Abstract

The plant corepressor TOPLESS (TPL) is recruited to a large number of loci that are selectively induced in response to developmental or environmental cues, yet the mechanisms by which it inhibits expression in the absence of these stimuli is poorly understood. Previously, we had used the N-terminus of Arabidopsis thaliana TPL to enable repression of a synthetic auxin response circuit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast). Here, we leveraged the yeast system to interrogate the relationship between TPL structure and function, specifically scanning for repression domains. We identified a potent repression domain in Helix 8 located within the CRA domain, which directly interacted with the Mediator middle module subunits Med21 and Med10. Interactions between TPL and Mediator were required to fully repress transcription in both yeast and plants. In contrast, we found that multimer formation, a conserved feature of many corepressors, had minimal influence on the repression strength of TPL.

Data availability

All flow cytometry data is deposited at https://flowrepository.org/. Repository IDS: FR-FCM-Z2GM, FR-FCM-Z2GR, FR-FCM-Z2GQ, FR-FCM-Z2GX, FR-FCM-Z2GT, FR-FCM-Z2W2. All protein interactions have been deposited to IntAct, under the accession code, IM-28972. All code is available through Github: https://github.com/achillobator/TPL_Structure_Function/

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alexander R Leydon

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3034-1482
  2. Wei Wang

    Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Hardik P Gala

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sabrina Gilmour

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Samuel Juarez-Solis

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Mollye L Zahler

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Joseph E Zemke

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. NIng Zheng

    Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jennifer L Nemhauser

    Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    jn7@uw.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8909-735X

Funding

National Institutes of Health (GM107084)

  • Alexander R Leydon
  • Hardik P Gala
  • Sabrina Gilmour
  • Samuel Juarez-Solis
  • Mollye L Zahler
  • Joseph E Zemke
  • Jennifer L Nemhauser

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Alexander R Leydon
  • Wei Wang
  • Hardik P Gala
  • Sabrina Gilmour
  • Samuel Juarez-Solis
  • Mollye L Zahler
  • Joseph E Zemke
  • NIng Zheng
  • Jennifer L Nemhauser

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Leydon et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,935
    views
  • 519
    downloads
  • 52
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alexander R Leydon
  2. Wei Wang
  3. Hardik P Gala
  4. Sabrina Gilmour
  5. Samuel Juarez-Solis
  6. Mollye L Zahler
  7. Joseph E Zemke
  8. NIng Zheng
  9. Jennifer L Nemhauser
(2021)
Repression by the Arabidopsis TOPLESS corepressor requires association with the core Mediator complex
eLife 10:e66739.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66739

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66739

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Shihui Chen, Carolyn Marie Phillips
    Research Article

    RNA interference (RNAi) is a conserved pathway that utilizes Argonaute proteins and their associated small RNAs to exert gene regulatory function on complementary transcripts. While the majority of germline-expressed RNAi proteins reside in perinuclear germ granules, it is unknown whether and how RNAi pathways are spatially organized in other cell types. Here, we find that the small RNA biogenesis machinery is spatially and temporally organized during Caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis. Specifically, the RNAi factor, SIMR-1, forms visible concentrates during mid-embryogenesis that contain an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, a poly-UG polymerase, and the unloaded nuclear Argonaute protein, NRDE-3. Curiously, coincident with the appearance of the SIMR granules, the small RNAs bound to NRDE-3 switch from predominantly CSR-class 22G-RNAs to ERGO-dependent 22G-RNAs. NRDE-3 binds ERGO-dependent 22G-RNAs in the somatic cells of larvae and adults to silence ERGO-target genes; here we further demonstrate that NRDE-3-bound, CSR-class 22G-RNAs repress transcription in oocytes. Thus, our study defines two separable roles for NRDE-3, targeting germline-expressed genes during oogenesis to promote global transcriptional repression, and switching during embryogenesis to repress recently duplicated genes and retrotransposons in somatic cells, highlighting the plasticity of Argonaute proteins and the need for more precise temporal characterization of Argonaute-small RNA interactions.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Steven Henikoff, David L Levens
    Insight

    A new method for mapping torsion provides insights into the ways that the genome responds to the torsion generated by RNA polymerase II.