brys L
    7. Brombacher F
    8. Baetselier PD
    9. Beschin A

    (2002) Infection stage-dependent modulation of macrophage activation in Trypanosoma congolense-resistant and -susceptible mice

    Infection and Immunity 70:6180–6187.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.11.6180-6187.2002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Noël W
    2. Raes G
    3. Hassanzadeh Ghassabeh G
    4. De Baetselier P
    5. Beschin A

    (2004) Alternatively activated macrophages during parasite infections

    Trends in Parasitology 20:126–133.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2004.01.004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. O'Gorman GM
    2. Park SD
    3. Hill EW
    4. Meade KG
    5. Mitchell LC
    6. Agaba M
    7. Gibson JP
    8. Hanotte O
    9. Naessens J
    10. Kemp SJ
    11. MacHugh DE

    (2006) Cytokine mRNA profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from trypanotolerant and trypanosusceptible cattle infected with Trypanosoma congolense

    Physiological Genomics 28:53–61.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00100.2006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Oladiran A
    2. Beauparlant D
    3. Belosevic M

    (2011) The expression analysis of inflammatory and antimicrobial genes in the goldfish (Carassius auratus L.) infected with Trypanosoma carassii

    Fish & Shellfish Immunology 31:606–613.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2011.07.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Oladiran A
    2. Belosevic M

    (2009) Trypanosoma carassii hsp70 increases expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in macrophages of the goldfish (Carassius auratus L.)

    Developmental & Comparative Immunology 33:1128–1136.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2009.06.003

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Oladiran A
    2. Belosevic M

    (2010) Trypanosoma carassii calreticulin binds host complement component C1q and inhibits classical complement pathway-mediated lysis

    Developmental & Comparative Immunology 34:396–405.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2009.11.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Oladiran A
    2. Belosevic M

    (2012) Recombinant glycoprotein 63 (Gp63) of Trypanosoma carassii suppresses antimicrobial responses of goldfish (Carassius auratus L.) monocytes and macrophages

    International Journal for Parasitology 42:621–633.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.04.012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Overath P
    2. Ruoff J
    3. Stierhof YD
    4. Haag J
    5. Tichy H
    6. Dyková I
    7. Lom J

    (1998) Cultivation of bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma carassii, a common parasite of freshwater fish

    Parasitology Research 84:343–347.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s004360050408

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Overath P
    2. Haag J
    3. Lischke A
    4. O'hUigin C

    (2001) The surface structure of trypanosomes in relation to their molecular phylogeny

    International Journal for Parasitology 31:468–471.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00152-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Page DM
    2. Wittamer V
    3. Bertrand JY
    4. Lewis KL
    5. Pratt DN
    6. Delgado N
    7. Schale SE
    8. McGue C
    9. Jacobsen BH
    10. Doty A
    11. Pao Y
    12. Yang H
    13. Chi NC
    14. Magor BG
    15. Traver D

    (2013) An evolutionarily conserved program of B-cell development and activation in zebrafish

    Blood 122:e1–e11.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-12-471029

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Palha N
    2. Guivel-Benhassine F
    3. Briolat V
    4. Lutfalla G
    5. Sourisseau M
    6. Ellett F
    7. Wang CH
    8. Lieschke GJ
    9. Herbomel P
    10. Schwartz O
    11. Levraud JP

    (2013) Real-time whole-body visualization of chikungunya virus infection and host interferon response in zebrafish

    PLOS Pathogens 9:e1003619.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003619

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Petrie-Hanson L
    2. Hohn C
    3. Hanson L

    (2009) Characterization of rag1 mutant zebrafish leukocytes

    BMC Immunology 10:8.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-10-8

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Phan QT
    2. Sipka T
    3. Gonzalez C
    4. Levraud JP
    5. Lutfalla G
    6. Nguyen-Chi M

    (2018) Neutrophils use superoxide to control bacterial infection at a distance

    PLOS Pathogens 14:e1007157.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007157

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Radwanska M
    2. Vereecke N
    3. Deleeuw V
    4. Pinto J
    5. Magez S

    (2018) Salivarian trypanosomosis: a review of parasites involved, their global distribution and their interaction with the innate and adaptive mammalian host immune system

    Frontiers in Immunology 9:1–20.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02253

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. Conference

    1. Ramakrishnan L

    (2013)

    The zebrafish guide to tuberculosis immunity and treatment

    Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. pp. 179–192.

    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Renshaw SA
    2. Loynes CA
    3. Trushell DM
    4. Elworthy S
    5. Ingham PW
    6. Whyte MK

    (2006) A transgenic zebrafish model of neutrophilic inflammation

    Blood 108:3976–3978.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-05-024075

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Renshaw SA
    2. Trede NS

    (2012) A model 450 million years in the making: zebrafish and vertebrate immunity

    Disease Models & Mechanisms 5:38–47.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.007138

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Ribeiro CM
    2. Pontes MJ
    3. Bird S
    4. Chadzinska M
    5. Scheer M
    6. Verburg-van Kemenade BM
    7. Savelkoul HF
    8. Wiegertjes GF

    (2010) Trypanosomiasis-induced Th17-like immune responses in carp

    PLOS ONE 5:e13012.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Rifkin MR
    2. Landsberger FR

    (1990) Trypanosome variant surface glycoprotein transfer to target membranes: a model for the pathogenesis of trypanosomiasis

    PNAS 87:801–805.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.2.801

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Rosowski E
    2. Knox B
    3. Archambault L
    4. Huttenlocher A
    5. Keller N
    6. Wheeler R
    7. Davis J

