Activity-dependent Golgi satellite formation in dendrites reshapes the neuronal surface glycoproteome

  1. Anitha P Govind
  2. Okunola Jeyifous  Is a corresponding author
  3. Theron A Russell
  4. Zola Yi
  5. Aubrey V Weigel
  6. Abhijit Ramaprasad
  7. Luke Newell
  8. William Ramos
  9. Fernando M Valbuena
  10. Jason C Casler
  11. Jing-Zhi Yan
  12. Benjamin S Glick
  13. Geoffrey T Swanson
  14. Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz  Is a corresponding author
  15. William N Green  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Chicago, United States
  2. Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States
  3. The University of Chicago, United States
  4. Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Activity-driven changes in the neuronal surface glycoproteome are known to occur with synapse formation, plasticity and related diseases, but their mechanistic basis and significance are unclear. Here, we observed that N-glycans on surface glycoproteins of dendrites shift from immature to mature forms containing sialic acid in response to increased neuronal activation. In exploring the basis of these N-glycosylation alterations, we discovered they result from the growth and proliferation of Golgi satellites scattered throughout the dendrite. Golgi satellites that formed during neuronal excitation were in close association with ER exit sites and early endosomes and contained glycosylation machinery without the Golgi structural protein, GM130. They functioned as distal glycosylation stations in dendrites, terminally modifying sugars either on newly synthesized glycoproteins passing through the secretory pathway, or on surface glycoproteins taken up from the endocytic pathway. These activities led to major changes in the dendritic surface of excited neurons, impacting binding and uptake of lectins, as well as causing functional changes in neurotransmitter receptors such as nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Neural activity thus boosts the activity of the dendrite’s satellite micro-secretory system by redistributing Golgi enzymes involved in glycan modifications into peripheral Golgi satellites. This remodeling of the neuronal surface has potential significance for synaptic plasticity, addiction and disease.

Data availability

Source data files for all quantitative data presented in the current study have been deposited at Dryad. These contain raw data values, statistical summaries, and raw gels for panels in Figs 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, and supplemental figures, figure 1-figure supplement 2, figure 2-figure supplement 2, figure 4-figure supplements 1 and 2, and figure 7-figure supplement 2. The files can be accessed via Dryad (doi:10.5061/dryad.qjq2bvqg3):

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anitha P Govind

    Department of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5890-2395
  2. Okunola Jeyifous

    Department of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    For correspondence
    ojeyifou@bsd.uchicago.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4176-4694
  3. Theron A Russell

    Department of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Zola Yi

    Department of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Aubrey V Weigel

    Lippincott-Schwartz Lab, Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1694-4420
  6. Abhijit Ramaprasad

    Department of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Luke Newell

    Department of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. William Ramos

    Department of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Fernando M Valbuena

    Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jason C Casler

    Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9742-9978
  11. Jing-Zhi Yan

    Department of Pharmacology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Benjamin S Glick

    Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7921-1374
  13. Geoffrey T Swanson

    Department of Pharmacology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz

    Lippincott-Schwartz Lab, Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States
    For correspondence
    lippincottschwartzj@janelia.hhmi.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8601-3501
  15. William N Green

    Department of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    For correspondence
    wgreen@uchicago.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2167-1391

Funding

National Institutes of Health (DA035430)

  • William N Green

National Institutes of Health (DA044760)

  • William N Green

National Institutes of Health (DA043361)

  • William N Green

National Institutes of Health (GM104010)

  • Benjamin S Glick

National Institutes of Health (GM007183)

  • Fernando M Valbuena

Peter F McManus Foundation

  • William N Green

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal procedures were approved by the University of Chicago Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol #72016) and are in accordance with the recommendations of the Panel on Euthanasia of the American Veterinary Medical Association. Strict adherence to AVMA guidelines was followed to prevent pain and suffering of animals.

Copyright

© 2021, Govind et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,152
    views
  • 485
    downloads
  • 28
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Anitha P Govind
  2. Okunola Jeyifous
  3. Theron A Russell
  4. Zola Yi
  5. Aubrey V Weigel
  6. Abhijit Ramaprasad
  7. Luke Newell
  8. William Ramos
  9. Fernando M Valbuena
  10. Jason C Casler
  11. Jing-Zhi Yan
  12. Benjamin S Glick
  13. Geoffrey T Swanson
  14. Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz
  15. William N Green
(2021)
Activity-dependent Golgi satellite formation in dendrites reshapes the neuronal surface glycoproteome
eLife 10:e68910.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68910

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68910

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Xiaojiao Hua, Chen Zhao ... Yan Zhou
    Research Article

    The β-catenin-dependent canonical Wnt signaling is pivotal in organ development, tissue homeostasis, and cancer. Here, we identified an upstream enhancer of Ctnnb1 – the coding gene for β-catenin, named ieCtnnb1 (intestinal enhancer of Ctnnb1), which is crucial for intestinal homeostasis. ieCtnnb1 is predominantly active in the base of small intestinal crypts and throughout the epithelia of large intestine. Knockout of ieCtnnb1 led to a reduction in Ctnnb1 transcription, compromising the canonical Wnt signaling in intestinal crypts. Single-cell sequencing revealed that ieCtnnb1 knockout altered epithelial compositions and potentially compromised functions of small intestinal crypts. While deletion of ieCtnnb1 hampered epithelial turnovers in physiologic conditions, it prevented occurrence and progression of Wnt/β-catenin-driven colorectal cancers. Human ieCTNNB1 drove reporter gene expression in a pattern highly similar to mouse ieCtnnb1. ieCTNNB1 contains a single-nucleotide polymorphism associated with CTNNB1 expression levels in human gastrointestinal epithelia. The enhancer activity of ieCTNNB1 in colorectal cancer tissues was stronger than that in adjacent normal tissues. HNF4α and phosphorylated CREB1 were identified as key trans-factors binding to ieCTNNB1 and regulating CTNNB1 transcription. Together, these findings unveil an enhancer-dependent mechanism controlling the dosage of Wnt signaling and homeostasis in intestinal epithelia.

    1. Cell Biology
    Eleanor Martin, Rossana Girardello ... Alexander Ludwig
    Research Article

    Caveolae are small membrane pits with fundamental roles in mechanotransduction. Several studies have shown that caveolae flatten out in response to an increase in membrane tension, thereby acting as a mechanosensitive membrane reservoir that buffers acute mechanical stress. The dynamic assembly and disassembly of caveolae has also been implicated in the control of RhoA/ROCK-mediated actomyosin contractility at the rear of migrating cells. However, how membrane tension controls the organisation of caveolae and caveolae-mediated mechanotransduction is poorly understood. To address this, we systematically quantified protein-protein interactions of caveolin-1 in migrating RPE1 cells at steady state and in response to an acute increase in membrane tension using biotin-based proximity labelling and quantitative mass spectrometry. Our data show that caveolae are highly enriched at the rear of migrating RPE1 cells and that membrane tension rapidly and reversibly disassembles the caveolar protein coat. Membrane tension also dislodges caveolin-1 from focal adhesion proteins and several mechanosensitive cortical actin regulators including filamins and cortactin. In addition, we present evidence that ROCK and the RhoGAP ARHGAP29 are associated with caveolin-1 in a membrane tension-dependent manner, and that ARHGAP29 regulates caveolin-1 Y14 phosphorylation, caveolae rear localisation, and RPE1 cell migration. Taken together, our work uncovers a membrane tension-sensitive coupling between caveolae and the rear-localised F-actin cytoskeleton. This provides a framework for dissecting the molecular mechanisms underlying caveolae-regulated mechanotransduction pathways.