1. Cell Biology

An in vivo reporter for tracking lipid droplet dynamics in transparent zebrafish

  1. Dianne Lumaquin
  2. Eleanor Johns
  3. Emily Montal
  4. Joshua M Weiss
  5. David Ola
  6. Abderhman Abuhashem
  7. Richard M White  Is a corresponding author
  1. Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  2. Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, United States
  3. Gerstner Sloan Kettering Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  4. Developmental Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64744
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Dianne Lumaquin
  2. Eleanor Johns
  3. Emily Montal
  4. Joshua M Weiss
  5. David Ola
  6. Abderhman Abuhashem
  7. Richard M White
(2021)
An in vivo reporter for tracking lipid droplet dynamics in transparent zebrafish
eLife 10:e64744.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64744
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Lipid droplets are lipid storage organelles found in nearly all cell types from adipocytes to cancer cells. Although increasingly implicated in disease, current methods to study lipid droplets in vertebrate models rely on static imaging or the use of fluorescent dyes, limiting investigation of their rapid in vivo dynamics. To address this, we created a lipid droplet transgenic reporter in whole animals and cell culture by fusing tdTOMATO to Perilipin-2 (PLIN2), a lipid droplet structural protein. Expression of this transgene in transparent casper zebrafish enabled in vivo imaging of adipose depots responsive to nutrient deprivation and high-fat diet. Simultaneously, we performed a large-scale in vitro chemical screen of 1280 compounds and identified several novel regulators of lipolysis in adipocytes. Using our Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish line, we validated several of these novel regulators and revealed an unexpected role for nitric oxide in modulating adipocyte lipid droplets. Similarly, we expressed the PLIN2-tdTOMATO transgene in melanoma cells and found that the nitric oxide pathway also regulated lipid droplets in cancer. This model offers a tractable imaging platform to study lipid droplets across cell types and disease contexts using chemical, dietary, or genetic perturbations.

eLife digest

Organisms need fat molecules as a source of energy and as building blocks, but these ‘lipids’ can also damage cells if they are present in large amounts. Cells guard against such toxicity by safely sequestering lipids in specialized droplets that participate in a range of biological processes. For instance, these structures can quickly change size to store or release lipids depending on the energy demands of a cell.

It is possible to image lipid droplets – using, for example, dyes that preferentially stain fat – but often these methods can only yield a snapshot: tracking lipid droplet dynamics over time remains difficult. Lumaquin, Johns et al. therefore set out to develop a new method that could label lipid droplets and monitor their behaviour ‘live’ in the cells of small, transparent zebrafish larvae.

First, the fish were genetically manipulated so that a key protein found in lipid droplets would carry a fluorescent tag: this made the structures strongly fluorescent and easy to track over time. And indeed, Lumaquin, Johns et al. could monitor changes in the droplets depending on the fish diet, with the structures getting bigger when the animal received rich food, and shrinking when resources were scarce. Finally, experiments were conducted to screen for compounds that could lead to lipids being released in fat cells. The new imaging technique was then used to confirm the effect of these molecules in live cells, revealing an unexpected role for a signalling molecule known as nitric oxide, which also turned out to be regulating lipid droplets in cancerous cells. Further work then showed that drugs affecting nitric oxide could modulate lipid droplet size in both normal and tumor cells.

This work has validated a new method to study the real-time behavior of lipid droplets and their responses to different stimuli in living cells. In the future, Lumaquin, Johns et al. hope that the technique will help to shed new light on how lipids are involved in both healthy and abnormal biological processes.

Introduction

Lipid droplets are cellular organelles that act as storage sites for neutral lipids and are key regulators of cellular metabolism (Wilfling et al., 2013). Lipid droplets are present in most cell types and are characterized by a monophospholipid membrane surrounding a hydrophobic lipid core (Tauchi-Sato et al., 2002; Wilfling et al., 2013). Cells maintain energetic homeostasis and membrane formation through the regulated incorporation and release of fatty acids and lipid species from the lipid droplet core (Kurat et al., 2009; Kuerschner et al., 2008; Fujimoto et al., 2007; Zimmermann et al., 2004). Importantly, lipid droplets can assume various functions during cellular stress through the sequestration of potentially toxic lipids and misfolded proteins (Bailey et al., 2015; Listenberger et al., 2003; Vevea et al., 2015; Fei et al., 2009), maintenance of energy and redox homeostasis (Liu et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2017), regulation of fatty acid transfer to the mitochondria for β-oxidation (Rambold et al., 2015; Herms et al., 2015), and the maintenance of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane homeostasis (Chitraju et al., 2017; Bosma et al., 2014; Velázquez et al., 2016; Vevea et al., 2015). Moreover, a recent study demonstrated that lipid droplets actively participate in the innate immune response (Bosch et al., 2020) and, conversely, can be hijacked by infectious agents like hepatitis C virus to facilitate viral replication (Barba et al., 1997; Miyanari et al., 2007; Vieyres et al., 2020). The role of lipid droplets in metabolic homeostasis and cellular stress is critical across multiple cell types and has also been increasingly implicated in cancer. For example, lipid droplets can act as a storage pool in cancer cells after they take up lipids from extracellular sources, including adipocytes (Kuniyoshi et al., 2019; Nieman et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2018).

Lipid droplets are ubiquitous across most cell types; however, they are essential to the function of adipocytes in regulating organismal energy homeostasis (Zimmermann et al., 2004; Bergman et al., 2001). White adipocytes, which contain a large unilocular lipid droplet, can be readily labeled by lipophilic dyes (Minchin and Rawls, 2017a; Fam et al., 2018). However, in vivo imaging of lipid droplets, in adipocytes or other cell types, is currently highly limited. Understanding the dynamics of lipid droplets in vivo, rather than in fixed tissues, is important since the size of the lipid droplet can change very rapidly in response to fluctuating metabolic needs (Bosch et al., 2020; Fam et al., 2018). In mice, much of adipose tissue imaging utilizes tissue fixation and sectioning, which can fail to preserve key aspects of the tissue structure (Berry et al., 2014; Xue et al., 2010). Whole-mount imaging approaches in mice can be combined with adipocyte-specific promoters; however, these methods still require tissue dissection and can be limited by tissue thickness (Berry and Rodeheffer, 2013; Chi et al., 2018).

Zebrafish offer a tractable model to address these limitations given the ease of high-throughput imaging of live animals. This is especially true with the availability of relatively transparent strains such as casper, which allows for detailed in vivo imaging without the need for fixation of the animal (White et al., 2008). Although less well studied than other vertebrates, zebrafish adipose tissue is highly similar to mammalian white adipose tissue, and a detailed work has classified the timing, dynamics, and location of zebrafish adipose tissue development (Minchin and Rawls, 2017a). Current imaging approaches using lipophilic fluorescent dyes or analogs in vivo have advanced our understanding of lipid droplets in adipocytes and other cell types (Minchin and Rawls, 2017a; Minchin et al., 2018; Minchin and Rawls, 2017b; Carten et al., 2011; Farber et al., 2001; Otis and Farber, 2016); however, these methods can require extensive and repeated staining, which may restrict the ability to read out dynamic changes over time. Furthermore, fluorescent dyes such as BODIPY and NileRed have limitations in their specificity for the lipid droplet (Daemen et al., 2016). Finally, although a probe-free imaging approach to study subcellular lipid populations has been recently described (Høgset et al., 2020), this method is restricted to early-stage zebrafish, which would fail to capture post-embryonic cell populations and tissues, including adipocytes.

Here, we report the development of an in vivo lipid droplet reporter using a -3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato transgene in the casper strain. To date, transgenic lipid droplet reporters have been restricted to cell culture systems and invertebrate model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) and Drosophila (Targett-Adams et al., 2003; Beller et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2015) although a similar approach in zebrafish was recently described while this manuscript was in review (Wilson et al., 2021). We demonstrate that the -3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato reporter faithfully marks the lipid droplet, which enables robust in vivo imaging. We show that this reporter can be applied to visualize adipocytes and to monitor adipose tissue remodeling in response to dietary and pharmacologic perturbations. Furthermore, we report the discovery of novel pharmacologic regulators of adipocyte lipolysis such as nitric oxide and demonstrate that several of these compounds can modulate adipose tissue area in our in vivo system. To facilitate the study of lipid droplets in novel contexts outside of adipocytes, we also generated a zebrafish melanoma cell line (ZMEL) (Heilmann et al., 2015) expressing -3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato (ZMEL-LD). We confirm that this cell line can be used to monitor changes in lipid droplet production in response to both known and novel regulators of lipolysis. We anticipate that these models will be highly valuable as a high-throughput imaging platform to investigate lipid droplets in both adipose tissue biology and disease contexts such as cancer.

Results

An in vivo lipid droplet reporter using a PLIN2-tdTOMATO fusion transgene

To create a specific fluorescent reporter for lipid droplets in zebrafish, we fused tdTomato to the 3’ end of the plin2 cDNA. We chose plin2 because it is a well-known lipid droplet-associated protein that is ubiquitously expressed on lipid droplets across cell types (Olzmann and Carvalho, 2019). We generated stable transgenic zebrafish expressing -3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato and sought to validate whether the construct faithfully marks lipid droplets (Figure 1A). White adipocytes are fat cells known for their large unilocular lipid droplet (Fujimoto and Parton, 2011; Heid et al., 2014), so we expected expression of the PLIN2-tdTOMATO fusion protein on the surface of the adipocyte lipid droplet (Figure 1A). Since the adipocyte lipid droplet occupies the majority of space in the cell (Fujimoto et al., 2020), existing methods to visualize zebrafish adipocytes rely on lipophilic dyes and lipid analogs, which incorporate into the lipid droplet (Zhang et al., 2018). Thus, in addition to labeling individual lipid droplets, we reasoned that the PLIN2-tdTOMATO fusion protein can also function as a reporter for adipocytes since these cells would have the largest and unilocular lipid droplets.

Figure 1
Download asset Open asset
An in vivo lipid droplet reporter using a PLIN2-tdTOMATO fusion transgene.

(A) Schematic of ubb:plin2-tdTomato construct injected into zebrafish and an adipocyte lipid droplet labeled with PLIN2-tdTOMATO fusion protein. Widefield microscope images of adult (B) wild-type sibling and (C) Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish. Box shows zoomed images of the fish tail with panels for brightfield, BODIPY, PLIN2-tdTOMATO, and merge. (D) Confocal images of fish tail adipocytes of adult wild-type sibling and Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish. Panels show brightfield, BODIPY, PLIN2-tdTOMATO, and merge. (E) Adult casper and Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish tails were fixed and immunohistochemistry was conducted for tdTOMATO expression of tail adipocytes.

