Fertilization: Conserved sperm factors are no longer a bone of contention

Proteins related to a molecule involved in the formation of osteoclasts in bone are required for fertilization in worms, flies and mammals.
  • Download
  • Cite
  • CommentOpen annotations (there are currently 0 annotations on this page).
  1. Xue Mei
  2. Andrew Singson  Is a corresponding author
  1. Waksman Institute of Microbiology and Department of Genetics, Rutgers University, United States

Osteoclasts are multinucleated cells that break down bone for skeletal maintenance, repair, and remodeling. Experiments on mice have established that a gene called DC-stamp (dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein) is involved in progenitor cells fusing to make osteoclasts (Kukita et al., 2004; Kodama and Kaito, 2020). Two related genes, Dcst1 and Dcst2 (DC-stamp domain containing 1 and 2), are expressed in the testes of mice, and likely share a common ancestor with a group of invertebrate genes required for fertilization (Mei and Singson, 2021), including snky in Drosophila (Wilson et al., 2006), and spe-49 and spe-42 in C. elegans (Kroft et al., 2005; Wilson et al., 2018). Together these sperm-specific genes span between 700 million and one billion years of evolutionarily conserved function.

Now, in eLife, Naokazu Inoue (Fukushima Medical University), Yoshihisa Hagihara (AIST) and Ikuo Wada (Fukushima Medical University) report that the DCST1 and DCST2 proteins are required for fertilization in mice (Inoue et al., 2021). After sperm have migrated to the egg, fertilization involves several stages: the spermatozoa must first interact with and penetrate the egg coat, and then adhere to the egg plasma membrane. Next, the plasma membrane of the sperm and egg must fuse to form a zygote. The sperm of male mice lacking the genes Dcst1 and Dcst2 can penetrate the egg coat, but they are unable to fuse: this indicates that these genes have a direct or indirect role in cell fusion that is reminiscent of the role of DC-stamp in osteoclast formation.

Comparing DCST1 and DCST2 to related invertebrate and human proteins, Inoue et al. found that mouse DCST1 was most closely related to human DCST1, nematode SPE-49 and fruit fly SNKY, whereas mouse DCST2 was closer to human DCST2, nematode SPE-42 and fruit fly DCST2. Single-gene knockouts of Dcst1 and Dcst2, as well as double-knockout mice, exhibited male-specific sterility, with mutant spermatozoa failing to fertilize eggs in vitro. The spermatozoa from the double knockouts could reach the egg and undergo the acrosome reaction to penetrate the egg coat, but then they accumulated in the region between the egg coat and the egg membrane (Figure 1).

The interruption of fertilization in Dcst-related gene mutants in different species.

(A) In mammals, sperm mutant for Dcst1 and/or Dcst2 can penetrate the egg coat and contact the egg plasma membrane, but they do not fuse with the egg. (B) In C. elegans, spe-42 or spe-49 mutant …

These results indicate that DCST1 and 2 are not required for sperm migration to egg, the acrosome reaction, or penetration of the egg coat. In fact, the phenotype of the mouse double mutant is similar to that of mice lacking other key sperm molecules during fertilization, including the immunoglobulin superfamily proteins IZUMO1 and SPACA6. These two proteins are involved in sperm-egg recognition, adhesion or fusion (Bianchi and Wright, 2020). When spermatozoa mutant for both Dcst1 and Dcst2 contacted the egg in vitro, it appeared that IZUMO1, its egg-surface binding partner JUNO, and an egg-surface molecule called CD9, were all recruited normally to the interface between the sperm and the egg. This suggests that key molecules are recruited normally despite fusion failing.

Inoue et al. next investigated the presence of IZUMO1 and SPACA6 in sperm mutant for different molecules. IZUMO1 was present in sperm lacking Dcst1 and Dcst2, and also in sperm mutant for Spaca6. SPACA6, on the other hand, was lost in Izumo1, Dcst1, and Dcst2 mutant sperm. These results suggest that these proteins, which are all needed for sperm-egg fusion, likely assemble in a hierarchical fashion, with IZUMO1 being assembled independently of other molecules (Krauchunas et al., 2016). Further analyses of these proteins in various mutant backgrounds may provide new insights into how they assemble and interact during fertilization.

The groundbreaking work of Inoue et al. suggests important future questions. Why are two similar proteins both required non-redundantly for fertility in worms and mammals? Precise protein localization, domain swapping, and studies examining the relationship between structure and function could shed light on this question. Additionally, the biochemical role of these proteins is not clear. It is possible that they act as signaling molecules with an unknown ligand (Chiu et al., 2017). However, loss of function phenotypes appear consistent with some role in either membrane fusion (in mammals and worms) or in membrane breakdown (in flies; Figure 1).

