1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
  2. Plant Biology

Widespread premature transcription termination of Arabidopsis thaliana NLR genes by the spen protein FPA

  1. Matthew T Parker
  2. Katarzyna Knop
  3. Vasiliki Zacharaki
  4. Anna V Sherwood
  5. Daniel Tome
  6. Xuhong Yu
  7. Pascal GP Martin
  8. Jim Beynon
  9. Scott Michaels
  10. Geoffrey John Barton
  11. Gordon Grant Simpson  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Dundee, United Kingdom
  2. University of Warwick, United Kingdom
  3. Indiana University, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65537
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Matthew T Parker
  2. Katarzyna Knop
  3. Vasiliki Zacharaki
  4. Anna V Sherwood
  5. Daniel Tome
  6. Xuhong Yu
  7. Pascal GP Martin
  8. Jim Beynon
  9. Scott Michaels
  10. Geoffrey John Barton
  11. Gordon Grant Simpson
(2021)
Widespread premature transcription termination of Arabidopsis thaliana NLR genes by the spen protein FPA
eLife 10:e65537.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65537
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Genes involved in disease resistance are some of the fastest evolving and most diverse components of genomes. Large numbers of nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat (NLR) genes are found in plant genomes and are required for disease resistance. However, NLRs can trigger autoimmunity, disrupt beneficial microbiota or reduce fitness. It is therefore crucial to understand how NLRs are controlled. Here we show that the RNA-binding protein FPA mediates widespread premature cleavage and polyadenylation of NLR transcripts, thereby controlling their functional expression and impacting immunity. Using long-read Nanopore direct RNA sequencing, we resolved the complexity of NLR transcript processing and gene annotation. Our results uncover a co-transcriptional layer of NLR control with implications for understanding the regulatory and evolutionary dynamics of NLRs in the immune responses of plants.

Data availability

IVI-MS data is available from the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD022684. FPA and Pol II ChIP-Seq data is available from ENA accession PRJNA449914. Col-0 nanopore DRS data is available from ENA accession PRJEB32782. fpa-8 and 35S::FPA:YFP nanopore DRS data is available from ENA accession PRJEB41451. hen2-2 nanopore DRS data is available from ENA accession PRJEB41381. Col-0, fpa-8 and 35S::FPA:YFP Helicos DRS data is available from Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.4309752 ahead of submission to ENA. Col-0, fpa-8 and 35S::FPA:YFP Illumina RNA-Seq data is available from ENA accession PRJEB41455.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Matthew T Parker

    School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0891-8495

  2. Katarzyna Knop

    School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2636-9450

  3. Vasiliki Zacharaki

    School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5543-2332

  4. Anna V Sherwood

    School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Daniel Tome

    School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Xuhong Yu

    Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Pascal GP Martin

    Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4271-658X

  8. Jim Beynon

    School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Scott Michaels

    Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. Geoffrey John Barton

    School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9014-5355

  11. Gordon Grant Simpson

    School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    g.g.simpson@dundee.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6744-5889

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M010066/1)

  • Geoffrey John Barton
  • Gordon Grant Simpson

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J00247X/1)

  • Geoffrey John Barton
  • Gordon Grant Simpson

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M004155/1)

  • Geoffrey John Barton
  • Gordon Grant Simpson

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (799300)

  • Katarzyna Knop

Wellcome (097945/B/11/Z)

  • Geoffrey John Barton
  • Gordon Grant Simpson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Parker et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,561
    views
  • 545
    downloads
  • 44
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Matthew T Parker
  2. Katarzyna Knop
  3. Vasiliki Zacharaki
  4. Anna V Sherwood
  5. Daniel Tome
  6. Xuhong Yu
  7. Pascal GP Martin
  8. Jim Beynon
  9. Scott Michaels
  10. Geoffrey John Barton
  11. Gordon Grant Simpson
(2021)
Widespread premature transcription termination of Arabidopsis thaliana NLR genes by the spen protein FPA
eLife 10:e65537.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65537

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65537

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Evolutionary Biology

    The emergence and evolution of gene expression in genome regions replete with regulatory motifs

