Abstract

The plant corepressor TOPLESS (TPL) is recruited to a large number of loci that are selectively induced in response to developmental or environmental cues, yet the mechanisms by which it inhibits expression in the absence of these stimuli is poorly understood. Previously, we had used the N-terminus of Arabidopsis thaliana TPL to enable repression of a synthetic auxin response circuit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast). Here, we leveraged the yeast system to interrogate the relationship between TPL structure and function, specifically scanning for repression domains. We identified a potent repression domain in Helix 8 located within the CRA domain, which directly interacted with the Mediator middle module subunits Med21 and Med10. Interactions between TPL and Mediator were required to fully repress transcription in both yeast and plants. In contrast, we found that multimer formation, a conserved feature of many corepressors, had minimal influence on the repression strength of TPL.

Data availability

All flow cytometry data is deposited at https://flowrepository.org/. Repository IDS: FR-FCM-Z2GM, FR-FCM-Z2GR, FR-FCM-Z2GQ, FR-FCM-Z2GX, FR-FCM-Z2GT, FR-FCM-Z2W2. All protein interactions have been deposited to IntAct, under the accession code, IM-28972. All code is available through Github: https://github.com/achillobator/TPL_Structure_Function/

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alexander R Leydon

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3034-1482
  2. Wei Wang

    Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Hardik P Gala

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sabrina Gilmour

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Samuel Juarez-Solis

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Mollye L Zahler

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Joseph E Zemke

    Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. NIng Zheng

    Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Jennifer L Nemhauser

    Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    jn7@uw.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8909-735X

Funding

National Institutes of Health (GM107084)

  • Alexander R Leydon
  • Hardik P Gala
  • Sabrina Gilmour
  • Samuel Juarez-Solis
  • Mollye L Zahler
  • Joseph E Zemke
  • Jennifer L Nemhauser

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Alexander R Leydon
  • Wei Wang
  • Hardik P Gala
  • Sabrina Gilmour
  • Samuel Juarez-Solis
  • Mollye L Zahler
  • Joseph E Zemke
  • NIng Zheng
  • Jennifer L Nemhauser

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Irwin Davidson, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, France

Version history

  1. Received: January 21, 2021
  2. Accepted: May 31, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 2, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: June 14, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Leydon et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,255
    Page views
  • 443
    Downloads
  • 29
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alexander R Leydon
  2. Wei Wang
  3. Hardik P Gala
  4. Sabrina Gilmour
  5. Samuel Juarez-Solis
  6. Mollye L Zahler
  7. Joseph E Zemke
  8. NIng Zheng
  9. Jennifer L Nemhauser
(2021)
Repression by the Arabidopsis TOPLESS corepressor requires association with the core Mediator complex
eLife 10:e66739.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66739

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.66739

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Erandi Velazquez-Miranda, Ming He
    Insight

    Endothelial cell subpopulations are characterized by unique gene expression profiles, epigenetic landscapes and functional properties.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Monica Salinas-Pena, Elena Rebollo, Albert Jordan
    Research Article

    Histone H1 participates in chromatin condensation and regulates nuclear processes. Human somatic cells may contain up to seven histone H1 variants, although their functional heterogeneity is not fully understood. Here, we have profiled the differential nuclear distribution of the somatic H1 repertoire in human cells through imaging techniques including super-resolution microscopy. H1 variants exhibit characteristic distribution patterns in both interphase and mitosis. H1.2, H1.3, and H1.5 are universally enriched at the nuclear periphery in all cell lines analyzed and co-localize with compacted DNA. H1.0 shows a less pronounced peripheral localization, with apparent variability among different cell lines. On the other hand, H1.4 and H1X are distributed throughout the nucleus, being H1X universally enriched in high-GC regions and abundant in the nucleoli. Interestingly, H1.4 and H1.0 show a more peripheral distribution in cell lines lacking H1.3 and H1.5. The differential distribution patterns of H1 suggest specific functionalities in organizing lamina-associated domains or nucleolar activity, which is further supported by a distinct response of H1X or phosphorylated H1.4 to the inhibition of ribosomal DNA transcription. Moreover, H1 variants depletion affects chromatin structure in a variant-specific manner. Concretely, H1.2 knock-down, either alone or combined, triggers a global chromatin decompaction. Overall, imaging has allowed us to distinguish H1 variants distribution beyond the segregation in two groups denoted by previous ChIP-Seq determinations. Our results support H1 variants heterogeneity and suggest that variant-specific functionality can be shared between different cell types.