Decoding subjective emotional arousal from eeg during an immersive virtual reality experience

  1. Simon M Hofmann  Is a corresponding author
  2. Felix Klotzsche  Is a corresponding author
  3. Alberto Mariola  Is a corresponding author
  4. Vadim Nikulin
  5. Arno Villringer
  6. Michael Gaebler  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany
  2. University of Sussex, United Kingdom

Abstract

Immersive virtual reality (VR) enables naturalistic neuroscientific studies while maintaining experimental control, but dynamic and interactive stimuli pose methodological challenges. We here probed the link between emotional arousal, a fundamental property of affective experience, and parieto-occipital alpha power under naturalistic stimulation: 37 young healthy adults completed an immersive VR experience, which included rollercoaster rides, while their EEG was recorded. They then continuously rated their subjective emotional arousal while viewing a replay of their experience. The association between emotional arousal and parieto-occipital alpha power was tested and confirmed by (1) decomposing the continuous EEG signal while maximizing the comodulation between alpha power and arousal ratings and by (2) decoding periods of high and low arousal with discriminative common spatial patterns and a Long Short-Term Memory recurrent neural network. We successfully combine EEG and a naturalistic immersive VR experience to extend previous findings on the neurophysiology of emotional arousal towards real-world neuroscience.

Data availability

We did not obtain participants' consent to release their individual data. Since our analyses focus on the single-subject level, we have only limited data which are sufficiently anonymized (e.g., summarized or averaged) to be publicly shared. Wherever possible, we provide "source data" to reproduce the manuscript's tables and figures (Figures 2, 4, 8 and 10). The scripts of all analyses are available at https://github.com/SHEscher/NeVRo

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Simon M Hofmann

    Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    For correspondence
    simon.hofmann@cbs.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0958-501X
  2. Felix Klotzsche

    Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    For correspondence
    klotzsche@cbs.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3985-2481
  3. Alberto Mariola

    Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    a.mariola@sussex.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Vadim Nikulin

    Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Arno Villringer

    Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Michael Gaebler

    Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
    For correspondence
    gaebler@cbs.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (13GW0206)

  • Felix Klotzsche
  • Michael Gaebler

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Participants signed informed consent before their participation, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department of Psychology at the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (vote no. 2017-22).

Reviewing Editor

  1. Alexander Shackman, University of Maryland, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: October 25, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: November 11, 2020
  3. Accepted: October 27, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: October 28, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: December 15, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Hofmann et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,899
    Page views
  • 615
    Downloads
  • 24
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Simon M Hofmann
  2. Felix Klotzsche
  3. Alberto Mariola
  4. Vadim Nikulin
  5. Arno Villringer
  6. Michael Gaebler
(2021)
Decoding subjective emotional arousal from eeg during an immersive virtual reality experience
eLife 10:e64812.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64812

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Louise Schenberg, Aïda Palou ... Mathieu Beraneck
    Research Article

    The functional complementarity of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and optokinetic reflex (OKR) allows for optimal combined gaze stabilization responses (CGR) in light. While sensory substitution has been reported following complete vestibular loss, the capacity of the central vestibular system to compensate for partial peripheral vestibular loss remains to be determined. Here, we first demonstrate the efficacy of a 6-week subchronic ototoxic protocol in inducing transient and partial vestibular loss which equally affects the canal- and otolith-dependent VORs. Immunostaining of hair cells in the vestibular sensory epithelia revealed that organ-specific alteration of type I, but not type II, hair cells correlates with functional impairments. The decrease in VOR performance is paralleled with an increase in the gain of the OKR occurring in a specific range of frequencies where VOR normally dominates gaze stabilization, compatible with a sensory substitution process. Comparison of unimodal OKR or VOR versus bimodal CGR revealed that visuo-vestibular interactions remain reduced despite a significant recovery in the VOR. Modeling and sweep-based analysis revealed that the differential capacity to optimally combine OKR and VOR correlates with the reproducibility of the VOR responses. Overall, these results shed light on the multisensory reweighting occurring in pathologies with fluctuating peripheral vestibular malfunction.

    1. Neuroscience
    Mika Rubinov
    Review Article

    Genuinely new discovery transcends existing knowledge. Despite this, many analyses in systems neuroscience neglect to test new speculative hypotheses against benchmark empirical facts. Some of these analyses inadvertently use circular reasoning to present existing knowledge as new discovery. Here, I discuss that this problem can confound key results and estimate that it has affected more than three thousand studies in network neuroscience over the last decade. I suggest that future studies can reduce this problem by limiting the use of speculative evidence, integrating existing knowledge into benchmark models, and rigorously testing proposed discoveries against these models. I conclude with a summary of practical challenges and recommendations.