Leveraging the mendelian disorders of the epigenetic machinery to systematically map functional epigenetic variation
- Johns Hopkins University, United States
- Stanford University, United States
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States
Abstract
Although each Mendelian Disorder of the Epigenetic Machinery (MDEM) has a different causative gene, there are shared disease manifestations. We hypothesize that this phenotypic convergence is a consequence of shared epigenetic alterations. To identify such shared alterations we interrogate chromatin (ATAC-Seq) and expression (RNA-Seq) states in B cells from three MDEM mouse models (Kabuki (KS) types 1&2 and Rubinstein-Taybi (RT1) syndromes). We develop a new approach for the overlap analysis and find extensive overlap primarily localized in gene promoters. We show that disruption of chromatin accessibility at promoters often disrupts downstream gene expression, and identify 587 loci and 264 genes with shared disruption across all three MDEMs. Subtle expression alterations of multiple, IgA-relevant genes, collectively contribute to IgA deficiency in KS1 and RT1, but not in KS2. We propose that the joint study of MDEMs offers a principled approach for systematically mapping functional epigenetic variation in mammals.
Data availability
Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE162181.
-
ATAC-Seq dataNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE162181.
-
RNA-Seq dataNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE162181.
Article and author information
Author details
Allison Kalinousky
Funding
National Institutes of Health (R01GM121459)
- Kasper Daniel Hansen
Icelandic Centre for Research (195835-051)
- Hans T Bjornsson
Icelandic Centre for Research (206806-051)
- Hans T Bjornsson
Icelandic Centre for Research (2010588-0611)
- Hans T Bjornsson
Louma G Private Foundation (KS grant)
- Teresa R Luperchio
- Hans T Bjornsson
Johns Hopkins University (Discovery grant)
- Leandros Boukas
- Kasper Daniel Hansen
- Hans T Bjornsson
Burroughs Wellcome Fund (MD-GEM grant)
- Leandros Boukas
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: We performed all mouse experiments in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and all were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Johns Hopkins University. (protocol number: MO18M112).
Copyright
© 2021, Luperchio et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,806
- views
-
- 251
- downloads
-
- 23
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Leveraging the mendelian disorders of the epigenetic machinery to systematically map functional epigenetic variation
eLife 10:e65884.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65884
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Computational and Systems Biology
Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
- Neuroscience
Accumulating evidence to make decisions is a core cognitive function. Previous studies have tended to estimate accumulation using either neural or behavioral data alone. Here, we develop a unified framework for modeling stimulus-driven behavior and multi-neuron activity simultaneously. We applied our method to choices and neural recordings from three rat brain regions—the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the frontal orienting fields (FOF), and the anterior-dorsal striatum (ADS)—while subjects performed a pulse-based accumulation task. Each region was best described by a distinct accumulation model, which all differed from the model that best described the animal’s choices. FOF activity was consistent with an accumulator where early evidence was favored while the ADS reflected near perfect accumulation. Neural responses within an accumulation framework unveiled a distinct association between each brain region and choice. Choices were better predicted from all regions using a comprehensive, accumulation-based framework and different brain regions were found to differentially reflect choice-related accumulation signals: FOF and ADS both reflected choice but ADS showed more instances of decision vacillation. Previous studies relating neural data to behaviorally inferred accumulation dynamics have implicitly assumed that individual brain regions reflect the whole-animal level accumulator. Our results suggest that different brain regions represent accumulated evidence in dramatically different ways and that accumulation at the whole-animal level may be constructed from a variety of neural-level accumulators.