In adult zebrafish, subcutaneous adipocytes are known to reside proximally to the tail fin (Minchin and Rawls, 2017a). When we imaged 6-month-old adult Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish, we detected PLIN2-tdTOMATO expression in the zebrafish tail fin adipocytes, which colocalized with BODIPY staining (Figure 1B,C). Lipophilic dyes such as BODIPY stain the lipid-rich core of the lipid droplet while lipid droplet resident proteins, such as PLIN2, localize to the lipid droplet membrane (Zhang et al., 2018). As expected, higher magnification images of tail adipocytes revealed that PLIN2-tdTOMATO expression was on the outside of the lipid droplet, whereas the BODIPY staining was on the interior of each droplet in the adipocyte (Figure 1D). Similarly, immunohistochemistry (IHC) on the Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish tail fin showed that adipocytes express tdTOMATO (Figure 1E). Taken together, this data demonstrates that the PLIN2-tdTOMATO fusion protein functions as a fluorescent lipid droplet reporter that can be applied to visualize adipocytes in vivo.

The Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) is an in vivo reporter for visceral adipocytes

Visceral adipose tissue, otherwise known as abdominal fat, plays an important role in metabolism and participates in pathological processes of obesity, aging, and metabolic syndromes (Tchernof and Després, 2013). Because PLIN2-tdTOMATO labeled subcutaneous adipocytes in the adult zebrafish tail fin, we wondered whether we could use the Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish to visualize other adipose depots in vivo such as visceral adipocytes. In 21 days post-fertilization (dpf) zebrafish, visceral adipose tissue is composed of abdominal and pancreatic visceral adipocytes predominantly located on the right flank near the swim bladder (Figure 2A; Minchin and Rawls, 2017a). To determine whether Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) visceral adipocytes express PLIN2-tdTOMATO, we imaged around the swim bladder of zebrafish where we expected development of abdominal visceral adipocytes (Figure 2B). Visceral adipocytes visualized in brightfield demonstrate colocalization of PLIN2-tdTOMATO and BODIPY, as we observed for subcutaneous adipocytes (Figure 2C). IHC confirmed that the abdominal and visceral adipocytes of Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-Tomato) express tdTOMATO (Figure 2G).

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) is an in vivo reporter for visceral adipocytes.

(A) Schematic of visceral adipose tissue development in the 21 days post-fertilization (dpf) zebrafish. Abdominal visceral adipocytes (orange) develop around the swim bladder (gray) and pancreatic visceral adipocytes (red) develop ventrally around the pancreas. (B) Brightfield image of Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) at 21 dpf. Red box indicates position of higher magnification images to visualize abdominal visceral adipocytes. (C) Widefield microscope images of 21 dpf wild-type casper and Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) visceral adipocytes around the posterior swim bladder (SB) costained with BODIPY. Panels show brightfield, BODIPY, tdTOMATO, and merge. BODIPY stained adipose tissue was imaged and analyzed for (D) area, (E) standard length, and (F) area/standard length. Points indicate individual fish for N = 3 independent experiments; wild-type sibling, Data values for (D-F). n=35; Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato), n = 28. Bars indicate mean and SEM. Significance calculated via Mann-Whitney test. (G) 21 dpf wild-typecasperandTg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato)zebrafish were fixed and immunohistochemistry conducted for tdTOMATO expression of abdominal (AVA) and pancreatic visceral adipocytes (PVA).

Figure 2—source data 1

Data values for Figure 2D-F.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/64744/elife-64744-fig2-data1-v1.xlsx

Previous studies have shown that overexpression of perilipin proteins alters lipid accumulation in adipocytes (Sawada et al., 2010). To test whether constitutive expression of our PLIN2-tdTOMATO transgenes altered adiposity, we compared the visceral adipose tissue of Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) fish to their wild-type siblings. Using BODIPY staining, we did not detect differences in visceral adipose tissue area (Figure 2D). In addition to dpf, standard length can indicate developmental progress in zebrafish (Parichy et al., 2009). Similarly, we found no difference in standard lengths between wild-type siblings and Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) at 21 dpf (Figure 2E). We normalized visceral adipose tissue area to standard length, similar to a Body Mass Index (BMI) in mammals, and did not detect differences between wild-type and Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) fish (Figure 2F). To comprehensively assess whether constitutive PLIN2-tdTOMATO expression alters adiposity, we imaged adipose depots of wild-type and Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish from 5 dpf larvae to adult fish. Using BODIPY staining to visualize adipose tissue, we observed similar development of the major adipose depots between wild-type and Tg(-3.5:ubbplin2-tdTomato) zebrafish (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A–B). Furthermore, we detected PLIN2-tdTOMATO expression at the corresponding time points and adipose depots within Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A–B). Thus, the Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish faithfully recapitulates normal adipose tissue development.

Diet and pharmacologically induced reduction in visceral adipose tissue area

After confirming that we could image visceral adipose tissue in Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato), we wanted to test whether this could be a tractable platform to image adipose tissue remodeling. We first verified whether we could use Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) to track reduction in visceral adiposity. Fasting is a well-known mechanism for reducing adiposity, since it will induce lipolysis and lead to a reduction in the size of the adipocyte lipid droplet (Henne et al., 2018; Longo and Mattson, 2014; Rambold et al., 2015; Tang et al., 2017). To test this, wild-type and Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish were fed or fasted for 7 days and then imaged to measure standard length and adipose tissue area (Figure 3A). As expected, we observed a reduction in the BODIPY-stained visceral adipose tissue in both wild-type and Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) fasted zebrafish (Figure 3B). Similarly, we measured a significant reduction in adipose tissue area, standard length, and normalized area to standard length between fed and fasted fish (Figure 3C,D,E). Furthermore, we did not see differences in adiposity or standard length between wild-type and Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) fish within the same diet (Figure 3C,D,E). This suggests that the transgenic expression of PLIN2-tdTOMATO reflects adipose tissue remodeling consistent with wild-type fish.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Fasting reduces visceral adipose tissue area.

(A) Schematic of experimental set-up for fasting experiment. 21 days post-fertilization (dpf) wild-type casper and Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish were fed or fasted for 7 days and imaged to measure standard length and adipose area. (B) Representative images of zebrafish fed or fasted after 7 days. Panels show merged images of brightfield and BODIPY-stained visceral adipose tissue. BODIPY-stained adipocytes were imaged to measure (C) area, (D) standard length, and (E) area/standard length. Data points indicate individual fish for N = 3 independent experiments; bars indicate mean and 95% CI. Fed wild-type n = 24; fed Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) n = 24; fasted wild-type n = 29; fasted Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) n = 20. Significance calculated via Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test; ****p<0.0001. (F) Representative image of computational segmentation of Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) adipocytes. PLIN2-tdTOMATO was background subtracted with GFP fluorescence. Bottom panels show brightfield, segmented adipocytes, and segmentation overlaid on brightfield. (G) Schematic of experimental set-up for repeated imaging of 21 dpf Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish, which were fed or fasted for 7 days. Adipose tissue was imaged and analyzed for (H) area, (I) standard length, and (J) area/standard length. Points indicate mean and error bars indicate 95% CI for N = 3 independent experiments; by day 7, fed n = 46 and fasted n = 57. Significance calculated via Mann-Whitney test; **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001.

Figure 3—source data 1

Data values for Figure 3C-E.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/64744/elife-64744-fig3-data1-v1.xlsx
Figure 3—source data 2

Data values for Figure 3H-J.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/64744/elife-64744-fig3-data2-v1.xlsx

Combined with the capacity for high-throughput in vivo imaging in zebrafish, we sought to use Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) as a model to study lipid droplet dynamics in visceral adipocytes. One challenge we encountered was the autofluorescence from the zebrafish intestinal loops and gallbladder present in the tdTOMATO and GFP channels (Figure 3F). To remove background fluorescence, we developed an image analysis pipeline in MATLAB to segment the visceral adipocytes in juvenile Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-Tomato) zebrafish (Figure 3F). Next, we combined our image analysis pipeline with the ability to do repeated imaging in zebrafish to more granularly quantify adipose tissue remodeling in fed or fasted Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) fish (Figure 3G). We saw the expected increase in adipose tissue area, standard length, and normalized area to standard length over 7 days in fed Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) fish (Figure 3H–J). The standard lengths for fasted fish were significantly lower than those for fed fish and remained stable over 7 days, which we attribute to food restriction, disrupting zebrafish development (Figure 3I). Notably, we found that visceral adiposity was not reduced until after 2 days of fasting (Figure 3H,J).

In addition to fasting as a dietary perturbation, we also pharmacologically reduced adipose tissue. To achieve this, we used Forskolin, a drug that is known to induce lipolysis through cAMP signaling (Litosch et al., 1982). We treated juvenile zebrafish for 24 hr with either dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or 5 µM Forskolin and imaged the adipocytes (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A). We detected a reduction in both the adipose tissue area and normalized area to standard length in the Forskolin-treated fish, but no differences in standard length (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B–D). Thus, Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) can be used as an in vivo model to visualize adipocytes, with the benefits of avoiding staining steps and allowing for repeated imaging with high-throughput image analysis in zebrafish.

High-fat diet leads to specific enlargement of visceral adipose tissue

Having shown that we could use Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) to image and measure reduction in adipose tissue, we tested whether we can use our model to detect an increase in adiposity. Zebrafish have been used as a model for diet-induced obesity and share pathophysiological perturbations seen in mammals, but few studies have focused on architectural changes of visceral adipose tissue (Chu et al., 2012; Landgraf et al., 2017; Oka et al., 2010). We sought to determine if we could detect increases in visceral adiposity from a high-fat diet (HFD). We fed juvenile zebrafish with either control feed (12% crude fat) or HFD (23% crude fat) for 7 days and subsequently imaged the adipose tissue (Figure 4A,B). After a week of HFD feeding, we observed that HFD-fed fish developed significantly increased visceral adiposity compared to the fish fed with control feed (Figure 4C,E). Although less dramatic between 7 and 14 days of HFD, we found that significantly greater visceral adiposity persisted after 2 weeks of HFD (Figure 4C,E). Interestingly, we did not detect differences in the standard lengths of the control and HFD-fed fish, suggesting that this formulation of HFD leads to specific enlargement of visceral adipose tissue (Figure 4E). Our results demonstrate that Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) is an effective and unique tool to visualize visceral adipose tissue remodeling induced by HFD, which can be widely applied to study obesity.

Figure 4
Download asset Open asset
High-fat diet leads to specific enlargement of visceral adipose tissue.

(A) Percent breakdown of nutritional content for control feed and high-fat diet (HFD). (B) Schematic of experimental set-up for HFD experiment. 21 days post-fertiization (dpf) Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish were fed control feed or HFD for 14 days and imaged to measure standard length and adipose area. Image analysis pipeline resulted in measurements of adipose tissue (C) area, (D) standard length, and (E) area/standard length. Points indicate mean and error bars indicate 95% CI for N = 3 independent experiments; by day 14, control feed n = 57; HFD n = 61. Significance calculated via Mann-Whitney test; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001.