    (2018) The zebrafish as a model host for invasive fungal infections

    Journal of Fungi 4:136.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4040136

    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Russell DG
    2. Cardona PJ
    3. Kim MJ
    4. Allain S
    5. Altare F

    (2009) Foamy macrophages and the progression of the human tuberculosis granuloma

    Nature Immunology 10:943–948.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.1781

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Saeij JP
    2. Groeneveld A
    3. Van Rooijen N
    4. Haenen OL
    5. Wiegertjes GF

    (2003) Minor effect of depletion of resident macrophages from peritoneal cavity on resistance of common carp Cyprinus carpio to blood flagellates

    Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 57:67–75.

    https://doi.org/10.3354/dao057067

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Saka HA
    2. Valdivia R

    (2012) Emerging roles for lipid droplets in immunity and host-pathogen interactions

    Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 28:411–437.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-153958

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Scharsack JP
    2. Steinhagen D
    3. Kleczka C
    4. Schmidt JO
    5. Körting W
    6. Michael RD
    7. Leibold W
    8. Schuberth HJ

    (2003) Head kidney neutrophils of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) are functionally modulated by the haemoflagellateTrypanoplasma borreli

    Fish & Shellfish Immunology 14:389–403.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/fsim.2002.0447

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Sileghem M
    2. Saya R
    3. Grab DJ
    4. Naessens J

    (2001) An accessory role for the diacylglycerol moiety of variable surface glycoprotein of african trypanosomes in the stimulation of bovine monocytes

    Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 78:325–339.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2427(01)00241-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Simpson AG
    2. Stevens JR
    3. Lukes J

    (2006) The evolution and diversity of kinetoplastid flagellates

    Trends in Parasitology 22:168–174.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2006.02.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Sternberg MJ
    2. Mabbott NA

    (1996) Nitric oxide-mediated suppression of T cell responses during Trypanosoma brucei infection: soluble trypanosome products and interferon-gamma are synergistic inducers of nitric oxide synthase

    European Journal of Immunology 26:539–543.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830260306

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Stijlemans B
    2. Guilliams M
    3. Raes G
    4. Beschin A
    5. Magez S
    6. De Baetselier P

    (2007) African trypanosomosis: from immune escape and immunopathology to immune intervention

    Veterinary Parasitology 148:3–13.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.05.005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Stijlemans B
    2. Caljon G
    3. Van Den Abbeele J
    4. Van Ginderachter JA
    5. Magez S
    6. De Trez C

    (2016) Immune evasion strategies of Trypanosoma brucei within the mammalian host: progression to pathogenicity

    Frontiers in Immunology 7:233.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00233

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Stijlemans B
    2. Radwanska M
    3. De Trez C
    4. Magez S

    (2017) African trypanosomes undermine humoral responses and vaccine development: link with inflammatory responses?

    Frontiers in Immunology 8:582.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00582

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Torraca V
    2. Masud S
    3. Spaink HP
    4. Meijer AH

    (2014) Macrophage-pathogen interactions in infectious diseases: new therapeutic insights from the zebrafish host model

    Disease Models & Mechanisms 7:785–797.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.015594

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
94. 1. Torraca V
    2. Mostowy S

    (2018) Zebrafish infection: from pathogenesis to cell biology

    Trends in Cell Biology 28:143–156.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2017.10.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
95. 1. Travnickova J
    2. Tran Chau V
    3. Julien E
    4. Mateos-Langerak J
    5. Gonzalez C
    6. Lelièvre E
    7. Lutfalla G
    8. Tavian M
    9. Kissa K

    (2015) Primitive macrophages control HSPC mobilization and definitive haematopoiesis

    Nature Communications 6:6227.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7227

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Vallochi AL
    2. Teixeira L
    3. Oliveira KDS
    4. Maya-Monteiro CM
    5. Bozza PT

    (2018) Lipid droplet, a key player in Host-Parasite interactions

    Frontiers in Immunology 9:1022.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01022

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
97. 1. White RM
    2. Sessa A
    3. Burke C
    4. Bowman T
    5. LeBlanc J
    6. Ceol C
    7. Bourque C
    8. Dovey M
    9. Goessling W
    10. Burns CE
    11. Zon LI

    (2008) Transparent adult zebrafish as a tool for in vivo transplantation analysis

    Cell Stem Cell 2:183–189.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2007.11.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Woo PT
    2. Ardelli BF

    (2014) Immunity against selected piscine flagellates

    Developmental and Comparative Immunology 43:268–279.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2013.07.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
99. 1. Wu H
    2. Liu G
    3. Shi M

    (2017) Interferon gamma in african trypanosome infections: friends or foes?

    Frontiers in Immunology 8:1105.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01105

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
100. 1. Wymann MP
     2. Schneiter R

     (2008) Lipid signalling in disease

     Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 9:162–176.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2335

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Sem H Jacobs

   1. Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
   2. Experimental Zoology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7482-3438

2. Eva Dóró

   Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands

   Present address

   Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Ffion R Hammond

   Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands

   Present address

   Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Mai E Nguyen-Chi

   DIMNP, CNRS, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Georges Lutfalla

   DIMNP, CNRS, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Geert F Wiegertjes

   1. Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
   2. Aquaculture and Fisheries Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. Maria Forlenza

   Cell Biology and Immunology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing

   For correspondence

   maria.forlenza@wur.nl

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9026-7320

• 1,432

  views

• 153

  downloads

• 3

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.