    Timothy Fuqua, Yiqiao Sun, Andreas Wagner
    Research Article

    Gene regulation is essential for life and controlled by regulatory DNA. Mutations can modify the activity of regulatory DNA, and also create new regulatory DNA, a process called regulatory emergence. Non-regulatory and regulatory DNA contain motifs to which transcription factors may bind. In prokaryotes, gene expression requires a stretch of DNA called a promoter, which contains two motifs called –10 and –35 boxes. However, these motifs may occur in both promoters and non-promoter DNA in multiple copies. They have been implicated in some studies to improve promoter activity, and in others to repress it. Here, we ask whether the presence of such motifs in different genetic sequences influences promoter evolution and emergence. To understand whether and how promoter motifs influence promoter emergence and evolution, we start from 50 ‘promoter islands’, DNA sequences enriched with –10 and –35 boxes. We mutagenize these starting ‘parent’ sequences, and measure gene expression driven by 240,000 of the resulting mutants. We find that the probability that mutations create an active promoter varies more than 200-fold, and is not correlated with the number of promoter motifs. For parent sequences without promoter activity, mutations created over 1500 new –10 and –35 boxes at unique positions in the library, but only ~0.3% of these resulted in de-novo promoter activity. Only ~13% of all –10 and –35 boxes contribute to de-novo promoter activity. For parent sequences with promoter activity, mutations created new –10 and –35 boxes in 11 specific positions that partially overlap with preexisting ones to modulate expression. We also find that –10 and –35 boxes do not repress promoter activity. Overall, our work demonstrates how promoter motifs influence promoter emergence and evolution. It has implications for predicting and understanding regulatory evolution, de novo genes, and phenotypic evolution.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Developmental Biology

    N-terminus of Drosophila melanogaster MSL1 is critical for dosage compensation

    Valentin Babosha, Natalia Klimenko ... Oksana Maksimenko
    Research Article

    The male-specific lethal complex (MSL), which consists of five proteins and two non-coding roX RNAs, is involved in the transcriptional enhancement of X-linked genes to compensate for the sex chromosome monosomy in Drosophila XY males compared with XX females. The MSL1 and MSL2 proteins form the heterotetrameric core of the MSL complex and are critical for the specific recruitment of the complex to the high-affinity ‘entry’ sites (HAS) on the X chromosome. In this study, we demonstrated that the N-terminal region of MSL1 is critical for stability and functions of MSL1. Amino acid deletions and substitutions in the N-terminal region of MSL1 strongly affect both the interaction with roX2 RNA and the MSL complex binding to HAS on the X chromosome. In particular, substitution of the conserved N-terminal amino-acids 3–7 in MSL1 (MSL1GS) affects male viability similar to the inactivation of genes encoding roX RNAs. In addition, MSL1GS binds to promoters such as MSL1WT but does not co-bind with MSL2 and MSL3 to X chromosomal HAS. However, overexpression of MSL2 partially restores the dosage compensation. Thus, the interaction of MSL1 with roX RNA is critical for the efficient assembly of the MSL complex on HAS of the male X chromosome.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics

    A genome-wide nucleosome-resolution map of promoter-centered interactions in human cells corroborates the enhancer-promoter looping model

    Arkadiy K Golov, Alexey A Gavrilov ... Sergey V Razin
    Research Article

    The enhancer-promoter looping model, in which enhancers activate their target genes via physical contact, has long dominated the field of gene regulation. However, the ubiquity of this model has been questioned due to evidence of alternative mechanisms and the lack of its systematic validation, primarily owing to the absence of suitable experimental techniques. In this study, we present a new MNase-based proximity ligation method called MChIP-C, allowing for the measurement of protein-mediated chromatin interactions at single-nucleosome resolution on a genome-wide scale. By applying MChIP-C to study H3K4me3 promoter-centered interactions in K562 cells, we found that it had greatly improved resolution and sensitivity compared to restriction endonuclease-based C-methods. This allowed us to identify EP300 histone acetyltransferase and the SWI/SNF remodeling complex as potential candidates for establishing and/or maintaining enhancer-promoter interactions. Finally, leveraging data from published CRISPRi screens, we found that most functionally verified enhancers do physically interact with their cognate promoters, supporting the enhancer-promoter looping model.