Figure 4—source data 1

Data values for Figure 4A-E.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/64744/elife-64744-fig4-data1-v1.xlsx

A screen to discover novel compounds that modulate lipolysis and lipid droplets in vivo

To meet fluctuating nutritional needs of the cell, lipid droplets are remodeled through lipolysis to regulate lipid mobilization and metabolic homeostasis (Krahmer et al., 2013; Olzmann and Carvalho, 2019; Paar et al., 2012). As a major lipid depot for the body, white adipose tissue is critical to lipid availability and cycles through lipolytic flux in response to energy demands (Duncan et al., 2007). In disease contexts such as cancer, adipocytes undergoing lipolysis act as a lipid source for neighboring cancer cells (Lengyel et al., 2018). Adipocyte-derived lipids have been directly shown to promote cancer progression in ovarian (Nieman et al., 2011), breast (Balaban et al., 2017), and melanoma cancer cells (Zhang et al., 2018). Due to growing evidence of adipocyte and cancer cell cross-talk as a metabolic adaptation for tumor progression, there is significant interest in disrupting lipid transfer between adipocytes and cancer cells.

Leveraging our model to visualize lipid droplets in adipocytes, we became interested in identifying novel compounds that remodel adipocyte lipid droplets through lipolysis. In mammalian systems, the most commonly used cell line to study lipolysis is 3T3-L1 cells, which can be differentiated in vitro to resemble adipocytes (Zebisch et al., 2012). We first used the 3T3-L1 system to rapidly identify lipolysis inhibitors at high throughput and then test those hits using our zebrafish lipid droplet reporter. We reasoned that compounds that inhibit lipolysis in vitro would cause an increase in the size of the lipid droplets in vivo. To achieve this, we differentiated mouse 3T3-L1 fibroblast cells into adipocytes and conducted a chemical screen for compounds that inhibit lipolysis (Figure 5A), measured by quantifying glycerol in the media, a gold standard readout of lipolysis in this system (Hellmér et al., 1989). As a positive control, we used Atglistatin, an inhibitor of adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) that is known to be the rate-limiting step of lipolysis and has been shown to inhibit lipolysis in cell lines and mouse models (Mayer et al., 2013; Schweiger et al., 2017). We confirmed that Atglistatin potently inhibits lipolysis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (Figure 5B). We then screened through a library of 1280 compounds of diverse chemical structures to find novel inhibitors of lipolysis. Overall, we found 29 out of 1280 compounds that led to at least a 40% reduction in lipolysis as measured by glycerol release into the media. Looking more closely at the top 10 hits from this screen, we noted that 2 of the top 10 hits (Auranofin and JS-K) modulated nitric oxide (Figure 5A). Nitric oxide can be used for post-translational modification of proteins via S-nitrosylation (Stamler et al., 2001). A previous study has shown that increased nitric oxide has a suppressive role on lipolysis, and Auranofin, a thioredoxin reductase inhibitor that promotes S-nitrosylation, can inhibit lipolysis in 3T3-L1 cells (Yamada et al., 2015). Similarly, JS-K is a nitric oxide donor purported to promote S-nitrosylation, but it has not been shown to play a role in lipolysis (Nath et al., 2010; Shami et al., 2003). Given that both of these top hits were in the same pathway, we chose these for in vivo validation.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
A screen to discover novel compounds that modulate lipolysis and lipid droplets in vivo.

(A) Schematic of pharmacologic lipolysis screen in 3T3-L1 adipocytes using a glycerol release assay. Normalized log2 transformed values for top 10 drugs that inhibit lipolysis are shown. Magenta indicates compounds that modulate nitric oxide. (B) Normalized log2 transformed values for lipolysis inhibition in 3T3-L1 adipocytes using either dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or 100 µM Atglistatin. N = 5 independent experiments. Bars indicate mean and SEM. Significance calculated via Welch’s t-test; ****p<0.0001. (C) Schematic of experimental set-up for drug treatment. 21 days post-fertilization (dpf) Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish were individually placed in six-well plates with either DMSO, 40 µM Atglistatin, 1 µM Auranofin, or 1 µM JS-K for 24 hr. Adipose tissue was imaged and analyzed for (C) area, (D) standard length, and (E) area/standard length. Data points indicate individual fish for N = 4 independent experiments; DMSO n = 47; Atglistatin n = 44; Auranofin n = 42; JS-K n = 44. Bars indicate mean and SEM. Significance calculated via Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test; *p<0.05, ****p<0.0001.

Figure 5—source data 1

Complete list of lipolysis screen compounds and log2 transformed values.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/64744/elife-64744-fig5-data1-v1.xlsx
Figure 5—source data 2

Data values for Figure 5B.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/64744/elife-64744-fig5-data2-v1.xlsx
Figure 5—source data 3

Data values for Figure 5C-E.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/64744/elife-64744-fig5-data3-v1.xlsx

Next, we asked whether these drugs could modulate lipid droplet size and lead to increased adiposity in zebrafish. We first established the maximal tolerated doses of Atglistatin, Auranofin, and JS-K in vivo (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A–C), and then tested their effects on adipose tissue in the Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) fish (Figure 5D–F). As expected, treatment of juvenile zebrafish for 24 hr with Atglistatin caused a significant increase in adipose tissue area without affecting standard length or fish viability at the maximally tolerated dose. Consistent with our screen results, we found that JS-K also significantly increased adiposity (Figure 5C,E). These effects were specific to the adipose tissue as standard length was not affected (Figure 5D). These data indicate that modulators of nitric oxide can inhibit lipolysis in cell lines and lead to increased adiposity in vivo in zebrafish. Moreover, this approach demonstrates the power of this system to dissect the relationship between novel modulators of lipolysis (i.e., nitric oxide) and adiposity in vivo.

Lipolysis modulators also inhibit lipid droplet loss in melanoma cells

Upon uptake of adipocyte-derived lipids, cancer cells can store excess lipids in lipid droplets (Lengyel et al., 2018). Accumulation of lipid droplets in melanoma cells has been associated with increased metastatic potential and worse clinical outcomes (Fujimoto et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2018). The mechanisms regulating subsequent lipolysis from the lipid droplets in cancer cells are not well understood, but we reasoned that some of the same mechanisms (i.e., ATGL, nitric oxide) used in adipocytes might also be used in cancer cells. To test this, we created a stable zebrafish melanoma cell line (ZMEL) that expressed the -3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato construct (Heilmann et al., 2015) to generate the ZMEL-LD (lipid droplet) reporter cell line (Figure 6A). Because melanoma cells at baseline only have few small lipid droplets, we induced their formation via extrinsic addition of oleic acid, a key fatty acid that can be transferred from the adipocyte to the melanoma cell (Zhang et al., 2018). We found that after a pulse of oleic acid for 24 hr, we could easily detect PLIN2-tdTOMATO expression surrounding lipid droplets marked by the lipid droplet dye Monodansylpentane (MDH) (Figure 6B, Video 1), similar to what we saw in the adipocytes (Figure 1). Similar to what we did in the whole fish, we wanted to be sure that the PLIN2-tdTOMATO transgene itself did not alter lipid droplets, so we compared lipid droplet formation in ZMEL-LD and parental cell line (ZMEL-GFP) via imaging and flow cytometry (Figure 6—figure supplement 1A,B). Using the lipid droplet dye Lipidtox as a proxy for lipid droplet content, we pulsed the cells with increasing amounts of oleic acid and found no difference in Lipidtox median fluorescence intensity (MFI) between the two cell lines (Figure 6—figure supplement 1B), indicating that the transgene was not having any unexpected effect. Next, we assessed the sensitivity of the PLIN2-tdTOMATO transgene versus Lipidtox in reporting changes in lipid droplets of ZMEL-LD. While both PLIN2-tdTOMATO and Lipidtox expression increased accordingly with oleic acid, PLIN2-tdTOMATO expression provided a much greater dynamic range (Figure 6—figure supplement 1C–F), highlighting its advantages over standard lipid dyes like Lipidtox.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Lipolysis modulators also inhibit lipid droplet loss in melanoma cells.

(A) Schematic of zebrafish melanoma cell line with lipid droplet reporter (ZMEL-LD) with lipid droplet labeled by PLIN2-tdTOMATO. (B) Confocal images of ZMEL-LD cells after 24 hr of oleic acid treatment. Panels show fluorescence signals in PLIN2-tdTOMATO, MDH (lipid droplet dye) staining, and merge of images with cytoplasmic GFP. Red box indicates position of higher magnification image of lipid droplets. (C) ZMEL-LD cells were treated with either bovine serum albumin (BSA) or oleic acid with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for 72 hr and then analyzed by Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) for PLIN2-tdTOMATO expression. (D) Representative histogram of PLIN2-tdTOMATO expression of ZMEL-GFP and GFP+ZMEL-LD cells with indicated drugs. Dashed line shows threshold for PLIN2-tdTOMATO expression. (E) Quantification of percent of GFP+ZMEL-LD cells with lipid droplets. Lipid droplet low and high controls were ZMEL-LD cells treated with BSA or oleic acid for 72 hr. For drug treatments, ZMEL-LD cells were pulsed with oleic acid for 24 hr and then given DMSO, 40 µM Atglistatin, 0.5 µM Auranofin, or 0.5 µM JS-K for 48 hr. N = 3 independent experiments. Bars indicate mean and SEM. Significance calculated via one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test; *p<0.05, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.

Video 1
Download asset
3D reconstruction of ZMEL-LD lipid droplet.

ZMEL-LD cells were given oleic acid for 24 hr, fixed, and stained with the lipid droplet dye MDH. This video is a 3D reconstruction of 37 planes covering a 6 µm stack of a lipid droplet cluster in a ZMEL-LD cell. PLIN2-tdTOMATO (orange) is located outside of the lipid droplet core (blue).

