A subcellular map of the human kinome

  1. Haitao Zhang
  2. Xiaolei Cao
  3. Mei Tang
  4. Guoxuan Zhong
  5. Yuan Si
  6. Haidong Li
  7. Feifeng Zhu
  8. Qinghua Liao
  9. Liuju Li
  10. Jianhui Zhao
  11. Jia Feng
  12. Shuaifeng Li
  13. Chenliang Wang
  14. Manuel Kaulich
  15. Fangwei Wang
  16. Liangyi Chen
  17. Li Li
  18. Zongping Xia
  19. Tingbo Liang
  20. Huasong Lu
  21. Xin-Hua Feng
  22. Bin Zhao  Is a corresponding author
  1. Zhejiang University, China
  2. Yulin Normal University, China
  3. Peking University, China
  4. Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
  5. Hangzhou Normal University, China
  6. First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China

Abstract

The human kinome comprises 538 kinases playing essential functions by catalyzing protein phosphorylation. Annotation of subcellular distribution of the kinome greatly facilitates investigation of normal and disease mechanisms. Here, we present Kinome Atlas (KA), an image-based map of the kinome annotated to 10 cellular compartments. 456 epitope-tagged kinases, representing 85% of the human kinome, were expressed in HeLa cells and imaged by immunofluorescent microscopy under a similar condition. KA revealed kinase family-enriched subcellular localizations, and discovered a collection of new kinase localizations at mitochondria, plasma membrane, extracellular space, and other structures. Furthermore, KA demonstrated the role of liquid-liquid phase separation in formation of kinase condensates. Identification of MOK as a mitochondrial kinase revealed its function in cristae dynamics, respiration, and oxidative stress response. Although limited by possible mislocalization due to overexpression or epitope tagging, this subcellular map of the kinome can be used to refine regulatory mechanisms involving protein phosphorylation.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Images of KA were available at the Cell Image Library database (http://flagella.crbs.ucsd.edu/pages/kinome_atlas?token=dHqMbfi06S).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Haitao Zhang

    Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Xiaolei Cao

    Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mei Tang

    Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Guoxuan Zhong

    Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yuan Si

    Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Haidong Li

    College of Biology and Pharmacy, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4427-7920
  7. Feifeng Zhu

    Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Qinghua Liao

    Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Liuju Li

    State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jianhui Zhao

    Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Jia Feng

    Department of ophthalmology, The Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6742-484X
  12. Shuaifeng Li

    Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Chenliang Wang

    Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Manuel Kaulich

    Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9528-8822
  15. Fangwei Wang

    Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5617-282X
  16. Liangyi Chen

    Institute of Molecular Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1270-7321
  17. Li Li

    Institute of Aging Research, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Zongping Xia

    Translational Medicine Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Tingbo Liang

    Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Huasong Lu

    Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Xin-Hua Feng

    Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Bin Zhao

    Life Sciences Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    For correspondence
    binzhao@zju.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1690-646X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970726)

  • Bin Zhao

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81730069)

  • Bin Zhao

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2017YFA0504502)

  • Bin Zhao

Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LZ21C070002)

  • Bin Zhao

Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation and Translational Research of Zhejiang Province

  • Bin Zhao

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Zhang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 15,066
    views
  • 1,802
    downloads
  • 53
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Haitao Zhang
  2. Xiaolei Cao
  3. Mei Tang
  4. Guoxuan Zhong
  5. Yuan Si
  6. Haidong Li
  7. Feifeng Zhu
  8. Qinghua Liao
  9. Liuju Li
  10. Jianhui Zhao
  11. Jia Feng
  12. Shuaifeng Li
  13. Chenliang Wang
  14. Manuel Kaulich
  15. Fangwei Wang
  16. Liangyi Chen
  17. Li Li
  18. Zongping Xia
  19. Tingbo Liang
  20. Huasong Lu
  21. Xin-Hua Feng
  22. Bin Zhao
(2021)
A subcellular map of the human kinome
eLife 10:e64943.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64943

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64943

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kira Breunig, Xuifen Lei ... Luiz O Penalva
    Research Article

    RNA binding proteins (RBPs) containing intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are present in diverse molecular complexes where they function as dynamic regulators. Their characteristics promote liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) and the formation of membraneless organelles such as stress granules and nucleoli. IDR-RBPs are particularly relevant in the nervous system and their dysfunction is associated with neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumor development. Serpine1 mRNA-binding protein 1 (SERBP1) is a unique member of this group, being mostly disordered and lacking canonical RNA-binding domains. We defined SERBP1’s interactome, uncovered novel roles in splicing, cell division and ribosomal biogenesis, and showed its participation in pathological stress granules and Tau aggregates in Alzheimer’s brains. SERBP1 preferentially interacts with other G-quadruplex (G4) binders, implicated in different stages of gene expression, suggesting that G4 binding is a critical component of SERBP1 function in different settings. Similarly, we identified important associations between SERBP1 and PARP1/polyADP-ribosylation (PARylation). SERBP1 interacts with PARP1 and its associated factors and influences PARylation. Moreover, protein complexes in which SERBP1 participates contain mostly PARylated proteins and PAR binders. Based on these results, we propose a feedback regulatory model in which SERBP1 influences PARP1 function and PARylation, while PARylation modulates SERBP1 functions and participation in regulatory complexes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Parnian Arafi, Sujan Devkota ... Michael S Wolfe
    Research Article

    Missense mutations in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilin-1 (PSEN1) cause early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD) and alter proteolytic production of secreted 38-to-43-residue amyloid β-peptides (Aβ) by the PSEN1-containing γ-secretase complex, ostensibly supporting the amyloid hypothesis of pathogenesis. However, proteolysis of APP substrate by γ-secretase is processive, involving initial endoproteolysis to produce long Aβ peptides of 48 or 49 residues followed by carboxypeptidase trimming in mostly tripeptide increments. We recently reported evidence that FAD mutations in APP and PSEN1 cause deficiencies in early steps in processive proteolysis of APP substrate C99 and that this results from stalled γ-secretase enzyme-substrate and/or enzyme-intermediate complexes. These stalled complexes triggered synaptic degeneration in a Caenorhabditis elegans model of FAD independently of Aβ production. Here, we conducted full quantitative analysis of all proteolytic events on APP substrate by γ-secretase with six additional PSEN1 FAD mutations and found that all six are deficient in multiple processing steps. However, only one of these (F386S) was deficient in certain trimming steps but not in endoproteolysis. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy in intact cells revealed that all six PSEN1 FAD mutations lead to stalled γ-secretase enzyme-substrate/intermediate complexes. The F386S mutation, however, does so only in Aβ-rich regions of the cells, not in C99-rich regions, consistent with the deficiencies of this mutant enzyme only in trimming of Aβ intermediates. These findings provide further evidence that FAD mutations lead to stalled and stabilized γ-secretase enzyme-substrate and/or enzyme-intermediate complexes and are consistent with the stalled process rather than the products of γ-secretase proteolysis as the pathogenic trigger.