Allosteric communication in class A β-lactamases occurs via cooperative coupling of loop dynamics

  1. Ioannis Galdadas  Is a corresponding author
  2. Shen Qu
  3. Ana Sofia F Oliveira
  4. Edgar Olehnovics
  5. Andrew R Mack
  6. Maria F Mojica
  7. Pratul K Agarwal
  8. Catherine L Tooke
  9. Francesco Luigi Gervasio
  10. James Spencer
  11. Robert A Bonomo
  12. Adrian J Mulholland  Is a corresponding author
  13. Shozeb Haider  Is a corresponding author
  1. University College London, United Kingdom
  2. University of Bristol, United Kingdom
  3. Case Western Reserve University, United States
  4. Oklahoma State University, United States

Abstract

Understanding allostery in enzymes and tools to identify it, offer promising alternative strategies to inhibitor development. Through a combination of equilibrium and nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations, we identify allosteric effects and communication pathways in two prototypical class A β-lactamases, TEM-1 and KPC-2, which are important determinants of antibiotic resistance. The nonequilibrium simulations reveal pathways of communication operating over distances of 30 Å or more. Propagation of the signal occurs through cooperative coupling of loop dynamics. Notably, 50% or more of clinically relevant amino acid substitutions map onto the identified signal transduction pathways. This suggests that clinically important variation may affect, or be driven by, differences in allosteric behavior, providing a mechanism by which amino acid substitutions may affect the relationship between spectrum of activity, catalytic turnover and potential allosteric behavior in this clinically important enzyme family. Simulations of the type presented here will help in identifying and analyzing such differences.

Data availability

All analysis scripts have been uploaded on figshare with doi 10.6084/m9.figshare.13583384

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ioannis Galdadas

    Chemistry ; Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    i.galdadas.17@ucl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2136-9723
  2. Shen Qu

    School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Ana Sofia F Oliveira

    School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Edgar Olehnovics

    School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Andrew R Mack

    Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0131-7996
  6. Maria F Mojica

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Pratul K Agarwal

    Department of Physiological Sciences and High-Performance Computing Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, United States
    Competing interests
    Pratul K Agarwal, Pratul K Agarwal is the founder and owner of Arium BioLabs LLC..
  8. Catherine L Tooke

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Francesco Luigi Gervasio

    Chemistry ; Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4831-5039
  10. James Spencer

    School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Robert A Bonomo

    Department of Infectious Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Adrian J Mulholland

    School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    adrian.mulholland@bristol.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1015-4567
  13. Shozeb Haider

    School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    shozeb.haider@ucl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2650-2925

Funding

AstraZeneca (Case Studentship)

  • Ioannis Galdadas

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI072219)

  • Robert A Bonomo

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM105978)

  • Pratul K Agarwal

National Institutes of Health (RO1AI063517)

  • Robert A Bonomo
  • Shozeb Haider

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M022609/1)

  • Ana Sofia F Oliveira
  • Adrian J Mulholland

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N024117/1)

  • Ana Sofia F Oliveira
  • Adrian J Mulholland

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/L01386X/1)

  • Ana Sofia F Oliveira
  • Adrian J Mulholland

Medical Research Council (MR/T016035/1)

  • Catherine L Tooke
  • James Spencer
  • Adrian J Mulholland

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI100560)

  • Robert A Bonomo

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI063517)

  • Robert A Bonomo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Yogesh K Gupta, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: January 14, 2021
  2. Accepted: March 19, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 23, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: March 24, 2021 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: April 21, 2021 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2021, Galdadas et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,493
    Page views
  • 307
    Downloads
  • 10
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ioannis Galdadas
  2. Shen Qu
  3. Ana Sofia F Oliveira
  4. Edgar Olehnovics
  5. Andrew R Mack
  6. Maria F Mojica
  7. Pratul K Agarwal
  8. Catherine L Tooke
  9. Francesco Luigi Gervasio
  10. James Spencer
  11. Robert A Bonomo
  12. Adrian J Mulholland
  13. Shozeb Haider
(2021)
Allosteric communication in class A β-lactamases occurs via cooperative coupling of loop dynamics
eLife 10:e66567.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66567

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Medicine
    Xiaojing Chu et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Background:

    The large inter-individual variability in immune-cell composition and function determines immune responses in general and susceptibility o immune-mediated diseases in particular. While much has been learned about the genetic variants relevant for type 1 diabetes (T1D), the pathophysiological mechanisms through which these variations exert their effects remain unknown.

    Methods:

    Blood samples were collected from 243 patients with T1D of Dutch descent. We applied genetic association analysis on >200 immune-cell traits and >100 cytokine production profiles in response to stimuli measured to identify genetic determinants of immune function, and compared the results obtained in T1D to healthy controls.

    Results:

    Genetic variants that determine susceptibility to T1D significantly affect T cell composition. Specifically, the CCR5+ regulatory T cells associate with T1D through the CCR region, suggesting a shared genetic regulation. Genome-wide quantitative trait loci (QTLs) mapping analysis of immune traits revealed 15 genetic loci that influence immune responses in T1D, including 12 that have never been reported in healthy population studies, implying a disease-specific genetic regulation.

    Conclusions:

    This study provides new insights into the genetic factors that affect immunological responses in T1D.

    Funding:

    This work was supported by an ERC starting grant (no. 948207) and a Radboud University Medical Centre Hypatia grant (2018) to YL and an ERC advanced grant (no. 833247) and a Spinoza grant of the Netherlands Association for Scientific Research to MGN CT received funding from the Perspectief Biomarker Development Center Research Programme, which is (partly) financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). AJ was funded by a grant from the European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD/AZ Macrovascular Programme 2015). XC was supported by the China Scholarship Council (201706040081).

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    Simón Oxenford et al.
    Tools and Resources Updated

    Background:

    Deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implant trajectories are stereotactically defined using preoperative neuroimaging. To validate the correct trajectory, microelectrode recordings (MERs) or local field potential recordings can be used to extend neuroanatomical information (defined by MRI) with neurophysiological activity patterns recorded from micro- and macroelectrodes probing the surgical target site. Currently, these two sources of information (imaging vs. electrophysiology) are analyzed separately, while means to fuse both data streams have not been introduced.

    Methods:

    Here, we present a tool that integrates resources from stereotactic planning, neuroimaging, MER, and high-resolution atlas data to create a real-time visualization of the implant trajectory. We validate the tool based on a retrospective cohort of DBS patients (N = 52) offline and present single-use cases of the real-time platform.

    Results:

    We establish an open-source software tool for multimodal data visualization and analysis during DBS surgery. We show a general correspondence between features derived from neuroimaging and electrophysiological recordings and present examples that demonstrate the functionality of the tool.

    Conclusions:

    This novel software platform for multimodal data visualization and analysis bears translational potential to improve accuracy of DBS surgery. The toolbox is made openly available and is extendable to integrate with additional software packages.

    Funding:

    Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft (410169619, 424778381), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DynaSti), National Institutes of Health (2R01 MH113929), and Foundation for OCD Research (FFOR).