To validate whether the lipolysis-inhibiting compounds we identified above could modulate lipid droplets in ZMEL-LD cells, we utilized the same flow cytometry assay to measure PLIN2-tdTOMATO expression. We treated ZMEL-LD cells for 72 hr with either BSA or oleic acid as controls for low- or high-lipid droplet cell populations (Figure 6C). We then tested the effects of the lipolysis inhibitors Atglistatin, Auranofin, and JS-K. We pulsed the ZMEL-LD cells with oleic acid for 24 hr (to induce lipid droplets) and then measured the subsequent decay in signal over the ensuing 48 hr, which is expected to decrease due to gradual lipolysis of the lipid droplets. Compared to cells with oleic acid pulse and DMSO, cells given JS-K did not differ in the percent of lipid droplet-positive cells (Figure 6D,E). In contrast, cells treated with Atglistatin and Auranofin demonstrated significantly higher lipid droplet-positive cells (Figure 6D,E). These data indicate that similar to adipocytes, ATGL is a key regulatory step in lipolysis in melanoma cells. Moreover, we found that nitric oxide, which was identified in our adipocyte screen, is similarly a modulator of lipolysis in the melanoma context and can be utilized for future studies to target adipocyte-melanoma cell cross-talk. We do not yet understand why different nitric oxide donors are more or less potent in adipocytes (where JS-K is a better inhibitor in vivo) versus melanoma cells (where Auranofin is a better inhibitor), but this could reflect differences in pharmacokinetics or cell-type-specific lipid droplet regulation.

Discussion

Lipid droplets are cytosolic storage organelles for cellular lipids, which are dynamically regulated in response to metabolic and oxidative perturbations (Jarc and Petan, 2019). Changes in the lipid droplet content of a cell can occur in response to a variety of factors, including hypoxia, reactive oxygen stress, ER stress, and alterations in nutrient availability (Bailey et al., 2015; Bensaad et al., 2014; Chitraju et al., 2017; Velázquez et al., 2016; Vevea et al., 2015; Cabodevilla et al., 2013; Nguyen et al., 2017). However, the regulatory mechanisms driving these processes remain incompletely understood. Furthermore, lipid droplets are highly heterogeneous, and the pathways that regulate lipid droplet dynamics in specific cell types warrant investigation.

To address such questions, we report the first lipid droplet reporter in a vertebrate model organism. We show that our plin2-tdtomato reporter faithfully marks the lipid droplet in vivo. As a further validation of our approach, while our manuscript was in review, a similar approach using knockin at the endogenous plin2 promoter was recently described (Wilson et al., 2021). The combination of our reporter with the in vivo system of the casper zebrafish enables flexible and robust imaging approaches to examine lipid droplet regulation and function. In particular, the ease of chemical and genetic manipulation of the zebrafish combined with high-throughput imaging approaches enables interrogation of relevant pathways in a cell type-specific manner. Furthermore, the capacity for intravital imaging creates the opportunity to conduct longitudinal analysis of lipid droplet dynamics across developmental time and in disease contexts between single animals.

Here, we demonstrate the capabilities of the Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) line by taking advantage of the fact that white adipocytes are readily labeled by PLIN2-tdTOMATO expression. This labeling enables the study of individual adipocytes and adipose tissue in adult and juvenile zebrafish. We show that the Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) reporter can be used as an alternative to lipophilic fluorescent dyes to study adipose tissue across zebrafish developmental stages while preserving normal adipose tissue development.

We establish the utility of this transgenic line to study the regulation of adipose tissue by both diet and pharmacologic perturbations. We focused on visceral adipose tissue due to its role as an endocrine organ and the central regulator of organismal metabolism (Fox et al., 2007; Le Jemtel et al., 2018; Verboven et al., 2018). We show that our Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) line is sensitive enough to capture quantitative changes in visceral adipose tissue after short-term pharmacologic treatments with known regulators of adipocyte lipolysis. Furthermore, by combining top hits from a large-scale in vitro chemical screen in 3T3-L1 adipocytes with our reporter we uncovered a novel role for nitric oxide in modulating adipocyte lipolysis and adipose tissue dynamics.

Beyond pharmacologic perturbations, we also demonstrate the power of this line to perform longitudinal analyses of diet-induced perturbations on adipose tissue area across multiple time points. This work yielded compelling insights into the dynamics of adipose tissue response to both prolonged fasting and high-fat diet. Differences in the kinetics of each response suggest a complex relationship between adipose tissue development and the nutritional and energetic requirements of the developing organism, which merits future investigation. Collectively, these data illustrate the potential of our model to yield novel insights into the regulation of visceral adipose tissue, including the context of obesity.

While our studies show that this tool can be used to increase our understanding of adipocyte biology, it can also be utilized to study lipid droplets in other contexts as well. Lipid droplets are ubiquitous across almost all cell types. Therefore, this model could be applied to study the regulation of lipid droplets in the development and function of other adipose depots and additional cell types, such as muscle and hepatocytes (Bosma, 2016; Wang et al., 2013). In the disease context, we focused on the role of lipid droplets in cancer, since tumor cells can take up lipids from adipocytes and then package them into lipid droplets (Balaban et al., 2017; Lengyel et al., 2018; Nieman et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2018). This transfer of lipids has been linked to disease progression, making the regulation of lipid release from the lipid droplet through subsequent lipolysis in the tumor cell of particular interest. We found that regulation of lipolysis by ATGL and nitric oxide pathways is conserved between adipocytes and melanoma cells although phenotypes downstream of nitric oxide may be cell type specific. Collectively, this underscores the complexity of lipid droplet regulation and emphasizes the importance of studying these processes in multiple cell types. We believe that our model will serve as a powerful tool to study cell type-specific regulation of lipid droplet biogenesis and function while preserving the endogenous structural and metabolic environment of an in vivo system.

Materials and methods

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Cell line (Danio rerio)ZMELHeilmann et al., 2015mitfa:BRAFV600E/p53-/-
Cell line (Danio rerio)ZMEL-LDThis paper(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdtomato) in pDestTol2pA2-blastocidin
Cell line (Mus musculus)3T3-L1ZenBioSP-L1-F
Strain, strain background (Danio rerio)casperWhite et al., 2008mitfaw2/w2;mpv17a9/a9
Strain, strain background (Danio rerio)(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdtomato)This paper
Recombinant DNA reagent(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdtomato) in pDestTol2CG2 (plasmid)This paper
Recombinant DNA reagent(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdtomato) in pDestTol2pA2-blastocidin (plasmid)This paper
Recombinant DNA reagentpDestTol2pA2-blastocidin (plasmid)Heilmann et al., 2015
Recombinant DNA reagentpDestTol2CG2 (plasmid)Kwan et al., 2007
Sequence-based reagentPLIN2 cDNA FWDThis paperPCR primerAAAGCAGGCTCCACCATGAGCTTTCTTCTGTACTTGAAACTG
Sequence-based reagentPLIN2 cDNA REVThis paperPCR primerGCCCTTGCTCACCATTTCAGTGACTTGAAGGGTCCTCTGT
Sequence-based reagentPLIN2-TMT FWDThis paperPCR primerGCCGCCCCCTTCACCATGAGCTTTCTTCTGTACTTGAAAC
Sequence-based reagentPLIN2-TMT REVThis paperPCR primerGCCCTTGCTCACCATTTCAGTGACTTG
Sequence-based reagenttdTOMATO ME PLIN2 FWDThis paperPCR primerATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAG
Sequence-based reagenttdTOMATO ME PLIN2 REVThis paperPCR primerGGTGAAGGGGGCGGC
Commercial assay or kitCloneamp HiFi PCR PremixTakaraCatalog #639298
Commercial assay or kitIn-Fusion HD Cloning PlusTakaraCatalog #638920
Commercial assay or kitGateway LR Clonase Enzyme mixThermo FisherCatalog #11791019
Commercial assay or kitZymogen Quick RNA Miniprep KitZymo ResearchCatalog #R1054
Commercial assay or kitInvitrogen SuperScriptIII First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix KitThermo FisherCatalog #18080400
Commercial assay or kitNucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean upTakaraCatalog #740609.50
Commercial assay or kitFree Glycerol ReagentSigma-AldrichCatalog #F6428
Chemical compoundGlycerol Standard SolutionSigma-AldrichCatalog #G7793
OtherHCS LipidTOX deep redThermo FisherCatalog #H344771:250 or 1:500
OtherBODIPY 493/503Thermo FisherCatalog #D39225 or 10 ng/µl
OtherAUTODOT Visualization Dye (MDH)AbceptaCatalog #SM1000a1:500
Chemical compound, drugForskolinSigma-AldrichCatalog #F68865 µM (fish)
Chemical compound, drugAuranofinSigma-AldrichCatalog #A67331 µM (fish), 0.5 µM (cells)
Chemical compound, drugJS-KSigma-AldrichCatalog #J41371 µM (fish), 0.5 µM (cells)
Chemical compound, drugAtglistatinSigma-AldrichCatalog #SML107540 µM
Chemical compoundOleic Acid-AlbuminSigma-AldrichCatalog #O3008-5M
Chemical compoundLOPAC 1280 LibrarySigma-AldrichCatalog #LO1280
AntibodyAnti-RFP antibody (rabbit polyclonal)RocklandCatalog #600-401-379, RRID:AB_2209751(1:500), (1 µL)
Software, algorithmMATLABMathworks
Software, algorithmPRISMGraphpad
Software, algorithmFIJISchindelin et al., 2012
Software, algorithmFlowJoBecton, Dickinson and Company
OtherHigh-fat dietSparosSee detailed description of high-fat diet contents in the 'Methods' section below

Cloning of -3.5ubb:plin2-tdtomato

Request a detailed protocol

To clone the plin2 cDNA, tissue from the muscle and heart of adult casper zebrafish was dissected, pooled, and then RNA was isolated using the Zymogen Quick RNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, USA; catalog #R1054) according to manufacturer's instructions. The Invitrogen SuperScriptIII First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix Kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA; catalog #18080400) was used according to manufacturer's instructions to produce cDNA. CloneAmp HiFi PCR Premix (Takara, Mountain View, USA; catalog #639298) was used to PCR amplify the PLIN2 cDNA and gel purified via NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean Up (Takara, Mountain View, USA; catalog #740609.50). To generate pME-PLIN2-tdTOMATO, the PLIN2 cDNA was inserted on the 5’ end of pME-tdTOMATO using In-Fusion HD Cloning Plus (Takara, Mountain View, USA; catalog #638920). Gateway cloning using the Gateway LR Clonase Enzyme mix (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA; catalog #11791019) was employed to create the -3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato construct with p5E-ubb, pME-PLIN2-tdTOMATO, and p3E-polyA into pDestTol2pA2-blastocidin (cells) (Heilmann et al., 2015) or pDestTol2CG2 (zebrafish) (Kwan et al., 2007).

Zebrafish husbandry

Request a detailed protocol

All zebrafish experiments were carried out in accordance with institutional animal protocols. All zebrafish were housed in a temperature- (28.5°C) and light-controlled (14 hr on, 10 hr off) room. Fish were initially housed at a density of five fish per liter and fed three times per day using rotifers and pelleted zebrafish food. Anesthesia was done using Tricaine (Western Chemical Incorporated, Ferndale, USA) with a stock of 4 g/l (protected for light) and diluted until the fish was immobilized. All procedures were approved by and adhered to Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol #12-05-008 through Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Generation of Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato)

Request a detailed protocol

The ubb:plin2-tdTomato plasmid was injected into casper embryos with Tol2 mRNA to introduce stable integration of the ubb:plin2-tdTomato cassette. Fish with GFP+ hearts (due to pDestTol2CG) were selected and outcrossed with casper fish to produce the F1 generation. F1 zebrafish with GFP+ hearts and validated PLIN2-tdTOMATO-expressing adipocytes were outcrossed to generate F2 and F3 generation zebrafish for experiments.

