Niche partitioning facilitates coexistence of closely related honey bee gut bacteria
Abstract
Ecological processes underlying bacterial coexistence in the gut are not well understood. Here, we disentangled the effect of the host and the diet on the coexistence of four closely related Lactobacillus species colonizing the honey bee gut. We serially passaged the four species through gnotobiotic bees and in liquid cultures in the presence of either pollen (bee diet) or simple sugars. Although the four species engaged in negative interactions, they were able to stably coexist, both in vivo and in vitro. However, coexistence was only possible in the presence of pollen, and not in simple sugars, independent of the environment. Using metatranscriptomics and metabolomics, we found that the four species utilize different pollen-derived carbohydrate substrates indicating resource partitioning as the basis of coexistence. Our results show that despite longstanding host association, gut bacterial interactions can be recapitulated in vitro providing insights about bacterial coexistence when combined with in vivo experiments.
Data availability
The amplicon sequencing data and the RNA sequencing data are available under the NCBI Bioproject PRJNA700984 and the GEO record GSE166724 respectively.All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Bacterial abundance data (CFUs) are included into Supplementary File 3, amplicon sequencing processed data are included into Supplementary File 4, RNA sequencing processed data, statistical analysis results (enrichment tests) and transcript per million data are included into Supplementary File 5-9, metabolomics analysis data are included into Supplementary File 10. All differential expression analysis results of this study are included in Supplementary File 11.
-
Lactobacillus Firm5 amplicon sequencingNCBI Sequence Read Archive PRJNA700984.
-
Lactobacillus Firm5 in vivo and in vitro RNA sequencingNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus GSE166724.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (31003A_160345)
- Philipp Engel
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (31003A_179487)
- Andrew Quinn
- Nicolas Neuschwander
- Philipp Engel
H2020 European Research Council (714804)
- Silvia Brochet
- Philipp Engel
NCCR Microbiomes (51NF40_180575)
- Philipp Engel
Human Frontier Science Program (RGY0077/2016)
- Philipp Engel
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Karina B Xavier, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Portugal
Version history
- Preprint posted: March 12, 2021 (view preprint)
- Received: March 19, 2021
- Accepted: July 14, 2021
- Accepted Manuscript published: July 19, 2021 (version 1)
- Accepted Manuscript updated: July 22, 2021 (version 2)
- Version of Record published: August 31, 2021 (version 3)
- Version of Record updated: April 1, 2022 (version 4)
Copyright
© 2021, Brochet et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,804
- views
-
- 593
- downloads
-
- 64
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Ecology
Predator-prey arms races have led to the evolution of finely tuned disguise strategies. While the theoretical benefits of predator camouflage are well established, no study has yet been able to quantify its consequences for hunting success in natural conditions. We used high-resolution movement data to quantify how barn owls (Tyto alba) conceal their approach when using a sit-and-wait strategy. We hypothesized that hunting barn owls would modulate their landing force, potentially reducing noise levels in the vicinity of prey. Analysing 87,957 landings by 163 individuals equipped with GPS tags and accelerometers, we show that barn owls reduce their landing force as they approach their prey, and that landing force predicts the success of the following hunting attempt. Landing force also varied with the substrate, being lowest on man-made poles in field boundaries. The physical environment, therefore, affects the capacity for sound camouflage, providing an unexpected link between predator-prey interactions and land use. Finally, hunting strike forces in barn owls were the highest recorded in any bird, relative to body mass, highlighting the range of selective pressures that act on landings and the capacity of these predators to modulate their landing force. Overall, our results provide the first measurements of landing force in a wild setting, revealing a new form of motion-induced sound camouflage and its link to hunting success.