Leveraging the mendelian disorders of the epigenetic machinery to systematically map functional epigenetic variation

  1. Teresa R Luperchio
  2. Leandros Boukas
  3. Li Zhang
  4. Genay Opal Pilarowski
  5. Jenny Jiang
  6. Allison Kalinousky
  7. Kasper Daniel Hansen
  8. Hans T Bjornsson  Is a corresponding author
  1. Johns Hopkins University, United States
  2. Stanford University, United States
  3. Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States

Abstract

Although each Mendelian Disorder of the Epigenetic Machinery (MDEM) has a different causative gene, there are shared disease manifestations. We hypothesize that this phenotypic convergence is a consequence of shared epigenetic alterations. To identify such shared alterations we interrogate chromatin (ATAC-Seq) and expression (RNA-Seq) states in B cells from three MDEM mouse models (Kabuki (KS) types 1&2 and Rubinstein-Taybi (RT1) syndromes). We develop a new approach for the overlap analysis and find extensive overlap primarily localized in gene promoters. We show that disruption of chromatin accessibility at promoters often disrupts downstream gene expression, and identify 587 loci and 264 genes with shared disruption across all three MDEMs. Subtle expression alterations of multiple, IgA-relevant genes, collectively contribute to IgA deficiency in KS1 and RT1, but not in KS2. We propose that the joint study of MDEMs offers a principled approach for systematically mapping functional epigenetic variation in mammals.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE162181.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Teresa R Luperchio

    Department of Biological Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Leandros Boukas

    Predoctoral Training Program in Human Genetics, McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Li Zhang

    McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Genay Opal Pilarowski

    Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jenny Jiang

    Pediatrics and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University, Stafford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8310-298X
  6. Allison Kalinousky

    Pediatrics and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7292-8500
  7. Kasper Daniel Hansen

    Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Hans T Bjornsson

    Pediatrics and Genetics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    hbjorns1@jhmi.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6635-6753

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01GM121459)

  • Kasper Daniel Hansen

Icelandic Centre for Research (195835-051)

  • Hans T Bjornsson

Icelandic Centre for Research (206806-051)

  • Hans T Bjornsson

Icelandic Centre for Research (2010588-0611)

  • Hans T Bjornsson

Louma G Private Foundation (KS grant)

  • Teresa R Luperchio
  • Hans T Bjornsson

Johns Hopkins University (Discovery grant)

  • Leandros Boukas
  • Kasper Daniel Hansen
  • Hans T Bjornsson

Burroughs Wellcome Fund (MD-GEM grant)

  • Leandros Boukas

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: We performed all mouse experiments in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and all were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Johns Hopkins University. (protocol number: MO18M112).

Copyright

© 2021, Luperchio et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,651
    views
  • 241
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Teresa R Luperchio
  2. Leandros Boukas
  3. Li Zhang
  4. Genay Opal Pilarowski
  5. Jenny Jiang
  6. Allison Kalinousky
  7. Kasper Daniel Hansen
  8. Hans T Bjornsson
(2021)
Leveraging the mendelian disorders of the epigenetic machinery to systematically map functional epigenetic variation
eLife 10:e65884.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65884

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65884

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Brian DePasquale, Carlos D Brody, Jonathan W Pillow
    Research Article

    Accumulating evidence to make decisions is a core cognitive function. Previous studies have tended to estimate accumulation using either neural or behavioral data alone. Here we develop a unified framework for modeling stimulus-driven behavior and multi-neuron activity simultaneously. We applied our method to choices and neural recordings from three rat brain regions - the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the frontal orienting fields (FOF), and the anterior-dorsal striatum (ADS) - while subjects performed a pulse-based accumulation task. Each region was best described by a distinct accumulation model, which all differed from the model that best described the animal's choices. FOF activity was consistent with an accumulator where early evidence was favored while the ADS reflected near perfect accumulation. Neural responses within an accumulation framework unveiled a distinct association between each brain region and choice. Choices were better predicted from all regions using a comprehensive, accumulation-based framework and different brain regions were found to differentially reflect choice-related accumulation signals: FOF and ADS both reflected choice but ADS showed more instances of decision vacillation. Previous studies relating neural data to behaviorally-inferred accumulation dynamics have implicitly assumed that individual brain regions reflect the whole-animal level accumulator. Our results suggest that different brain regions represent accumulated evidence in dramatically different ways and that accumulation at the whole-animal level may be constructed from a variety of neural-level accumulators.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Ecology
    Lenore Pipes, Rasmus Nielsen
    Tools and Resources

    Environmental DNA (eDNA) is becoming an increasingly important tool in diverse scientific fields from ecological biomonitoring to wastewater surveillance of viruses. The fundamental challenge in eDNA analyses has been the bioinformatical assignment of reads to taxonomic groups. It has long been known that full probabilistic methods for phylogenetic assignment are preferable, but unfortunately, such methods are computationally intensive and are typically inapplicable to modern Next-Generation Sequencing data. We here present a fast approximate likelihood method for phylogenetic assignment of DNA sequences. Applying the new method to several mock communities and simulated datasets, we show that it identifies more reads at both high and low taxonomic levels more accurately than other leading methods. The advantage of the method is particularly apparent in the presence of polymorphisms and/or sequencing errors and when the true species is not represented in the reference database.