Zebrafish imaging and analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Zebrafish were imaged using an upright Zeiss AxioZoom V16 Fluorescence Stereo Zoom Microscope with a x0.5 (for adult fish) or x1.0 (for juvenile fish) adjustable objective lens equipped with a motorized stage, brightfield, and Cy5, GFP, and tdTomato filter sets. To acquire images, zebrafish were lightly anesthetized with 0.2% Tricaine. Images were acquired with the Zeiss Zen Pro v2 and exported as CZI files for visualization using FIJI or analysis using FIJI (to manually quantify standard length) and MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, USA).

Our adipocyte segmentation approach utilized the Image Processing Toolbox within MATLAB. Because the zebrafish gut is highly autofluorescent, we chose a threshold for the GFP channel to categorize as background signal and subtracted it from a determined threshold for the tdTOMATO channel. We used a set size to crop images around the tdTOMATO-positive signal and created a mask for the adipose tissue. Within the masked area, we applied a higher tdTOMATO threshold to segment the fluorescent signal from the adipocytes. Finally, we quantified the number of pixels above the threshold to quantify adipose tissue area. MATLAB code is available for download at https://github.com/dlumaquin/PLIN2-tdT-Adipo-Quant.git (copy archived at swh:1:rev:decae59e912bd79d43f8559d5a4ee32316233153); Anthony, 2021.

To quantify BODIPY-stained adipose tissue, we utilized FIJI to autothreshold GFP signal. We removed background autofluorescence by subtracting Cy5 autothresholded signal. We used the polygon tool to outline and quantify the resulting segmented adipose area.

For visualization purposes, the segmented images were color filtered on Adobe Photoshop from grayscale to gold color scale.

BODIPY staining of zebrafish

Request a detailed protocol

Adult zebrafish were placed in tanks with 10 ng/µl BODIPY 493/503 (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA; catalog #D3922) for 30 min in the dark. Fish were washed and then placed in new tanks with fresh water for 2 hr. Fish were washed again to remove any residual BODIPY, then anesthetized and imaged as indicated above for whole adipose tissue.

Higher resolution images of zebrafish adipocytes were acquired using the Zeiss LSM 880 inverted confocal microscope using a x10 objective. Zebrafish were lightly anesthetized with 0.2% Tricaine and mounted on a glass bottom dish (MatTek, Ashland, USA; catalog #P35G-1.5–20 C) with 0.1% low gelling agarose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA; catalog #A9045-25G).

Staining to track adipose depot development

Request a detailed protocol

For BODIPY staining, 5, 14, and 21 dpf fish were incubated with 5 ng/µl BODIPY 493/503 in dishes for 30 min in the dark. Fish were washed with fresh E3 every 45 min for 1.5 hr, then anesthetized and imaged as indicated above for whole adipose tissue. 42 dpf and adult zebrafish were stained in p1000 tip boxes for 30 or 15 min, respectively, in the dark. Fish were then placed back on system to wash with fresh water for 1.5 hr and then anesthetized and imaged as indicated below for whole adipose tissue.

Image analysis to track adipose depot development

Request a detailed protocol

To track adipose depot development across multiple stages, F2 (-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish were outcrossed with caspers to generate F3 fish expressing the transgene and control siblings. Control and Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) fish were raised to a standard density of 25 fish per 2.8 l tank. At the appropriate time points, 5, 14, 21, and 42 dpf or adult-stage zebrafish were removed from the tank and stained for BODIPY as described above.

Images were acquired in three segments per fish along the anterior to posterior axis to capture the entire body of the fish. Adipose depots were classified based on the previously described system (Minchin and Rawls, 2017a). To determine the presence of each adipose depot, images were thresholded in FIJI for GFP (BODIPY493/503) or tdTomato (-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) using control fish as the reference. A depot was scored as present based on positive signal corresponding to the presence of adipocytes for at least one sub-depot in the appropriate anatomic location.

IHC for tdTOMATO

Request a detailed protocol

Zebrafish were sacrificed in an ice bath for at least 15 min. For adults, zebrafish tails were dissected. For juvenile zebrafish, the entire fish was used for fixation. Selected zebrafish were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 72 hr at 4°C, washed in 70% ethanol for 24 hr, and then paraffin embedded. Fish were sectioned at 5 µm and placed on Apex Adhesive slides, baked at 60°C, and then stained with antibodies against tdTomato (1:500, Rockland, #600-401-379). Histology was performed and stained by Histowiz.

Zebrafish fast

Request a detailed protocol

Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) F2 fish were outcrossed with caspers to generate the F3 generation. F3 fish were raised at a standard density of 25 fish per 2.8 l tank. For BODIPY staining experiments, 21 dpf fish were separated into new tanks that received standard feed or were fasted for 7 days. Prior to imaging, food was withheld for 3–6 hr to clear the gut. Fish were anesthetized with Tricaine and imaged as described above to quantify BODIPY-stained visceral adipose tissue area and standard length. For the time course fast, 21 dpf Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) fish were separated into new tanks that received standard feed or fasted. Prior to imaging, food was withheld for 3–6 hr to clear the gut. Fish were anesthetized with Tricaine and imaged on days 0, 2, 5, and 7 to quantify PLIN2-tdTOMATO-positive visceral adipose tissue area and standard length.

High-fat diet feeding

Request a detailed protocol

Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) F3 zebrafish were raised at a standard density of 25 fish per 2.8 l tank. At 21 dpf, the zebrafish were placed in 0.8 l tanks and fed either a high-fat or control diet (Sparos, Portugal) for up to 14 days. Fish were then imaged for PLIN2-tdTOMATO expression at days 0, 7, and 14 after the start of diet. Prior to imaging, fish were put in a new tank and food withheld for ~16 hr. Zebrafish were at equal density for control and experimental groups, ranging from 15 to 30 fish per tank. Fish were fed 0.1 g feed per tank per day split over two feedings. The high-fat and control diets were customized and produced at Sparos Lda (Olhão, Portugal), where powder ingredients were initially mixed according to each target formulation in a double-helix mixer, and thereafter ground twice in a micropulverizer hammer mill (SH1; Hosokawa-Alpine, Germany). The oil fraction of the formulation was subsequently added and diets were humidified and agglomerated through low-shear extrusion (Dominioni Group, Italy). Upon extrusion, diets were dried in a convection oven (OP 750-UF; LTE Scientifics, United Kingdom) for 4 hr at 60°C, and subsequently crumbled (Neuero Farm, Germany) and sieved to 400 μm. Experimental diets were analyzed for proximal composition. The Sparos control diet contains 30% fishmeal, 33% squid meal, 5% fish gelatin, 5.5% wheat gluten, 12% cellulose, 2.5% soybean oil, 2.5% rapeseed oil, 2% vitamins and minerals, 0.1% vitamin E, 0.4% antioxidant, 2% monocalcium phosphate, and 2.2% calcium silicate. The Sparos HFD contains 30% fishmeal, 33% squid meal, 5% fish gelatin, 5.5% wheat gluten, 12% palm oil, 2.5% soybean oil, 2.5% rapeseed oil, 2% vitamins and minerals, 0.1% vitamin E, 0.4% antioxidant, 2% monocalcium phosphate, and 2.2% calcium silicate.

3T3-L1 cell culture

Request a detailed protocol

3T3-L1 cells were acquired from ZenBio and their differentiation protocol was followed. Cells were received at passage 8 and split to a maximum of passage 12 as per the recommendations of the company. 96-well plates were coated with fibronectin (EMD Millipore, Burlington, USA; catalog #FC010) diluted 1:100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for at least 30 min to promote improved adherence of cells to the dish. 3T3-L1 cells were first cultured in PM-1-L1 Preadipocyte Medium and allowed to grow to 100% confluence. PM-1-L1 medium was changed every 48–72 hr. 48 hr after reaching 100% confluence, cells were changed to DM-1-L1 Differentiation Medium for 72 hr and then changed to AM-1-L1 Adipocyte Medium. AM-1-L1 Adipocyte Medium was changed every 48–72 hr. Once in AM-1-L1, the medium was changed gently with a multichannel pipette, and only 150 µl of the 200 µl was replaced to prevent touching the bottom of the well with the pipette tip. After 2–3 weeks in AM-1-L1, the 3T3-L1 developed significantly large lipid droplets and were used in the screen.

LOPAC library screen

Request a detailed protocol

The LOPAC library includes 1280 clinically relevant compounds with annotated targets or pathways. The workflow of the screen involved drug or vehicle control of the 3T3-L1 adipocytes for 24 hr in serum-free media. After 24 hr, 100 µl of the media supernatant was collected to measure secreted glycerol using the Free Glycerol Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA; catalog F6428) following the associated glycerol assay protocol.

The medium (screen media) used for drug treatment was phenol-free DMEM supplemented with 0.2% BSA FFA-free (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA; catalog 9048-46-8). The 1280 compounds were aliquoted as 2 µl at 1 mM into 16 × 96-well plates and stored at −20°C. Upon thawing, 198 µl of screen media was added to the well, bringing the final drug concentration for all compounds in the screen to 10 µM. Control vehicle was 1% DMSO served as a negative control and 1 uM isoproterenol served as a positive control in the screen. This medium containing LOPAC drugs, DMSO, and isoproterenol was transferred to 3T3-L1 cells and incubated for 24 hr.

To measure glycerol release as a readout for lipolysis, 100 µl of Free Glycerol Reagent was aliquoted per well of a 96-well plate. 10 µl of supernatant media from 3T3-L1 adipocytes was then added to each well. A standard curve was produced by using Glycerol Standard Solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA; catalog G7793). The plate was incubated at 37°C for 5 min and then developed with a plate reader set to detect absorbance at 540 nm. Using the standard curve, a fit equation was developed in Excel to convert the absorbance values into glycerol concentrations. To take into account differences that occur in wells on the edge versus middle of the plate, all well positions across all plates in the screen were averaged to create a normalization factor for any given position on the plate. These normalized values were then used to determine top hits for compounds that block lipolysis.

