Most cancers carry a substantial deleterious load due to Hill-Robertson interference
Abstract
Cancer genomes exhibit surprisingly weak signatures of negative selection1,2. This may be because selective pressures are relaxed or because genome-wide linkage prevents deleterious mutations from being removed (Hill-Robertson interference)3. By stratifying tumors by their genome-wide mutational burden, we observe negative selection (dN/dS ~ 0.56) in low mutational burden tumors, while remaining cancers exhibit dN/dS ratios ~1. This suggests that most tumors do not remove deleterious passengers. To buffer against deleterious passengers, tumors upregulate heat shock pathways as their mutational burden increases. Finally, evolutionary modeling finds that Hill-Robertson interference alone can reproduce patterns of attenuated selection and estimates the total fitness cost of passengers to be 46% per cell on average. Collectively, our findings suggest that the lack of observed negative selection in most tumors is not due to relaxed selective pressures, but rather the inability of selection to remove deleterious mutations in the presence of genome-wide linkage.
Data availability
Exonic, open-access SNV calls (WES) of 10,486 cancer patients in (The Cancer Genome Atlas) TCGA were downloaded from the Multi-Center Mutation Calling in Multiple Cancers (MC3) project. This repository uses a consensus of seven mutation-calling algorithms. Expression data of SNVs were downloaded from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project (v7 release). All CNAs were downloaded from the COSMIC database on June 20151.Gene expression data compared to CNAs was downloaded from the COSMIC database on 14 September 2019.
-
TCGA - MC3 mutation callsGenomic Data Commons, MC3 Public MAF.
-
COSMIC - copy number callsCOSMIC, CosmicCompleteCNA.tsv.gz.
-
COSMIC - gene expression dataCOSMIC, CosmicCompleteGeneExpression.tsv.gz.
-
GTEX - expression dataGTEX, GTEx_Analysis_2016-01-15_v7_RNASeQCv1.1.8_gene_median_tpm.gct.gz.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Human Genome Research Institute (T32-HG000044-21)
- Christopher D McFarland
National Institutes of Health (E25-CA180993)
- Christopher D McFarland
National Institutes of Health (DP1-CA238296)
- Christina Curtis
National Cancer Institute (R01-CA207133)
- Dmitri A Petrov
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35-GM118165)
- Dmitri A Petrov
National Institutes of Health (R01-CA231253)
- Dmitri A Petrov
National Cancer Institute (K99-CA226506)
- Christopher D McFarland
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Martin Taylor, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Version history
- Preprint posted: September 14, 2019 (view preprint)
- Received: February 23, 2021
- Accepted: August 31, 2022
- Accepted Manuscript published: September 1, 2022 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: September 22, 2022 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2022, Tilk et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,735
- Page views
-
- 328
- Downloads
-
- 3
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: PubMed Central, Crossref, Scopus.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Evolutionary Biology
- Neuroscience
The process of brain folding is thought to play an important role in the development and organisation of the cerebrum and the cerebellum. The study of cerebellar folding is challenging due to the small size and abundance of its folia. In consequence, little is known about its anatomical diversity and evolution. We constituted an open collection of histological data from 56 mammalian species and manually segmented the cerebrum and the cerebellum. We developed methods to measure the geometry of cerebellar folia and to estimate the thickness of the molecular layer. We used phylogenetic comparative methods to study the diversity and evolution of cerebellar folding and its relationship with the anatomy of the cerebrum. Our results show that the evolution of cerebellar and cerebral anatomy follows a stabilising selection process. We observed 2 groups of phenotypes changing concertedly through evolution: a group of 'diverse' phenotypes - varying over several orders of magnitude together with body size, and a group of 'stable' phenotypes varying over less than 1 order of magnitude across species. Our analyses confirmed the strong correlation between cerebral and cerebellar volumes across species, and showed in addition that large cerebella are disproportionately more folded than smaller ones. Compared with the extreme variations in cerebellar surface area, folial anatomy and molecular layer thickness varied only slightly, showing a much smaller increase in the larger cerebella. We discuss how these findings could provide new insights into the diversity and evolution of cerebellar folding, the mechanisms of cerebellar and cerebral folding, and their potential influence on the organisation of the brain across species.
-
- Developmental Biology
- Evolutionary Biology
Cephalochordates and tunicates represent the only two groups of invertebrate chordates, and extant cephalochordates – commonly known as amphioxus or lancelets – are considered the best proxy for the chordate ancestor, from which they split around 520 million years ago. Amphioxus has been an important organism in the fields of zoology and embryology since the 18th century, and the morphological and genomic simplicity of cephalochordates (compared to vertebrates) makes amphioxus an attractive model for studying chordate biology at the cellular and molecular levels. Here we describe the life cycle of amphioxus, and discuss the natural histories and habitats of the different species of amphioxus. We also describe their use as laboratory animal models, and discuss the techniques that have been developed to study different aspects of amphioxus.