Niche partitioning facilitates coexistence of closely related honey bee gut bacteria
Abstract
Ecological processes underlying bacterial coexistence in the gut are not well understood. Here, we disentangled the effect of the host and the diet on the coexistence of four closely related Lactobacillus species colonizing the honey bee gut. We serially passaged the four species through gnotobiotic bees and in liquid cultures in the presence of either pollen (bee diet) or simple sugars. Although the four species engaged in negative interactions, they were able to stably coexist, both in vivo and in vitro. However, coexistence was only possible in the presence of pollen, and not in simple sugars, independent of the environment. Using metatranscriptomics and metabolomics, we found that the four species utilize different pollen-derived carbohydrate substrates indicating resource partitioning as the basis of coexistence. Our results show that despite longstanding host association, gut bacterial interactions can be recapitulated in vitro providing insights about bacterial coexistence when combined with in vivo experiments.
Data availability
The amplicon sequencing data and the RNA sequencing data are available under the NCBI Bioproject PRJNA700984 and the GEO record GSE166724 respectively.All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Bacterial abundance data (CFUs) are included into Supplementary File 3, amplicon sequencing processed data are included into Supplementary File 4, RNA sequencing processed data, statistical analysis results (enrichment tests) and transcript per million data are included into Supplementary File 5-9, metabolomics analysis data are included into Supplementary File 10. All differential expression analysis results of this study are included in Supplementary File 11.
-
Lactobacillus Firm5 amplicon sequencingNCBI Sequence Read Archive PRJNA700984.
-
Lactobacillus Firm5 in vivo and in vitro RNA sequencingNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus GSE166724.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (31003A_160345)
- Philipp Engel
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (31003A_179487)
- Andrew Quinn
- Nicolas Neuschwander
- Philipp Engel
H2020 European Research Council (714804)
- Silvia Brochet
- Philipp Engel
NCCR Microbiomes (51NF40_180575)
- Philipp Engel
Human Frontier Science Program (RGY0077/2016)
- Philipp Engel
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Karina B Xavier, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Portugal
Version history
- Preprint posted: March 12, 2021 (view preprint)
- Received: March 19, 2021
- Accepted: July 14, 2021
- Accepted Manuscript published: July 19, 2021 (version 1)
- Accepted Manuscript updated: July 22, 2021 (version 2)
- Version of Record published: August 31, 2021 (version 3)
- Version of Record updated: April 1, 2022 (version 4)
Copyright
© 2021, Brochet et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,393
- Page views
-
- 533
- Downloads
-
- 35
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, Scopus, PubMed Central.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Ecology
- Evolutionary Biology
Groups of animals inhabit vastly different sensory worlds, or umwelten, which shape fundamental aspects of their behaviour. Yet the sensory ecology of species is rarely incorporated into the emerging field of collective behaviour, which studies the movements, population-level behaviours, and emergent properties of animal groups. Here, we review the contributions of sensory ecology and collective behaviour to understanding how animals move and interact within the context of their social and physical environments. Our goal is to advance and bridge these two areas of inquiry and highlight the potential for their creative integration. To achieve this goal, we organise our review around the following themes: (1) identifying the promise of integrating collective behaviour and sensory ecology; (2) defining and exploring the concept of a ‘sensory collective’; (3) considering the potential for sensory collectives to shape the evolution of sensory systems; (4) exploring examples from diverse taxa to illustrate neural circuits involved in sensing and collective behaviour; and (5) suggesting the need for creative conceptual and methodological advances to quantify ‘sensescapes’. In the final section, (6) applications to biological conservation, we argue that these topics are timely, given the ongoing anthropogenic changes to sensory stimuli (e.g. via light, sound, and chemical pollution) which are anticipated to impact animal collectives and group-level behaviour and, in turn, ecosystem composition and function. Our synthesis seeks to provide a forward-looking perspective on how sensory ecologists and collective behaviourists can both learn from and inspire one another to advance our understanding of animal behaviour, ecology, adaptation, and evolution.