Glycerol release assay with Atglistatin

Request a detailed protocol

3T3-L1s were differentiated on a fibronectin-coated 96-well dish. At the start of the lipolysis experiment, 3T3-L1s were changed to serum-free DMEM supplemented with 0.2% BSA FFA-free (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA; catalog 9048-46-8). The medium was supplemented with 1% DMSO for negative control or 1 uM isoproterenol to induce lipolysis or ±100 µM Atglistatin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA; catalog SML1075) to block lipolysis and cells were incubated for 24 hr.

To measure glycerol release, 100 µl of Free Glycerol Reagent was aliquoted per well of a new 96-well plate. 10 µl of supernatant media from 3T3-L1 adipocytes was then added to each well. A standard curve was produced by using Glycerol Standard Solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA; catalog G7793). The plate was incubated at 37°C for 5 min and then developed with a plate reader set to detect absorbance at 540 nm. Using the standard curve, a fit equation was developed in Excel to convert the absorbance values into glycerol concentrations.

Zebrafish drug treatments

Request a detailed protocol

Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish were outcrossed with caspers to generate the F2 or F3 generation. F2 or F3 fish were raised at a standard density of 50 fish per 6.0 l tank. For drug treatment, fish were removed from the system at 21 dpf and placed at a density of one fish per well in a six-well plate with 10 ml of E3 per well. To evaluate viability, fish were treated for 24 hr and quantified for live and dead larvae. After a 24 hr incubation with the drug, fish were anesthetized with Tricaine and imaged using the described protocol to quantify (1) standard length and (2) area of PLIN2-tdTOMATO expression corresponding to visceral adipose tissue area. Fish were treated with Forskolin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA; catalog #F6886), Auranofin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA; catalog #A6733), JS-K (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA; catalog #J4137), or Atglistatin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA; catalog #SML1075[1]), which were all dissolved in DMSO.

Generation of ZMEL-LD cell line

Request a detailed protocol

The ZMEL zebrafish melanoma cell line was derived from a tumor of a mitfa:BRAFV600E/p53-/- zebrafish as described previously (Heilmann et al., 2015). ZMEL cells constitutively express eGFP driven by the mitfa promoter (Heilmann et al., 2015). ZMEL cells were grown at 28°C in a humidified incubator in DMEM (Gibco, Waltham, USA; catalog #11965) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gemini Bio, #100–500), 1x penicillin/streptomycin/glutamine (Gibco, Waltham, USA; catalog #10378016), and 1x GlutaMAX (Gibco, Waltham, USA; catalog #35050061). To generate the ZMEL-LD cells, ZMEL cells were nucleofected with the ubb:plin2-tdtomato plasmid using the Neon Transfection System (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA; catalog #MPK10096), selected for 2 weeks in blasticidine-supplemented media at 4 µg/µl (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA; catalog #15205–25 MG), and FACS sorted for GFP and tdTOMATO double-positive cells. ZMEL and ZMEL-LD cells underwent routine Mycoplasma testing, most recently in January 2021.

ZMEL-GFP and ZMEL-LD imaging

Request a detailed protocol

Eight-well Nunc Lab-Tek Chambered Coverglass was coated with 1:100 dilution of fibronectin in Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) (Millipore Sigma, Burlington, USA; catalog #FC010-5MG) for 30 min and then washed with DPBS (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, USA; catalog #14190–250). ZMEL-GFP or ZMEL-LD cells were seeded at 30,000 cells per well and left to adhere for 24 hr. A medium supplemented with oleic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA; catalog #O3008-5ML) was added for 24 hr. Cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, USA; catalog #sc-281692) for 45 min and washed with DPBS. For MDH staining, cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA; catalog #PI85111) for 30 min at room temperature, washed, and stained with 1:500 MDH (Abcepta, San Diego, USA; catalog #SM1000a) for 15 min. Cells were imaged on the Zeiss LSM 880 inverted confocal microscope with AiryScan using a x63 oil immersion objective. For Lipid staining, cells were stained with 1:500 Lipidtox Deep Red (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA; catalog #H34477) and 1:2000 Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA; catalog #H3570) for 30 min. Cells were imaged on the Zeiss LSM 880 inverted confocal microscope using a x40 oil immersion objective. Confocal stacks were visualized via FIJI, and 3D reconstruction was created using Imaris (Bitplane Inc, Concord, USA).

ZMEL-LD FACS analysis

Request a detailed protocol

ZMEL Dark (no fluorescence), ZMEL-GFP, and ZMEL-LD cells were plated on fibronectin-coated six-well plates at a density of 500,000 cells in 1 ml of media per well. At 24 hr after plating, cells were given either 150 µM of BSA or oleic acid with 1 µl of DMSO. At 48 and 72 hr after plating, lipid droplet low and high controls were switched to fresh media with 150 µM of BSA or oleic acid with 1 µl of DMSO. Cells pulsed with oleic acid received fresh media with 150 µM of BSA with either 40 µM Atglistatin, 0.5 µM Auranofin, or 0.5 µM JS-K. At 96 hr after plating, cells were trypsinized, washed with DPBS, and resuspended in DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS, 1x penicillin/streptomycin/glutamine, and 1x GlutaMAX. Cells were stained for viability with 1:1000 DAPI and strained through the Falcon FACS Tube with Cell Strainer Cap (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, USA; catalog #08-771-23). For Lipidtox comparison, cells were given either BSA or indicated concentrations of oleic acid for 24 hr. Cells were trypsinized, washed with DPBS, stained with 1:250 Lipid Deep Red and 1:1000 DAPI for 10 min, and strained through the Falcon FACS Tube with Cell Strainer Cap. Data was acquired via the Beckman Coulter CytoFLEX Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Miami, USA) and analyzed using FlowJo software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA).

Schematics

Request a detailed protocol

Schematics and illustrations were generated using Biorender on biorender.com.

Statistics

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (Graphpad, San Diego, USA). Data are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval (CI) or standard error of the mean (SEM). p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical tests used are noted in the figure legend. All experiments were done with at least three independent replicates. For in vivo experiments, N denotes the number of independent experiments while n denotes the number of individual fish. Imaging analyses utilized FIJI, Imaris, and MATLAB software.

Availability of resources

Request a detailed protocol

All zebrafish cell lines and transgenic lines are available upon request. In addition, the Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) zebrafish will be deposited at the Zebrafish International Resource Center.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 2-5 and Figure 2-figure supplement 1, Figure 3-figure supplement 1 and Figure 5-figure supplement 1.

References

    1. Jarc E
    2. Petan T
    (2019)
    Lipid droplets and the management of cellular stress
    The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 92:435–452.
    1. Litosch I
    2. Hudson TH
    3. Mills I
    4. Li SY
    5. Fain JN
    (1982)
    Forskolin as an activator of cyclic AMP accumulation and lipolysis in rat adipocytes
    Molecular Pharmacology 22:109–115.
    1. Shami PJ
    2. Saavedra JE
    3. Wang LY
    4. Bonifant CL
    5. Diwan BA
    6. Singh SV
    7. Gu Y
    8. Fox SD
    9. Buzard GS
    10. Citro ML
    11. Waterhouse DJ
    12. Davies KM
    13. Ji X
    14. Keefer LK
    (2003)
    JS-K, a Glutathione/Glutathione S-Transferase-activated nitric oxide donor of the diazeniumdiolate class with potent antineoplastic activity
    Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 2:409–417.

Decision letter

  1. Amnon Schlegel
    Reviewing Editor; University of Utah School of Medicine, United States
  2. Didier YR Stainier
    Senior Editor; Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany
  3. Amnon Schlegel
    Reviewer; University of Utah School of Medicine, United States
  4. James Minchin
    Reviewer

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

Acceptance summary:

In this rigorously revised manuscript you and your colleagues show that your Pin2-tdTomato fusion protein system (in whole zebrafish and in melanoma cells) is a robust reporter of lipid mass. The carefully controlled time series, high-fat feeding, and dose-response experiments strengthen your conclusions. Your reporter line will be a major resource to those in the lipid droplet field. The explicit statements regarding transgenic line and source code availability are major steps in spreading the use of your resource.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "An in vivo reporter for tracking lipid droplet dynamics in transparent zebrafish" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, including Amnon Schlegel as the Reviewing Editor and Reviewer #1, and the evaluation has been overseen by Didier Stainier as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: James Minchin (Reviewer #2).

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

As the editors have judged that your manuscript is of interest, but as described below that additional experiments are required before it is published, we would like to draw your attention to changes in our revision policy that we have made in response to COVID-19 (https://elifesciences.org/articles/57162). First, because many researchers have temporarily lost access to the labs, we will give authors as much time as they need to submit revised manuscripts. We are also offering, if you choose, to post the manuscript to bioRxiv (if it is not already there) along with this decision letter and a formal designation that the manuscript is "in revision at eLife". Please let us know if you would like to pursue this option. (If your work is more suitable for medRxiv, you will need to post the preprint yourself, as the mechanisms for us to do so are still in development.)

In this Tools and Resources manuscript, the authors present a transgenic zebrafish line ubiquitously expressing a lipid droplet coat protein gene fused to a fluorescent protein. The authors characterize the properties of this reporter in labeling adipocyte lipid droplets of optically transparent juveniles and adults casper mutants. Experiments are presented using this reporter construct to validate the results of a chemical screen conducted in in vitro-differentiated adipocytes, revealing a role for nitric oxide signaling in controlling lipolysis. Several hits from this screen are also validated in a zebrafish melanoma cell line system expressing the lipid droplet reporter system. The authors posit transgenic reporter system will be useful to workers interested in lipid droplet accumulation in an intact vertebrate animal.

The authors prepared a transgenic zebrafish whose official name should be stated as Tg-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato throughout the manuscript. This line expresses a fusion protein of the lipid droplet coat protein Perilipin 2 with a C-terminally fused tdTomato fluorescent reporter (Figure 1). This line was prepared to establish a system for evaluating lipid droplets in an intact vertebrate model organism, something not available to the research community prior to this study. The authors posit this tool will be of use to other researchers interested in studying lipid droplet biology with implications for several diseases.

The authors use the reporter line to examine the appearance of lipid droplet area in the visceral depots of late larvae (Figure 2); monitor the decrease lipid droplet area in starvation and following adrenergic signaling-driven lipolytic states (figure 3); and to demonstrate an increase in adipose area in a high-fat dietary challenge (Figure 4).

The authors then conducted a chemical screen in 3T3-L1 differentiated adipocytes for compounds that modulate lipolysis (glycerol release being the high-throughput assay read-out). They find multiple nitric oxide modulators inhibit lipolysis, and demonstrate that treatment of fasted Tg-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato juveniles with the hit compounds also modulates lipid droplet area. These same compounds also modulate lipid droplet number and size in a zebrafish melanoma cell line.