DCST1 and DCST2 and related proteins could be better understood by investigating the molecules they interact with. For instance, it has been shown in C. elegans that SPE-42 binds to other sperm membrane proteins involved in spermatogenesis and fertilization (Marcello et al., 2018). Its interaction with the dysferlin FER-1 is particularly intriguing, since FER-1 regulates calcium-mediated membrane fusion during worm spermatogenesis (Washington and Ward, 2006). Mutations in a human dysferlin gene are associated with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy due to a loss of membrane repair in skeletal muscles (Bashir et al., 1998). This indicates that, in addition to a better understanding of fertilization, ongoing work on genes related to Dcst1 and Dcst2 may provide new insights into muscle and bone health.

In most species, relatively few gamete interaction molecules have been genetically defined (Mei and Singson, 2021), so the existence of conserved gamete interaction genes between invertebrates and mammals has been ‘a bone of contention’. A manuscript recently posted on bioRxiv confirms the role of Dcst1 and Dcst2 in male fertility described by Inoue and co-workers (Noda et al., 2021). This paper further demonstrates that zebrafish dcst1/2 are also required for fertilization. The characterization of genes related to sperm Dcst1 and Dcst2 in diverse species, including humans, should go a long way towards ending debates over deeply conserved gamete function genes. As the pace of fertility gene discovery increases in both vertebrate and invertebrate model systems, we fully expect that more fundamental molecular parallels and key features of the interaction between sperm and egg will be discovered.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xue Mei

    Xue Mei is in the Waksman Institute of Microbiology and the Department of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6498-1261
  2. Andrew Singson

    Andrew Singson is in the Waksman Institute and the Department of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, United States

    For correspondence
    singson@waksman.rutgers.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5091-0892

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2021, Mei and Singson

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 998
    views
  • 94
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Alexandra V Bruter, Ekaterina A Varlamova ... Victor V Tatarskiy
    Research Article

    CDK8 and CDK19 paralogs are regulatory kinases associated with the transcriptional Mediator complex. We have generated mice with the systemic inducible Cdk8 knockout on the background of Cdk19 constitutive knockout. Cdk8/19 double knockout (iDKO) males, but not single Cdk8 or Cdk19 KO, had an atrophic reproductive system and were infertile. The iDKO males lacked postmeiotic spermatids and spermatocytes after meiosis I pachytene. Testosterone levels were decreased whereas the amounts of the luteinizing hormone were unchanged. Single-cell RNA sequencing showed marked differences in the expression of steroidogenic genes (such as Cyp17a1, Star, and Fads) in Leydig cells concomitant with alterations in Sertoli cells and spermatocytes, and were likely associated with an impaired synthesis of steroids. Star and Fads were also downregulated in cultured Leydig cells after iDKO. The treatment of primary Leydig cell culture with a CDK8/19 inhibitor did not induce the same changes in gene expression as iDKO, and a prolonged treatment of mice with a CDK8/19 inhibitor did not affect the size of testes. iDKO, in contrast to the single knockouts or treatment with a CDK8/19 kinase inhibitor, led to depletion of cyclin C (CCNC), the binding partner of CDK8/19 that has been implicated in CDK8/19-independent functions. This suggests that the observed phenotype was likely mediated through kinase-independent activities of CDK8/19, such as CCNC stabilization.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Thomas A Bos, Elizaveta Polyakova ... Monique RM Jongbloed
    Research Article Updated

    Human autonomic neuronal cell models are emerging as tools for modeling diseases such as cardiac arrhythmias. In this systematic review, we compared 33 articles applying 14 different protocols to generate sympathetic neurons and 3 different procedures to produce parasympathetic neurons. All methods involved the differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells, and none employed permanent or reversible cell immortalization. Almost all protocols were reproduced in multiple pluripotent stem cell lines, and over half showed evidence of neural firing capacity. Common limitations in the field are a lack of three-dimensional models and models that include multiple cell types. Sympathetic neuron differentiation protocols largely mirrored embryonic development, with the notable absence of migration, axon extension, and target-specificity cues. Parasympathetic neuron differentiation protocols may be improved by including several embryonic cues promoting cell survival, cell maturation, or ion channel expression. Moreover, additional markers to define parasympathetic neurons in vitro may support the validity of these protocols. Nonetheless, four sympathetic neuron differentiation protocols and one parasympathetic neuron differentiation protocol reported more than two-thirds of cells expressing autonomic neuron markers. Altogether, these protocols promise to open new research avenues of human autonomic neuron development and disease modeling.