The three reviewers agree that the manuscript represents a potentially major advance. For labs using zebrafish, this tool will provide new abilities to monitor lipid droplets and their potential roles in metabolic challenges and diseases like cancer. This reporter could also allow for novel understanding of heterogeneity of adipocytes and lipid droplets by allowing study of how single cells and even single lipid droplets dynamically change in an organism. The essential revisions were formulated after discussion in the hopes of strengthening the manuscript and yielding a tool of wide interest to the field.

Title:

See the comments below regarding the need to include the chemical screen in the title or abstract.

Essential revisions:

1. A fuller ontogeny of lipid droplets within adipocytes should be feasible with the authors new reporter: starting from feeding (5 to 7 dfp) , a time series of representative larval whole-mount photomicrographs should be presented to demonstrate when, where, and to what extent the reporter begins to report. (Figure 1). Others have used a similar lipid droplet coat protein labeling approach in cell culture models and invertebrates; these citations are more pertinent than several review articles (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12591929/) and (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24894357/). An alternative, probe-free, whole animal imaging platform has been described in zebrafish, and merits discussion: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33268772/.

2. A direct comparison of the tdTomato signal with a fluorescent lipid dye such as BODIPY 493/503 in a time series would allow the reader to grasp what the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches are. A critical control for this experiment is to use analyze the fluorescent lipid signal of casper siblings not carrying the transgene to assess whether the transgene itself alters lipid accumulation. The presence of a Perilipin A transgene in mouse adipose alters whole body physiology, making the need to evaluate the zebrafish Plin2-tdTomato transgenic for possible neomorphic phenotypes critical: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21103377/. Along similar lines, the text from lines 17 to 58 and line 75 should be revised to more fairly describe the body of work using several lipid dyes in this model system.

3. A prolonged fast is feasible, and has been done with fluorescent lipid molecule vital stains (again, see point 1 regarding the robust read-out available with these probes and the need for balanced discussion of their limitations). Conducting such a fast would greatly enhance the results of Figure 2. A time course of up to 7 days would be very informative, revealing how the tdTomato signal decreases as lipid mass decreases. This would also reveal how a transgene under a ubiquitous promoter responds to loss of a cellular structure. This point mirrors the first: casper animals lacking the transgene should be examined with concurrent BODIPY staining, since this would reveal if the transgene's presence alters the kinetics of lipolysis. If single animals could be tracked, that would also enhance the power of the tool to reveal individual organism lipid levels. Of course, repeated microscopic mounting might not be feasible; but sufficient animals will survive the process to make initial and final data points informative (Figure 2).

4. The impact of the short-term (7 days) feeding of the "HFD" on mass and condition factor should be presented. The expansion of visceral lipid area seems rather modest in 7 days; doubling this duration and plotting time series for the changes in SL, mass, and adipose fluorescent area would reveal the dynamic range of this tool in revealing increases in adiposity. A second diet of age-appropriate live feed would also make the results more useful to other workers: the defined diet the authors present might not be widely used by others.

5. The scale and scope of the chemical screen should be described in the title, abstract, or both. The potent ATGL inhibitor Atglistatin has a much larger effect in preventing loss of fluorescent area in a 24-hour drug treatment in vivo than the nitric oxide donor JS-K or the thioredoxin reductase inhibitor does. This might reflect dose more than potency of mechanism: 40 μm vs. 1 uM. A dose range for the nitric oxide modulators is needed to make valid comparisons and to address the power of the transgenic system to serve as a valid readout in future chemical screens (i.e., using these animals and not 3T3L1 cells will reveal both autonomous and non-autonomous mechanisms of adipose lipid accumulation). Others have made a similar observation that merits citation: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26317347/.

6. Paralleling points 1 to 3, the melanoma cell experiments should be done with the BODIPY tracer as a comparator to reveal what is gained with the transgenic reporter. A video of melanoma cells does not add much to this manuscript, since it is the power of the in vivo reporter that is being showcased and could be demonstrated better with addressing the above points.

7. Data Availability

The availability of the Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) casper line is not disclosed, while a competing interest of the senior author's use of the casper line is. Given the NIH funding listed, this model organism should be deposited in the Zebrafish International Resource Center, and a statement regarding this should be included in the manuscript.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64744.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

1. A fuller ontogeny of lipid droplets within adipocytes should be feasible with the authors new reporter: starting from feeding (5 to 7 dfp) , a time series of representative larval whole mount photomicrographs should be presented to demonstrate when, where, and to what extent the reporter begins to report. (Figure 1). Others have used a similar lipid droplet coat protein labeling approach in cell culture models and invertebrates; these citations are more pertinent than several review articles (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12591929/) and (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24894357/). An alternative, probe-free, whole animal imaging platform has been described in zebrafish, and merits discussion: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33268772/.

We have performed a time-series analysis of expression in both WT siblings as well as the Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) line. This was done at 5, 14, 21, 42dpf and adulthood. In addition, and in response to point #2 below, we simultaneously stained with BODIPY to be able to compare our transgenic with a more established lipid dye. Using previously developed nomenclature for various adipocyte depots in zebrafish (Minchin and Rawls, 2017a), we created heatmaps of expression for both BODIPY and tdTomato (Supplementary Figure 2A) and show representative images (Supplementary Figure 2B). These results demonstrate that the transgenic reporter is first visible at 14dpf, which matches what is seen by BODIPY at this time point. Expression in the transgenic line increases with time, as expected and includes additional depots by adulthood, again matching closely what is seen in the BODIPY stained animals.

We agree with the comment that citation of primary literature, rather than review papers, is appropriate. We have corrected this in the text.

2. A direct comparison of the tdTomato signal with a fluorescent lipid dye such as BODIPY 493/503 in a time series would allow the reader to grasp what the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches are. A critical control for this experiment is to use analyze the fluorescent lipid signal of casper siblings not carrying the transgene to assess whether the transgene itself alters lipid accumulation. The presence of a Perilipin A transgene in mouse adipose alters whole body physiology, making the need to evaluate the zebrafish Plin2-tdTomato transgenic for possible neomorphic phenotypes critical: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21103377/. Along similar lines, the text from lines 17 to 58 and line 75 should be revised to more fairly describe the body of work using several lipid dyes in this model system.

We agree that the use of sibling controls, along with BODIPY, was an essential experiment to rule out a neomorphic effect of the transgene. As noted in point #1 above, we have performed these experiments and see strong concordance between BODIPY staining and tdTomato fluorescence, with no obvious effect of the transgene.

Specifically, in Figure 2C-F, we see no significant difference in BODIPY staining between the WT siblings and the Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) line (average BODIPY area: WT = 0.37 ± 0.04 mm2 and Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) = 0.34 ± 0.05 mm2 | Mann Whitney test p=0.42). Furthermore, in quantifying the effect across time (see the heatmap in Supplementary Figure 2), we see no difference in the timing of BODIPY staining in WT siblings versus transgenics. We also saw no effect of the transgene on lipolysis during prolonged fasting (see point #3, below). Finally, and as explained in more detail in point #6 below, we also found that the transgene did not affect lipid droplet content in the ZMEL melanoma cell line experiments as well. Thus, while we cannot rule out an effect on the transgene is every single physiologic situation, we do not see an effect during normal development or in the cancer context.

We have modified the text to take these new results into account and put them into better context with the existing literature regarding lipid dyes.

3. A prolonged fast is feasible, and has been done with fluorescent lipid molecule vital stains (again, see point 1 regarding the robust read-out available with these probes and the need for balanced discussion of their limitations). Conducting such a fast would greatly enhance the results of Figure 2. A time course of up to 7 days would be very informative, revealing how the tdTomato signal decreases as lipid mass decreases. This would also reveal how a transgene under a ubiquitous promoter responds to loss of a cellular structure. This point mirrors the first: casper animals lacking the transgene should be examined with concurrent BODIPY staining, since this would reveal if the transgene's presence alters the kinetics of lipolysis. If single animals could be tracked, that would also enhance the power of the tool to reveal individual organism lipid levels. Of course, repeated microscopic mounting might not be feasible; but sufficient animals will survive the process to make initial and final data points informative (Figure 2).

We have now performed this experiment as suggested. The new data is now shown in Figure 3 of the revised manuscript. We first performed the control experiment in which we used WT and Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) siblings at 21dpf, and fasted them for 7 days and stained them with BODIPY (to further address point #2 above). Individual animals were tracked within each group, and the data then pooled for each group. We observed a decrease in BODIPY staining to the same extent in the WT or Tg control (Figure 3A-E). We then further quantified the tdTomato signal at days 0, 2, 5, and 7 during a prolonged 7d fast and saw the expected decrease in adipocyte area (Figure 3F-J). These data again suggest that the presence of the transgene does not affect overall lipolysis after fasting, and that the transgene can be used to track lipid droplets over a prolonged period of time.

4. The impact of the short-term (7 days) feeding of the "HFD" on mass and condition factor should be presented. The expansion of visceral lipid area seems rather modest in 7 days; doubling this duration and plotting time series for the changes in SL, mass, and adipose fluorescent area would reveal the dynamic range of this tool in revealing increases in adiposity. A second diet of age-appropriate live feed would also make the results more useful to other workers: the defined diet the authors present might not be widely used by others.

We have performed this experiment in which we fed either a control/standard diet or high-fat diets and measured area and standard length from 0 to 14 days. This revealed that the majority of the increase in adiposity from high-fat diet occurs by day 7, with relatively little further increase by day 14. Surprisingly, we found little acceleration of standard length in this assay, suggesting the effect of HFD is very specific to adipose tissue. These data are shown in Figure 4A-E. We attempted to measure the mass of the fish in addition to SL and fluorescent area but the small SLs and variable adherence of water to the fish produced inconsistent results.

While we agree that live-feed diets remain common in the field, our facility has converted to a powdered feed diet. In addition, there is no simple way to make a high fat diet addition to a live feed diet. We have repeatedly tried adding egg yolk to the diet (to mimic a high fat diet) and have found that the fish consistently avoid eating it. We did not feel it would be a fair comparison to compare a standard live feed diet to a powdered high fat diet. Thus for these experiments, we used either a standard control diet or high-fat feed diet from Sparos, which mirrors what is increasingly being used in many facilities, including ours.

5. The scale and scope of the chemical screen should be described in the title, abstract, or both. The potent ATGL inhibitor Atglistatin has a much larger effect in preventing loss of fluorescent area in a 24-hour drug treatment in vivo than the nitric oxide donor JS-K or the thioredoxin reductase inhibitor does. This might reflect dose more than potency of mechanism: 40 μm vs. 1 uM. A dose range for the nitric oxide modulators is needed to make valid comparisons and to address the power of the transgenic system to serve as a valid readout in future chemical screens (i.e., using these animals and not 3T3L1 cells will reveal both autonomous and non-autonomous mechanisms of adipose lipid accumulation). Others have made a similar observation that merits citation: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26317347/.

We agree that a more robust dose response curve was needed for the in vivo experiments. We first performed dose-limiting toxicity studies in the fish to find the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) that did not cause death or illness. This was 40µM for Atglistatin, 1µM for Auranofin, and 1µM for JS-K (Supplementary Figure 5A-C). Based on this, we tested these drugs at their MTD in vivo and measured lipid droplet area, and confirmed that only Atglistatin and JS-K had an effect at these doses (Figure 5C-E). Because Atglistatin was very well tolerated at multiple doses, we also measured lipid droplet area after exposure to 1µM, 10µM and 40µM and again found only an effect at the MTD of 40µM (Supplementary Figure 5D-F). These data suggest that for in vivo studies, it is likely that the efficacy of a given drug is likely to be greatest at or near the MTD, which is not surprising given the potential for lipolysis to affect systemic physiology.

We have modified the abstract to better reflect the chemical screen aspect of the paper, and will add in the additional relevant citation.

6. Paralleling points 1 to 3, the melanoma cell experiments should be done with the BODIPY tracer as a comparator to reveal what is gained with the transgenic reporter. A video of melanoma cells does not add much to this manuscript, since it is the power of the in vivo reporter that is being showcased and could be demonstrated better with addressing the above points.

We have performed this control experiment. Analogous to what we did in the sibling fish (points #1 and #2 above), we exposed either control ZMEL-GFP or ZMEL-LD cells to increasing doses of oleic acid, and stained them with the far-red dye Lipidtox (which fluoresces in a range distinct from either GFP or tdTomato). We then quantified median fluorescence intensity (MFI) for far-red fluorescence (from the Lipidtox). Consistent with our in vivo results, we saw no effect of the transgene on accumulation of Lipidtox staining after oleic acid treatment.

To further explore this, we then used FACS to quantify the percentage of tdTomato versus Lipidtox positive cells after oleic acid. Instead of measuring MFI in this assay, cells were gated with a negative control population and anything above that control gate is considered positive, as is common in FACS. This was highly informative. While the Lipid staining clearly is responsive to oleic acid, it did not show a very high dynamic range, in that the various concentrations read out in fairly similar ways. In contrast, the same assay using the tdTomato transgene showed very high dynamic range, essentially mirroring the concentration of oleic acid added to the media.

Taken together, these two experiments demonstrate that the transgene does not exert a neomorphic effect on the melanoma cells, and further demonstrates the potential usefulness of the transgene compared to lipid dyes. A consideration of this data has been added to the manuscript.

7. Data Availability

The availability of the Tg(-3.5ubb:plin2-tdTomato) casper line is not disclosed, while a competing interest of the senior author's use of the casper line is. Given the NIH funding listed, this model organism should be deposited in the Zebrafish International Resource Center, and a statement regarding this should be included in the manuscript.

These fish will be deposited in ZIRC as is standard in the field. However, in some cases ZIRC will not accept all transgenics, depending on their capacity. Should that be the case, we would readily make the animals available to any lab who requests it. In addition, we will make all transgenes available via Addgene.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64744.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dianne Lumaquin

    1. Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    2. Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Eleanor Johns
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5285-0467

  2. Eleanor Johns

    1. Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    2. Gerstner Sloan Kettering Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Dianne Lumaquin
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6802-041X

  3. Emily Montal

    Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  4. Joshua M Weiss

    1. Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    2. Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7340-4004

  5. David Ola

    Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  6. Abderhman Abuhashem

    1. Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York, United States
    2. Developmental Biology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  7. Richard M White

    Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing
    For correspondence
    whiter@mskcc.org
    Competing interests
    Richard White: Senior editor, eLife. Is a paid consultant to N-of-One Therapeutics, a subsidiary of Qiagen. Is on thescientific advisory board of Consano, but receives no income for this. Receives royalty payments for the use of the casper zebrafish line from Carolina Biologicals.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9099-9169

Funding

National Institutes of Health (F30 CA254152)

  • Dianne Lumaquin

National Institutes of Health (T32GM007739-42)

  • Dianne Lumaquin
  • Joshua M Weiss
  • Abderhman Abuhashem

National Institutes of Health (5K00CA223016-04)

  • Emily Montal

National Institutes of Health (F30 HD 103398)

  • Abderhman Abuhashem

National Institutes of Health (F31 AR079215)

  • Eleanor Johns

National Institutes of Health (R25CA020449)

  • David Ola

Melanoma Research Alliance

  • Richard M White

National Institutes of Health (R01CA229215)

  • Richard M White

National Institutes of Health (R01CA238317)

  • Richard M White

National Institutes of Health (DP2CA186572)

  • Richard M White

Pershing Square Foundation

  • Richard M White

Mark Foundation For Cancer Research

  • Richard M White

Harry J. Lloyd Charitable Trust

  • Richard M White

National Cancer Institute (P30 CA008748)

  • Richard M White

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

  • Richard M White

Consano

  • Richard M White

SSC

  • Richard M White

American Cancer Society (American Cancer Society Research Scholar)

  • Richard M White

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank members at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Aquatics Core, Molecular Cytology Core, and Flow Cytometry Core for their contributions to this work. We thank Dr. Mohita Tagore and Dr. Ting-Hsiang (Richard) Huang for comments on the project and manuscript.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#12-05-008) of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (Permit Number: D16-00199). Every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Senior Editor

  1. Didier YR Stainier, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany

Reviewing Editor

  1. Amnon Schlegel, University of Utah School of Medicine, United States

Reviewers

  1. Amnon Schlegel, University of Utah School of Medicine, United States
  2. James Minchin

Version history

  1. Received: November 9, 2020
  2. Accepted: May 14, 2021
  3. Version of Record published: June 11, 2021 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2021, Lumaquin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,036
    Page views
  • 609
    Downloads
  • 12
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dianne Lumaquin
  2. Eleanor Johns
  3. Emily Montal
  4. Joshua M Weiss
  5. David Ola
  6. Abderhman Abuhashem
  7. Richard M White
(2021)
An in vivo reporter for tracking lipid droplet dynamics in transparent zebrafish
eLife 10:e64744.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64744

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology

    Rab12 is a regulator of LRRK2 and its activation by damaged lysosomes

    Xiang Wang, Vitaliy V Bondar ... Anastasia G Henry
    Short Report Updated

    Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) variants associated with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and Crohn’s disease lead to increased phosphorylation of its Rab substrates. While it has been recently shown that perturbations in cellular homeostasis including lysosomal damage can increase LRRK2 activity and localization to lysosomes, the molecular mechanisms by which LRRK2 activity is regulated have remained poorly defined. We performed a targeted siRNA screen to identify regulators of LRRK2 activity and identified Rab12 as a novel modulator of LRRK2-dependent phosphorylation of one of its substrates, Rab10. Using a combination of imaging and immunopurification methods to isolate lysosomes, we demonstrated that Rab12 is actively recruited to damaged lysosomes and leads to a local and LRRK2-dependent increase in Rab10 phosphorylation. PD-linked variants, including LRRK2 R1441G and VPS35 D620N, lead to increased recruitment of LRRK2 to the lysosome and a local elevation in lysosomal levels of pT73 Rab10. Together, these data suggest a conserved mechanism by which Rab12, in response to damage or expression of PD-associated variants, facilitates the recruitment of LRRK2 and phosphorylation of its Rab substrate(s) at the lysosome.

    1. Cell Biology

    Genome-wide screen reveals Rab12 GTPase as a critical activator of Parkinson’s disease-linked LRRK2 kinase

    Herschel S Dhekne, Francesca Tonelli ... Suzanne R Pfeffer
    Research Advance Updated

    Activating mutations in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) cause Parkinson’s disease. LRRK2 phosphorylates a subset of Rab GTPases, particularly Rab10 and Rab8A, and we showed previously that these phosphoRabs play an important role in LRRK2 membrane recruitment and activation (Vides et al., 2022). To learn more about LRRK2 pathway regulation, we carried out an unbiased, CRISPR-based genome-wide screen to identify modifiers of cellular phosphoRab10 levels. A flow cytometry assay was developed to detect changes in phosphoRab10 levels in pools of mouse NIH-3T3 cells harboring unique CRISPR guide sequences. Multiple negative and positive regulators were identified; surprisingly, knockout of the Rab12 gene was especially effective in decreasing phosphoRab10 levels in multiple cell types and knockout mouse tissues. Rab-driven increases in phosphoRab10 were specific for Rab12, LRRK2-dependent and PPM1H phosphatase-reversible, and did not require Rab12 phosphorylation; they were seen with wild type and pathogenic G2019S and R1441C LRRK2. As expected for a protein that regulates LRRK2 activity, Rab12 also influenced primary cilia formation. AlphaFold modeling revealed a novel Rab12 binding site in the LRRK2 Armadillo domain, and we show that residues predicted to be essential for Rab12 interaction at this site influence phosphoRab10 and phosphoRab12 levels in a manner distinct from Rab29 activation of LRRK2. Our data show that Rab12 binding to a new site in the LRRK2 Armadillo domain activates LRRK2 kinase for Rab phosphorylation and could serve as a new therapeutic target for a novel class of LRRK2 inhibitors that do not target the kinase domain.

    1. Cell Biology

    Differential regulation of hair cell actin cytoskeleton mediated by SRF and MRTFB

    Ling-Yun Zhou, Chen-Xi Jin ... Hao Wu
    Research Article Updated

    The MRTF–SRF pathway has been extensively studied for its crucial role in driving the expression of a large number of genes involved in actin cytoskeleton of various cell types. However, the specific contribution of MRTF–SRF in hair cells remains unknown. In this study, we showed that hair cell-specific deletion of Srf or Mrtfb, but not Mrtfa, leads to similar defects in the development of stereocilia dimensions and the maintenance of cuticular plate integrity. We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based hair cell RNA-Seq analysis to investigate the mechanistic underpinnings of the changes observed in Srf and Mrtfb mutants, respectively. Interestingly, the transcriptome analysis revealed distinct profiles of genes regulated by Srf and Mrtfb, suggesting different transcriptional regulation mechanisms of actin cytoskeleton activities mediated by Srf and Mrtfb. Exogenous delivery of calponin 2 using Adeno-associated virus transduction in Srf mutants partially rescued the impairments of stereocilia dimensions and the F-actin intensity of cuticular plate, suggesting the involvement of Cnn2, as an Srf downstream target, in regulating the hair bundle morphology and cuticular plate actin cytoskeleton organization. Our study uncovers, for the first time, the unexpected differential transcriptional regulation of actin cytoskeleton mediated by Srf and Mrtfb in hair cells, and also demonstrates the critical role of SRF–CNN2 in modulating actin dynamics of the stereocilia and cuticular plate, providing new insights into the molecular mechanism underlying hair cell development and maintenance.